Preoperative Progressive Pneumoperitoneum in the Treatment of Hernias With Loss of Domain. Our Experience in 50 Cases

Introduction: Surgical planning for repair of giant hernias with loss of domain needs to consider patient comorbidities, potential risks and possible postoperative complications. Some postoperative complications are related to the increase in intra-abdominal pressure caused by the reintroduction of abdominal contents into the peritoneal space. Preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP) increases the capacity of abdominal cavity prior to hernia repair and allows for better physiological postoperative adaptation. The aim of this study is to analyze perioperative and intraoperative characteristics as well as outcomes of a cohort of patients treated with PPP prior to giant hernia repair at a single, high volume center. Methods: Prospective, descriptive, observational single-center study including 50 patients undergoing PPP prior to hernia with loss of domain repair between January 2005 and June 2022. We analysed epidemiological, surgical and safety variables. Results: Fifty patients were included: 43 incisional hernias, 6 inguinal hernias and 1 umbilical hernia. Mean age was 66 years (36-85). Median insufflation time was 12 days (4-20) and median insufflated volume of ambient air was 10,036 cc. There were complications during PPP in nine patients: 2 decompensation of chronic respiratory disease and 7 subcutaneous emphysema. PPP was prematurely suspended in patients with respiratory decompensation. All patients with incisional and umbilical hernias underwent open repair with mesh placement. Preperitoneal repair was performed in inguinal hernias. Three cases of hernia recurrence were reported during the follow up. Conclusion: PPP is a safe and effective tool in the preoperative management of patients with giant hernias. It helps to achieve the decrease or absence of abdominal wall tension and can favour the results of complex eventroplasty techniques.

Safe Anastomoses without Ostomies in Cytoreductive Surgery with Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Technical Considerations and Modifications

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal complications, predominantly anastomotic leak (AL), are the most frequent source of severe morbidity after cytoreductive surgery (CRS).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to present the technical standards for colorectal anastomoses developed and systematically applied to all patients undergoing CRS in a high-volume tertiary center, and the associated AL rates.

METHODS

This was a descriptive study reporting the technical characteristics of a standardized protocol for three types of colorectal anastomoses (colorectal, ileorectal, and ileocolic) in CRS with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on anastomotic outcomes. All patients (1172) undergoing CRS with HIPEC from September 2006 to September 2020 were included. The anastomotic complications were classified according to the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer Surgery (ISGRCS) classification.

RESULTS

Overall, 1172 patients underwent 1300 procedures and 1359 gastrointestinal anastomoses. An ileocolic anastomosis was performed in 408 patients, colorectal anastomosis in 469 patients, and ileorectal anastomosis in 16 patients, none with diverting ileostomy; 345 other gastrointestinal reconstructions and 82 urinary reconstructions were performed in these patients. The AL rate was 1% (4/408) for the ileocolic anastomosis, 0.85% (4/469) for the colorectal anastomosis, and 0% (0/16) for the ileorectal anastomosis. One patient died postoperatively due to AL.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic application of standardized techniques adapted to ensure optimal tissue healing (stapled anastomoses avoiding overlap, accurate staple deployment, and hand-sewn reinforcement) are associated with a very high level of anastomotic safety in a large cohort of patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC.

Defining optimal selection criteria to improve prognosis and avoid futility in surgical resection of colorectal peritoneal metastases

36

Background: Surgical resection of peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer (CRC PM) may benefit some patients similar to hepatic metastases. This approach remains controversial in part due to inconsistent selection criteria and reported outcomes. The impact of preoperative clinical characteristics and tumor molecular profiles on survival among surgically treated patients is incompletely understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between possible predictive variables and survival in a large cohort of patients treated on a standardized clinical pathway and to develop a clinically useful patient selection tool. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized the database of the Catalonian peritoneal metastases regional program, established in 2006. The program provides treatment for all PM patients within an autonomous region with a population of 7.5 million and includes a single dedicated high volume surgical unit. We included all adult patients with surgically resected CRC PM. The clinical pathway includes the administration of perioperative (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) systemic chemotherapy and has historically included a dose of heated intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) at the time of surgery. Demographic and clinical data was analyzed with descriptive statistics. Survival and the associated predictors were analyzed with the Cox proportional hazard model with HRs used to create a predictive nomogram. Results: A total of 538 patients (mean age 59) have been treated with surgery and a complete resection (CC0) was achieved in 94% of cases. Planned preoperative systemic chemotherapy was delivered in 95% of cases, consistent with the clinical pathway. Surgical morbidity was low (urgent reoperation 6.1%, postoperative return to the ICU 2.4%, 30-day readmission 4.3%) as was 30-day mortality (0.4%). After a median follow up of 27.5 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 43.1 months. It varied considerably by subgroup: patients with low peritoneal tumor burden had the highest OS (median 49 months) and those with signet ring cell subtype the lowest (median 19 months). Factors independently associated with survival were: N stage at diagnosis, histological subtype, quantified peritoneal tumor burden (PCI score) and presence of visceral involvement. A selection tool and predictive nomogram were designed incorporating the results of the multivariable analysis. Conclusions: A set of clinical variables can be identified that independently influences patient survival after surgical resection of CRC PM that should be used as selection criteria when considering surgery. With optimized patient selection and treatment within a specialized center, excellent survival and low morbidity can be anticipated following surgery for CRC PM.

Comparative study of access routes for Port-A-Cath® implantation

INTRODUCTION

There has been an increase in the implantation of subcutaneous reservoirs in recent years. The objective of this study was to compare puncture techniques against venous dissection.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who required a Port-a-Cath and were divided into two groups: venous puncture (PV) and venous dissection (DV). Patients were over 18 years of age, requiring continued intravenous treatment, with no restriction of pathology. Patients with a previous reservoir and <18 years old were excluded. The choice of the technique was based on the surgeon's preferences. We analyzed the clinical parameters of age, sex, ASA, BMI, reason for placement and laterality, and data related to the complications and withdrawal rate in each of the groups.

RESULTS

386 patients were included for 5 years: 228 DV group and 155 PV group. In three cases, the technique was not documented. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to age, sex, ASA, BMI and reason for implantation (p>0.05). The average follow-up was two years. The DV group was found to have a lower number of complications, while the PV group had an increased incidence of catheter replacement and removal. However, these differences were not statistically significant (p=0.113).

CONCLUSIONS

Both DV and PV are safe and effective techniques. In our experience, DV presented better intraoperative and long-term results. Further studies are recommended to discern which technique to use more safely.