OP0003 DOES IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPY IMPROVE GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS?

Background

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is frequently affected in systemic sclerosis (SSc), leading to considerable morbidity and even mortality. While important progress has been made in the last years regarding treatment of SSc, there is no disease-modifying treatment available for SSc-related GI involvement.

Objectives

We aimed to identify, in an observational cohort study of real-life patients with SSc, an association between immunosuppressive therapy and the severity of GI symptoms, measured by the University of California at Los Angeles / Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastro-Intestinal Tract instrument 2.0 (UCLA GIT 2.0).

Methods

We selected patients from our EUSTAR centre who met the 2013 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SSc and had at least two visits with completed UCLA GIT 2.0 questionnaires, with an interval of 12±3 months between visits. We defined the first visit with a completed UCLA GIT 2.0 questionnaire as baseline visit. Immunosuppressive therapy was defined as exposure for at least 6 months between the two visits to at least one of the following drugs, regardless of indication: mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, azathioprine, leflunomide, glucocorticoids (>10mg/d prednisone-equivalent), rituximab, tocilizumab, and abatacept. The study outcome was the UCLA GIT 2.0 score at the follow-up visit. We performed multivariable linear regression with this outcome as dependent variable and immunosuppressive therapy during follow-up, immunosuppressive therapy before baseline, baseline UCLA GIT 2.0 score and several baseline parameters selected by clinical judgment as potentially influencing GI symptoms, as independent variables. Multiple imputation was implemented to handle missing values.

Results

We included 209 patients. Baseline characteristics were: 82.3% female, median (IQR) age 59.0 (48.6, 68.2) years, median disease duration 6.0 (2.7, 12.5) years, 40 (19.1%) diffuse cutaneous SSc, median baseline UCLA GIT 2.0 score 0.19 (0.06, 0.43). Of these, 71 patients were exposed to immunosuppressive therapy during the observation period: 27/71 methotrexate, 1/71 cyclophosphamide, 17/71 MMF, 3/71 leflunomide, 3/71 azathioprine, 6/71 glucocorticoids >10mg/d, 16/34 rituximab, 18/34 tocilizumab. Patients on immunosuppressive therapy during the observation period had, compared to patients without such treatment, overall more severe SSc, higher prevalence of treatment with proton pump inhibitors, similar UCLA GIT 2.0 scores at baseline and at follow up and tendentially less severe GI symptoms at baseline and follow-up by medical history. In multivariable linear regression, immunosuppressive therapy, lower body mass index, longer disease duration and lower baseline UCLA GIT 2.0 score were significantly associated with lower (better) UCLA GIT 2.0 scores at follow-up (Table 1).

Table 1.Predictors of UCLA GIT 2.0 score at follow-upEstimates95% CIpAge0.002-0.001 – 0.0060.136Sex [male]-0.056-0.172 – 0.0610.347Disease duration-0.005-0.009 – -0.0000.030Body mass index0.0140.002 – 0.0250.017UCLA GIT 2.0 total score baseline0.6900.571 – 0.809<0.001Immunosuppressive therapy during observation period-0.119-0.228 – -0.0100.032Immunosuppressive therapy before baseline0.080-0.032 – 0.1920.160Modified Rodnan Skin Score-0.001-0.008 – 0.0070.860Forced vital capacity-0.001-0.004 – 0.0010.302Erythrocyte sedimentation rate0.003-0.001 – 0.0060.116Proton pump inhibitors-0.034-0.120 – 0.0520.435(Intercept)-0.120-0.531 – 0.2910.566

Baseline factors associated with the total UCLA GIT 2.0 score at the end of the observation period. Multiple linear regression model with imputation for missing variables. N=209 patients

Conclusion

Immunosuppressive treatment was associated with lower UCLA GIT 2.0 scores, which suggests potential effects of immunosuppressants on GI manifestations in patients with SSc. These results need verification in additional studies and randomised controlled clinical trials.

References

[1]Khanna D et al. Arthritis Rheum, 2009; 61: 1257-63.

Disclosure of Interests

Lea Stamm: None declared, Alexandru Garaiman: None declared, Norina Zampatti: None declared, Mike O. Becker Speakers bureau: Mepha, MSD, Novartis, GSK, Bayer and Vifor, Consultant of: Mepha, MSD, Novartis, GSK, Bayer and Vifor, Grant/research support from: Mepha, MSD, Novartis, GSK, Bayer and Vifor, Cosimo Bruni Speakers bureau: Actelion, Eli-Lilly, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, EUSTAR, Gruppo Italiano Lotta alla Sclerodermia (GILS), SCTC, Rucsandra Dobrota Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Grant/research support from: Iten-Kohaut Foundation, Muriel Elhai: None declared, Sherif Ismail Grant/research support from: EULAR scientific training grant for young fellows 2021, Suzana Jordan: None declared, Aurora Tatu: None declared, Oliver Distler Speakers bureau: Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Medscape, Consultant of: Abbvie, Acceleron, Alcimed, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx, AstraZeneca, Baecon, Blade, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, 4P Science, Galapagos, Glenmark, Horizon, Inventiva, Kymera, Lupin, Miltenyi Biotec, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD, Novartis, Prometheus, Roivant, Sanofi and Topadur, Grant/research support from: Kymera, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Boehringer Ingelheim, Carina Mihai Speakers bureau: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Mepha, MED Talks Switzerland, Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen, Grant/research support from: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen, Roche.

Performance of the UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract 2.0 instrument as a clinical decision aid in the routine clinical care of patients with systemic sclerosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument 2.0 (UCLA GIT 2.0) is validated to capture gastrointestinal (GI) tract morbidity in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The aims of this study were to determine in a large SSc cohort if the UCLA GIT 2.0 is able to discriminate patients for whom a rheumatologist with experience in SSc would recommend an esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD), and if it could identify patients with endoscopically proven esophagitis or with any pathologic finding on EGD.

METHODS

We selected patients fulfilling the ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria for SSc from our EUSTAR center having completed at least once the UCLA GIT 2.0 questionnaire, and we collected data on gastrointestinal symptoms and EGD from their medical charts. We analyzed by general linear mixed effect models several parameters, including UCLA GIT 2.0, considered as potentially associated with the indication of EGD, as well as with endoscopic esophagitis and any pathologic finding on EGD.

RESULTS

We identified 346 patients (82.7% female, median age 63 years, median disease duration 10 years, 23% diffuse cutaneous SSc) satisfying the inclusion criteria, who completed UCLA GIT 2.0 questionnaires at 940 visits. EGD was recommended at 169 visits. In multivariable analysis, UCLA GIT 2.0 and some of its subscales (reflux, distention/bloating, social functioning) were associated with the indication of EGD. In 177 EGD performed in 145 patients, neither the total ULCA GIT 2.0 score nor any of its subscales were associated with endoscopic esophagitis, nor with any pathologic EGD findings.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-life setting, the UCLA GIT 2.0 and its reflux subscale were able to discriminate patients with SSc who had an indication for EGD, but did not correlate with findings in EGD. We conclude that, while using the UCLA GIT 2.0 in the routine care of patients with SSc may help the rheumatologist to better understand the burden of GI symptoms in the individual patient, it should not be used as a stand-alone instrument to identify an indication of EGD.

FRI0267 CLINICAL CORRELATES AND RELEVANCE OF UCLA GIT 2.0 FOR ESOPHAGITIS AND INDICATION FOR ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY IN REAL-LIFE PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS

Background:

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is frequently involved in systemic sclerosis (SSc). The University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument 2.0 (UCLA GIT 2.0) is validated to capture GI morbidity in patients with SSc (1). The routine clinical investigation of GI involvement in these patients is not standardized and there is no consensus about when and how frequently an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) should be performed.

Objectives:

The main aim of this study was to analyze the capacity of UCLA GIT 2.0 to identify patients with erosive esophagitis in an unselected, real-life SSc patients’ cohort. Secondary aim was to determine whether the UCLA GIT 2.0 could discriminate SSc patients for whom an expert rheumatologist would recommend an EGD.

Methods:

We selected patients fulfilling the ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria for SSc from the Zurich cohort, having completed at least once the UCLA GIT 2.0 questionnaire. We reviewed the medical charts of SSc patients from 2013 to 2019 and recorded data on EGD. We analyzed by univariable logistic regression several parameters, including UCLA GIT 2.0, considered as potentially associated with 1) the referral to EGD and 2) macroscopic esophagitis according to the Los Angeles criteria.

Results:

We identified 346 patients (82.7% female, median age 63 years, median disease duration 10 years, 23% with diffuse cutaneous SSc) satisfying the inclusion criteria, who filled in 940 UCLA GIT 2.0 questionnaires.

From 940 visits, 31 were excluded because EGD was done within 3 months before completing the UCLA GIT 2.0. In the 909 remaining visits, EGD was recommended by the expert rheumatologists in 128 cases. In logistic regression, UCLA GIT 2.0 total score and some of its subscales, but also the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) and esophageal and stomach symptoms by past medical history, associated with the referral to EGD (Table 1).

Table 1.

Logistic regression of factors associated with referral to EGD

OR (95% CI)p-valuemRSS1.04 (1.01 - 1.06)0.009Hemoglobin (Hb)1.00 (0.96 - 1.04)0.978Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)0.37 (0.12 - 1.15)0.086Esophageal symptoms3.37 (2.28 - 4.96)<0.001Stomach symptoms2.93 (2.02 - 4.26)<0.001Reflux subscale2.04 (1.52 - 2.73)<0.001Distention/bloating subscale1.53 (1.24 - 1.89)<0.001Social functioning2.20 (1.57 - 3.07)<0.001Emotional wellbeing1.42 (1.03 - 1.97)0.034Total score of UCLA GIT 2.02.27 (1.55 - 3.32)<0.001

We found data on 177 EGD performed in 150 patients, meaning that 49 EGD were performed on indication by another physician. In logistic regression, mRSS and esophageal symptoms correlated with esophagitis, while neither the total ULCA GIT 2.0 score nor the reflux subscale or any of the other subscales showed an association with esophagitis (Table 2).

Table 2.

Logistic regression of factors associated with esophagitis

OR (95% CI)p-valuemRSS1.09 (1.03 - 1.15)0.001Hb1.03 (0.99 - 1.06)0.126PPI0.52 (0.27 - 1.03)0.059Esophageal symptoms2.92 (1.29 - 6.61)0.010Stomach symptoms1.60 (0.80 - 3.21)0.183Reflux subscale1.07 (0.60 - 1.93)0.816Distention/Bloating subscale0.63 (0.39 - 1.01)0.054Social functioning0.65 (0.31 - 1.35)0.245Emotional wellbeing0.77 (0.36 - 1.61)0.483Total score of UCLA GIT 2.00.67 (0.28 - 1.60)0.367

Conclusion:

In a real-life setting, UCLA GIT 2.0 subscales (reflux, distention/bloating, social functioning, emotional wellbeing) and total score strongly associated with expert interpretation of gastroesophageal symptoms and consecutive referral to EGD. However, they showed no correlation with esophagitis on EGD. The main clinical association of esophagitis was the presence of esophageal symptoms.

References:

[1]Khanna D, et al. Reliability and validity of the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(9):1257-63.

Disclosure of Interests:

Norina Zampatti: None declared, Alexandru Garaiman: None declared, Suzana Jordan: None declared, Mike O. Becker: None declared, Britta Maurer Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Protagen, Novartis, congress support from Pfizer, Roche, Actelion, and MSD, Speakers bureau: Novartis, Rucsandra Dobrota: None declared, Oliver Distler Grant/research support from: Grants/Research support from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Competitive Drug Development International Ltd. and Mitsubishi Tanabe; he also holds the issued Patent on mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (US8247389, EP2331143)., Consultant of: Consultancy fees from Actelion, Acceleron Pharma, AnaMar, Bayer, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Boehringer, CSL Behring, Catenion, ChemomAb, Curzion Pharmaceuticals, Ergonex, Galapagos NV, GSK, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, Italfarmaco, iQvia, medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Roche, Sanofi and UCB, Speakers bureau: Speaker fees from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medscape, Pfizer and Roche, Carina Mihai: None declared