Patient reported experience and adherence to remote patient management in chronic heart failure patients: a posthoc analysis of the TIM-HF2 trial

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): German Federal Ministry of Education and Research

Background

Remote Patient Management (RPM) enables early detection and prevention of cardiac deterioration in heart failure (HF) patients by measuring vital signs. Clinical trials reported inconsistent results. Patient adherence was suggested to be one of the main reasons for inconsistent results in previous trials (2-4). The "Telemedical interventional management in heart failure II (TIM-HF2)" study showed the superiority of non-invasive RPM compared to usual care (UC) in terms of mortality and unplanned cardiovascular (CV) hospitalisation (1).

Purpose

The objective of the analysis is to assess the patient experience with RPM, the adherence to daily measurements and outline factors affecting both aspects.

Methods

TIM-HF2 was conducted 2013-2018 with 1,538 HF patients in a 12-month follow-up (5). Inclusion criteria were HF in NYHA class II or III with either LVEF ≤45% or, if LVEF >45%, patients had been treated with oral diuretics; and HF hospitalisation within the last 12 months. Patients with major depression were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to RPM or UC. RPM-Patients had to measure daily weight, blood pressure, ECG and self-rated health status. Data were sent automatically to the telemedical centre (TMC). In case of conspicuous findings, the TMC contacted the patient or GP for therapy adjustment. At the study end, RPM-patients were asked to evaluate the program through a 9-question survey. Adherence was distinguished between measurement of at least one (incomplete adherence- IA) and all vital parameters (complete adherence- CA) and defined as ratio of the number of days of measurements taken divided by the number of days of possible measurements. All data were analysed descriptively (mean ± standard deviation). Differences between groups were analysed by ANOVA and T-Test.

Results

The survey was answered by n=564 patients (response rate: 79.7%). The patients were satisfied with the program and device usability. CA was 89.1±14.1% and consistently high over the study course (table 1). Reasons for dropouts (n=37) were e.g. frustration with the devices and physical inability to complete the measurement protocol.

Patients <70 years and living in rural areas had lower IA rates. The mean adherence was independent of severe of disease (LVEF, NTproBNP, NYHA). Patients (n=244) had significantly lower IA the week prior to an unplanned CV hospitalisation (difference by -5.2±20.5%) compared to the entire study period. IA was significantly lower by -12.8±24.7% in the week after an unplanned CV hospitalisation compared to the entire study period.

Conclusions

In a setting with user-friendly devices, pre-interventional patient training, regular TMC-patient contact and close cooperation between primary physicians and TMC a long-lasting and high adherence and satisfaction regarding RPM could be achieved. A change in adherence might detect deterioration in health status and indicate the need to intensify telemedical care.

Effects of remote patient management on self-care behaviour in heart failure patients: results from the TIM-HF2 trial

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): German Federal Ministry of Education and Research

Background

Remote patient management (RPM) in heart failure (HF) patients is a rapidly developing field of digital cardiology with beneficial clinical effects. RPM might affect HF specific self-care behaviour, which represents an important patient-reported outcome.

Purpose

To investigate the effects of RPM used in the Telemedical Interventional Management in Heart Failure II (TIM-HF2) trial on HF-specific self-care as a prespecified secondary endpoint analysis.

Methods and Results

HF patients who were recently hospitalized and do not suffer from major depression were randomized to either RPM plus Usual Care (UC) or UC only, with a 12-month follow-up. Self-reported self-care behaviour at baseline and study-end were assessed by mean differences of the 9-item European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale (EHFScBS-9). 1,538 HF patients (mean age 70.3±10.5 years, 70% men, 52% NYHA class II and 47% NYHA class III, 65% LVEF ≤45%) were included, obtaining 1,321 patients with valid baseline and follow-up questionnaires.

Self-care behaviour sum scores increased in the RPM group (n=667) from 78.7±17 to 84.5±14 and in the UC group (n=654) from 79.0±17 to 80.0±16 from baseline to 12 months (mean difference 4.58 95% CI 3.02, 6.14; p<0.001). The subgroup of patients living alone and having an inadequate (<70) baseline self-care behaviour score showed the highest improvement (8.66[3.52; 13.81]). There were significant changes between both groups in item "I weight myself every day" (MD -1.13; 95% CI -1.24, -1.02; p<0.001), and item "I take my medication as prescribed" (MD -0.06; 95% CI -0.10, -0.01; p=0.014). No relation was found between the self-care behaviour score and the efficacy of RPM on the primary and main secondary endpoints of the TIM-HF2 study.

Conclusions

RPM improves HF-specific self-care behaviour by achieving a better adherence to recommended HF regimen. Clinical endpoints were not affected by the level of self-care behaviour.

[Will telemonitoring be adopted by patients with chronic heart failure?]

BACKGROUND

Remote Patient Management for chronic heart failure (CHF) is gaining increasing importance in health care. Telemonitoring is defined as daily measuring of health parameters by the patient and their transmission to a telemedical centre. The adherence of this action by the patient can be considered as a measure for RPM adoption.

METHODS

The randomized controlled clinical trial TIM-HF (NCT 00543881) was conducted between 2008 and 2010 with 710 CHF patients with the primary endpoint total mortality for a mean follow-up of 21.5 ± 7.2 months. The non-prespecified analysis of adherence to daily measuring of ECG, blood pressure, weight and self-assessment was focused on sociodemographic and disease-related factors of the 354 RPM patients.

RESULTS

The mean adherence to telemonitoring was more than 80% (absolute adherence: 81.8 ± 22.8%, relative adherence: 88.9 ± 21.5%). From the beginning of treatment 6.5% of the patients (23/354) have shown an adherence below average. The high adherence of the majority of the patients was stable for the entire study duration and irrespective of age, sex, severity of the disease and the presence of mild to moderate depression.

CONCLUSION

A high adherence can be achieved by individual training of the patient regarding the handling of his disease, the use of telemedical devices and an easy-to-use telemonitoring system. The majority of the informed self-determined CHF patients NYHA class II/III are adopting telemonitoring and are adherent in the long term.