1
|
Martinot JB, Le Dong NN, Cuthbert V, Coumans N, Tamisier R, Malhotra A, Pépin JL. 0736 Mandibular Movements Are a Reliable Noninvasive Alternative to Esophageal Pressure for Measuring Respiratory Effort in Patients with Sleep Apnea Syndrome. Sleep 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsac079.732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Differentiation between obstructive and central apneas and hypopneas requires quantitative measurement of respiratory effort (RE) using esophageal pressure (PES), which is rarely implemented. This study investigated whether the sleep mandibular movements (MM) signal recorded with a tri-axial chin sensor (Sunrise, Namur, Belgium) is a reliable surrogate of PES in patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
Methods
In-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) with PES and concurrent MM monitoring was performed. PSGs were scored manually using AASM 2012 rules. Data blocks (n=8042) were randomly sampled during normal breathing (NB), obstructive or central apnea/hypopnea (OA/OH/CA/CH), respiratory effort-related arousal (RERA), and mixed apnea (MxA). Analyses were: evaluation of the similarity and linear correlation between PES and MM using the longest common subsequence (LCSS) algorithm and Pearson’s coefficient; description of signal amplitudes; estimation of the marginal effect for crossing from NB to a respiratory disturbance for a given change in MM signal using a mixed linear-regression.
Results
Participants (n=38) had mild to severe OSA (median AH index 28.9/h; median arousal index 23.2/h). MM showed a high level of synchronization with concurrent PES signals. Distribution of gyroscope MM signal amplitude differed significantly between event types: median (95% confidence interval) values of 0.60 (0.17–2.43) for CA, 0.83 (0.23–4.71) for CH, 1.93 (0.54–5.57) for MxA, 3.23 (0.72–18.09) for OH, and 6.42 (0.88–26.81) units for OA. Mixed regression indicated that crossing from NB to central events would decrease gyroscope MM signal amplitude by –1.23 (CH) and –2.04 (CA) units, while obstructive events would increase gyroscope MM signal amplitude by +3.27 (OH) and +6.79 (OA) units (all p<10-6).
Conclusion
In OSA patients, MM signals facilitated the measurement of specific levels of RE associated with obstructive, central or mixed apneas and/or hypopneas. A high degree of similarity was observed with the PES gold-standard signal.
Support (If Any)
Collapse
|