1
|
Rasmussen A, Stone DU, Kaufman CE, Hefner KS, Fram NR, Siatkowski RL, Huang AJW, Chodosh J, Rasmussen PT, Fife DA, Pezant N, Grundahl K, Radfar L, Lewis DM, Weisman MH, Venuturupalli S, Wallace DJ, Rhodus NL, Brennan MT, Montgomery CG, Lessard CJ, Scofield RH, Sivils KL. Reproducibility of Ocular Surface Staining in the Assessment of Sjögren Syndrome-Related Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca: Implications on Disease Classification. ACR Open Rheumatol 2019; 1:292-302. [PMID: 31453437 PMCID: PMC6710016 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.1033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to assess the performance and reproducibility of the two currently used ocular surface staining scores in the assessment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca in Sjögren syndrome (SS) research classification. Methods In a multidisciplinary clinic for the evaluation of sicca, we performed all tests for the American European Consensus Group (AECG) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria, including the van Bijsterveld score (vBS) and the Ocular Staining Score (OSS), in 994 participants with SS or with non-SS sicca. We analyzed the concordance between the scores, the diagnostic accuracy and correlation with clinical variables, and interrater and intrasubject reproducibility. Results A total of 308 (31.1%) participants had a discordant vBS and OSS that was due to extra corneal staining points in the OSS. The presence of one or more of the additional points was highly predictive of SS classification (odds ratio = 3.66; P = 1.65 × 10e-20) and was associated with abnormal results of all measures of autoimmunity and glandular dysfunction. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed optimal cutoff values of four for the vBS (sensitivity = 0.62; specificity = 0.71; Youden's J = 0.33) and five for the OSS (sensitivity = 0.56; specificity = 0.75; Youden's J = 0.31). Notably, there was very poor consistency in interobserver mean scores and distributions (P < 0.0001) and in intrasubject scores after a median of 5.5 years (35% changed status of the ocular criterion). Conclusion Ocular surface staining scores are useful for SS research classification; however, they are subject to significant interrater and intrasubject variability, which could result in changes in classification in 5%-10% of all subjects. These results highlight the need for objective and reproducible markers of disease that have thus far remained elusive for SS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Rasmussen
- Astrid Rasmussen, MD, PhD: Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, and Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, México City, México
| | - Donald U Stone
- Donald U. Stone, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (current address: Dean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City)
| | - C Erick Kaufman
- C. Erick Kaufman, MD, Lida Radfar, DDS, MS, David M. Lewis, DDS: University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City
| | - Kimberly S Hefner
- Kimberly S. Hefner, DO: Hefner Eye Care and Optical Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Nicole R Fram
- Nicole R. Fram, MD: David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Rhea L Siatkowski
- Rhea L. Siatkowski, MD: University of Oklahoma and Dean McGee Eye Institute, Oklahoma City
| | - Andrew J W Huang
- Andrew J. W. Huang, MD: School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri (current address: University of Minnesota)
| | - James Chodosh
- James Chodosh, MD, MPH: Massachusetts Eye and Ear and Harvard University, Boston (current address: Dean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City)
| | | | - Dustin A Fife
- Dustin A. Fife, PhD (current address: Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City), Nathan Pezant, MS, Kiely Grundahl, BS, Courtney G. Montgomery, PhD: Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City
| | - Nathan Pezant
- Dustin A. Fife, PhD (current address: Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City), Nathan Pezant, MS, Kiely Grundahl, BS, Courtney G. Montgomery, PhD: Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City
| | - Kiely Grundahl
- Dustin A. Fife, PhD (current address: Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City), Nathan Pezant, MS, Kiely Grundahl, BS, Courtney G. Montgomery, PhD: Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City
| | - Lida Radfar
- C. Erick Kaufman, MD, Lida Radfar, DDS, MS, David M. Lewis, DDS: University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City
| | - David M Lewis
- C. Erick Kaufman, MD, Lida Radfar, DDS, MS, David M. Lewis, DDS: University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City
| | - Michael H Weisman
- Michael H. Weisman, MD, Swamy Venuturupalli, MD, Daniel J. Wallace, MD: Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Swamy Venuturupalli
- Michael H. Weisman, MD, Swamy Venuturupalli, MD, Daniel J. Wallace, MD: Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Daniel J Wallace
- Michael H. Weisman, MD, Swamy Venuturupalli, MD, Daniel J. Wallace, MD: Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Nelson L Rhodus
- Nelson L. Rhodus, DMD, MPH: School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Michael T Brennan
- Michael T. Brennan, DDS, MHS: Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Courtney G Montgomery
- Dustin A. Fife, PhD (current address: Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City), Nathan Pezant, MS, Kiely Grundahl, BS, Courtney G. Montgomery, PhD: Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City
| | - Christopher J Lessard
- Christopher J. Lessard, PhD, Kathy L. Sivils, PhD: Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation and University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City
| | - R Hal Scofield
- R. Hal Scofield, MD: Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, University of Oklahoma, and Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Oklahoma City
| | - Kathy L Sivils
- Christopher J. Lessard, PhD, Kathy L. Sivils, PhD: Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation and University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vestergaard M, Madsen NT, Bligaard HB, Bredahl L, Rasmussen PT, Andersen HR. Consequences of two or four months of finishing feeding of culled dry dairy cows on carcass characteristics and technological and sensory meat quality. Meat Sci 2007; 76:635-43. [PMID: 22061239 DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2006] [Revised: 12/29/2006] [Accepted: 02/02/2007] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Finishing feeding was evaluated as a way to improve carcass-, meat- and eating quality of culled dairy cows. In total, 125 Danish Friesian cows were purchased from commercial dairy herds. Cows were culled for various typical reasons at different stages of lactation, were non-pregnant and had milk yield at culling ranging from 1 to 25kg/d and had LW varying from 330 to 778kg. Cows were housed in tie-stalls and had free access to barley straw and water during a 7-d drying-off period. Cows were allocated to three equal treatment groups based on parity, LW, BCS, and culling reason. A control group (C) was slaughtered immediately after drying-off (n=43), a group (F2) was finishing-fed for 63 days (n=41), and a group (F4) was finishing-fed for 126 days (n=41). In the finishing period, cows had free access to a TMR (10.6 MJ ME and 130g CP per kg of DM). Cows on treatment, F2 and F4 gained 1.16±0.05kg/d in the finishing period. Compared with C-cows, F2- and F4-cows had 56 and 97kg higher carcass weight, 10% and 21% larger Longissimus muscle area, and 14 and 70% more backfat, respectively, at time of slaughter. EUROP conformation scores were 2.2 (C), 3.4 (F2) and 4.4 (F4) and EUROP fat scores were 1.9, 3.0 and 3.7. Finishing feeding increased IMF, improved meat flavour and colour, and tended to reduce shear force value and improve tenderness and juiciness. The F4 cows also had higher fat trim than C- and F2-cows. Cows were divided into two parity groups (1st parity and older cows). Compared with 1st parity cows, older cows ate 12% more feed, had similar daily gain, were heavier, and had higher BCS and fatness including IMF. The results show that it is possible to dry-off and finish-feed culled dairy cows resulting in larger muscles, increased fatness, improved overall carcass quality and better technological as well as sensory quality characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Vestergaard
- Department of Animal Health, Wealth and Nutrition, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, PO Box 50, Foulum, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|