Management of Obese Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (Double Diabetes) Through Telemedicine During COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown: A Case Report

Metabolic syndrome in Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) has been shown to be an independent risk factor for macro-vascular and micro-vascular complications. Obesity also affects many people with T1DM across their lifetime with an increasing prevalence in recent decades. Individuals with T1DM who are overweight, have a family history of type 2 diabetes, and/or have clinical features of insulin resistance, are known as "double diabetes". It is challenging for a person with double diabetes to achieve reasonable glycemic control, avoid insulin-related weight gain, and prevent hypoglycaemia. This was especially true during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic lockdown. The aim of this report is to show that lifestyle modification through telemedicine can immensely help in managing uncontrolled T1DM with associated morbid obesity in lockdown situations, with the help of the diabetes educator. In this case, the complicated history of double diabetes was taken through telephonic and online consultations with the help of a nutritionist and diabetes educator, and the treating clinician supervised the insulin doses and frequency. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 questionnaire was used to assess depression. Medical nutrition therapy (MNT) was given through online consultations, where the patient was reoriented to carbohydrate counting, insulin dose adjustment, along with modifications in the diet. Regular exercise was advised along with frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Moreover, the diet order was changed to eat protein and fibre first, followed by carbohydrates, later. The three-tier system of the medical expert, clinical dietitian, and diabetes educator was applied. The subject was trained for carbohydrate counting and insulin dose adjustment by teaching her about the insulin-to-carb ratio and insulin sensitivity factor (ISF). She was asked to examine her insulin injection sites by visual and palpatory methods for lipohypertrophy. Once a week, the diabetes educator and nutritionist did telephonic follow-up and counselling, while online consultation was done by the treating clinician once a month. As a result, her weight, BMI, and waist circumference were reduced drastically, and there was an improvement in haemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), lipid parameters, and blood pressure after the intervention. Thus, implementing diabetes education via telemedicine in circumstances such as the COVID-19 pandemic can help achieve the best possible compliance for strict diet adherence, regular exercise and monitoring, reducing obesity, glycosylated HbA1c, insulin doses, and risk of depression in a person with double diabetes.

Clinical Implications of Lipohypertrophy Among People with Type 1 Diabetes in India

BACKGROUND

Lipohypertrophy (LH) at insulin injection sites is a common but preventable complication in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). We evaluated the prevalence, contributing risk factors, and consequences of LH, specifically the glycemic variability (GV) among T1DM patients.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary care center in India, wherein 139 subjects with T1DM were randomly selected and evaluated for the presence of LH through visual and palpation examinations. Demography, anthropometry, and injecting practices were evaluated using a validated questionnaire and their effect on LH was determined. Subsequently, the effect of LH on GV and unexplained hypoglycemia (UH) was studied. Mean glucose, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGEs), and continuous overlapping net glycemic action (CONGA) were assessed in a subset of patients who injected insulin alternately in LH and non-LH sites.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of LH was 69.8%, and was significantly higher in adults than in children (P = 0.038). Improper rotation of sites (P < 0.0001) and insulin syringe reusage for more than five times (P = 0.009) significantly increase the risk of LH. The presence of LH has a significant effect on GV and UH with adjusted odds ratios of 17.65 (P < 0.0001) and 28.02 (P < 0.0001), respectively. Ambulatory glucose monitoring on a subset of patients confirmed that the mean glucose, MAGE, and CONGA were higher when subjects injected insulin at LH sites than at non-LH sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Improper rotation of sites and reuse of needles are the leading causes of LH in Indian T1DM patients, which, in turn, significantly increases the risk of GV and UH.