1
|
Worthen G, Vinson A, Cardinal H, Doucette S, Gogan N, Gunaratnam L, Keough-Ryan T, Kiberd BA, Prasad B, Rockwood K, Sills L, Suri RS, Tangri N, Walsh M, West K, Yohanna S, Tennankore K. Prevalence of Frailty in Patients Referred to the Kidney Transplant Waitlist. Kidney360 2021; 2:1287-1295. [PMID: 35369656 PMCID: PMC8676383 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0001892021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Comparisons between frailty assessment tools for waitlist candidates are a recognized priority area for kidney transplantation. We compared the prevalence of frailty using three established tools in a cohort of waitlist candidates. Methods Waitlist candidates were prospectively enrolled from 2016 to 2020 across five centers. Frailty was measured using the Frailty Phenotype (FP), a 37-variable frailty index (FI), and the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). The FI and CFS were dichotomized using established cutoffs. Agreement was compared using κ coefficients. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to compare the FI and CFS (treated as continuous measures) with the FP. Unadjusted associations between each frailty measure and time to death or waitlist withdrawal were determined using an unadjusted Cox proportional hazards model. Results Of 542 enrolled patients, 64% were male, 80% were White, and the mean age was 54±14 years. The prevalence of frailty by the FP was 16%. The mean FI score was 0.23±0.14, and the prevalence of frailty was 38% (score of ≥0.25). The median CFS score was three (IQR, 2-3), and the prevalence was 15% (score of ≥4). The κ values comparing the FP with the FI (0.44) and CFS (0.27) showed fair to moderate agreement. The area under the ROC curves for the FP and FI/CFS were 0.86 (good) and 0.69 (poor), respectively. Frailty by the CFS (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.04 to 4.24) and FI (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.00 to 3.21) was associated with death or permanent withdrawal. The association between frailty by the FP and death/withdrawal was not statistically significant (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 0.79 to 3.71). Conclusion Frailty prevalence varies by the measurement tool used, and agreement between these measurements is fair to moderate. This has implications for determining the optimal frailty screening tool for use in those being evaluated for kidney transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Worthen
- Division of Nephrology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Amanda Vinson
- Division of Nephrology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Héloise Cardinal
- Division of Nephrology, Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Nessa Gogan
- Division of Nephrology, Horizon Health Network, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Lakshman Gunaratnam
- Division of Nephrology, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tammy Keough-Ryan
- Division of Nephrology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Bryce A. Kiberd
- Division of Nephrology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Bhanu Prasad
- Division of Nephrology, Regina General Hospital, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Kenneth Rockwood
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Laura Sills
- Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada
| | - Rita S. Suri
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center and Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Navdeep Tangri
- Chronic Disease Innovation Center, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Michael Walsh
- Division of Nephrology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kenneth West
- Division of Nephrology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Seychelle Yohanna
- Division of Nephrology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karthik Tennankore
- Division of Nephrology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tennankore KK, Gunaratnam L, Suri RS, Yohanna S, Walsh M, Tangri N, Prasad B, Gogan N, Rockwood K, Doucette S, Sills L, Kiberd B, Keough-Ryan T, West K, Vinson A. Frailty and the Kidney Transplant Wait List: Protocol for a Multicenter Prospective Study. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2020; 7:2054358120957430. [PMID: 32963793 PMCID: PMC7488612 DOI: 10.1177/2054358120957430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Understanding how frailty affects patients listed for transplantation has
been identified as a priority research need. Frailty may be associated with
a high risk of death or wait-list withdrawal, but this has not been
evaluated in a large multicenter cohort of Canadian wait-listed
patients. Objective: The primary objective is to evaluate whether frailty is associated with death
or permanent withdrawal from the transplant wait list. Secondary objectives
include assessing whether frailty is associated with hospitalization,
quality of life, and the probability of being accepted to the wait list. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Seven sites with established renal transplant programs that evaluate patients
for the kidney transplant wait list. Patients: Individuals who are being considered for the kidney transplant wait list. Measurements: We will assess frailty using the Fried Phenotype, a frailty index, the Short
Physical Performance Battery, and the Clinical Frailty Scale at the time of
listing for transplantation. We will also assess frailty at the time of
referral to the wait list and annually after listing in a subgroup of
patients. Methods: The primary outcome of the composite of time to death or permanent wait-list
withdrawal will be compared between patients who are frail and those who are
not frail and will account for the competing risks of deceased and live
donor transplantation. Secondary outcomes will include number of
hospitalizations and length of stay, and in a subset, changes in frailty
severity over time, change in quality of life, and the probability of being
listed. Recruitment of 1165 patients will provide >80% power to identify
a relative hazard of ≥1.7 comparing patients who are frail to those who are
not frail for the primary outcome (2-sided α = .05), whereas a more
conservative recruitment target of 624 patients will provide >80% power
to identify a relative hazard of ≥2.0. Results: Through December 2019, 665 assessments of frailty (inclusive of those for the
primary outcome and all secondary outcomes including repeated measures) have
been completed. Limitations: There may be variation across sites in the processes of referral and listing
for transplantation that will require consideration in the analysis and
results. Conclusions: This study will provide a detailed understanding of the association between
frailty and outcomes for wait-listed patients. Understanding this
association is necessary before routinely measuring frailty as part of the
wait-list eligibility assessment and prior to ascertaining the need for
interventions that may modify frailty. Trial Registration: Not applicable as this is a protocol for a prospective observational
study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karthik K Tennankore
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University & Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada
| | - Lakshman Gunaratnam
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Rita S Suri
- Division of Nephrology and Research Institute, Department of Medicine, McGill University/Centre de Recherche de l'Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Michael Walsh
- Departments of Medicine and Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences/McMaster University, ON, Canada.,St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Navdeep Tangri
- Department of Medicine and Department of Community Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | | | - Nessa Gogan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Horizon Health Network, Dalhousie University, Saint John, NB, Canada
| | - Kenneth Rockwood
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, School of Health Administration, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Steve Doucette
- Research Methods Unit, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada
| | - Laura Sills
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | - Tammy Keough-Ryan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University & Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada
| | - Kenneth West
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University & Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada
| | - Amanda Vinson
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University & Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada
| |
Collapse
|