1
|
Walwyn-Brown K, Pugh J, Cocker AT, Beyzaie N, Singer BB, Olive D, Guethlein LA, Parham P, Djaoud Z. Phosphoantigen-stimulated γδ T cells suppress natural killer cell-responses to missing-self. Cancer Immunol Res 2022; 10:558-570. [PMID: 35263761 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-21-0696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
γδ T cells stimulated by phosphoantigens (pAg) are potent effectors that secrete Th1 cytokines and kill tumor cells. Consequently, they are considered candidates for use in cancer immunotherapy. However, they have proven only moderately effective in several clinical trials. We studied the consequences of pAg-stimulated γδ T-cell interactions with Natural Killer (NK) cells and CD8+ T cells, major innate and adaptive effectors, respectively. We found that pAg-stimulated γδ T cells suppressed NK-cell responses to "missing-self" but had no effect on antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell responses. Extensive analysis of the secreted cytokines showed that pAg-stimulated γδ T cells had a pro-inflammatory profile. CMV-pp65-specific CD8+ T cells primed with pAg-stimulated γδ T cells showed little effect on responses to pp65-loaded target cells. By contrast, NK cells primed similarly with γδ T cells had impaired capacity to degranulate and produce IFNγ in response to HLA class I-deficient targets. This effect depended on BTN3A1 and required direct contact between NK cells and γδ T cells. γδ T cell-priming of NK cells also led to a downregulation of NKG2D and NKp44 on NK cells. Every NK-cell subset was affected by γδ T cell-mediated immunosuppression, but the strongest effect was on KIR+NKG2A- NK cells. We therefore report a previously unknown function for γδ T cells, as brakes of NK-cell responses to "missing-self". This provides a new perspective for optimizing the use of γδ T cells in cancer immunotherapy and for assessing their role in immune responses to pAg-producing pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Daniel Olive
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, Inserm, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM,, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guethlein LA, Beyzaie N, Nemat-Gorgani N, Wang T, Ramesh V, Marin WM, Hollenbach JA, Schetelig J, Spellman SR, Marsh SGE, Cooley S, Weisdorf DJ, Norman PJ, Miller JS, Parham P. Following Transplantation for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, Donor KIR Cen B02 Better Protects against Relapse than KIR Cen B01. J Immunol 2021; 206:3064-3072. [PMID: 34117109 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2100119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In the treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, we previously demonstrated that there is a greater protection from relapse of leukemia when the hematopoietic cell transplantation donor has either the Cen B/B KIR genotype or a genotype having two or more KIR B gene segments. In those earlier analyses, KIR genotyping could only be assessed at the low resolution of gene presence or absence. To give the analysis greater depth, we developed high-resolution KIR sequence-based typing that defines all the KIR alleles and distinguishes the expressed alleles from those that are not expressed. We now describe and analyze high-resolution KIR genotypes for 890 donors of this human transplant cohort. Cen B01 and Cen B02 are the common CenB haplotypes, with Cen B02 having evolved from Cen B01 by deletion of the KIR2DL5, 2DS3/5, 2DP1, and 2DL1 genes. We observed a consistent trend for Cen B02 to provide stronger protection against relapse than Cen B01 This correlation indicates that protection depends on the donor having inhibitory KIR2DL2 and/or activating KIR2DS2, and is enhanced by the donor lacking inhibitory KIR2DL1, 2DL3, and 3DL1. High-resolution KIR typing has allowed us to compare the strength of the interactions between the recipient's HLA class I and the KIR expressed by the donor-derived NK cells and T cells, but no clinically significant interactions were observed. The trend observed between donor Cen B02 and reduced relapse of leukemia points to the value of studying ever larger transplant cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisbeth A Guethlein
- Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Niassan Beyzaie
- Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Neda Nemat-Gorgani
- Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Tao Wang
- Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | | | - Wesley M Marin
- Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jill A Hollenbach
- Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Stephen R Spellman
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Steven G E Marsh
- Anthony Nolan Research Institute, Royal Free Campus, London, United Kingdom.,University College London Cancer Institute, Royal Free Campus, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Cooley
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; and
| | - Daniel J Weisdorf
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; and
| | - Paul J Norman
- Division of Biomedical Informatics and Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO
| | - Jeffrey S Miller
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; and
| | - Peter Parham
- Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; .,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|