1
|
Ontiveros P, Landaverde C, Graf R, Levin MK, Hippely S, Wang Y, Landers M, Dittamore R, O'Shaughnessy JA. Abstract P3-01-07: Enabling HER2 and androgen receptor (AR) protein expression and localization in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) of ER(+/-)HER2(-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts). Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p3-01-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Upregulation of HER2 and AR are mechanisms of acquired resistance to endocrine therapy, and are being investigated as treatment-guiding biomarkers. However, measurement of these proteins and their localization requires metastatic biopsies, which are costly, invasive, and prone to under-sampling which limits their utility to guide treatment in late stage metastatic patients. A CTC-based test could expand the clinical utility of these biomarkers. Here we utilized the Epic Sciences CTC platform for CTC detection and characterization. MBC blood samples were characterized for CTC prevalence, HER2 and AR expression at time of disease progression.
Material and methods:
HER2 and AR expression levels were determined based on model cell lines. A total of 72 blood samples were acquired from ER(+/-)/HER2(-) patients (by standard tissue pathology) at disease progression. 72 samples were analyzed for HER2 and 64 were analyzed for AR using the Epic Platform. Single-cell whole genome sequencing was performed to assess clonality and inter-patient heterogeneity of CTCs detected.
Results:
55/72 (76.4%) of patients had CTCs detected across two slides. 13/72 (18.1%) had at least one HER2(+) CTC, 14/64 (21.9%) had at least one AR(+) CTC, and 7/64 (10.9%) had at both AR(+) and HER2(+) CTCs detected on replicate slides. HER2 expression on individual CTCs showed distinctive cytoplasmic membrane staining, and AR expression on individual CTCs showed frequent nuclear localization. Most patient samples showed heterogeneous expression of these markers at disease progression indicating subclonal sensitivity to targeted therapies. Subsequently, these cells will be individually sequenced to better determine the clonality of resistance.
Conclusions:
CTCs are detected in most MBC pts upon disease progression, with expression of known endocrine therapy resistance markers, HER2 and AR, observed that CTCs could guide subsequent therapy selection. Prospective evaluation of HER2 and AR on MBC pts' CTCs as predictive biomarkers of benefit from inhibitors of these proteins is needed.
Citation Format: Ontiveros P, Landaverde C, Graf R, Levin MK, Hippely S, Wang Y, Landers M, Dittamore R, O'Shaughnessy JA. Enabling HER2 and androgen receptor (AR) protein expression and localization in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) of ER(+/-)HER2(-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-01-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Ontiveros
- Epic Sciences, San Diego, CA; Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX
| | - C Landaverde
- Epic Sciences, San Diego, CA; Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX
| | - R Graf
- Epic Sciences, San Diego, CA; Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX
| | - MK Levin
- Epic Sciences, San Diego, CA; Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX
| | - S Hippely
- Epic Sciences, San Diego, CA; Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX
| | - Y Wang
- Epic Sciences, San Diego, CA; Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX
| | - M Landers
- Epic Sciences, San Diego, CA; Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX
| | - R Dittamore
- Epic Sciences, San Diego, CA; Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX
| | - JA O'Shaughnessy
- Epic Sciences, San Diego, CA; Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mendoza CF, Ontiveros P, Xibillé DX, Rivera HM. Erratum to: Ectopic ACTH secretion associated to a well-differentiated peritoneal mesothelioma. BMC Endocr Disord 2015; 15:48. [PMID: 26370229 PMCID: PMC4570587 DOI: 10.1186/s12902-015-0046-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2015] [Accepted: 09/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen F Mendoza
- Endocrinology Department, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos and Hospital General de Cuernavaca, Iztaccihuatl Esq. Leñeros S/N, Los Volcanes, Cuernavaca, 62350, Morelos, Mexico.
| | | | - Daniel X Xibillé
- Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos and Hospital General de Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Heriberto Manuel Rivera
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mendoza CF, Ontiveros P, Xibillé DX, Rivera HM. Ectopic ACTH secretion (EAS) associated to a well-differentiated peritoneal mesothelioma: case report. BMC Endocr Disord 2015; 15:40. [PMID: 26253127 PMCID: PMC4528349 DOI: 10.1186/s12902-015-0031-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2015] [Accepted: 06/12/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association between mesotheliomas and ectopic ACTH secretion has been rarely reported; we present the first case of ectopic ACTH secretion (EAS) associated with a well-differentiated peritoneal mesothelioma in whom the high dose dexamethasone suppression test (HDDST) results and plasmatic ACTH levels were similar to those found in Cushing's disease (CD). CASE PRESENTATION A 43-year-old hispanic woman with a 20 year history of treatment resistant diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension. She had a full moon face, a buffalo hump, increased volume in both supraclavicular regions, purple striae in her arms and abdomen, truncal obesity, polymenorrhea and umbilical hernia. A cortisol suppression test with low dose dexamethasone (LDDST) with a result of 16.6 μg/dL and ACTH plasma levels were measured at 32.6 pg/mL. The high dose dexamethasone test suppression percentage was 84.8% and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed no evidence of pituitary alterations, computed tomography (CT) showed images suggestive of uterine fibroid and an intra-abdominal tumor that correlated with an umbilical hernia, which reinforcement after contrast. Surgery was performed, finding uterine fibroids and paracolic tumor implants as well as on the omentum, bladder, bowel, ovaries and appendix. Pathology reported a well-differentiated peritoneal mesothelioma with positive immunohistochemistry for ACTH. CONCLUSIONS Although most cases of ectopic secretion of ACTH derive from rapidly-developing lung tumors, with very high plasma ACTH levels and cortisol suppression percentages with high doses of dexamethasone under 60%, there is a small percentage of slow-developing, chronic tumors that are biochemically undistinguishable from Cushing's disease. Following the expert recommendations regarding imaging techniques it is possible to identify the associated tumor in most cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen F Mendoza
- Endocrinology Department, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos and Hospital General de Cuernavaca, Iztaccihuatl Esq. Leñeros S/N, Los Volcanes, 62350, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
| | | | - Daniel X Xibillé
- Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos and Hospital General de Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hamajima N, Hirose K, Tajima K, Rohan T, Calle EE, Heath CW, Coates RJ, Liff JM, Talamini R, Chantarakul N, Koetsawang S, Rachawat D, Morabia A, Schuman L, Stewart W, Szklo M, Bain C, Schofield F, Siskind V, Band P, Coldman AJ, Gallagher RP, Hislop TG, Yang P, Kolonel LM, Nomura AMY, Hu J, Johnson KC, Mao Y, De Sanjosé S, Lee N, Marchbanks P, Ory HW, Peterson HB, Wilson HG, Wingo PA, Ebeling K, Kunde D, Nishan P, Hopper JL, Colditz G, Gajalanski V, Martin N, Pardthaisong T, Silpisornkosol S, Theetranont C, Boosiri B, Chutivongse S, Jimakorn P, Virutamasen P, Wongsrichanalai C, Ewertz M, Adami HO, Bergkvist L, Magnusson C, Persson I, Chang-Claude J, Paul C, Skegg DCG, Spears GFS, Boyle P, Evstifeeva T, Daling JR, Hutchinson WB, Malone K, Noonan EA, Stanford JL, Thomas DB, Weiss NS, White E, Andrieu N, Brêmond A, Clavel F, Gairard B, Lansac J, Piana L, Renaud R, Izquierdo A, Viladiu P, Cuevas HR, Ontiveros P, Palet A, Salazar SB, Aristizabel N, Cuadros A, Tryggvadottir L, Tulinius H, Bachelot A, Lê MG, Peto J, Franceschi S, Lubin F, Modan B, Ron E, Wax Y, Friedman GD, Hiatt RA, Levi F, Bishop T, Kosmelj K, Primic-Zakelj M, Ravnihar B, Stare J, Beeson WL, Fraser G, Bullbrook RD, Cuzick J, Duffy SW, Fentiman IS, Hayward JL, Wang DY, McMichael AJ, McPherson K, Hanson RL, Leske MC, Mahoney MC, Nasca PC, Varma AO, Weinstein AL, Moller TR, Olsson H, Ranstam J, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, Apelo RA, Baens J, de la Cruz JR, Javier B, Lacaya LB, Ngelangel CA, La Vecchia C, Negri E, Marubini E, Ferraroni M, Gerber M, Richardson S, Segala C, Gatei D, Kenya P, Kungu A, Mati JG, Brinton LA, Hoover R, Schairer C, Spirtas R, Lee HP, Rookus MA, van Leeuwen FE, Schoenberg JA, McCredie M, Gammon MD, Clarke EA, Jones L, Neil A, Vessey M, Yeates D, Appleby P, Banks E, Beral V, Bull D, Crossley B, Goodill A, Green J, Hermon C, Key T, Langston N, Lewis C, Reeves G, Collins R, Doll R, Peto R, Mabuchi K, Preston D, Hannaford P, Kay C, Rosero-Bixby L, Gao YT, Jin F, Yuan JM, Wei HY, Yun T, Zhiheng C, Berry G, Cooper Booth J, Jelihovsky T, MacLennan R, Shearman R, Wang QS, Baines CJ, Miller AB, Wall C, Lund E, Stalsberg H, Shu XO, Zheng W, Katsouyanni K, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D, Dabancens A, Martinez L, Molina R, Salas O, Alexander FE, Anderson K, Folsom AR, Hulka BS, Bernstein L, Enger S, Haile RW, Paganini-Hill A, Pike MC, Ross RK, Ursin G, Yu MC, Longnecker MP, Newcomb P, Bergkvist L, Kalache A, Farley TMM, Holck S, Meirik O. Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer--collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease. Br J Cancer 2002; 87:1234-45. [PMID: 12439712 PMCID: PMC2562507 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 675] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2002] [Revised: 08/08/2002] [Accepted: 08/23/2002] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Alcohol and tobacco consumption are closely correlated and published results on their association with breast cancer have not always allowed adequately for confounding between these exposures. Over 80% of the relevant information worldwide on alcohol and tobacco consumption and breast cancer were collated, checked and analysed centrally. Analyses included 58,515 women with invasive breast cancer and 95,067 controls from 53 studies. Relative risks of breast cancer were estimated, after stratifying by study, age, parity and, where appropriate, women's age when their first child was born and consumption of alcohol and tobacco. The average consumption of alcohol reported by controls from developed countries was 6.0 g per day, i.e. about half a unit/drink of alcohol per day, and was greater in ever-smokers than never-smokers, (8.4 g per day and 5.0 g per day, respectively). Compared with women who reported drinking no alcohol, the relative risk of breast cancer was 1.32 (1.19-1.45, P<0.00001) for an intake of 35-44 g per day alcohol, and 1.46 (1.33-1.61, P<0.00001) for >/=45 g per day alcohol. The relative risk of breast cancer increased by 7.1% (95% CI 5.5-8.7%; P<0.00001) for each additional 10 g per day intake of alcohol, i.e. for each extra unit or drink of alcohol consumed on a daily basis. This increase was the same in ever-smokers and never-smokers (7.1% per 10 g per day, P<0.00001, in each group). By contrast, the relationship between smoking and breast cancer was substantially confounded by the effect of alcohol. When analyses were restricted to 22 255 women with breast cancer and 40 832 controls who reported drinking no alcohol, smoking was not associated with breast cancer (compared to never-smokers, relative risk for ever-smokers=1.03, 95% CI 0.98-1.07, and for current smokers=0.99, 0.92-1.05). The results for alcohol and for tobacco did not vary substantially across studies, study designs, or according to 15 personal characteristics of the women; nor were the findings materially confounded by any of these factors. If the observed relationship for alcohol is causal, these results suggest that about 4% of the breast cancers in developed countries are attributable to alcohol. In developing countries, where alcohol consumption among controls averaged only 0.4 g per day, alcohol would have a negligible effect on the incidence of breast cancer. In conclusion, smoking has little or no independent effect on the risk of developing breast cancer; the effect of alcohol on breast cancer needs to be interpreted in the context of its beneficial effects, in moderation, on cardiovascular disease and its harmful effects on cirrhosis and cancers of the mouth, larynx, oesophagus and liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Hamajima
- Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Gibson Building, Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Calle EE, Heath CW, Miracle-McMahill HL, Coates RJ, Liff JM, Franceschi S, Talamini R, Chantarakul N, Koetsawang S, Rachawat D, Morabia A, Schuman L, Stewart W, Szklo M, Bain C, Schofield F, Siskind V, Band P, Coldman AJ, Gallagher RP, Hislop TG, Yang P, Duffy SW, Kolonel LM, Nomura AMY, Oberle MW, Ory HW, Peterson HB, Wilson HG, Wingo PA, Ebeling K, Kunde D, Nishan P, Colditz G, Martin N, Pardthaisong T, Silpisornkosol S, Theetranont C, Boosiri B, Chutivongse S, Jimakorn P, Virutamasen P, Wongsrichanalai C, McMichael AJ, Rohan T, Ewertz M, Paul C, Skegg DCG, Spears GFS, Boyle P, Evstifeeva T, Daling JR, Malone K, Noonan EA, Stanford JL, Thomas DB, Weiss NS, White E, Andrieu N, Brêmond A, Clavel F, Gairard B, Lansac J, Piana L, Renaud R, Fine SRP, Cuevas HR, Ontiveros P, Palet A, Salazar SB, Aristizabel N, Cuadros A, Bachelot A, Leê MG, Deacon J, Peto J, Taylor CN, Alfandary E, Modan B, Ron E, Friedman GD, Hiatt RA, Bishop T, Kosmelj K, Primic-Zakelj M, Ravnihar B, Stare J, Beeson WL, Fraser G, Allen DS, Bulbrook RD, Cuzick J, Fentiman IS, Hayward JL, Wang DY, Hanson RL, Leske MC, Mahoney MC, Nasca PC, Varma AO, Weinstein AL, Moller TR, Olsson H, Ranstam J, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, Apelo RA, Baens J, de la Cruz JR, Javier B, Lacaya LB, Ngelangel CA, La Vecchia C, Negri E, Marbuni E, Ferraroni M, Gerber M, Richardson S, Segala C, Gatei D, Kenya P, Kungu A, Mati JG, Brinton LA, Hoover R, Schairer C, Spirtas R, Lee HP, Rookus MA, van Leeuwen FE, Schoenberg JA, Gammon MD, Clarke EA, Jones L, McPherson K, Neil A, Vessey M, Yeates D, Beral V, Bull D, Crossley B, Hermon C, Jones S, Key T, Reeves CG, Smith P, Collins R, Doll R, Peto R, Hannaford P, Kay C, Rosero-Bixby L, Yuan JM, Wei HY, Yun T, Zhiheng C, Berry G, Booth JC, Jelihovsky T, Maclennan R, Shearman R, Wang QS, Baines CJ, Miller AB, Wall C, Lund E, Stalsberg H, Dabancens A, Martinez L, Molina R, Salas O, Alexander FE, Hulka BS, Chilvers CED, Bernstein L, Haile RW, Paganini-Hill A, Pike MC, Ross RK, Ursin G, Yu MC, Adami HO, Bergstrom R, Longnecker MP, Farley TMN, Holck S, Meirik O. Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: further results. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Contraception 1996; 54:1S-106S. [PMID: 8899264 DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(15)30002-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer has brought together and reanalysed the worldwide epidemiological evidence on breast cancer risk and use of hormonal contraceptives. Original data from 54 studies, representing about 90% of the information available on the topic, were collected, checked and analysed centrally. The 54 studies were performed in 26 countries and include a total of 53,297 women with breast cancer and 100,239 women without breast cancer. The studies were varied in their design, setting and timing. Most information came from case-control studies with controls chosen from the general population; most women resided in Europe or North America and most cancers were diagnosed during the 1980s. Overall 41% of the women with breast cancer and 40% of the women without breast cancer had used oral contraceptives at some time; the median age at first use was 26 years, the median duration of use was 3 years, the median year of first use was 1968, the median time since first use was 16 years, and the median time since last use was 9 years. The main findings, summarised elsewhere, are that there is a small increase in the risk of having breast cancer diagnosed in current users of combined oral contraceptives and in women who had stopped use in the past 10 years but that there is no evidence of an increase in the risk more than 10 years after stopping use. In addition, the cancers diagnosed in women who had used oral contraceptives tended to be less advanced clinically than the cancers diagnosed in women who had not used them. Despite the large number of possibilities investigated, few factors appeared to modify the main findings either in recent or in past users. For recent users who began use before age 20 the relative risks are higher than for recent users who began at older ages. For women whose use of oral contraceptives ceased more than 10 years before there was some suggestion of a reduction in breast cancer risk in certain subgroups, with a deficit of tumors that had spread beyond the breast, especially among women who had used preparations containing the highest doses of oestrogen and progestogen. These findings are unexpected and need to be confirmed. Although these data represent most of the epidemiological evidence on the topic to date, there is still insufficient information to comment reliably about the effects of specific types of oestrogen or of progestogen. What evidence there is suggests, however, no major differences in the effects for specific types of oestrogen or of progestogen and that the pattern of risk associated with use of hormonal contraceptives containing progestogens alone may be similar to that observed for preparations containing both oestrogens and progestogens. On the basis of these results, there is little difference between women who have and have not used combined oral contraceptives in terms of the estimated cumulative number of breast cancers diagnosed during the period from starting use up to 20 years after stopping. The cancers diagnosed in women who have used oral contraceptives are, however, less advanced clinically than the cancers diagnosed in never users. Further research is needed to establish whether the associations described here are due to earlier diagnosis of breast cancer in women who have used oral contraceptives, to the biological effects of the hormonal contraceptives or to a combination of both. Little information is as yet available about the effects on breast cancer risk of oral contraceptive use that ceased more than 20 years before and as such data accumulate it will be necessary to re-examine the worldwide evidence.
Collapse
|
6
|
Cuevas HR, Salazar SB, Palet A, Ontiveros P, Silpisornkosol S, Pardthaisong T, Charoeniam V, Theetranont S, Boosiri B, Chutivongse S, Virutamasen P, Wongsrichanalai C, Sindhvananda S, Koetsawang S, Rachawat D, Kiriwat O, Koetsawang A, Scully RE, Young RH, Thomas DB, Stanford JL, Rosenblatt KA, Noonan EA, Ray RM, Holck S, Farley TMM, Stanford JL, Thomas DB. Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and risk of edometrial cancer. Int J Cancer 1991. [DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910490208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
7
|
Rodríguez RS, Ontiveros P, Torres S, Khanna AK, Buskirk DR, Zabriskie JB. [Presence of a non-HLA antigen in B-lymphocytes from patients with rheumatic fever and their relatives defined using monoclonal antibodies]. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 1990; 47:313-7. [PMID: 2390184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Numerous investigators have suspected that there is a genetic predisposition to rheumatic fever (RF). In this context a group of investigators at Rockefeller University have produced a monoclonal antibody that identifies an antigen present in 100% of all RF studied at that center. Using this antibody, labeled D8/17, we studied 47 patients with acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. Of these, 39 were not receiving steroids at the of the test and 35 were positive for the marker (89.7%). The highest percentage of positive cells was seen in the probands with 34.6 +/- 13.16%, while unaffected mothers, fathers and siblings gave 24.9, 5.2 and 7.3% respectively. The control group had an average of 7.5% of positive cells. This study and previous ones, performed by the Rockefeller University group in which HLA typing was included, suggest an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance, not associated with the MHC system, for the D8/17 antigen. Rheumatic fever; non-HLA antigen in; genetic predisposition in.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R S Rodríguez
- Departamento de Medicina Interna Pediátrica, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|