MYC dependency in GLS1 and NAMPT is a therapeutic vulnerability in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematological malignancy in which MYC alterations contribute to the malignant phenotype. Nevertheless, MYC lacks therapeutic druggability. Here, we leveraged large-scale loss-of-function screens and conducted a small molecule screen to identify genes and pathways with enhanced essentiality correlated with MYC expression. We reported a specific gene dependency in glutaminase (GLS1), essential for the viability and proliferation of MYC overexpressing cells. Conversely, the analysis of isogenic models, as well as cell lines dataset (CCLE) and patient datasets, revealed GLS1 as a non-oncogenic dependency in MYC-driven cells. We functionally delineated the differential modulation of glutamine to maintain mitochondrial function and cellular biosynthesis in MYC overexpressing cells. Furthermore, we observed that pharmaceutical inhibition of NAMPT selectively affects MYC upregulated cells. We demonstrate the effectiveness of combining GLS1 and NAMPT inhibitors, suggesting that targeting glutaminolysis and NAD synthesis may be a promising strategy to target MYC-driven MM.

Small myeloid subclones are present at diagnosis of multiple myeloma in patients who develop secondary myelodysplastic syndromes

Not available.

Genomic profiling of Mycosis Fungoides identifies patients at high risk of disease progression

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most prevalent primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, with an indolent or aggressive course and poor survival. The pathogenesis of MF remains unclear, and prognostic factors in the early stages are not well-established. Here, we characterized the most recurrent genomic alterations using whole-exome sequencing of 67 samples from 48 patients from Lille University Hospital (France), including 18 sequential samples drawn across stages of the malignancy. Genomic data were analyzed on the Broad Institute's Terra bioinformatics platform. We found that gain7q, gain10p15.1 (IL2RA and IL15RA), del10p11.22 (ZEB1), or mutations in JUNB and TET2 are associated with high-risk disease stages. Furthermore, gain7q, gain10p15.1 (IL2RA and IL15RA), del10p11.22 (ZEB1), and del6q16.3 (TNFAIP3) are coupled with shorter survival. Del6q16.3 (TNFAIP3) was a risk factor for progression in low-risk patients. By analyzing the clonal heterogeneity and the clonal evolution of the cohort, we defined different phylogenetic pathways of the disease with acquisition of JUNB, gain10p15.1 (IL2RA and IL15RA), or del12p13.1 (CDKN1B) at progression. These results establish the genomics and clonality of MF and identify potential patients at risk of progression, independent of their clinical stage.

Estimation of the additional costs of chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

A large multicentre randomised trial, the Big Lung Trial, which in part compared supportive care with or without cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, provided an opportunity to evaluate the impact on the UK National Health Service of the costs incurred with the use of chemotherapy.

METHODS

This costing study was based on the retrospective collection of resource use data from hospital records. Case notes from 194 patients (98 chemotherapy + supportive care (C), 96 supportive care alone (NoC)) were inspected in eight centres recruiting the largest numbers of patients into the Big Lung Trial. Quantities were multiplied by fixed unit costs to calculate a total cost for each patient. The main outcome measure was the total cost incurred by the use of secondary care resources (including investigations, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgical procedures, inpatient days, outpatient attendances, and hospice inpatient care) in the two groups.

RESULTS

Patients randomised to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy had an average of 3.4 more inpatient bed days than the mean of 11.9 days for patients randomised to supportive care alone, and more outpatient attendances. NoC patients were more likely to have received palliative radiotherapy. The mean total cost for C patients was 5355 sterling pound compared with 3595 sterling pound for the NoC group, difference 760 sterling pound (95% CI 781 sterling pound to 2742 sterling pound ). When split, the cost in the C group associated with the administration of chemotherapy was 1233 sterling pound and non-chemotherapy costs were 4122 sterling pound .

CONCLUSION

The additional cost of chemotherapy was not offset by a reduction in subsequent costs (as the non-chemotherapy costs were similar), so the survival benefit of about 10 weeks observed in the C group was achieved with the cost of chemotherapy administration.

Randomized trial comparing weekly versus 3-week chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer: a Cancer Research Campaign trial

PURPOSE

A randomized trial of chemotherapy, given on either a 1-week or a 3-week schedule, was performed in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. The aim was to determine if weekly scheduling produced survival superior to conventional treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred thirty-eight patients with SCLC with either limited disease (LD; 276 patients) or good-prognosis extensive disease (ED; 162 patients) were randomized. Weekly chemotherapy was 12 alternating cycles of ifosfamide/doxorubicin and cis-platin/etoposide (PE), while 3-week treatment was six alternating cycles of cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine (CAV) and PE. Thoracic irradiation was administered 3 weeks after completion of chemotherapy to LD patients who attained a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Patients were well matched for clinical characteristics and prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Overall response was the same in both arms: 82.3% (39.4% CR) with weekly and 81.1% (36.9% CR) with 3-week treatment. The median survival (MS) durations were 10.8 and 10.6 months for weekly and 3-week chemotherapy, respectively. The 2-year survival rates were 11.8% and 11.7% in the weekly and 3-week arms, respectively. Received dose-intensity (DI) was 73.9% of projected for weekly treatment and 92.7% for 3-week treatment. Hematologic toxicity was the major dose-limiting toxicity for the weekly treatment.

CONCLUSION

This trial excludes at 90% power a benefit of greater than 10% for 2-year survival for weekly treatment. The received DI was reduced to a greater extent with weekly treatment, mainly due to hematologic toxicity.