Preauricular Aging: A Three-Point Grading System to Guide Treatment in Facial Rejuvenation

BACKGROUND

Aging affects the face in all its dimensions. However, more has been published about the improvement of the periocular, midface, and perioral aging changes. We believe the profile view, particularly the preauricular area, is of great value when assessing the need for facial contouring procedures, as well as their effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and evaluate a classification based on the aging changes around the preauricular area, which aims to provide an objective direction to the appropriate treatment method.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

All patients who attended the clinic for different aesthetic procedures between June 2019 and January 2020 were photographed. Two non-treating dermatologists and two non-treating plastic surgeons were asked to evaluate the perceived aging of the preauricular area using a three-point grading system. The assessment of each photograph was made once by each evaluator, and the inter-rater correlation was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 158 profile pictures of the preauricular area of 158 patients were evaluated by two non-treating dermatologists and two non-treating plastic surgeons. The inter-rater correlation was excellent at 0.942. The mean grading system of the patient samples was 1.42, with a standard deviation of 0.9 and a variance of 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

The preauricular area is often overlooked and undertreated. Our results demonstrate an excellent inter-rater correlation between plastic surgeons and dermatologists at assessing the degree of aging in the area. This relatively hidden lateral area can serve as a test point, evaluating response to selected treatment before proceeding to full-face intervention. We suggest using a simple three-point scale to help guide treatment of the preauricular area and as part of our holistic approach to facial rejuvenation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The combined effect of tranilast 8% liposomal gel on the final cosmesis of acne scarring in patients concomitantly treated by isotretinoin: prospective, double-blind, split-face study

BACKGROUND

Tranilast [N-(3,4-dimethoxycinnamoyl) anthranilic acid] has never been investigated for the prevention and treatment of acne scars.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tranilast 8% gel in improving the final appearance of patients with acne scarring concomitantly treated by isotretinoin.

METHODS

This was a prospective, double-blind, split-face study, which enrolled 40 otherwise healthy participants (aged 18-49 years) with facial acne scars. For each patient, one half of the face were treated with tranilast 8% liposomal gel and the other half with a water-based placebo. Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), acne scars were evaluated by two dermatologists and by the patients, and the patients also rated their satisfaction with the treatment and reported adverse effects.

RESULTS

In total, 32 participants completed the trial. The mean GAIS scores at 5 months post-treatment were significantly lower (better outcome) for the tranilast-treated side than the placebo-treated areas in patients concomitantly treated with isotretinoin (P < 0.001). All the isotretinoin-treated patients reported greater satisfaction and better general improvement in the skin's appearance and texture, and also greater improvement of pigment and redness on the tranilast 8% gel-treated side compared with the control side.

CONCLUSION

Combined topical application of tranilast 8% gel twice daily with oral isotretinoin treatment in the active phase of acne vulgaris may result in fewer scars, finer skin texture and enhanced appearance.