Prospective comparison of acute severe toxicities between smokers and non-smokers during radiotherapy for head and neck cancers

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The association between smoking and acute radiation toxicities of head and neck cancer (HNC) is currently unproven. The aim of the study was to compare the occurrence of acute severe toxicity between active and non-active smokers treated for HNC by radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective monocentric cohort study included patients treated by (chemo)radiotherapy for HNC from January 2021 to January 2023. Smoking status was recorded. Patients underwent a medical exam weekly during the radiotherapy to report acute toxicities according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects system version 5.0. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of at least one grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity among mucositis, dysphagia and dermatitis.

RESULTS

Among the 102 patients included, 27.4 % were active smokers, 58.8 % were former smokers and 13.7 % had never smoked. Regarding toxicity, 23.5 % (n = 24) patients experienced severe mucositis, 37.2 % (n = 38) severe dysphagia, 13.7 % (n = 14) severe dermatitis and 54.9 % (n = 56) experienced at least one of them. Occurrence of severe acute toxicity was not statistically associated with smoking during radiotherapy (64.3 % among active smokers versus 51.3 % among non-active smokers; p = 0.24). On multivariate analysis, concurrent chemotherapy (87.5 % vs 65.2 %; OR = 5.04 [1.64-15.52]; p = 0.004) and 2.12 Gy versus 2 Gy fractionation schedule (64.3 % vs 41.3 %; OR = 2.53 [1.09-5.90]; p = 0.03) were significantly associated with severe acute toxicity.

CONCLUSION

This study did not find an association between smoking during radiotherapy for HNC and occurrence of severe acute toxicities.

Abstract 4534: National Multidisciplinary Tumor Board improves diagnostic stratification and therapeutic management in Cancers of Unknown Primary: the French Experience

Introduction: With the increasing complexity of current diagnostic investigations, the integration of clinical, pathological and molecular characteristics is crucial for the management of patients (pts) with cancers of unknown primary (CUP). A national multidisciplinary tumor board (NatCUPMTB) was created 2 years ago in France to discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic management of CUP pts. The objective of this study was to evaluate its diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic impact after 2 years of activity. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective study with prospective follow-up. All pts discussed at least once in the NatCUPMTB between June 2020 and August 2022 were included. Pts and tumors characteristics, pathological and molecular analyses including WGS, WES and RNAseq performed on SEQOIA and AURAGEN national large-scale sequencing platforms, multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) conclusions, and follow-up after MTB were collected. Results: 76 pts for whom a long-term follow-up was available were included. The median age at diagnosis was 57 yo, 54% were female, and the median number of metastatic sites at diagnosis was 2. The median time between diagnosis and first MTB presentation was 3.8 months (0.2-55). MTB investigations enabled to identify a likely primary origin in 44/76 (58%) pts, and the MTB recommended a personalized therapeutic strategy in 50/76 patients (66%). MTB recommendations were based on the combination of clinical, pathological and molecular investigations in 55% of pts. After a median follow-up of 6.2 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 17.7 months from diagnosis and 11.0 months from the 1st MTB presentation. Pts for which the MTB had a diagnostic impact, and having received a treatment following MTB recommendation (based on putative origin or targetable alteration) had increased OS compared to pts with no diagnostic orientation (median OS 18.4 months vs 5.6 months, p=0.003) or having received other treatments (median OS 18.4 vs 4.4 months, p=0.0001). Conclusion: NatCUPMTB provides significant diagnostic and therapeutic benefit in pts with CUP. Early presentation of pts at NatCUPMTB as soon as CUP diagnosis is suspected should be recommended.

Citation Format: Nicolas Jacquin, Maud Kamal, Ivan Bieche, Célia Dupain, Isabelle Guillou, Linda Larbi-Chérif, Etienne Rouleau, Julien Masliah Planchon, Isabelle Soubeyran, Christelle de la Fouchardière, Camille Tlemsani, Hélène Blons, Fabienne Escande, Michel Vidaud, Jennifer Wong, Pierre Saintigny, Sandrine Boyault, Adrien Buisson, Yves Allory, Anne Vincent-Salomon, Vincent Cockenpot, Janick Selves, Christophe Le Tourneau, Sarah Watson. National Multidisciplinary Tumor Board improves diagnostic stratification and therapeutic management in Cancers of Unknown Primary: the French Experience. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 4534.