Introduction of the low risk ankle rule to a paediatric emergency department

INTRODUCTION

Ankle injuries are a common presentation to the paediatric emergency department (PED), accounting for approximately 2% of presentations.¹ X-rays are ordered for 85-95% of patients but only 12% of x-rays reveal a fracture. Clinical prediction rules, such as The Low Risk Ankle Rule (LRAR) exist to help clinicians safely reduce the frequency of radiography in these injuries. The LRAR has been shown to reduce imaging by up to 60% without missing any clinically significant fractures. We sought to introduce The LRAR into our department and study its outcomes on our practice.

AIMS

To introduce the LRAR into our department and study its effects on our radiography rate and length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

An audit of x-ray rates in ankle injuries in 2016 was performed to determine our department's baseline rate of radiography and LOS. We then conducted education sessions and created x-ray ordering prompts to encourage clinicians to use the LRAR. We introduced the LRAR, with a pilot period initially, and gathered data prospectively.

RESULTS

969 patients presented in with an ankle injury in 2016, 90.7% of these patients had an x-ray. The median LOS was 109 min. 92 patients presented during  the LRAR implementation period with an ankle injury. Nine patients had exclusion criteria from using the LRAR and the attending physician did not use the LRAR in four patients. Of the remaining 79 patients, 49 had a LRAR positive exam. Only one of these patients went on to have an x-ray, which was normal. The 30 patients with a LRAR negative exam all had an x-ray. Overall, our x-ray rate during the study period was 40/92 (43.4%), a reduction of 47.3%. The average LOS during the study was 101 min. No clinically significant fractures were missed.

CONCLUSION

The LRAR can safely and effectively reduce the rate of radiography in ankle injuries, without missing any clinically significant fractures.

Using softcast to treat torus fractures in a paediatric emergency department

Wrist torus fractures in children are a frequent reason for Emergency Department (ED) visits. Torus fractures traditionally were treated with a backslab cast in the Children's ED and then referred to the Fracture Clinic. Guidelines were developed in order to standardise the care for children who attended the ED with a torus fracture. All patients who were seen & treated by the Advanced Nurse Practitioner (ANP) over a one year period with a diagnosis of a torus fracture were treated with immobilisation in a softcast. 119 patients met the criteria for inclusion. There were no adverse events recorded and no patient required subsequent visits to the Fracture Clinic. There was a cost savings of €18,596 as compared with the normal referral pathway to the Fracture Clinic.

Epidemiology of major paediatric trauma

In Europe injury is the leading cause of death in those aged between 1 and 14 years. In Ireland over 800,000 people are aged less than 14 years. There is currently no national trauma register to collect data on the morbidity and mortality associated with major trauma in the paediatric population in Ireland. We prospectively collected data on 153 patients admitted to our hospital with major trauma. There were 99 males and 54 females. The majority of patients were transported by ambulance (n= 138). Road traffic accidents (n=69) and thermal injuries (n=49) represented the majority of admissions. 68% (n=47) of the vehicle occupants in this study were either unrestrained or incorrectly restrained. Most patients (n=133) had an in patient stay of <50 days, with only 4 patients staying >100 days. 14 patients died. A paediatric trauma register as well as a level 1 paediatric trauma centre are required in Ireland.

Epidemiology of sporting and recreational injuries in a paediatric orthopaedic outpatients department

Knowledge of the number and type of injuries attending the paediatric orthopaedic outpatients is crucial in the future planning of any new paediatric hospital. We prospectively collected data on all new patients attending two paediatric orthopaedic out-patients departments, over a four month period. There were a total of 1,791 completed questionnaires. Sporting and recreational injuries represented 270% and 28% of the total attending, respectively. The new use of heelies represented 11% of the recreational injuries. The upper limb injuries represented 74% of the total, with the lower limb accounting for 25%. Treatment was nonoperative or operative. The number of patients, and the types of injuries presenting demonstrates the workload involved in diagnosing and treating these injuries. A total of 827 casts were applied. With almost half of those attending the clinic requiring a cast, the workload on the plaster technicians is substantial, and has implications for future service planning.

Heely injuries: a new epidemic warranting a government health warning!

INTRODUCTION

Heelys, the new craze gripping the nation, were first introduced to Ireland in 2005 having been available in the United States since 2000. Designed as "the only shoe with a removable wheel in the sole" and initially marketed among rollerbladers and skateboarders they have been adopted by children as contemporary footwear.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From April to June 2006, all patients presenting to trauma orthopaedic services at our institutions with injuries sustained while wearing Heelys were included in this study.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients are included in this study. The mean age was 9.1 years (range 7-13, median 9 years). Of the 39 patients referred to the orthopaedic service, 8 required admissions to hospital. One patient admitted following a head injury, required craniotomy and evacuation of an extradural haematoma.

CONCLUSION

The significance of the injuries encountered demonstrates the potentially devastating results from the use of Heelys. The public perception of safety is incorrect and manufacturers rightly recommend strongly the use of safety gear.