Under-reporting of subjective symptoms and its prognostic value: a pooled analysis of 12 cancer clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Oncologists tend to under-report subjective symptoms during cancer treatment. This study describes the under-reporting rate of selected symptoms and explores its association with overall survival (OS). A secondary aim is to test the association of patient-reported symptoms with OS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a post hoc analysis on data pooled from 12 randomized trials, promoted by the National Cancer Institute of Naples (Italy), enrolling patients between 2002 and 2019, with published primary analyses. Occurrence and grade of six side-effects (anorexia, nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea and fatigue) reported by physicians were compared with corresponding symptoms reported by patients in quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaires. Under-reporting was defined as the rate of cases reported grade 0 by the physician while grade ≥1 by the patient. Prognostic value was tested in a multivariable model stratified by trial, including age, sex and performance status as confounders. A landmark threshold was defined for OS analyses.

RESULTS

3792 patients with advanced lung, ovarian, pancreatic, breast or colorectal cancer were pooled; 2603 (68.6%) were eligible having at least one toxicity assessment and one QoL questionnaire, before the first planned disease restaging. Concordance between physicians' and patients' reporting was low with Cohen's k coefficients ranging from 0.03 (fatigue) to 0.33 (vomiting). Under-reporting ranged from 52.7% (nausea) to 80.5% (anorexia), and was not associated with OS. Patient-reported anorexia, vomiting and fatigue ('a little' or more) were significantly associated with shorter OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Under-reporting of treatment side-effects is frequent, but it does not affect OS. Patients' reported symptoms should be used for prognostic evaluation.

T-DM1 versus pertuzumab, trastuzumab and a taxane as first-line therapy of early-relapsed HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: an Italian multicenter observational study

Background

The current standard first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (+) metastatic breast cancer is the combination of pertuzumab, trastuzumab and a taxane (P + T + taxane), while standard second-line is ado-trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1). The registration trial of pertuzumab, however, did not include early-relapsing patients, defined as patients experiencing tumor relapse ≤12 months from the end of (neo)adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. Conversely, the pivotal trial of T-DM1 included some patients relapsing ≤6 months after the end of (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab. Thus, a proportion of early-relapsing patients are currently eligible to receive T-DM1 as first-line treatment. Nevertheless, no direct comparison exists between the two regimens in this clinical setting.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively compared T-DM1 versus P + T + taxane as first-line treatment in two cohorts of early-relapsing patients in an Italian ‘real-world’ setting, involving 14 public health care institutions. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included patients' characterization, overall survival and post-progression survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out. All tests were two-sided and a P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Among 1252 screened patients, 75 met the inclusion criteria. Forty-four (58.7%) received P + T + taxane and 31 (41.3%) received T-DM1. The two cohorts showed similar characteristics of aggressiveness and no significant differences in treatment history. T-DM1, compared with P + T + taxane was associated with worse progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-4.52, P = 0.021) and overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.95, 95% confidence interval: 1.38-11.32, P = 0.010), irrespective of previous (neo)adjuvant treatment, age, hormone receptors status, time-to-relapse (≤6 months or within 6-12 months) and presence of visceral/brain metastases. No differences were observed in post-progression survival (P = 0.095).

Conclusions

Our study suggests superiority for P + T + taxane over T-DM1 as up-front treatment of early-relapsing HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, which merits further assessment in larger and prospective trials.

•

This is the first study comparing pertuzumab + trastuzumab + taxane (P + T + taxane) with T-DM1 in early-relapsing HER2+ MBC.

•

The majority of early-relapsing HER2+ MBC have high-grade, node-positive, large primary tumors.

•

First-line T-DM1 compared with P + T + taxane is associated with worse progression-free survival.

•

First-line T-DM1 compared with P + T + taxane is associated with worse overall survival.

•

Post-progression survival does not differ between the two treatments cohorts.

Eribulin in combination with bevacizumab as second-line treatment for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer progressing after first-line therapy with paclitaxel and bevacizumab: a multicenter, phase II, single arm trial (GIM11-BERGI)

Background

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the nontaxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor eribulin plus the humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab in a novel second-line chemotherapy scheme in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients progressing after first-line paclitaxel and bevacizumab.

Patients and methods

This is a multicenter, single-arm, Simon's two-stage, phase II study. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate, considered as the sum of partial and complete response based on the best overall response rate (BORR). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and clinical benefit rate.

Results

A total of 58 of the 61 patients enrolled in the study were evaluable for efficacy. The BORR was 24.6% (95% CI 14.5-37.3). The clinical benefit rate was 32.8% (95% CI 21.3-46.0). The median PFS was 6.2 months (95% CI 4.0-7.8), and median OS was 14.8 months (95% CI 12.6-22.8). Overall, adverse events (AEs) were clinically manageable and the most common AEs were fatigue, paresthesia, and neutropenia. Quality of life was well preserved in most patients.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that second-line therapy with bevacizumab in combination with eribulin has a meaningful clinical activity and may represent a potential therapeutic option for patients with HER2-negative MBC.

•

Bevacizumab + chemotherapy improved progression-free survival in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients.

•

Eribulin monotherapy improved overall survival in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC.

•

The GIM11-BERGI trial assessed the efficacy and safety of eribulin + bevacizumab as second-line treatment for HER2-MBC.

•

Eribulin + bevacizumab showed to be a safe and active treatment after progression to first-line paclitaxel + bevacizumab.

Absolute basophil count is associated with time to recurrence in patients with high-grade T1 bladder cancer receiving bacillus Calmette-Guérin after transurethral resection of the bladder tumor

BACKGROUND

Basophils, eosinophils and monocytes may be involved in BCG-induced immune responses and be associated with outcomes of bladder cancer patients receiving intravesical BCG. Our objective was to explore the association of baseline counts of basophils, eosinophils and monocytes with outcomes of patients with high-grade T1 bladder cancer receiving a standard course of intravesical BCG.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with primary T1 HG/G3 bladder cancer. After re-TURBT, patients were treated with a 6-week course of intravesical BCG induction followed by intravesical BCG every week for 3 weeks given at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months from initiation of therapy The analysis of potential risk factors for recurrence, muscle invasion and cancer-specific and overall survival was performed using univariable Cox regression models. Those factors that presented, at univariate analysis, an association with the event at a liberal p < 0.1, have been selected for the development of a multivariable model.

RESULTS

A total of 1045 patients with primary T1 HG/G3 were included. A total of 678 (64.9%) recurrences, 303 (29.0%) progressions and 150 (14.3%) deaths were observed during follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed that logarithmic transformation of basophils count was associated with a 30% increment in the hazard of recurrence per unit increase of logarithmic basophils count (HR 1.30; 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.54; p = 0.0026). Basophil count modeled by quartiles was also significantly associated with time to recurrence [second vs. lower quartile HR 1.42 (1.12-1.79); p = 0.003, third vs. lower quartile HR 1.26 (1.01-1.57); p = 0.041; upper vs. lower quartile HR 1.36 (1.1-1.68); p = 0.005]. The limitations of a retrospective study are applicable.

CONCLUSION

Baseline basophil count may predict recurrence in BCG-treated HG/G3 T1 bladder cancer patients. External validation is warranted.

Abstract P2-08-15: Metabolic syndrome and early-stage breast cancer outcome: Results from a prospective observational study

Background:Previous studies suggested a link between obesity, insulin-resistance and breast cancer outcome. The aim of the present prospective observational study was to investigate the role of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components on early breast cancer (EBC) patients' outcome.

Methods: MetS was defined by the presence of 3 to 5 of the following components: waist circumference (WC) &gt; 88 cm, blood pressure ≥ 130/≥85 mmHg, serum levels of triglycerides (TG) ≥ 150 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) &lt; 50 mg/dL and fasting glucose (FG) ≥ 110 mg/ dL (National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults - NCEP-ATPIII criteria). Overall, 955 EBC patients were prospectively enrolled between January 2009 and December 2013 at University Hospital Federico II and National Cancer Institute G.Pascale, Naples, Italy. Clinical and tumor characteristics were collected for all the patients. A total of 494 patients (51.7%) had complete data on all the components of MetS at first diagnosis and thus were included in the current analysis. Study population was divided into 2 main groups: (1) patients with less than 3 components (No MetS); (2) patients with 3-5 components (MetS). Categorical variables were analyzed by the chi-square test and survival data by the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression model.

Results: Overall 366 (74.1%) and 128 (25.9%) women were categorized as No MetS and MetS, respectively. MetS patients were more likely to be older and postmenopausal compared to No MetS patients. In detail, 46% vs 38% were older than 55 yrs (p&lt;0.0001) and 87% vs 54% were postmenopausal (p&lt;0.0001) in MetS vs No MetS groups, respectively. No statistically significant differences in tumor stage, type of adjuvant therapy or tumor subtypes defined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) were identified among the two groups. At univariate analysis, stage, tumor subtypes, TG and FG values, number of components of MetS, and presence of MetS were significantly associated to both disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Age, BMI, WC, and HDL levels were correlated to OS only. At the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (adjusted for age, menopausal status, stage, IHC subtypes and adjuvant therapy) MetS patients had numerically higher risk of relapse and significantly higher risk of death compared to No MetS patients [DFS hazard ratio (HR): 1.64 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94-2.86, p=0.07 and OS HR: 3.83, 95% CI 1.7-6.77 p=0.001]. Additionally, of the 366 No MetS patients included in the analysis, 122 (33.3%) had 0 and 244 (66.7%) had “1 to 2” components of MetS. Interestingly, patients with “1 to 2” components of MetS had increased risk of dying compared to patients with 0 components (OS HR: 4.39, 95% CI:1.26-15.36, p=0.02) . No significant difference among these two groups was observed in terms of DFS.

Conclusions: MetS is correlated with poor outcome in EBC patients. Among patients without full criteria for MetS diagnosis, the presence of 1 or 2 components of the syndrome may predict for worse survival. Testing for components of MetS in BC patients is recomended to predict outcome and to eventually suggest lifestyle changes, exercise and diet.

Citation Format: Buono G, Crispo A, Giuliano M, Rea CG, Forestieri V, Lauria R, De Placido P, De Laurentiis M, Pacilio C, Grimaldi M, Nocerino F, Montella M, De Placido S, Arpino G. Metabolic syndrome and early-stage breast cancer outcome: Results from a prospective observational study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-15.

Abstract P6-21-13: A phase II single arm trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of eribulin in combination with bevacizumab for second-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing after first-line therapy with bevacizumab and paclitaxel

Background: At present, there is no standard second-line chemotherapy-based treatment in patients with HER2-negative MBC. Continued VEGF inhibition with bevacizumab is a new potential option in patients progressing to first line bevacizumab and chemotherapy. Eribulin is a non-taxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor, with a unique mechanism of action and suggested beneficial effects on tumor microenvironment and neoangiogenesis. This study evaluated efficacy and safety of eribulin plus bevacizumab as a novel second-line chemotherapy scheme, in patients progressing after first line paclitaxel and bevacizumab.

Methods: This is a multicenter, single-arm, Simon's two-stage, Phase II study. Patients with HER2-negative MBC progressing to paclitaxel and bevacizumab received eribulin (1.23 mg/m2 intravenously on Days 1 and 8 of every 21-day cycle) plus bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks intravenously), as second-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), considered as sum of partial (PR) and complete response (CR), basing on the best overall response. The present safety and efficacy analyses, as planned per study design, refer to six cycles of treatment (18 weeks).

Results: Among the 61 patients enrolled in the study, 55 (90,2% ) were evaluable for efficacy. ORR (PR/CR) was 9.1% [95% confidence intervals (C.I.) 3.0 to 19.9]; stable disease (SD) rate was 63.6% [95% C.I. 49.6 to 76.2]; clinical benefit rate (CR/PR/SD) at 24 weeks was 35% [95% C.I. 22.0 to 49.1]. The median progression free survival was 6.3 months [95% C.I. 4.1 to 7.8 months]. Drugs-related adverse events (AEs) were: 49.5% related to eribulin, 7.7% related to bevacizumab, and 11.8% related to both the study drugs. The most common AEs were fatigue (9.9% of all AEs), paresthesia (6.5% of all AEs) and neutropenia (6.2% of all AEs). Quality of life was well preserved among the majority of patients.

Conclusions: The results of our trial suggest that continuing bevacizumab in combination with eribulin, beyond first line treatment with bevacizumab and paclitaxel, offers a reasonable therapeutic option for patients with HER2-negative MBC, without detrimentally affecting quality of life.

Citation Format: De Placido S, De Laurentiis M, Bruzzese D, Bernardo A, Baldini EE, Montesarchio V, Fabi A, Gamucci T, De Placido P, Russo S, Lauria R, De Santo I, De Angelis C, Del Mastro L, Giuliano M, Arpino G. A phase II single arm trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of eribulin in combination with bevacizumab for second-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing after first-line therapy with bevacizumab and paclitaxel [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-21-13.