Hydroxyvitamin D assays: An historical perspective from DEQAS

Recent years have seen a substantial increase in demand for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) assays. DEQAS (the Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme) has been monitoring the performance of these assays since 1989. The first DEQAS distribution was in June 1989 and results were submitted by 13 laboratories in the UK, two of which used HPLC/UV; the rest used ligand binding assays with a tritium tracer. Inter-laboratory CVs (ALTM) ranged from 29.3% (42.7nmol/L) to 53.7% (20.0nmol/L). Currently the scheme has participants in 56 countries using 30 methods or variants of methods. In January 2017, 918 participants returned results and inter-laboratory CVs (ALTM) ranged from 10.3% (73.1nmol/L) to 15.3% (29.4nmol/L). Over the last 27 years, there have been a number of significant milestones in assay development. The first major advance was the development of an iodinated 25-OHD tracer by Hollis and Napoli in 1992, subsequently used in an RIA kit marketed by DiaSorin. This and other commercial radioimmunoassays that followed brought 25-OHD assays within reach of many more non-specialist routine laboratories. With the introduction of fully automated non-isotopic assays without solvent extraction, measurement of 25-OHD became available to any clinical chemistry laboratory with an appropriate analytical platform. However, as the limitations of these non-extraction assays became apparent more laboratories started using LC-MS/MS methodology. Meanwhile the variable accuracy of 25-OHD methods has been addressed by the Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP) which encourages manufacturers to produce methods traceable to the reference measurement procedures (RMPs) of NIST, University of Ghent and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). DEQAS changed to an accuracy-based scheme in 2013 and now assesses assay accuracy against the NIST RMP. This review will use DEQAS results and statistics to chart the historical development in 25-OHD assay technology and highlight some of the problems encountered in obtaining reliable results for this most challenging of analytes.

Quality assessment of vitamin D metabolite assays used by clinical and research laboratories

The Vitamin D External Quality Assessment Scheme (DEQAS) was launched in 1989 and monitors the performance of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) and 1,25- dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)₂D) assays. In April 2015 a pilot scheme for 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (24,25(OH)₂D) was introduced. The 25-OHD scheme is accuracy - based with target values assigned by the NIST Reference Measurement Procedure (RMP) for 25-OHD₂ and 25-OHD₃. A similar method is used to assign values for 3-epi-25-OHD. Five samples of human serum are distributed quarterly to over 1000 participants in 58 countries (April 2016) and clinical laboratories are expected to submit results within approximately 5 weeks. Research laboratories with assays run less frequently are not given a deadline. Archived samples with NIST- assigned values are also available. Performance is assessed on the first four samples with the fifth reserved for investigations e.g. recovery experiments or to assess the influence of other serum constituents such as lipids. DEQAS provides rapid feedback, with an on-line preliminary report available immediately after a participant submits results and a comprehensive report soon after the results deadline. In 2015, DEQAS investigations revealed that several 25-OHD immunoassays under-recovered 25-OHD₂ and 25-OHD results were falsely low on a sample with a modestly raised triglyceride concentration. An RMP for 1,25 (OH)₂D is not yet available and results are judged against the Method Mean. Free advice is available from the DEQAS Advisory Panel which includes experts on methodology and biostatistics. DEQAS collaborates closely with the Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP) and both organizations have successfully worked with participants and manufacturers to improve the accuracy of vitamin D assays.

The voting rights of adults with intellectual disabilities: reflections on the arguments, and situation in Kenya and England and Wales

Article 29 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities guarantees equality of political rights, including the right to vote and stand for election. The affirmation of these rights, first guaranteed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, raises an important question given the long-standing association between political rights and beliefs concerning the abilities of citizens to reason and act independently: how and to what degree can people identified as having intellectual disabilities participate in a defining act of the democratic process? Focused specifically on the right to vote, this paper addresses the question by (1) introducing the debates that have surrounded the voting rights of this population; and (2) reporting on recent attempts in Kenya, and in England and Wales, to promote voting by people with intellectual disabilities. It concludes by considering the effectiveness of the different approaches these countries have adopted.