1
|
Jacquot C, Gordon O, Noland D, Donowitz JR, Levy E, Jain S, Willis Z, Rimland C, Loi M, Arrieta A, Annen K, Drapeau N, Osborne S, Ardura MI, Arora S, Zivick E, Delaney M. Multi-institutional experience with COVID-19 convalescent plasma in children. Transfusion 2023; 63:918-924. [PMID: 36965173 PMCID: PMC10175190 DOI: 10.1111/trf.17318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Convalescent COVID-19 plasma (CCP) was developed and used worldwide as a treatment option by supplying passive immunity. Adult studies suggest administering high-titer CCP early in the disease course of patients who are expected to be antibody-negative; however, pediatric experience is limited. We created a multi-institutional registry to characterize pediatric patients (<18 years) who received CCP and to assess the safety of this intervention. METHODS A REDCap survey was distributed. The registry collected de-identified data including demographic information (age, gender, and underlying conditions), COVID-19 disease features and concurrent treatments, CCP transfusion and safety events, and therapy response. RESULTS Ninety-five children received CCP: 90 inpatients and 5 outpatients, with a median age of 10.2 years (range 0-17.9). They were predominantly Latino/Hispanic and White. The most frequent underlying medical conditions were chronic respiratory disease, immunosuppression, obesity, and genetic syndromes. CCP was primarily given as a treatment (95%) rather than prophylaxis (5%). Median total plasma dose administered and transfusion rates were 5.0 ml/kg and 2.6 ml/kg/h, respectively. The transfusions were well-tolerated, with 3 in 115 transfusions reporting mild reactions. No serious adverse events were reported. Severity scores decreased significantly 7 days after CCP transfusion or at discharge. Eighty-five patients (94.4%) survived to hospital discharge. All five outpatients survived to 60 days. CONCLUSIONS CCP was found to be safe and well-tolerated in children. CCP was frequently given concurrently with other COVID-19-directed treatments with improvement in clinical severity scores ≥7 days after CCP, but efficacy could not be evaluated in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyril Jacquot
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children's National Hospital, District of Columbia, Washington, USA
- Departments of Pathology and Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Oren Gordon
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey R Donowitz
- Children's Hospital of Richmond at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Sanjay Jain
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Michele Loi
- Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- University of Colorado-Anschutz School of Medicine Dept. of Pathology, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Antonio Arrieta
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, California, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Kyle Annen
- Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- University of Colorado-Anschutz School of Medicine Dept. of Pathology, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Stephanie Osborne
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, California, USA
| | - Monica I Ardura
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases & Host Defense Program, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Satyam Arora
- Postgraduate Institute of Child Health, Delhi, India
| | - Elise Zivick
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Meghan Delaney
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children's National Hospital, District of Columbia, Washington, USA
- Departments of Pathology and Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saliba M, Drapeau N, Skime M, Hu X, Accardi CJ, Athreya AP, Kolacz J, Shekunov J, Jones DP, Croarkin PE, Romanowicz M. PISTACHIo (PreemptIon of diSrupTive behAvior in CHIldren): real-time monitoring of sleep and behavior of children 3-7 years old receiving parent-child interaction therapy augment with artificial intelligence - the study protocol, pilot study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:23. [PMID: 36759915 PMCID: PMC9909978 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01254-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emotional behavior problems (EBP) are the most common and persistent mental health issues in early childhood. Early intervention programs are crucial in helping children with EBP. Parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT) is an evidence-based therapy designed to address personal difficulties of parent-child dyads as well as reduce externalizing behaviors. In clinical practice, parents consistently struggle to provide accurate characterizations of EBP symptoms (number, timing of tantrums, precipitating events) even from the week before in their young children. The main aim of the study is to evaluate feasibility of the use of smartwatches in children aged 3-7 years with EBP. METHODS This randomized double-blind controlled study aims to recruit a total of 100 participants, consisting of 50 children aged 3-7 years with an EBP measure rated above the clinically significant range (T-score ≥ 60) (Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory-ECBI; Eyberg & Pincus, 1999) and their parents who are at least 18 years old. Participants are randomly assigned to the artificial intelligence-PCIT group (AI-PCIT) or the PCIT-sham biometric group. Outcome parameters include weekly ECBI and Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) as well as Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) obtained weeks 1, 6, and 12 of the study. Two smartphone applications (Garmin connect and mEMA) and a wearable Garmin smartwatch are used collect the data to monitor step count, sleep, heart rate, and activity intensity. In the AI-PCIT group, the mEMA application will allow for the ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and will send behavioral alerts to the parent. DISCUSSION Real-time predictive technologies to engage patients rely on daily commitment on behalf of the participant and recurrent frequent smartphone notifications. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) provides a way to digitally phenotype in-the-moment behavior and functioning of the parent-child dyad. One of the study's goals is to determine if AI-PCIT outcomes are superior in comparison with standard PCIT. Overall, we believe that the PISTACHIo study will also be able to determine tolerability of smartwatches in children aged 3-7 with EBP and could participate in a fundamental shift from the traditional way of assessing and treating EBP to a more individualized treatment plan based on real-time information about the child's behavior. TRIAL REGISTRATION The ongoing clinical trial study protocol conforms to the international Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines and is registered in clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT05077722), an international clinical trial registry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Saliba
- grid.66875.3a0000 0004 0459 167XDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Noelle Drapeau
- grid.66875.3a0000 0004 0459 167XDepartment of Pediatrics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Michelle Skime
- grid.66875.3a0000 0004 0459 167XDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Xin Hu
- grid.189967.80000 0001 0941 6502Clinical Biomarkers Laboratory, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| | - Carolyn Jonas Accardi
- grid.189967.80000 0001 0941 6502Clinical Biomarkers Laboratory, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| | - Arjun P. Athreya
- grid.66875.3a0000 0004 0459 167XDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905 USA ,grid.66875.3a0000 0004 0459 167XDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Jacek Kolacz
- grid.412332.50000 0001 1545 0811Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
| | - Julia Shekunov
- grid.66875.3a0000 0004 0459 167XDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Dean P. Jones
- grid.189967.80000 0001 0941 6502Clinical Biomarkers Laboratory, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
| | - Paul E. Croarkin
- grid.66875.3a0000 0004 0459 167XDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Magdalena Romanowicz
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|