Clofarabine in Pediatric Acute Relapsed or Refractory Leukemia: Where Do We Stand on the Bridge to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation?

Background

Despite pronounced improvement in overall survival (OS) in pediatric leukemia, a proportion of patients continue to suffer from lack of response or relapse, and the management of such patients is exceedingly difficult. Immunotherapy and engineered chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy have shown promising results in the course of relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, conventional chemotherapy continues to be utilized for re-induction purposes whether independently or in combination with immunotherapy.

Methods

Forty-three pediatric leukemia patients (age < 14 years at diagnosis) consecutively diagnosed at our institution and got treated with clofarabine based regimen at a single tertiary care hospital between January 2005 and December 2019 were enrolled in this study. ALL comprised of 30 (69.8%) patients of the cohort while the remaining 13 (30.2%) were with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Results

Post-clofarabine bone marrow (BM) was negative in 18 (45.0%) cases. Overall clofarabine failure rate was 58.1% (n = 25) with 60.0% (n = 18) in ALL and 53.8% (n = 7) in AML (P = 0.747). Eighteen (41.9%) patients eventually underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); 11 (61.1%) were from ALL group and remaining seven (38.9%) were AML (P = 0.332). Three- and 5-year OS of our patients was 37.7±7.6% and 32.7±7.3%. There was a trend of better OS for ALL patients compared to AML (40.9±9.3% vs. 15.4±10.0%, P = 0.492). Cumulative probability of 5-year OS was significantly better in transplanted patients (48.1±12.1% vs. 21.4±8.4%, P = 0.024).

Conclusions

Though almost 90% of our patients proceeded to HSCT with complete response post-clofarabine treatment, yet clofarabine-based regimens are associated with the significant burden of infectious complications and sepsis-related deaths.

Lamotrigine and antiepileptic drugs as mood stabilizers in bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical trials literature on the use of antiepileptic drugs (AED) as mood stabilizers and to suggest an evidence-based approach when utilizing these agents in bipolar disorder.

METHOD

The literature is reviewed and subdivided into the following sections: carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine, valproate, lamotrigine, gabapentin and other AED, and discussion.

RESULTS

Data exist to support the use of carbamazepine and valproate - and to a lesser extent, oxcarbazepine - in the management of acute manic episodes associated with bipolar I disorder. Lamotrigine, gabapentin, and other AED have not demonstrated consistent anti-manic effects. Clinical trials data favor lamotrigine over all other AED in the treatment of acute bipolar I depression and in rapid cycling bipolar disorder (particularly type II), although the absence of an active comparator in these lamotrigine trials must be noted. Lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and valproate all have evidence supporting their roles as potential long-term mood stabilizers to prevent bipolar relapse, with lamotrigine having a stronger effect in the prevention of depression.

CONCLUSION

The AED are a heterogeneous group of medications with differential spectrum of efficacy in the treatment of bipolar disorder.