Broca's Area as a Pre-articulatory Phonetic Encoder: Gating the Motor Program

The exact nature of the role of Broca’s area in control of speech and whether it is exerted at the cognitive or at the motor level is still debated. Intraoperative evidence of a lack of motor responses to direct electrical stimulation (DES) of Broca’s area and the observation that its stimulation induces a “speech arrest” without an apparent effect on the ongoing activity of phono-articulatory muscles, raises the argument. Essentially, attribution of direct involvement of Broca’s area in motor control of speech, requires evidence of a functional connection of this area with the phono-articulatory muscles’ motoneurons. With a quantitative approach we investigated, in 20 patients undergoing surgery for brain tumors, whether DES delivered on Broca’s area affects the recruitment of the phono-articulatory muscles’ motor units. The electromyography (EMG) of the muscles active during two speech tasks (object picture naming and counting) was recorded during and in absence of DES on Broca’s area. Offline, the EMG of each muscle was analyzed in frequency (power spectrum, PS) and time domain (root mean square, RMS) and the two conditions compared. Results show that DES on Broca’s area induces an intensity-dependent “speech arrest.” The intensity of DES needed to induce “speech arrest” when applied on Broca’s area was higher when compared to the intensity effective on the neighboring pre-motor/motor cortices. Notably, PS and RMS measured on the EMG recorded during “speech arrest” were superimposable to those recorded at baseline. Partial interruptions of speech were not observed. Speech arrest was an “all-or-none” effect: muscle activation started only by removing DES, as if DES prevented speech onset. The same effect was observed when stimulating directly the subcortical fibers running below Broca’s area. Intraoperative data point to Broca’s area as a functional gate authorizing the phonetic translation to be executed by the motor areas. Given the absence of a direct effect on motor units recruitment, a direct control of Broca’s area on the phono-articulatory apparatus seems unlikely. Moreover, the strict correlation between DES-intensity and speech prevention, might attribute this effect to the inactivation of the subcortical fibers rather than to Broca’s cortical neurons.

The role of attention in human motor resonance

Observation of others' actions evokes in primary motor cortex and spinal circuits of observers a subliminal motor resonance response, which reflects the motor program encoding observed actions. We investigated the role of attention in human motor resonance with four experimental conditions, explored in different subject groups: in the first explicit condition, subjects were asked to observe a rhythmic hand flexion-extension movement performed live in front of them. In two other conditions subjects had to monitor the activity of a LED light mounted on the oscillating hand. The hand was clearly visible but it was not the focus of subjects' attention: in the semi-implicit condition hand movement was relevant to task completion, while in the implicit condition it was irrelevant. In a fourth, baseline, condition subjects observed the rhythmic oscillation of a metal platform. Motor resonance was measured with the H-reflex technique as the excitability modulation of cortico-spinal motorneurons driving a hand flexor muscle. As expected, a normal resonant response developed in the explicit condition, and no resonant response in the baseline condition. Resonant responses also developed in both semi-implicit and implicit conditions and, surprisingly, were not different from each other, indicating that viewing an action is, per se, a powerful stimulus for the action observation network, even when it is not the primary focus of subjects' attention and even when irrelevant to the task. However, the amplitude of these responses was much reduced compared to the explicit condition, and the phase-lock between the time courses of observed movement and resonant motor program was lost. In conclusion, different parameters of the response were differently affected by subtraction of attentional resources with respect to the explicit condition: time course and muscle selection were preserved while the activation of motor circuits resulted in much reduced amplitude and lost its kinematic specificity.

Decreased motor cortex excitability mirrors own hand disembodiment during the rubber hand illusion

During the rubber hand illusion (RHI), subjects experience an artificial hand as part of their own body, while the real hand is subject to a sort of 'disembodiment'. Can this altered belief about the body also affect physiological mechanisms involved in body-ownership, such as motor control? Here we ask whether the excitability of the motor pathways to the real (disembodied) hand are affected by the illusion. Our results show that the amplitude of the motor-evoked potentials recorded from the real hand is significantly reduced, with respect to baseline, when subjects in the synchronous (but not in the asynchronous) condition experience the fake hand as their own. This finding contributes to the theoretical understanding of the relationship between body-ownership and motor system, and provides the first physiological evidence that a significant drop in motor excitability in M1 hand circuits accompanies the disembodiment of the real hand during the RHI experience.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14972.001

The feeling of body ownership — that the various parts of your body are all part of you — is something that we typically take for granted. However, brain damage can disrupt this sensation and leave individuals convinced that an arm or a leg is no longer their own. Even in healthy people, the ‘rubber hand illusion’ can temporarily produce a similar phenomenon. Individuals watch a lifelike rubber hand being touched while their own hand – which is hidden from view – is touched at the same time. This creates the feeling that the artificial hand has become part of their body, while their real hand is left in a ‘disembodied’ state.

How does the brain generate this illusory sense of ownership and accompanying sense of disembodiment? A person’s ability to move their body is thought to contribute to their feeling of body ownership. Therefore, della Gatta, Garbarini et al. asked whether the brain’s ability to move the real hand changes during the rubber hand illusion.

In the experiments, the region of the brain that controls hand movement was artificially stimulated in a number of volunteers. When an individual had been primed by the rubber hand illusion to perceive a fake hand as part of their own body, their brain was temporarily less able to activate the muscles of their real hand. This is as if the brain no longer considered the real hand as part of the body. Thus, the altered sense of body ownership experienced during the rubber hand illusion is not a bizarre fantasy, but corresponds to a physiological reaction that accompanies changes in brain activity.

The next step is to further define and quantify the relationship between the sense of body ownership and the control of body movement. Specifically, how does activity in the brain areas that control movement contribute to the sense of body ownership? And how do these brain regions communicate with one another to generate a sense of self?

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14972.002

The mirror neuron system and the strange case of Broca's area

Mirror neurons, originally described in the monkey premotor area F5, are embedded in a frontoparietal network for action execution and observation. A similar Mirror Neuron System (MNS) exists in humans, including precentral gyrus, inferior parietal lobule, and superior temporal sulcus. Controversial is the inclusion of Broca's area, as homologous to F5, a relevant issue in light of the mirror hypothesis of language evolution, which postulates a key role of Broca's area in action/speech perception/production. We assess "mirror" properties of this area by combining neuroimaging and intraoperative neurophysiological techniques. Our results show that Broca's area is minimally involved in action observation and has no motor output on hand or phonoarticulatory muscles, challenging its inclusion in the MNS. The presence of these functions in premotor BA6 makes this area the likely homologue of F5 suggesting that the MNS may be involved in the representation of articulatory rather than semantic components of speech.

Protein kinase C modulates NMDA receptors in the myenteric plexus of the guinea pig ileum during in vitro ischemia and reperfusion

BACKGROUND

Ischemic episodes lead to profound functional and structural alterations of the gastrointestinal tract which may contribute to disorders of intestinal motility. Enhancement of glutamate overflow and the consequent activation of NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors may participate to such changes by modulating different enteric neurotransmitter systems, including cholinergic motor pathways.

METHODS

The molecular mechanism/s underlying activation of NMDA receptors in the guinea pig ileum were investigated after glucose/oxygen deprivation (in vitro ischemia) and during reperfusion.

KEY RESULTS

The number of ileal myenteric neurons positive for NR1, the functional subunit of NMDA receptors, and its mRNA levels were unchanged after in vitro ischemia/reperfusion. In these conditions, the protein levels of NR1, and of its phosphorylated form by protein kinase C (PKC), significantly increased in myenteric neurons, whereas, the levels of NR1 phosphorylated by protein kinase A (PKA) did not change, with respect to control values. Spontaneous glutamate overflow increased during in vitro ischemia/reperfusion. In these conditions, the NMDA receptor antagonists, D(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid [(D)-AP5] (10 μmol L(-1)) and 5,7-dichlorokynurenic acid (5,7-diClKyn acid) (10 μmol L(-1)) and the PKC antagonist, chelerythrine (1 μmol L(-1)), but not the PKA antagonist, H-89 (1 μmol L(-1)), were able to significantly depress the increased glutamate efflux.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The present data suggest that in the guinea pig ileum during in vitro ischemia/reperfusion, NR1 protein levels increase. Such event may rely upon posttranscriptional events involving NR1 phosphorylation by PKC. Increased NR1 levels may, at least in part, explain the ability of NMDA receptors to modulate a positive feedback on ischemia/reperfusion-induced glutamate overflow.

Activation of motor pathways during observation and execution of hand movements

Some neural properties of "motor resonance"--the subliminal activation of the motor system when observing actions performed by others--are investigated in humans. Two actions performed with the right hand are observed by experimental subjects: a finalized (transitive) action (reaching for and grasping a ball) and an intransitive action (cyclic up-and-down oscillation of the hand), while the H-reflex and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation techniques are utilized to test the excitability of the observer's motor pathways to hand and forearm muscles (first dorsal interosseus, flexor digitorum superficialis, flexor carpi radialis). Results indicate that motor resonance: (1) is mainly mediated by the primary motor cortex; (2) involves the same forearm muscles as used in the execution of the observed movement; (3) is also recorded in the homologous muscles of the arm contralateral to the one observed; and (4) is evoked by both transitive and intransitive movements of the human hand, but not by similar movements of inanimate objects. The similarities and discrepancies between the resonant response in humans and the properties of monkey "mirror neurons" are discussed.

Bilateral motor resonance evoked by observation of a one-hand movement: role of the primary motor cortex

In humans, observation of movement performed by others evokes a subliminal motor resonant response, probably mediated by the mirror neurone system, which reproduces the motor commands needed to execute the observed movement with good spatial and temporal fidelity. Motor properties of the resonant response were here investigated with the ultimate goal of understanding the principles operating in the transformation from observation to internal reproduction of movement. Motor resonance was measured as the modulation of excitability of spinal motoneurones, evoked by the observation of a cyclic flexion-extension of one hand. The first two experiments showed that the observation of a one-hand movement always evoked a bimanual resonant response independent of which hand was observed and that these bilateral responses were consistently phase-linked. H-reflexes simultaneously recorded in right and left flexor carpi radialis muscles were always modulated 'in-phase' with each other. The goal of the third experiment was to define the role of primary motor cortex in the bilateral resonant response. Bilateral H-reflexes were recorded during a temporary inactivation induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the left cortical hand motor area of observers. The finding that such cortical depression abolished the H-reflex modulation of only the right flexor carpi radialis motoneurones, leaving it unchanged on the left side, suggested that both primary motor areas were activated by the premotor cortex and transmit the resonant activation through crossed corticospinal pathways. The data provide further evidence that the subliminal activation of motor pathways induced by movement observation is organized according to general rules shared with the control of voluntary movement.

Excitability changes in human corticospinal projections to muscles moving hand and fingers while viewing a reaching and grasping action

Excitability of the H-reflex in the relaxed flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) muscle was tested in five subjects observing a reaching and grasping action. The amplitude of the FDS H-reflex was modulated with a peak occurring during the hand-opening phase of the observed movement. When the H-reflex was facilitated by subliminal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), the modulation was larger than for an unconditioned reflex of similar size. This suggests that the primary motor cortex excitability is modulated by action viewing and reasonably causes the motoneuronal excitability changes. Moreover, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were elicited by supraliminal TMS in FDS, flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and first dorsal interosseus (FDI) when observing the same movement. MEP amplitude was modulated in FDS with the same time-course as the H-reflex, the peak excitability occurring during hand opening. In FDI, however, the maximal excitability occurred during finger closing while in FCR no correlation was found with the movement phases. Finally the EMG activity of FCR, FDS and FDI was recorded while the subjects were actually performing a grasping movement similar to the one observed. In all subjects and for each muscle there was a clear-cut correspondence between the time-course of the excitability modulation of MEPs and the temporal pattern of EMG recruitment. In conclusion, the present study suggests that 'motor resonance' subliminally activates the same motor pathways that would be overtly recruited in each observer when actually performing the observed movement, reproducing the personal strategy adopted in the same task.

Cyclic time course of motor excitability modulation during the observation of a cyclic hand movement

The observation of a sinusoidal flexion-extension of the wrist was utilized to determine the continuous time course and phase relation between observed movement and its effects on the observer's motor pathways. While observing movements performed by others, the observers' cortical motor areas and spinal circuits were activated, reflecting the specific temporal and muscular pattern of the actual movement (motor resonance). H-reflexes and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were elicited, respectively, by electrical stimulation of the median nerve and magnetic stimulation of the appropriate cortical area, in the right forearm muscle Flexor Carpi Radialis (FCR) of subjects who were observing a 1-Hz cyclic oscillation of the right prone hand executed by a different person. Observation elicited a parallel cyclic excitability modulation of the observer's H-reflex and MEP responses with identical period as the observed movement. Modulation was phase advanced, as is muscle activation with respect to the real movement. The same results were obtained when the observed hand oscillation was executed with different frequency (1.6 Hz) and when the hands of mover and observer were supine. No motor resonance was elicited by observing the oscillation of a metal platform. The excitability modulation of MEPs simultaneously monitored in both antagonists of the observer's forearm (FCR and Extensor Carpi Radialis, ECR) was in almost perfect phase opposition, reflecting their natural reciprocal activation during the execution of a hand oscillation. These findings suggest that during observation, motor pathways are modulated subliminally reproducing with high temporal fidelity the motor commands needed to execute the observed movement.

Excitability changes in resting forearm muscles during voluntary foot movements depend on hand position: a neural substrate for hand–foot isodirectional coupling

When associating hand and foot voluntary oscillations, isodirectional coupling is preferred irrespective of hand position (prone or supine). To investigate the neural correlates of this coupling modality, excitability of the motor projections innervating the resting forearm was tested during cyclic voluntary flexion-extensions of the ipsilateral foot. H-reflexes, in some experiments facilitated by subliminal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), and Compound Muscle Action Potentials (CMAPs), evoked by supraliminal TMS, were elicited in Flexor Carpi Radialis (FCR) and Extensor Carpi Radialis (ECR) muscles at five intervals during the foot movement cycle. With the hand prone, a sinusoidal excitability modulation was observed in wrist flexors and extensors, but reversed in phase: in FCR, excitability increased during plantar-flexion and decreased during dorsiflexion, while in ECR the opposite occurred. This reciprocal organisation was confirmed by the excitability modulation of CMAPs evoked simultaneously in the two antagonists. When the hand was supinated, the H-reflex modulation reversed in phase, i.e., FCR excitability increased during foot dorsiflexion and decreased during plantar-flexion. In both muscles and hand positions tested, when the muscle-to-movement phase-lag was increased by inertial loading of the foot, H-reflex excitability modulations remained phase linked to muscular contractions, not to movement. Together, these results suggest that the subliminal excitability modulation of hand movers has a common central origin with the parallel overt activation of foot movers, is reciprocally organised, and is direction- not muscle-dependent. It may therefore represent the neural substrate for isodirectional coupling of hand (prone or supine) with the foot.

Cyclic h-reflex modulation in resting forearm related to contractions of foot movers, not to foot movement

During rhythmic voluntary oscillations of the foot, the excitability of the H-reflex in the Flexor Carpi Radialis (FCR) muscle of the resting prone forearm increases during the foot plantar-flexion and decreases during dorsiflexion. It is known that, when the two extremities are moved together, isodirectional (in-phase) coupling is the preferred form of movement association. Thus the above pattern of the H-reflex excitability modulation may favor the preferred coupling between the two limbs. To gain some clues about its origin, FCR H-reflex excitability was tested before and after modifying the phase relations between the activation [electromyogram (EMG)] of foot movers and foot movement, either by loading of the foot or by changing the movement frequency. After foot loading, the movement cycle was consistently delayed with respect to the onset of the EMG in Soleus (Sol) or Tibialis Anterior (TA) muscles. Simultaneously, the FCR H-reflex modulation advanced by that same amount with respect to the foot movement, thus remaining phase-locked to the EMG onsets. Similarly, when movement frequency was varied step-wise between 1.0 and 2.0 Hz, the foot movement was progressively delayed with respect to both the EMG onset (Sol and TA) and the FCR H-reflex modulation, so that the phase relation between the motor command to the foot and the H-modulation in the forearm remained constant. These results suggest that modulation of H-reflex in the forearm is tied to leg muscle contraction, rather than to foot kinematics, and point to a central, rather than kinesthetic, origin for the modulation.

Excitability changes in human corticospinal projections to forearm muscles during voluntary movement of ipsilateral foot

Excitability of the H-reflex in the relaxed flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscle was tested during voluntary oscillations of the ipsilateral foot at five evenly spaced delays during a 600 ms cycle. In some experiments the H-reflex was conditioned by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). With the hand prone, the amplitude of the FCR H-reflex was modulated sinusoidally with the same period as the foot oscillation, the modulation peak occurring in coincidence with contraction of the foot plantar-flexor soleus and the trough during contraction of the extensor tibialis anterior. When the H-reflex was facilitated by TMS at short latency (conditioning-test interval: -2 to -3.5 ms), the modulation was larger than that occurring with an unconditioned reflex of comparable size. This suggests that both the peripheral and the corticospinal components of the facilitated response were modulated in parallel. When the H-reflex was tested 40-60 ms after conditioning, i.e. during the cortical "silent period" induced by TMS, no direct effect was produced on the reflex size but the foot-associated modulation was deeply depressed. These results suggest that the reflex modulation may depend on activity fluctuations in the cortical motor area innervating the forearm motoneurones. It is proposed that when the foot is rhythmically oscillated, along with the full activation of the foot cortical area a simultaneous lesser co-activation of the forearm area produces a subliminal cyclic modulation of cervical motoneurones excitability. Should the two limbs be moved together, the time course of this modulation would favour isodirectional movements of the prone hand and foot, indeed the preferential coupling observed when hand and foot are voluntarily oscillated.

Neural compensation for mechanical differences between hand and foot during coupled oscillations of the two segments

(1) Rhythmic flexion-extensions of the hand and foot on one side were performed by ten male and nine female subjects. Limbs were rotated in the same direction (in-phase) or in opposite directions (anti-phase). Oscillation frequency ranged from 0.6 to 3.2 Hz for in-phase and to 2.2 Hz for anti-phase movements. In both genders, movement synchrony was more strictly maintained during anti-phase than during in-phase coupling. (2) EMG recordings showed that, in males, movement synchrony was achieved by activating hand movers in advance of foot movers. This phase advance increased as the oscillation frequency increased. In females, instead, muscles of the two limbs were activated almost simultaneously over most of the frequency range. Since the different timing of muscle activation in the two genders suggests that their limbs have different mechanical characteristics, the frequency response of each limb was estimated in either gender. The frequency response between 0.6 and 3.2 Hz was evaluated in five males and five females by measuring the phase delay between the onset of the EMG activity and the onset of the related movement, both when the limbs were moved in isolation and when they were coupled. (3) In uncoupled conditions, the hand and foot curves were roughly parallel in females, the phase delay being about 45 degrees larger in the hand than in the foot. In males, the curves were also separated by 45 degrees at the lowest frequencies but they further diverged when the frequency was raised, because of a faster increase in the phase delay in the hand than in the foot. These results indicate that, when the extremities have to be coupled, a nervous compensation is necessary and that it must be different in the two genders. (4) Analysis of the phase-response when limbs were coupled showed that synchrony was approached by two mechanisms: (a) an earlier EMG activation of the hand movers, preferentially utilised by males during in-phase coupling; and (b) a change in the viscoelastic properties of one extremity, which reduces (or eliminates) the difference between their frequency responses as well as between the EMG onsets of hand and foot movers. This second mechanism was utilised by both genders during anti-phase coupling.