1
|
Price M, Lavau C, Baeta C, Byemerwa J, Wardell S, Brueckner O, Mukherjee D, Haynes C, Nguyen A, Chang C, McDonnell D, Goodwin CR. Abstract P131: The role of UDP-6 glucose dehydrogenase (UGDH) in estrogen-mediated phenotypes in both estrogen receptor positive and estrogen receptor negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.targ-21-p131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
A better understanding of pathologic mechanisms underlying breast cancer progression and metastasis is critical to improve current treatment modalities. UDP-6- glucose dehydrogenase (UGDH) is an enzyme that has become a recent oncologic target of interest across various cancer subtypes for its role in increasing the aggressiveness and migratory capacity of tumor cells both in vitro and in vivo. UGDH is ubiquitously expressed and plays a critical role in forming the extracellular matrix (ECM), producing nucleotide sugars, and processing hormones through glucuronidation. For these reasons, investigating the effect of UGDH on breast cancer in the setting of hormonal stimulation is important. We found that knocking down UGDH in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer cell lines (MCF7 marco and T47D) and an estrogen receptor negative (ER-) breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231) could abrogate estrogen induced migration-specific phenotypes in vitro. Furthermore, we found that knocking down UGDH mitigated estrogen stimulated primary tumor growth in vivo for both MCF7 macro and MDA-MB-231 mammary fat pad tumor models in mice. Thus, we found that UGDH regulates estrogen stimulated migratory phenotypes in both ER+ and ER- breast cancers in vitro and primary tumor growth in vivo. For this reason, UGDH and its associated pathways are promising targets for future drug development and small molecular targets in the treatment of both metastatic ER positive and ER negative breast cancers.
Citation Format: Meghan Price, Catherine Lavau, Cesar Baeta, Jovita Byemerwa, Suzanne Wardell, Olivia Brueckner, Debarati Mukherjee, Corinne Haynes, Annee Nguyen, Chingyi Chang, Donald McDonnell, C. Rory Goodwin. The role of UDP-6 glucose dehydrogenase (UGDH) in estrogen-mediated phenotypes in both estrogen receptor positive and estrogen receptor negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr P131.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan Price
- 1Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chakraborty B, Byemerwa J, Shepherd J, Haines CN, Baldi R, Gong W, Liu W, Mukherjee D, Artham S, Lim F, Bae Y, Brueckner O, Tavares K, Wardell SE, Hanks BA, Perou CM, Chang CY, McDonnell DP. Inhibition of estrogen signaling in myeloid cells increases tumor immunity in melanoma. J Clin Invest 2021; 131:151347. [PMID: 34637400 DOI: 10.1172/jci151347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies have significantly prolonged patient survival across multiple tumor types, particularly in melanoma. Interestingly, sex-specific differences in response to ICB have been observed, with males receiving a greater benefit from ICB than females, although the mechanism or mechanisms underlying this difference are unknown. Mining published transcriptomic data sets, we determined that the response to ICBs is influenced by the functionality of intratumoral macrophages. This puts into context our observation that estrogens (E2) working through the estrogen receptor α (ERα) stimulated melanoma growth in murine models by skewing macrophage polarization toward an immune-suppressive state that promoted CD8+ T cell dysfunction and exhaustion and ICB resistance. This activity was not evident in mice harboring macrophage-specific depletion of ERα, confirming a direct role for estrogen signaling within myeloid cells in establishing an immunosuppressed state. Inhibition of ERα using fulvestrant, a selective estrogen receptor downregulator (SERD), decreased tumor growth, stimulated adaptive immunity, and increased the antitumor efficacy of ICBs. Further, a gene signature that determines ER activity in macrophages predicted survival in patients with melanoma treated with ICB. These results highlight the importance of E2/ER signaling as a regulator of intratumoral macrophage polarization, an activity that can be therapeutically targeted to reverse immune suppression and increase ICB efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binita Chakraborty
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jovita Byemerwa
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jonathan Shepherd
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Corinne N Haines
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Robert Baldi
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Weida Gong
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Wen Liu
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Debarati Mukherjee
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sandeep Artham
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Felicia Lim
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Yeeun Bae
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Olivia Brueckner
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kendall Tavares
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Suzanne E Wardell
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Brent A Hanks
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charles M Perou
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ching-Yi Chang
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Donald P McDonnell
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|