ESGO-ESMO-ESP consensus conference recommendations on ovarian cancer: pathology and molecular biology and early, advanced and recurrent disease

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society of Pathology held a consensus conference (CC) on ovarian cancer on 15-16 June 2022 in Valencia, Spain. The CC panel included 44 experts in the management of ovarian cancer and pathology, an ESMO scientific advisor and a methodologist. The aim was to discuss new or contentious topics and develop recommendations to improve and harmonise the management of patients with ovarian cancer. Eighteen questions were identified for discussion under four main topics: (i) pathology and molecular biology, (ii) early-stage disease and pelvic mass in pregnancy, (iii) advanced stage (including older/frail patients) and (iv) recurrent disease. The panel was divided into four working groups (WGs) to each address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above, based on their expertise. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the WGs and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript focuses on the recommendation statements that reached a consensus, their voting results and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.

Olaparib plus bevacizumab first-line maintenance in ovarian cancer: final overall survival results from the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial

BACKGROUND

In the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 primary analysis, maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab demonstrated a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer patients in clinical response after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, irrespective of surgical status. Prespecified, exploratory analyses by molecular biomarker status showed substantial benefit in patients with a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD; BRCAm and/or genomic instability). We report the prespecified final overall survival (OS) analysis, including analyses by HRD status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized 2:1 to olaparib (300 mg bid; up to 24 months) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg q3w; 15 months total) or placebo plus bevacizumab. Analysis of OS, a key secondary endpoint in hierarchical testing, was planned for ∼60% maturity or 3 years after the primary analysis.

RESULTS

After median follow-up of 61.7 and 61.9 months in the olaparib and placebo arms, respectively, median OS was 56.5 versus 51.6 months in the ITT (hazard ratio [HR]=0.92, 95% CI 0.76-1.12; P=0.4118). Subsequent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy was received by 105 (19.6%) olaparib patients versus 123 (45.7%) placebo patients. In the HRD-positive population, OS was longer with olaparib plus bevacizumab (HR=0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.85; 5-year OS rate, 65.5% versus 48.4%); at 5 years, updated PFS also showed a higher proportion of olaparib plus bevacizumab patients without relapse (HR=0.41, 95% CI 0.32-0.54; 5-year PFS rate, 46.1% versus 19.2%). Myelodysplastic syndrome, acute myeloid leukemia, aplastic anemia, and new primary malignancy incidence remained low and balanced between arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Olaparib plus bevacizumab provided clinically meaningful OS improvement for first-line patients with HRD-positive ovarian cancer. These prespecified exploratory analyses demonstrated improvement despite a high proportion of patients in the placebo arm receiving PARP inhibitors post-progression, confirming the combination as one of the standards of care in this setting with the potential to enhance cure.

Depression and anxiety in women with malignant ovarian germ cell (MOGCT) and sex cord stromal tumors (SCST): an analysis of the AGO-CORSETT database

INTRODUCTION

The intention of this study was to evaluate the level of anxiety and depression of malignant ovarian germ cell (MOGCT) and sex cord stromal tumors (SCST) survivors and to identify possible alterable cofactors.

METHODS

CORSETT was an observational, multicenter, mixed retrospective/prospective cohort study of the AGO Studygroup. Women who had been diagnosed with MOGCTs and SCSTs between 2001 and 2011 were asked to complete the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to evaluate distress. Predictors of distress (type of surgery, chemotherapy, time since diagnosis, recurrence, second tumor, pain) were investigated using multivariate linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

150 MOGCT and SCST patients with confirmed histological diagnosis completed the questionnaire median seven years after diagnosis. They had a HADS total score ≥ 13 indicating severe mental distress in 34% of cases. Patients after fertility-conserving surgery had lower probability of severe mental distress than those without fertility-conserving treatment (β = - 3.1, p = 0.04). Pain was associated with the level of distress in uni- and multivariate analysis (coef 0.1, p < 0.01, coef. Beta 0.5).

DISCUSSION

Severe mental distress was frequent in patients with MOGCT and SCST and the level of pain was associated with the level of distress. Fertility conserving therapy, however, was associated with less mental distress. Screening and treatment of pain and depression is required to improve mental well-being in survivors of MOGCT and SCST.

European experts consensus: BRCA/homologous recombination deficiency testing in first-line ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Homologous recombination repair (HRR) enables fault-free repair of double-stranded DNA breaks. HRR deficiency is predicted to occur in around half of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas. Ovarian cancers harbouring HRR deficiency typically exhibit sensitivity to poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). Current guidelines recommend a range of approaches for genetic testing to identify predictors of sensitivity to PARPi in ovarian cancer and to identify genetic predisposition.

DESIGN

To establish a European-wide consensus for genetic testing (including the genetic care pathway), decision making and clinical management of patients with recently diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, and the validity of biomarkers to predict the effectiveness of PARPi in the first-line setting. The collaborative European experts' consensus group consisted of a steering committee (n = 14) and contributors (n = 84). A (modified) Delphi process was used to establish consensus statements based on a systematic literature search, conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

A consensus was reached on 34 statements amongst 98 caregivers (including oncologists, pathologists, clinical geneticists, genetic researchers, and patient advocates). The statements concentrated on (i) the value of testing for BRCA1/2 mutations and HRR deficiency testing, including when and whom to test; (ii) the importance of developing new and better HRR deficiency tests; (iii) the importance of germline non-BRCA HRR and mismatch repair gene mutations for predicting familial risk, but not for predicting sensitivity to PARPi, in the first-line setting; (iv) who should be able to inform patients about genetic testing, and what training and education should these caregivers receive.

CONCLUSION

These consensus recommendations, from a multidisciplinary panel of experts from across Europe, provide clear guidance on the use of BRCA and HRR deficiency testing for recently diagnosed patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Impact of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) on short-term mortality in patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma (the NOGGO-AGO QoL Prognosis-Score-Study): results of a meta-analysis in 2209 patients

Objective

Recurrent ovarian cancer is an incurable disease with variable but poor prognosis. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a patient-reported outcome measure generally applied to measure effects of therapies. Our aim was the development and validation of a risk score for the prediction of short-term mortality using the combination of sociodemographic and clinical factors and HRQoL.

Methods

For exploratory and validation analysis, the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO) and Working Group Gynecological Oncology (AGO) study databases were screened for trials. Only trials which obtained defined HRQoL measurements were included in the final analysis. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors and their weighting for the risk score. Modulation with cubic regression analyses revealed median survival and short-term mortality defined as 1-year mortality for each value.

Results

For exploration, 974 patients from three clinical studies of the NOGGO and for validation, 1235 patients from several clinical studies of the AGO were eligible. The risk score included platinum-free interval, performance status, age, global QoL and nausea/vomiting. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed a good predictive value with an area under the curve of 0.81 for model 1 in the exploration and 0.74 in the validation. Short-term mortality in model 1 was 8.2%, 23.5% and 58.4% in the exploration sample, and 19.7%, 38.1% and 63.4% in the validation sample for patients under low, medium and high risk, respectively.

Conclusions

This risk score discriminates well between recurrent ovarian cancer patients under low, medium and high risk of short-term mortality. It may help to identify a risk group under high risk for short-term mortality that can be used for randomization in clinical trials and may support decision making for palliative chemotherapy.

•

This newly developed NOGGO-AGO QoL prognosis score clearly discriminates recurrent ovarian cancer (rOC) patients under low, medium and high risk for short-term survival (<1 year).

•

The risk score included platinum-free interval, performance status, age, global QoL and nausea/vomiting.

•

NOGGO-AGO QoL score can be used for stratification or randomization in clinical trials and for identification of a group under high risk for short-term mortality.

•

It may also help the decision making for chemotherapy and provide more precise information of further life expectation for rOC patients.

AB1237 Diagnostic value of proteasomal and autophagic markers in muscular diseases

Background:

Deficient cellular degradation pathways such as autophagy and the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) show a correlation with the onset of neurodegenerative diseases. Especially immune-mediated inflammatory myopathies often show therapy-resistant phenotypes with medical need for further understanding of pathogenesis und possible treatment.

Objectives:

The aim of this work was to study an association of these two degradation pathways in a large group of different muscle entities and to examine a possible influence in the pathogenesis of the investigated muscle diseases. Furthermore, a potential benefit in diagnostics was studied using factors such as ubiquitin, p62, NBR1 and LC3 and their role as adapter molecules.

Methods:

We examined ubiquitin, p62, NBR1 and LC3 on muscle biopsies from patients with the diagnosis of s-IBM, dermato- and polymyositis, muscular dystrophy, neurogenic atrophy, myotonic dystrophy type II (PROMM) and metabolic myopathies such as Pompe and McArdle disease. Immunohistochemical single and double stainings as well as immunofluorescence stainings were performed on cryosections. Furthermore, Western blot analysis was performed. The use of a histological score, defined as the product of the frequency of positive fibres and staining intensity, was used to investigate possible differences between the diseases in the expression of the investigated factors.

Results:

Especially in s-IBM, myofibrillar myopathies and Pompe disease, proteasomal and autophagic markers were detected. On the other hand, neurogenic atrophy, McArdle disease and the majority of the myotonic dystrophies type II showed no positive signals, except for p62, which was detected especially in internalized nuclei and regenerative fibres. Overall, in all entities in regenerative and necrotic as well as in atrophic fibres, a positive staining for ubiquitin, p62, NBR1 and LC3 could be shown. Dermatomyositis showed a moderate immunoreactivity for p62 and NBR1 in the area of the perifascicular atrophy. Polymyositis showed a strong endomysial reaction in the area of the attacked muscle fibres, especially in the area of the lymphocytic infiltrates. The histological score showed that ubiquitin was significantly higher in s-IBM than in polymyositis. NBR1 was significantly higher in s-IBM than in dermatomyositis and muscular dystrophies. LC3 and p62 showed a significantly higher level in s-IBM as compared to dermatomyositis and polymyositis. Except for NBR1, a positive correlation of autophagic and proteasomal markers was shown in dermatomyositis. There was also a positive correlation between LC3 and ubiquitin in polymyositis. Using multivariate analysis and recursive partitioning, we could show a predictability of the diagnosis of s-IBM with a LC3 score above 3. On the other hand, a value below 3 excluded the diagnosis of s-IBM.

Conclusion:

In particular, s-IBM, myofibrillar myopathies and Pompe disease showed a possible involvement disturbed proteasomal and autophagic degradation pathways in their pathogenesis. In addition, p62 and NBR1 seemed to have an important role in the immune response. Furthermore, the altered autophagic and proteasomal degradation pathways may be involved in ageing processes, sarcopenia and disease. In particular, LC3 seems to be suitable as a screening marker to recognize an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. The other markers, such as p62, LC3, and NBR1, would be able to distinguish between the subgroups of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Therefore, LC3 could be included as a marker in the routine of neuropathological diagnostics. Further studies are needed to fully understand the role of proteasomal and autophagic factors in possible immune suppressive and immune modulatory therapies and to assess possible side effects.

Disclosure of Interests:

Ulrich Drott: None declared, Patrick Harter: None declared, Harald Burkhardt Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Roche, Abbvie, Consultant of: Sanofi, Pfizer, Roche, Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, UCB, Eli Lilly, Chugai, Bristol Myer Scripps, Janssen, and Novartis, Speakers bureau: Sanofi, Pfizer, Roche, Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, UCB, Eli Lilly, Chugai, Bristol Myer Scripps, Janssen, and Novartis, Michel Mittelbronn: None declared