Performance Evaluation of MolecuTech REBA Myco-ID Using HybREAD480 for Identification of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria

BACKGROUND

Rapid and accurate identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) species is essential for the diagnosis and treatment of NTM disease. MolecuTech REBA Myco-ID (YD Diagnostics, Yongin, Korea) is a line probe assay for identification of NTM species and can be performed using HybREAD480, an instrument for automating the post-PCR steps. In this study, we assessed the performance of MolecuTech REBA Myco-ID using HybREAD480.

METHODS

Seventy-four reference strains, including 65 Mycobacterium strains and nine non-Mycobacterium strains within the order Mycobacteriales, were used to determine the analytical specificity of MolecuTech REBA Myco-ID. The clinical performance of this assay was evaluated with 192 clinical Mycobacterium strains, and the assay results were compared to those of multigene sequencing-based typing.

RESULTS

The accuracy of MolecuTech REBA Myco-ID for the 74 reference strains and 192 clinical strains was 77.0% (57/74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 65.8 - 86.0%) and 94.3% (181/192; 95% CI, 90.0 - 97.1%), respectively. Although some rarely isolated NTM species are misidentified, the most commonly isolated NTM species, including M. avium complex, M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, M. abscessus subsp. massiliense, and M. fortuitum com-plex, were all correctly identified. Of note, all M. lentiflavum strains tested (reference strain, n = 1; clinical strain, n = 10) were misidentified as M. gordonae.

CONCLUSIONS

MolecuTech REBA Myco-ID using HybREAD480 was accurate for identifying commonly isolated NTM species and for discriminating between M. abscessus subsp. abscessus and M. abscessus subsp. massiliense. However, the main limitations of this assay, including misidentification of some rarely isolated NTM species and cross-reactivity between M. lentiflavum and M. gordonae, should be considered.

Advantages of the AdvanSure MDR-TB GenoBlot assay containing disputed rpoB mutation-specific probes in a routine clinical laboratory setting

BACKGROUND

The AdvanSure MDR-TB GenoBlot Assay detects isoniazid- and rifampin-resistant tuberculosis using mutation-specific probes, including probes to disputed rpoB mutations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of molecular drug susceptibility testing (DST) using the AdvanSure assay with weekly batch testing in routine clinical laboratory settings in a country with an intermediate tuberculosis burden.

METHODS

The AdvanSure assay was evaluated against an absolute concentration (AC) method and the Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) 960 System, which are phenotypic DST methods, using 496 Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) isolates. We retrospectively reviewed and compared DST results and turnaround times (TATs), the time intervals from MTB culture identification to final reporting, for these methods.

RESULTS

For rifampin, the AdvanSure assay showed 99.2% (492/496) concordance with both the AC and MGIT methods. AdvanSure also detected an rpoB mutation (D516Y) conferring low-level resistance in three isolates categorized as rifampin-susceptible by both phenotypic DST methods. For isoniazid, AdvanSure concordance rates with the AC method and MGIT DST were 96.6% (479/496) and 95.4% (473/496), respectively. The median TAT of AdvanSure in weekly batch testing was 5.8 days, shorter than the times for the phenotypic DST methods, which were 35.1 days for the AC method and 8.9 days for MGIT DST.

CONCLUSIONS

AdvanSure shows promising clinical usefulness for rapid detection of rifampin- and/or isoniazid-resistant tuberculosis when used as a complementary method to phenotypic DST assays in weekly batch testing. Furthermore, MTB isolates with disputed mutations for rifampin resistance were detectable by the AdvanSure assay.