1
|
Temmink SJD, Peeters KCMJ, Nilsson PJ, Martling A, van de Velde CJH. Surgical Outcomes after Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1539. [PMID: 38672621 PMCID: PMC11048284 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the past decade, the treatment of rectal cancer has changed considerably. The implementation of TME surgery has, in addition to decreasing the number of local recurrences, improved surgical morbidity and mortality. At the same time, the optimisation of radiotherapy in the preoperative setting has improved oncological outcomes even further, although higher perineal infection rates have been reported. Radiotherapy regimens have evolved through the adjustment of radiotherapy techniques and fields, increased waiting intervals, and, for more advanced tumours, adding chemotherapy. Concurrently, imaging techniques have significantly improved staging accuracy, facilitating more precise selection of advanced tumours. Although chemoradiotherapy does lead to the downsizing and -staging of these tumours, a very clear effect on sphincter-preserving surgery and the negative resection margin has not been proven. Aiming to decrease distant metastasis and improve overall survival for locally advanced rectal cancer, systemic chemotherapy can be added to radiotherapy, known as total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT). High complete response rates, both pathological (pCR) and clinical (cCR), are reported after TNT. Patients who follow a Watch & Wait program after a cCR can potentially avoid surgical morbidity and colostomy. For both early and more advanced tumours, trials are now investigating optimal regimens in an attempt to offer organ preservation as much as possible. Multidisciplinary deliberation should include patient preference, treatment toxicity, and likelihood of end colostomy, but also the burden of intensive surveillance in a W&W program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofieke J. D. Temmink
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Koen C. M. J. Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Per J. Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zwart WH, Temmink SJD, Hospers GAP, Marijnen CAM, Putter H, Nagtegaal ID, Blomqvist L, Kranenbarg EMK, Roodvoets AGH, Martling A, van de Velde CJH, Glimelius B, Peeters KCMJ, van Etten B, Nilsson PJ. Oncological outcomes after a pathological complete response following total neoadjuvant therapy or chemoradiotherapy for high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer in the RAPIDO trial. Eur J Cancer 2024; 204:114044. [PMID: 38636289 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A pathological complete response (pCR) following chemoradiation (CRT) or short-course radiotherapy (scRT) leads to a favourable prognosis in patients with rectal cancer. Total neo-adjuvant therapy (TNT) doubles the pCR rate, but it is unknown whether oncological outcomes remain favourable and whether the same characteristics are associated with pCR as after CRT. METHODS Comparison between patients with pCR in the RAPIDO trial in the experimental [EXP] (scRT, chemotherapy, surgery, as TNT) and standard-of-care treatment [STD] (CRT, surgery, postoperative chemotherapy depending on hospital policy) groups. Primary and secondary outcomes were time-to-recurrence (TTR), overall survival (OS) and association between patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics and pCR. RESULTS Among patients with a resection within six months after preoperative treatment, 120/423 (28%) [EXP] and 57/398 (14%) [STD] achieved a pCR. Following pCR, 5-year cumulative TTR and OS rates in the EXP and STD arms were 8% vs. 7% (hazard ratio 1.04, 95%CI 0.32-3.38) and 94% vs. 93% (hazard ratio 1.41, 95%CI 0.51-3.92), respectively. Besides the EXP treatment (odds ratio 2.70, 95%CI 1.83-3.97), pre-treatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) <5, pre-treatment tumour size <40 mm and cT2 were associated with pCR. Distance from the anal verge was the only characteristic with a statistically significant difference in association with pCR between the EXP and STD treatment (Pinteraction=0.042). pCR rates did not increase with prolonged treatment time. CONCLUSIONS The doubled pCR rate of TNT compared to CRT results in similar oncological outcomes. Characteristics associated with pCR are the EXP treatment, normal CEA, and small tumour size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter H Zwart
- University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Sofieke J D Temmink
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Geke A P Hospers
- University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hein Putter
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Lennart Blomqvist
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Annet G H Roodvoets
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Anna Martling
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Bengt Glimelius
- Uppsala University, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Koen C M J Peeters
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn van Etten
- University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Surgery, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ghanipour L, Jansson Palmer G, Nilsson PJ, Nordenvall C, Frödin JE, Bexe Lindskog E, Asplund D, Swartling T, Graf W, Birgisson H, Syk I, Verwaal V, Brändstedt J, Cashin PH. Efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in colorectal cancer: A phase I and III open label randomized controlled registry-based clinical trial protocol. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0294018. [PMID: 38437211 PMCID: PMC10911585 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Standard treatment for patient with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). In recent years, the efficacy of oxaliplatin-based HIPEC has been challenged. An intensified HIPEC (oxaliplatin+irinotecan) in combination with early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) has shown increased recurrence-free survival in retrospective studies. The aim of this trial is to develop a new HIPEC/EPIC regimen and evaluate its effect on morbidity, oncological outcome, and quality-of-life (QoL). This study is designed as a combined phase I/III multicenter randomized trial (RCT) of patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer eligible for CRS-HIPEC. An initial phase I dose escalation study, designed as a 3+3 stepwise escalation, will determine the maximum tolerable dose of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) as 1-day EPIC, enrolling a total of 15-30 patients in 5 dose levels. In the phase III efficacy study, patients are randomly assigned intraoperatively to either the standard treatment with oxaliplatin HIPEC (control arm) or oxaliplatin/irinotecan-HIPEC in combination with single dose of 1-day 5-FU EPIC (experimental arm). 5-FU is administered intraoperatively after CRS-HIPEC and closure of the abdomen. The primary endpoint is 12-month recurrence-free survival. Secondary endpoints include 5-year overall survival, 5-year recurrence-free survival (registry based), postoperative complications, and QoL up to 3 years after study treatment. This phase I/III trial aims to identify a more effective treatment of colorectal peritoneal metastases by combination of HIPEC and EPIC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lana Ghanipour
- Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gastro Intestinal Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Gabriella Jansson Palmer
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, GI Oncology and Colorectal Surgery Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per J. Nilsson
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, GI Oncology and Colorectal Surgery Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Caroline Nordenvall
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, GI Oncology and Colorectal Surgery Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan-Erik Frödin
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elinor Bexe Lindskog
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Dan Asplund
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Torbjörn Swartling
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Wilhelm Graf
- Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gastro Intestinal Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Helgi Birgisson
- Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gastro Intestinal Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ingvar Syk
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Victor Verwaal
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Jenny Brändstedt
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Peter H. Cashin
- Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gastro Intestinal Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mirnezami AH, Drami I, Glyn T, Sutton PA, Tiernan J, Behrenbruch C, Guerra G, Waters PS, Woodward N, Applin S, Charles SJ, Rose SA, Denys A, Pape E, van Ramshorst GH, Baker D, Bignall E, Blair I, Davis P, Edwards T, Jackson K, Leendertse PG, Love-Mott E, MacKenzie L, Martens F, Meredith D, Nettleton SE, Trotman MP, van Hecke JJM, Weemaes AMJ, Abecasis N, Angenete E, Aziz O, Bacalbasa N, Barton D, Baseckas G, Beggs A, Brown K, Buchwald P, Burling D, Burns E, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Chang GJ, Coyne PE, Croner RS, Daniels IR, Denost QD, Drozdov E, Eglinton T, Espín-Basany E, Evans MD, Flatmark K, Folkesson J, Frizelle FA, Gallego MA, Gil-Moreno A, Goffredo P, Griffiths B, Gwenaël F, Harris DA, Iversen LH, Kandaswamy GV, Kazi M, Kelly ME, Kokelaar R, Kusters M, Langheinrich MC, Larach T, Lydrup ML, Lyons A, Mann C, McDermott FD, Monson JRT, Neeff H, Negoi I, Ng JL, Nicolaou M, Palmer G, Parnaby C, Pellino G, Peterson AC, Quyn A, Rogers A, Rothbarth J, Abu Saadeh F, Saklani A, Sammour T, Sayyed R, Smart NJ, Smith T, Sorrentino L, Steele SR, Stitzenberg K, Taylor C, Teras J, Thanapal MR, Thorgersen E, Vasquez-Jimenez W, Waller J, Weber K, Wolthuis A, Winter DC, Brangan G, Vimalachandran D, Aalbers AGJ, Abdul Aziz N, Abraham-Nordling M, Akiyoshi T, Alahmadi R, Alberda W, Albert M, Andric M, Angeles M, Antoniou A, Armitage J, Auer R, Austin KK, Aytac E, Baker RP, Bali M, Baransi S, Bebington B, Bedford M, Bednarski BK, Beets GL, Berg PL, Bergzoll C, Biondo S, Boyle K, Bordeianou L, Brecelj E, Bremers AB, Brunner M, Bui A, Burgess A, Burger JWA, Campain N, Carvalhal S, Castro L, Ceelen W, Chan KKL, Chew MH, Chok AK, Chong P, Christensen HK, Clouston H, Collins D, Colquhoun AJ, Constantinides J, Corr A, Coscia M, Cosimelli M, Cotsoglou C, Damjanovic L, Davies M, Davies RJ, Delaney CP, de Wilt JHW, Deutsch C, Dietz D, Domingo S, Dozois EJ, Duff M, Egger E, Enrique-Navascues JM, Espín-Basany E, Eyjólfsdóttir B, Fahy M, Fearnhead NS, Fichtner-Feigl S, Fleming F, Flor B, Foskett K, Funder J, García-Granero E, García-Sabrido JL, Gargiulo M, Gava VG, Gentilini L, George ML, George V, Georgiou P, Ghosh A, Ghouti L, Giner F, Ginther N, Glover T, Golda T, Gomez CM, Harris C, Hagemans JAW, Hanchanale V, Harji DP, Helbren C, Helewa RM, Hellawell G, Heriot AG, Hochman D, Hohenberger W, Holm T, Holmström A, Hompes R, Hornung B, Hurton S, Hyun E, Ito M, Jenkins JT, Jourand K, Kaffenberger S, Kapur S, Kanemitsu Y, Kaufman M, Kelley SR, Keller DS, Kersting S, Ketelaers SHJ, Khan MS, Khaw J, Kim H, Kim HJ, Kiran R, Koh CE, Kok NFM, Kontovounisios C, Kose F, Koutra M, Kraft M, Kristensen HØ, Kumar S, Lago V, Lakkis Z, Lampe B, Larsen SG, Larson DW, Law WL, Laurberg S, Lee PJ, Limbert M, Loria A, Lynch AC, Mackintosh M, Mantyh C, Mathis KL, Margues CFS, Martinez A, Martling A, Meijerink WJHJ, Merchea A, Merkel S, Mehta AM, McArthur DR, McCormick JJ, McGrath JS, McPhee A, Maciel J, Malde S, Manfredelli S, Mikalauskas S, Modest D, Morton JR, Mullaney TG, Navarro AS, Neto JWM, Nguyen B, Nielsen MB, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson PJ, Nordkamp S, O’Dwyer ST, Paarnio K, Pappou E, Park J, Patsouras D, Peacock O, Pfeffer F, Piqeur F, Pinson J, Poggioli G, Proud D, Quinn M, Oliver A, Radwan RW, Rajendran N, Rao C, Rasheed S, Rasmussen PC, Rausa E, Regenbogen SE, Reims HM, Renehan A, Rintala J, Rocha R, Rochester M, Rohila J, Rottoli M, Roxburgh C, Rutten HJT, Safar B, Sagar PM, Sahai A, Schizas AMP, Schwarzkopf E, Scripcariu D, Scripcariu V, Seifert G, Selvasekar C, Shaban M, Shaikh I, Shida D, Simpson A, Skeie-Jensen T, Smart P, Smith JJ, Solbakken AM, Solomon MJ, Sørensen MM, Spasojevic M, Steffens D, Stocchi L, Stylianides NA, Swartling T, Sumrien H, Swartking T, Takala H, Tan EJ, Taylor D, Tejedor P, Tekin A, Tekkis PP, Thaysen HV, Thurairaja R, Toh EL, Tsarkov P, Tolenaar J, Tsukada Y, Tsukamoto S, Tuech JJ, Turner G, Turner WH, Tuynman JB, Valente M, van Rees J, van Zoggel D, Vásquez-Jiménez W, Verhoef C, Vierimaa M, Vizzielli G, Voogt ELK, Uehara K, Wakeman C, Warrier S, Wasmuth HH, Weiser MR, Westney OL, Wheeler JMD, Wild J, Wilson M, Yano H, Yip B, Yip J, Yoo RN, Zappa MA. The empty pelvis syndrome: a core data set from the PelvEx collaborative. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae042. [PMID: 38456677 PMCID: PMC10921833 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Empty pelvis syndrome (EPS) is a significant source of morbidity following pelvic exenteration (PE), but is undefined. EPS outcome reporting and descriptors of radicality of PE are inconsistent; therefore, the best approaches for prevention are unknown. To facilitate future research into EPS, the aim of this study is to define a measurable core outcome set, core descriptor set and written definition for EPS. Consensus on strategies to mitigate EPS was also explored. METHOD Three-stage consensus methodology was used: longlisting with systematic review, healthcare professional event, patient engagement, and Delphi-piloting; shortlisting with two rounds of modified Delphi; and a confirmatory stage using a modified nominal group technique. This included a selection of measurement instruments, and iterative generation of a written EPS definition. RESULTS One hundred and three and 119 participants took part in the modified Delphi and consensus meetings, respectively. This encompassed international patient and healthcare professional representation with multidisciplinary input. Seventy statements were longlisted, seven core outcomes (bowel obstruction, enteroperineal fistula, chronic perineal sinus, infected pelvic collection, bowel obstruction, morbidity from reconstruction, re-intervention, and quality of life), and four core descriptors (magnitude of surgery, radiotherapy-induced damage, methods of reconstruction, and changes in volume of pelvic dead space) reached consensus-where applicable, measurement of these outcomes and descriptors was defined. A written definition for EPS was agreed. CONCLUSIONS EPS is an area of unmet research and clinical need. This study provides an agreed definition and core data set for EPS to facilitate further research.
Collapse
|
5
|
Rautiola J, Björklund J, Zelic R, Edgren G, Bottai M, Nilsson M, Vincent PH, Fredholm H, Falconer H, Sjövall A, Nilsson PJ, Wiklund P, Aly M, Akre O. Risk of Postoperative Ischemic Stroke and Myocardial Infarction in Patients Operated for Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1739-1748. [PMID: 38091152 PMCID: PMC10838243 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14688-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk assessment for ischemic stroke (IS) and myocardial infarction (MI) is done routinely before surgery, but the increase in risks associated with surgery is not known. The aim of this study is to assess the risk of arterial ischemic events during the first year after oncological surgery. METHODS We used Swedish healthcare databases to identify 443,300 patients who underwent cancer surgery between 1987 and 2016 and 4,127,761 matched comparison subjects. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) for myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke during the hospitalization with logistic regression and calculated 1-year cumulative incidences and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the outcomes after discharge. RESULTS The cumulative incidences of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke during the first postoperative year were 1.33% and 1.25%, respectively. In the comparison cohort, the corresponding 1-year cumulative incidences were 1.04% and 1.00%. During the hospitalization, the OR for myocardial infarction was 8.81 (95% CI 8.24-9.42) and the OR for ischemic stroke was 6.71 (95% CI 6.22-7.23). After discharge, the average HR during follow-up for 365 days was 0.90 (95% CI 0.87-0.93) for myocardial infarction and 1.02 (95% CI 0.99-1.05) for ischemic stroke. CONCLUSIONS We found an overall increased risk of IS and MI during the first year after cancer surgery that was attributable to events occurring during the hospitalization period. After discharge from the hospital, the overall risk of myocardial infarction was lower among the cancer surgery patients than among matched comparison subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juhana Rautiola
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Johan Björklund
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Renata Zelic
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gustaf Edgren
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Cardiology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Matteo Bottai
- Division of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magnus Nilsson
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Henrik Vincent
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hanna Fredholm
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Falconer
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Annika Sjövall
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Markus Aly
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Olof Akre
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rautiola J, Björklund J, Zelic R, Edgren G, Bottai M, Nilsson M, Vincent PH, Fredholm H, Falconer H, Sjövall A, Nilsson PJ, Wiklund P, Aly M, Akre O. ASO Author Reflections: Arterial Ischemic Events Following Cancer Surgery: Where Do We Stand? Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1789-1790. [PMID: 38206503 PMCID: PMC10838233 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14816-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Juhana Rautiola
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Johan Björklund
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Renata Zelic
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gustaf Edgren
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Cardiology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Matteo Bottai
- Division of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magnus Nilsson
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Henrik Vincent
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hanna Fredholm
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Falconer
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Annika Sjövall
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Markus Aly
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Olof Akre
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Björklund J, Rautiola J, Zelic R, Edgren G, Bottai M, Nilsson M, Vincent PH, Fredholm H, Falconer H, Sjövall A, Nilsson PJ, Wiklund P, Aly M, Akre O. Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Events After Surgery for Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2354352. [PMID: 38306100 PMCID: PMC10837742 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance The risks and benefits of thromboprophylaxis therapy after cancer surgery are debated. Studies that determine thrombosis risk after cancer surgery with high accuracy are needed. Objectives To evaluate 1-year risk of venous thromboembolic events after major cancer surgery and how these events vary over time. Design, Setting, and Participants This register-based retrospective observational matched cohort study included data on the full population of Sweden between 1998 and 2016. All patients who underwent major surgery for cancer of the bladder, breast, colon or rectum, gynecologic organs, kidney and upper urothelial tract, lung, prostate, or gastroesophageal tract were matched in a 1:10 ratio with cancer-free members of the general population on year of birth, sex, and county of residence. Data were analyzed from February 13 to December 5, 2023. Exposure Major surgery for cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was incidence of venous thromboembolic events within 1 year after the surgery. Crude absolute risks and risk differences of events within 1 year and adjusted time-dependent cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) of postdischarge events were calculated. Results A total of 432 218 patients with cancer (median age, 67 years [IQR, 58-75 years]; 68.7% women) and 4 009 343 cancer-free comparators (median age, 66 years [IQR, 57-74 years]; 69.3% women) were included in the study. The crude 1-year cumulative risk of pulmonary embolism was higher among the cancer surgery population for all cancers, with the following absolute risk differences: for bladder cancer, 2.69 percentage points (95% CI, 2.33-3.05 percentage points); for breast cancer, 0.59 percentage points (95% CI 0.55-0.63 percentage points); for colorectal cancer, 1.57 percentage points (95% CI, 1.50-1.65 percentage points); for gynecologic organ cancer, 1.32 percentage points (95% CI, 1.22-1.41 percentage points); for kidney and upper urinary tract cancer, 1.38 percentage points (95% CI, 1.21-1.55 percentage points); for lung cancer, 2.61 percentage points (95% CI, 2.34-2.89 percentage points); for gastroesophageal cancer, 2.13 percentage points (95% CI, 1.89-2.38 percentage points); and for prostate cancer, 0.57 percentage points (95% CI, 0.49-0.66 percentage points). The cause-specific HR of pulmonary embolism comparing patients who underwent cancer surgery with matched comparators peaked just after discharge and generally plateaued 60 to 90 days later. At 30 days after surgery, the HR was 10 to 30 times higher than in the comparison cohort for all cancers except breast cancer (colorectal cancer: HR, 9.18 [95% CI, 8.03-10.50]; lung cancer: HR, 25.66 [95% CI, 17.41-37.84]; breast cancer: HR, 5.18 [95% CI, 4.45-6.05]). The hazards subsided but never reached the level of the comparison cohort except for prostate cancer. Similar results were observed for deep vein thrombosis. Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study found an increased rate of venous thromboembolism associated with cancer surgery. The risk persisted for about 2 to 4 months postoperatively but varied between cancer types. The increased rate is likely explained by the underlying cancer disease and adjuvant treatments. The results highlight the need for individualized venous thromboembolism risk evaluation and prophylaxis regimens for patients undergoing different surgery for different cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Björklund
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Juhana Rautiola
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Renata Zelic
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gustaf Edgren
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Cardiology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Matteo Bottai
- Division of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magnus Nilsson
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Henrik Vincent
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hanna Fredholm
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Falconer
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Annika Sjövall
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per J. Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Markus Aly
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Olof Akre
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nilsson PJ, van Etten B, Hospers GAP, Marijnen CAM, Meershoek-Klein Kranenberg E, Roodvoets AGH, van de Velde CJH, Glimelius B. Comment on the RAPIDO Trial Point-Counterpoint Debate. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:e126. [PMID: 37889954 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Boudewijn van Etten
- University Medical Centre Groningen: Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Geke A P Hospers
- University Medical Centre Groningen: Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Netherlands Cancer Institute: Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Annet G H Roodvoets
- Leiden University Medical Center: Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nilsson PJ. T3 N1 M0 rectal cancer: optimal initial management is total neoadjuvant therapy. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znad322. [PMID: 37995257 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Axelsson A, Johansson M, Haglind E, Li Y, Nilsson PJ, Angenete E. Patient reported long-term side effects on bowel function and anal pain in anal cancer survivors - 3- and 6-year results from the Swedish national ANCA study. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:54-62. [PMID: 38010060 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
AIM The primary therapeutic option for anal cancer treatment is chemoradiotherapy resulting in 80% survival. The aim of this study was to assess long-term bowel function impairment and anal pain at 3 and 6 years after anal cancer diagnosis, based on a hypothesis of an increase in impairment over time. A secondary aim was to investigate if chemoradiotherapy increased the risk for bowel impairment, compared to radiotherapy alone. METHOD The ANal CAncer study (ANCA) consists of a national Swedish cohort of patients diagnosed with anal cancer between 2011-2013. Patients within the study were invited to respond to a study-specific questionnaire at 3- and 6-years after diagnosis. Descriptive analyses for the primary endpoint and ordinal logistic regressions for secondary endpoint were performed. RESULTS A total of 388 patients (84%) were included in the study. At 3 years of follow-up, 264 patients were alive. A total of 195 of these patients (74%) answered a study specific questionnaire, and at 6 years 154 patients (67%). Fifty-seven percent experienced bowel urgency at both 3 and 6 years. There was an increased risk for repeated bowel movement within 1 h (OR 2.44 [95% CI: 1.08-5.61, p = 0.03]) at 3 years in patients who had been treated by chemoradiation compared to radiotherapy alone. CONCLUSIONS Impairment in bowel function and anal pain after anal cancer treatment should be expected and remains after 6 years. This suggests that long-term follow-up may be necessary in some form after customary follow-up. The addition of chemotherapy increases long-term side effects of bowel function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Axelsson
- Department of Surgery, SSORG-Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Sahlgrenska, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mia Johansson
- Department of Oncology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Sahlgrenska, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eva Haglind
- Department of Surgery, SSORG-Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ying Li
- Department of Surgery, SSORG-Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Angenete
- Department of Surgery, SSORG-Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zwart WH, Dijkstra EA, Putter H, Marijnen CAM, Nilsson PJ, van de Velde CJH, van Etten B, Hospers GAP, Glimelius B. Corrigendum to "Authors' reply-Does the RAPIDO trial suggest a benefit of post-operative chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiation in rectal cancer? No, it does not": [ESMO Open 8 (2023) 101645]. ESMO Open 2023; 8:102042. [PMID: 37866027 PMCID: PMC10598700 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- W H Zwart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen.
| | - E A Dijkstra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen
| | - H Putter
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - C A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - B van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - G A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen
| | - B Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Prata I, Eriksson M, Krdzalic J, Kranenbarg EMK, Roodvoets AGH, Beets-Tan R, van de Velde CJH, van Etten B, Hospers GAP, Glimelius B, Nilsson PJ, Marijnen CAM, Peeters KCMJ, Blomqvist LK. Results of a diagnostic imaging audit in a randomised clinical trial in rectal cancer highlight the importance of careful planning and quality control. Insights Imaging 2023; 14:206. [PMID: 38001376 PMCID: PMC10673763 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-023-01552-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the modality used for baseline assessment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and restaging after neoadjuvant treatment. The overall audited quality of MR imaging in large multicentre trials on rectal cancer is so far not routinely reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS We collected MR images obtained within the Rectal Cancer And Pre-operative Induction Therapy Followed by Dedicated Operation (RAPIDO) trial and performed an audit of the technical features of image acquisition. The required MR sequences and slice thickness stated in the RAPIDO protocol were used as a reference. RESULTS Out of 920 participants of the RAPIDO study, MR investigations of 668 and 623 patients in the baseline and restaging setting, respectively, were collected. Of these, 304/668 (45.5%) and 328/623 (52.6%) MR images, respectively, fulfilled the technical quality criteria. The main reason for non-compliance was exceeding slice thickness 238/668, 35.6% in the baseline setting and 162/623, 26.0% in the restaging setting. In 166/668, 24.9% and 168/623, 27.0% MR images in the baseline and restaging setting, respectively, one or more of the required pulse sequences were missing. CONCLUSION Altogether, 49.0% of the MR images obtained within the RAPIDO trial fulfilled the image acquisition criteria required in the study protocol. High-quality MR imaging should be expected for the appropriate initial treatment and response evaluation of patients with LARC, and efforts should be made to maximise the quality of imaging in clinical trials and in clinical practice. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT This audit highlights the importance of adherence to MR image acquisition criteria for rectal cancer, both in multicentre trials and in daily clinical practice. High-resolution images allow correct staging, treatment stratification and evaluation of response to neoadjuvant treatment. KEY POINTS - Complying to MR acquisition guidelines in multicentre trials is challenging. - Neglection on MR acquisition criteria leads to poor staging and treatment. - MR acquisition guidelines should be followed in trials and clinical practice. - Researchers should consider mandatory audits prior to study initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Prata
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Martina Eriksson
- Department of Radiology, Capio S:T Göran Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jasenko Krdzalic
- Department of Radiology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Geleen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Annet G H Roodvoets
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Regina Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Boudewijn van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Geke A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Koen C M J Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Lennart K Blomqvist
- Department of Radiation Physics/Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
West CT, West MA, Mirnezami AH, Drami I, Denys A, Glyn T, Sutton PA, Tiernan J, Behrenbruch C, Guerra G, Waters PS, Woodward N, Applin S, Charles SJ, Rose SA, Pape E, van Ramshorst GH, Aalbers AGJ, Abdul AN, Abecasis N, Abraham-Nordling M, Akiyoshi T, Alahmadi R, Alberda W, Albert M, Andric M, Angeles M, Angenete E, Antoniou A, Armitage J, Auer R, Austin KK, Aytac E, Aziz O, Bacalbasa N, Baker RP, Bali M, Baransi S, Baseckas G, Bebington B, Bedford M, Bednarski BK, Beets GL, Berg PL, Bergzoll C, Biondo S, Boyle K, Bordeianou L, Brecelj E, Bremers AB, Brown K, Brunner M, Buchwald P, Bui A, Burgess A, Burger JWA, Burling D, Burns E, Campain N, Carvalhal S, Castro L, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Ceelen W, Chan KKL, Chang GJ, Chew MH, Chok AK, Chong P, Christensen HK, Clouston H, Collins D, Colquhoun AJ, Constantinides J, Corr A, Coscia M, Cosimelli M, Cotsoglou C, Coyne PE, Croner RS, Damjanovic L, Daniels IR, Davies M, Davies RJ, Delaney CP, de Wilt JHW, Denost QD, Deutsch C, Dietz D, Domingo S, Dozois EJ, Drozdov E, Duff M, Egger E, Eglinton T, Enrique-Navascues JM, Espín-Basany E, Evans MD, Eyjólfsdóttir B, Fahy M, Fearnhead NS, Fichtner-Feigl S, Flatmark K, Fleming F, Flor B, Folkesson J, Foskett K, Frizelle FA, Funder J, Gallego MA, García-Granero E, García-Sabrido JL, Gargiulo M, Gava VG, Gentilini L, George ML, George V, Georgiou P, Ghosh A, Ghouti L, Gil-Moreno A, Giner F, Ginther N, Glover T, Goffredo P, Golda T, Gomez CM, Griffiths B, Gwenaël F, Harris C, Harris DA, Hagemans JAW, Hanchanale V, Harji DP, Helbren C, Helewa RM, Hellawell G, Heriot AG, Hochman D, Hohenberger W, Holm T, Holmström A, Hompes R, Hornung B, Hurton S, Hyun E, Ito M, Iversen LH, Jenkins JT, Jourand K, Kaffenberger S, Kandaswamy GV, Kapur S, Kanemitsu Y, Kaufman M, Kazi M, Kelley SR, Keller DS, Kelly ME, Kersting S, Ketelaers SHJ, Khan MS, Khaw J, Kim H, Kim HJ, Kiran R, Koh CE, Kok NFM, Kokelaar R, Kontovounisios C, Kose F, Koutra M, Kraft M, Kristensen HØ, Kumar S, Kusters M, Lago V, Lakkis Z, Lampe B, Langheinrich MC, Larach T, Larsen SG, Larson DW, Law WL, Laurberg S, Lee PJ, Limbert M, Loria A, Lydrup ML, Lyons A, Lynch AC, Mackintosh M, Mann C, Mantyh C, Mathis KL, Margues CFS, Martinez A, Martling A, Meijerink WJHJ, Merchea A, Merkel S, Mehta AM, McArthur DR, McCormick JJ, McDermott FD, McGrath JS, McPhee A, Maciel J, Malde S, Manfredelli S, Mikalauskas S, Modest D, Monson JRT, Morton JR, Mullaney TG, Navarro AS, Neeff H, Negoi I, Neto JWM, Nguyen B, Nielsen MB, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson PJ, Nordkamp S, O’Dwyer ST, Paarnio K, Palmer G, Pappou E, Park J, Patsouras D, Peacock A, Pellino G, Peterson AC, Pfeffer F, Piqeur F, Pinson J, Poggioli G, Proud D, Quinn M, Oliver A, Quyn A, Radwan RW, Rajendran N, Rao C, Rasheed S, Rasmussen PC, Rausa E, Regenbogen SE, Reims HM, Renehan A, Rintala J, Rocha R, Rochester M, Rohila J, Rothbarth J, Rottoli M, Roxburgh C, Rutten HJT, Safar B, Sagar PM, Sahai A, Saklani A, Sammour T, Sayyed R, Schizas AMP, Schwarzkopf E, Scripcariu D, Scripcariu V, Seifert G, Selvasekar C, Shaban M, Shaikh I, Shida D, Simpson A, Skeie-Jensen T, Smart NJ, Smart P, Smith JJ, Smith T, Solbakken AM, Solomon MJ, Sørensen MM, Spasojevic M, Steele SR, Steffens D, Stitzenberg K, Stocchi L, Stylianides NA, Swartling T, Sumrien H, Swartking T, Takala H, Tan EJ, Taylor C, Taylor D, Tejedor P, Tekin A, Tekkis PP, Teras J, Thanapal MR, Thaysen HV, Thorgersen E, Thurairaja R, Toh EL, Tsarkov P, Tolenaar J, Tsukada Y, Tsukamoto S, Tuech JJ, Turner G, Turner WH, Tuynman JB, Valente M, van Rees J, van Zoggel D, Vásquez-Jiménez W, Verhoef C, Vierimaa M, Vizzielli G, Voogt ELK, Uehara K, Wakeman C, Warrier S, Wasmuth HH, Weber K, Weiser MR, Westney OL, Wheeler JMD, Wild J, Wilson M, Wolthuis A, Yano H, Yip B, Yip J, Yoo RN, Zappa MA, Winter DC. Empty pelvis syndrome: PelvEx Collaborative guideline proposal. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1730-1731. [PMID: 37757457 PMCID: PMC10805575 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
|
14
|
Temmink SJD, Martling A, Angenete E, Nilsson PJ. Complete response rates in rectal cancer: Temporal changes over a decade in a population-based nationwide cohort. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:106991. [PMID: 37495447 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.106991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the past decade many changes in neoadjuvant treatment for patients with rectal cancer have taken place and are expected to impact complete response rates. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact on pathological, and overall, complete response rates in a nationwide population-based cohort, in relation to changes in neoadjuvant treatment and the start of a Watch & Wait (WoW) study. MATERIALS AND METHODS A nationwide register study using prospectively collected data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Register between 2009 and 2020. Patients with rectal cancer stage I-III with a ypT0N0 in the resected specimen after neoadjuvant treatment and clinical complete responders from the yearly inclusion data of the national WoW study were included. Temporal changes in pathological and overall complete response rates were analysed, and differences in neoadjuvant treatment regimens over time and per region were studied. RESULTS Between 2009 and 2020 the pathological complete response rate for rectal cancer remained similar (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.091, p = 0.68) while the overall complete response rate increased significantly from 3.0% to 9.6% (Mann-Kendall tau of 0.818, p < 0.001). The pathological complete response rate for patients receiving short course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy was reduced by 50% after the introduction of the WoW study. CONCLUSIONS During the studied time period the overall complete response rate increased significantly presumably due to changes in national neoadjuvant treatment regimens. Since the start of the national WoW study clinical complete response seem to partly replace pathological complete response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofieke J D Temmink
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Anna Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Eva Angenete
- Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dijkstra EA, Nilsson PJ, Hospers GA, Bahadoer RR, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Roodvoets AG, Putter H, Berglund Å, Cervantes A, Crolla RM, Hendriks MP, Capdevila J, Edhemovic I, Marijnen CA, van de Velde CJ, Glimelius B, van Etten B. Locoregional Failure During and After Short-course Radiotherapy Followed by Chemotherapy and Surgery Compared With Long-course Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery: A 5-Year Follow-up of the RAPIDO Trial. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e766-e772. [PMID: 36661037 PMCID: PMC10481913 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 62.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze risk and patterns of locoregional failure (LRF) in patients of the RAPIDO trial at 5 years. BACKGROUND Multimodality treatment improves local control in rectal cancer. Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) aims to improve systemic control while local control is maintained. At 3 years, LRF rate was comparable between TNT and chemoradiotherapy in the RAPIDO trial. METHODS A total of 920 patients were randomized between an experimental (EXP, short-course radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery) and a standard-care group (STD, chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and optional postoperative chemotherapy). LRFs, including early LRF (no resection except for organ preservation/R2 resection) and locoregional recurrence (LRR) after an R0/R1 resection, were analyzed. RESULTS Totally, 460 EXP and 446 STD patients were eligible. At 5.6 years (median follow-up), LRF was detected in 54/460 (12%) and 36/446 (8%) patients in the EXP and STD groups, respectively ( P =0.07), in which EXP patients were more often treated with 3-dimensional-conformed radiotherapy ( P =0.029). In the EXP group, LRR was detected more often [44/431 (10%) vs. 26/428 (6%); P =0.027], with more often a breached mesorectum (9/44 (21%) vs. 1/26 (4); P =0.048). The EXP treatment, enlarged lateral lymph nodes, positive circumferential resection margin, tumor deposits, and node positivity at pathology were the significant predictors for developing LRR. Location of the LRRs was similar between groups. Overall survival after LRF was comparable [hazard ratio: 0.76 (95% CI, 0.46-1.26); P =0.29]. CONCLUSIONS The EXP treatment was associated with an increased risk of LRR, whereas the reduction in disease-related treatment failure and distant metastases remained after 5 years. Further refinement of the TNT in rectal cancer is mandated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmée A. Dijkstra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Per J. Nilsson
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Geke A.P. Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Renu R. Bahadoer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Annet G.H. Roodvoets
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hein Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Åke Berglund
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Andrés Cervantes
- Department of medical oncology, Biomedical Research Institute Incliva, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Jaume Capdevila
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall Hebron University Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ibrahim Edhemovic
- Department of surgical oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Corrie A.M. Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Boudewijn van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zwart WH, Dijkstra EA, Putter H, Marijnen CAM, Nilsson PJ, van de Velde CJH, van Etten B, Hospers GAP, Glimelius B. Authors' reply-Does the RAPIDO trial suggest a benefit of post-operative chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiation in rectal cancer? No, it does not. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101645. [PMID: 37713932 PMCID: PMC10511774 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- W H Zwart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - E A Dijkstra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - H Putter
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - C A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - B van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - G A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - B Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Temmink SJD, Peeters KCMJ, Renehan AG, Pares O, Perez RO, Nilsson PJ. Author response to: Comment on: Outcomes following watch and wait of a clinical complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment: comparison of patients with and without complete response at first reassessment in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD). Br J Surg 2023; 110:1242. [PMID: 37348060 PMCID: PMC10416698 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sofieke J D Temmink
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Koen C M J Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew G Renehan
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Oriol Pares
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Rodrigo O Perez
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa, São Paulo, Brazil; Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, São Paulo Branch, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Temmink SJD, Peeters KCMJ, Bahadoer RR, Kranenbarg EMK, Roodvoets AGH, Melenhorst J, Burger JWA, Wolthuis A, Renehan AG, Figueiredo NL, Pares O, Martling A, Perez RO, Beets GL, van de Velde CJH, Nilsson PJ. Watch and wait after neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer: comparison of outcomes in patients with and without a complete response at first reassessment in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD). Br J Surg 2023; 110:676-684. [PMID: 36972213 PMCID: PMC10364523 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In rectal cancer, watch and wait for patients with a cCR after neoadjuvant treatment has an established evidence base. However, there is a lack of consensus on the definition and management of a near-cCR. This study aimed to compare outcomes in patients who achieved a cCR at first reassessment versus later reassessment. METHODS This registry study included patients from the International Watch & Wait Database. Patients were categorized as having a cCR at first reassessment or at later reassessment (that is near-cCR at first reassessment) based on MRI and endoscopy. Organ preservation, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival rates were calculated. Subgroup analyses were done for near-cCR groups based on the response evaluation according to modality. RESULTS A total of 1010 patients were identified. At first reassessment, 608 patients had a cCR; 402 had a cCR at later reassessment. Median follow-up was 2.6 years for patients with a cCR at first reassessment and 2.9 years for those with a cCR at later reassessment. The 2-year organ preservation rate was 77.8 (95 per cent c.i. 74.2 to 81.5) and 79.3 (75.1 to 83.7) per cent respectively (P = 0.499). Similarly, no differences were found between groups in distant metastasis-free survival or overall survival rate. Subgroup analyses showed a higher organ preservation rate in the group with a near-cCR categorized exclusively by MRI. CONCLUSION Oncological outcomes for patients with a cCR at later reassessment are no worse than those of patients with a cCR at first reassessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofieke J D Temmink
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Koen C M J Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Renu R Bahadoer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Annet G H Roodvoets
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jarno Melenhorst
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Albert Wolthuis
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Andrew G Renehan
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Oriol Pares
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Anna Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rodrigo O Perez
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa, São Paulo, Brazil
- Colorectal Surgery Division, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, São Paulo Branch, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Geerard L Beets
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dijkstra EA, Zwart WH, Putter H, Marijnen CAM, Nilsson PJ, van de Velde CJH, van Etten B, Hospers GAP, Glimelius B. Authors' reply-A sensitivity analysis of the RAPIDO clinical trial. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:446-447. [PMID: 36581138 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- E A Dijkstra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - W H Zwart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - H Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - B van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - G A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - B Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dijkstra EA, Zwart WH, Nilsson PJ, Putter H, Roodvoets AGH, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Frödin JE, Nygren P, Østergaard L, Kersten C, Verbiené I, Cervantes A, Hendriks MP, Capdevila J, Edhemovic I, van de Velde CJH, Marijnen CAM, van Etten B, Hospers GAP, Glimelius B. The value of post-operative chemotherapy after chemoradiotherapy in patients with high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer-results from the RAPIDO trial. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101158. [PMID: 36871393 PMCID: PMC10163161 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) rather than radiotherapy (RT) has resulted in fewer locoregional recurrences (LRRs), but no decrease in distant metastasis (DM) rate for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). In many countries, patients receive post-operative chemotherapy (pCT) to improve oncological outcomes. We investigated the value of pCT after pre-operative CRT in the RAPIDO trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomised between experimental (short-course RT, chemotherapy and surgery) and standard-of-care treatment (CRT, surgery and pCT depending on hospital policy). In this substudy, we compared curatively resected patients from the standard-of-care group who received pCT (pCT+ group) with those who did not (pCT- group). Subsequently, patients from the pCT+ group who received at least 75% of the prescribed chemotherapy cycles (pCT ≥75% group) were compared with patients who did not receive pCT (pCT-/- group). By propensity score stratification (PSS), we adjusted for the following unbalanced confounders: age, clinical extramural vascular invasion, distance to the anal verge, ypT stage, ypN stage, residual tumour, serious adverse event (SAE) and/or readmission within 6 weeks after surgery and SAE related to pre-operative CRT. Cumulative probability of disease-free survival (DFS), DM, LRR and overall survival (OS) was analysed by Cox regression. RESULTS In total, 396/452 patients had a curative resection. The number of patients in the pCT+, pCT >75%, pCT- and pCT-/- groups was 184, 112, 154 and 149, respectively. The PSS-adjusted analyses for all endpoints demonstrated hazard ratios between approximately 0.7 and 0.8 (pCT+ versus pCT-), and 0.5 and 0.8 (pCT ≥75% versus pCT-/-). However, all 95% confidence intervals included 1. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest a benefit of pCT after pre-operative CRT for patients with high-risk LARC, with approximately 20%-25% improvement in DFS and OS and 20%-25% risk reductions in DM and LRR. Compliance with pCT additionally reduces or improves all endpoints by 10%-20%. However, differences are not statistically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E A Dijkstra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - W H Zwart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H Putter
- Departments of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - A G H Roodvoets
- Departments of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - J E Frödin
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Uppsala
| | - P Nygren
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - L Østergaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - C Kersten
- Department of Research, Sørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - I Verbiené
- Department of Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - A Cervantes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Biomedical Research Institute Incliva, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - M P Hendriks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
| | - J Capdevila
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall Hebron University Hospital. Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Edhemovic
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - C J H van de Velde
- Departments of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - C A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - B van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - G A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - B Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bahadoer RR, Hospers GA, Marijnen CA, Peeters KC, Putter H, Dijkstra EA, Kranenbarg EMK, Roodvoets AG, van Etten B, Nilsson PJ, Glimelius B, van de Velde CJ. Risk and location of distant metastases in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after total neoadjuvant treatment or chemoradiotherapy in the RAPIDO trial. Eur J Cancer 2023; 185:139-149. [PMID: 36996624 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although optimising rectal cancer treatment has reduced local recurrence rates, many patients develop distant metastases (DM). The current study investigated whether a total neoadjuvant treatment strategy influences the development, location, and timing of metastases in patients diagnosed with high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer included in the Rectal cancer And Pre-operative Induction therapy followed by Dedicated Operation (RAPIDO) trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to short-course radiotherapy followed by 18 weeks of CAPOX or FOLFOX4 before surgery (EXP), or long-course chemoradiotherapy with optional postoperative chemotherapy (SC-G). Assessments for metastatic disease were performed pre- and post-treatment, during surgery, and 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months postoperatively. From randomisation, differences in the occurrence of DM and first site of metastasis were evaluated. RESULTS In total, 462 patients were evaluated in the EXP and 450 patients in the SC-G groups. The cumulative probability of DM at 5 years after randomisation was 23% [95% CI 19-27] and 30% [95% CI 26-35] (HR 0.72 [95% CI 0.56-0.93]; P = 0.011) in the EXP and SC-G, respectively. The median time to DM was 1.4 (EXP) and 1.3 years (SC-G). After diagnosis of DM, median survival was 2.6 years [95% CI 2.0-3.1] in the EXP and 3.2 years [95% CI 2.3-4.1] in the SC-G groups (HR 1.39 [95% CI 1.01-1.92]; P = 0.04). First occurrence of DM was most often in the lungs (60/462 [13%] EXP and 55/450 [12%] SC-G) or the liver (40/462 [9%] EXP and 69/450 [15%] SC-G). A hospital policy of postoperative chemotherapy did not influence the development of DM. CONCLUSIONS Compared to long-course chemoradiotherapy, total neoadjuvant treatment with short-course radiotherapy and chemotherapy significantly decreased the occurrence of metastases, particularly liver metastases.
Collapse
|
22
|
Fahy MR, Kelly ME, Aalbers AGJ, Abdul Aziz N, Abecasis N, Abraham-Nordling M, Akiyoshi T, Alberda W, Albert M, Andric M, Angeles MA, Angenete E, Antoniou A, Auer R, Austin KK, Aytac E, Aziz O, Bacalbasa N, Baker RP, Bali M, Baransi S, Baseckas G, Bebington B, Bedford M, Bednarski BK, Beets GL, Berg PL, Bergzoll C, Beynon J, Biondo S, Boyle K, Bordeianou L, Brecelj E, Bremers AB, Brunner M, Buchwald P, Bui A, Burgess A, Burger JWA, Burling D, Burns E, Campain N, Carvalhal S, Castro L, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Ceelan W, Chan KKL, Chang GJ, Chang M, Chew MH, Chok AY, Chong P, Clouston H, Codd M, Collins D, Colquhoun AJ, Constantinides J, Corr A, Coscia M, Cosimelli M, Cotsoglou C, Coyne PE, Croner RS, Damjanovich L, Daniels IR, Davies M, Delaney CP, de Wilt JHW, Denost Q, Deutsch C, Dietz D, Domingo S, Dozois EJ, Drozdov E, Duff M, Eglinton T, Enriquez-Navascues JM, Espín-Basany E, Evans MD, Eyjólfsdóttir B, Fearnhead NS, Ferron G, Flatmark K, Fleming FJ, Flor B, Folkesson J, Frizelle FA, Funder J, Gallego MA, Gargiulo M, García-Granero E, García-Sabrido JL, Gargiulo M, Gava VG, Gentilini L, George ML, George V, Georgiou P, Ghosh A, Ghouti L, Gil-Moreno A, Giner F, Ginther DN, Glyn T, Glynn R, Golda T, Griffiths B, Harris DA, Hagemans JAW, Hanchanale V, Harji DP, Helewa RM, Hellawell G, Heriot AG, Hochman D, Hohenberger W, Holm T, Hompes R, Hornung B, Hurton S, Hyun E, Ito M, Iversen LH, Jenkins JT, Jourand K, Kaffenberger S, Kandaswamy GV, Kapur S, Kanemitsu Y, Kazi M, Kelley SR, Keller DS, Ketelaers SHJ, Khan MS, Kiran RP, Kim H, Kim HJ, Koh CE, Kok NFM, Kokelaar R, Kontovounisios C, Kose F, Koutra M, Kristensen HØ, Kroon HM, Kumar S, Kusters M, Lago V, Lampe B, Lakkis Z, Larach JT, Larkin JO, Larsen SG, Larson DW, Law WL, Lee PJ, Limbert M, Loria A, Lydrup ML, Lyons A, Lynch AC, Maciel J, Manfredelli S, Mann C, Mantyh C, Mathis KL, Marques CFS, Martinez A, Martling A, Mehigan BJ, Meijerink WJHJ, Merchea A, Merkel S, Mehta AM, Mikalauskas S, McArthur DR, McCormick JJ, McCormick P, McDermott FD, McGrath JS, Malde S, Mirnezami A, Monson JRT, Navarro AS, Negoi I, Neto JWM, Ng JL, Nguyen B, Nielsen MB, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson PJ, Nordkamp S, Nugent T, Oliver A, O’Dwyer ST, O’Sullivan NJ, Paarnio K, Palmer G, Pappou E, Park J, Patsouras D, Peacock O, Pellino G, Peterson AC, Pinson J, Poggioli G, Proud D, Quinn M, Quyn A, Rajendran N, Radwan RW, Rajendran N, Rao C, Rasheed S, Rausa E, Regenbogen SE, Reims HM, Renehan A, Rintala J, Rocha R, Rochester M, Rohila J, Rothbarth J, Rottoli M, Roxburgh C, Rutten HJT, Safar B, Sagar PM, Sahai A, Saklani A, Sammour T, Sayyed R, Schizas AMP, Schwarzkopf E, Scripcariu D, Scripcariu V, Selvasekar C, Shaikh I, Simpson A, Skeie-Jensen T, Smart NJ, Smart P, Smith JJ, Solbakken AM, Solomon MJ, Sørensen MM, Sorrentino L, Steele SR, Steffens D, Stitzenberg K, Stocchi L, Stylianides NA, Swartling T, Spasojevic M, Sumrien H, Sutton PA, Swartking T, Takala H, Tan EJ, Taylor C, Tekin A, Tekkis PP, Teras J, Thaysen HV, Thurairaja R, Thorgersen EB, Toh EL, Tsarkov P, Tsukada Y, Tsukamoto S, Tuech JJ, Turner WH, Tuynman JB, Valente M, van Ramshorst GH, van Zoggel D, Vasquez-Jimenez W, Vather R, Verhoef C, Vierimaa M, Vizzielli G, Voogt ELK, Uehara K, Urrejola G, Wakeman C, Warrier SK, Wasmuth HH, Waters PS, Weber K, Weiser MR, Wheeler JMD, Wild J, Williams A, Wilson M, Wolthuis A, Yano H, Yip B, Yip J, Yoo RN, Zappa MA, Winter DC. Minimum standards of pelvic exenterative practice: PelvEx Collaborative guideline. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1251-1263. [PMID: 36170347 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This document outlines the important aspects of caring for patients who have been diagnosed with advanced pelvic cancer. It is primarily aimed at those who are establishing a service that adequately caters to this patient group. The relevant literature has been summarized and an attempt made to simplify the approach to management of these complex cases.
Collapse
|
23
|
Dijkstra EA, Hospers GAP, Kranenbarg EMK, Fleer J, Roodvoets AGH, Bahadoer RR, Guren MG, Tjalma JJJ, Putter H, Crolla RMPH, Hendriks MP, Capdevila J, Radu C, van de Velde CJH, Nilsson PJ, Glimelius B, van Etten B, Marijnen CAM. Quality of life and late toxicity after short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer - The RAPIDO trial. Radiother Oncol 2022; 171:69-76. [PMID: 35447283 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The RAPIDO trial demonstrated a decrease in disease-related treatment failure (DrTF) and an increase in pathological complete responses (pCR) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients receiving total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) compared to conventional chemoradiotherapy. This study examines health-related quality of life (HRQL), bowel function, and late toxicity in patients in the trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients were randomized between short-course radiotherapy followed by pre-operative chemotherapy (EXP), or chemoradiotherapy and optional post-operative chemotherapy (STD). The STD group was divided into patients who did (STD+) and did not (STD-) receive post-operative chemotherapy. Three years after surgery patients received HRQL (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29 and QLQ-CIPN20) and LARS questionnaires. Patients who experienced a DrTF event before the toxicity assessments (6, 12, 24, or 36 months) were excluded from analyses. RESULTS Of 574 eligible patients, 495 questionnaires were returned (86%) and 453 analyzed (79% completed within time limits). No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29 or LARS scores. Sensory-related symptoms occurred significantly more often in the EXP group compared to all STD patients, but not compared to STD+ patients. Any toxicity of any grade and grade ≥ 3 toxicity was comparable between the EXP and STD groups at all time-points. Neurotoxicity grade 1-2 occurred significantly more often in the EXP and STD+ group at all time-points compared to the STD- group. CONCLUSION The results demonstrate that TNT for LARC, yielding improved DrTF and pCRs, does not compromise HRQL, bowel functional or results in more grade ≥3 toxicity compared to standard chemoradiotherapy at three years after surgery in DrTF-free patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmée A Dijkstra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Geke A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Joke Fleer
- Department of Health Sciences, Section Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Renu R Bahadoer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jolien J J Tjalma
- Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Hein Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mathijs P Hendriks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
| | - Jaume Capdevila
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall Hebron University Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Spain
| | - Calin Radu
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | | | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | - Boudewijn van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lambregts DMJ, Bogveradze N, Blomqvist LK, Fokas E, Garcia-Aguilar J, Glimelius B, Gollub MJ, Konishi T, Marijnen CAM, Nagtegaal ID, Nilsson PJ, Perez RO, Snaebjornsson P, Taylor SA, Tolan DJM, Valentini V, West NP, Wolthuis A, Lahaye MJ, Maas M, Beets GL, Beets-Tan RGH. Current controversies in TNM for the radiological staging of rectal cancer and how to deal with them: results of a global online survey and multidisciplinary expert consensus. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:4991-5003. [PMID: 35254485 PMCID: PMC9213337 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08591-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To identify the main problem areas in the applicability of the current TNM staging system (8th ed.) for the radiological staging and reporting of rectal cancer and provide practice recommendations on how to handle them.
Methods
A global case-based online survey was conducted including 41 image-based rectal cancer cases focusing on various items included in the TNM system. Cases reaching < 80% agreement among survey respondents were identified as problem areas and discussed among an international expert panel, including 5 radiologists, 6 colorectal surgeons, 4 radiation oncologists, and 3 pathologists.
Results
Three hundred twenty-one respondents (from 32 countries) completed the survey. Sixteen problem areas were identified, related to cT staging in low-rectal cancers, definitions for cT4b and cM1a disease, definitions for mesorectal fascia (MRF) involvement, evaluation of lymph nodes versus tumor deposits, and staging of lateral lymph nodes. The expert panel recommended strategies on how to handle these, including advice on cT-stage categorization in case of involvement of different layers of the anal canal, specifications on which structures to include in the definition of cT4b disease, how to define MRF involvement by the primary tumor and other tumor-bearing structures, how to differentiate and report lymph nodes and tumor deposits on MRI, and how to anatomically localize and stage lateral lymph nodes.
Conclusions
The recommendations derived from this global survey and expert panel discussion may serve as a practice guide and support tool for radiologists (and other clinicians) involved in the staging of rectal cancer and may contribute to improved consistency in radiological staging and reporting.
Key Points
• Via a case-based online survey (incl. 321 respondents from 32 countries), we identified 16 problem areas related to the applicability of the TNM staging system for the radiological staging and reporting of rectal cancer.
• A multidisciplinary panel of experts recommended strategies on how to handle these problem areas, including advice on cT-stage categorization in case of involvement of different layers of the anal canal, specifications on which structures to include in the definition of cT4b disease, how to define mesorectal fascia involvement by the primary tumor and other tumor-bearing structures, how to differentiate and report lymph nodes and tumor deposits on MRI, and how to anatomically localize and stage lateral lymph nodes.
• These recommendations may serve as a practice guide and support tool for radiologists (and other clinicians) involved in the staging of rectal cancer and may contribute to improved consistency in radiological staging and reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doenja M J Lambregts
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Nino Bogveradze
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, American Hospital Tbilisi, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Lennart K Blomqvist
- Department of Imaging and Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- Department of Radiooncology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Benno C. Schmidt Chair in Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tsuyoshi Konishi
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Division of Coloproctology, Pelvic Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rodrigo O Perez
- Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz & Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stuart A Taylor
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Damian J M Tolan
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicholas P West
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Albert Wolthuis
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geerard L Beets
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Suzuki C, Halperin SK, Nilsson PJ, Martling A, Holm T. Initial magnetic resonance imaging tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment predicts sustained complete response in patients with rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2022; 48:1643-1649. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
26
|
Axelsson A, Johansson M, Bock D, Haglind E, de la Croix H, Nilsson PJ, Angenete E. Patient-reported QoL in anal cancer survivors 3 and 6 years after treatment—results from the Swedish national ANCA study. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:4169-4178. [PMID: 35079906 PMCID: PMC8942973 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06769-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The impact of anal cancer treatment for the patients is best evaluated by the patients themselves. The purpose of this study was to investigate quality of life (QoL) in patients with anal cancer at 3 and 6 years after treatment. Methods A Swedish national cross-sectional prospective cohort study with patients diagnosed with anal cancer between 2011 and 2013. Patients were invited to respond to a QoL questionnaire at 3 and 6 years, with focus on bowel, urinary and sexual function, social and mental function, co-morbidity, lifestyle, daily activities, personal characteristics, and perceived QoL. It also contained questions on the severity of the symptoms regarding occurrence, frequency, and duration and the level of “bother” experienced related to functional symptoms. QoL and prevalence of bother with urinary, sexual, bowel dysfunction, and anal pain were described. The prevalence of impaired QoL was compared with a healthy reference population. The association between QoL and experiencing bother was quantified by regression models. Results From an original cohort of 464 patients with anal cancer, 264 (57%) were alive and contacted at 3 years and 230 (50%) at 6 years. One hundred ninety-five (74%) patients responded to the 3-year and 152 (66%) to the 6-year questionnaire. Sixty percent reported low QoL at both 3 and 6 years. Impaired QoL was more prevalent among patients with major bother due to bowel dysfunction (at 3 years RR 1.42, 95% CI (1.06–1.9) p-value 0.020, at 6 years RR 1.52, 95% CI (1.03–2.24) p-value 0.034) and urinary dysfunction (at 6 years RR 1.44, 95% CI (1.08–1.91) p-value 0.013). There was a tendency to a positive relationship between the number of bodily functions causing bother and risk for impaired QoL. Conclusion Patients treated for anal cancer reported bother regarding several bodily functions as well as poor QoL both at 3 and 6 years without much improvement. Bother was also associated with low QoL indicating that function-related bother should be addressed.
Collapse
|
27
|
Nilsson PJ, Ahlberg M, Kordnejad S, Holm T, Martling A. Organ preservation following short-course radiotherapy for rectal cancer. BJS Open 2021; 5:6408930. [PMID: 34686879 PMCID: PMC8536864 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Non-operative management of rectal cancer is increasingly being used in selected patients. Most reports include patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) before inclusion into a Watch & Wait (W&W) programme. The aim of this study was to report outcomes from a single-centre W&W programme involving a large cohort of patients. Methods Patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) with or without chemotherapy, between 2008 and 2020, who showed signs of a clinical complete response (cCR) were reviewed. Patients were assessed using digital rectal examination, flexible endoscopy, carcinoembryonic antigen measurement, MRI, and CT imaging, discussed at the multidisciplinary tumour board meeting, and followed up in a dedicated W&W programme as from 2015. Outcomes including regrowth and 3-year survival (time to regrowth or death) were prospectively evaluated. Results Of 142 patients who were assessed, 88 fulfilled the criteria for cCR. Treatment before cCR included CRT, SCRT with chemotherapy, and SCRT alone in 16 (18 per cent), 28 (32 per cent), and 44 (50 per cent) patients, respectively. Patients treated with CRT and SCRT with chemotherapy had more advanced clinical T- and N-stage, compared with patients treated with SCRT alone (clinical T-stage > 2: 81 per cent and 89 per cent versus 47 per cent, respectively; clinical N-stage > 0: 75 per cent and 93 per cent versus 68 per cent, respectively). Overall rate of regrowth was 19 per cent, with 31 per cent, 21 per cent, and 14 per cent following CRT, SCRT with chemotherapy, and SCRT alone, respectively. Uni- and multivariable analyses evaluating the clinical parameters revealed no statistically significant associations with risk of local regrowth. All but one patient with regrowth underwent salvage surgery. The 3-year survival rate (death with regrowth as competing risk) was 93 per cent, with no significant difference between treatment groups. Conclusion In this cohort of W&W patients, the vast majority received SCRT with or without chemotherapy and results consistent with previous W&W reports were obtained. No statistically significant differences in terms of regrowth rate were obtained when comparing CRT, SCRT with chemotherapy, and SCRT alone. SCRT can induce sustained cCR and may precede a W&W strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per J Nilsson
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Madelene Ahlberg
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Shahrzad Kordnejad
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Torbjörn Holm
- Department of Surgery, South Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Martling
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Holm T, J Nilsson P, Suzuki C, Szczegielniak S, Kordnejad S, T Schmidt P, Blomqvist L, Martling A. [20-25 procent of patients with rectal cancer may be saved from a rectal resection]. Lakartidningen 2021; 118:21014. [PMID: 34228808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Besides clinical evaluation, all patients with rectal cancer must be examined with CT of the chest and abdomen to assess the presence of metastases, pelvic MRI to stage the tumour locally, and if possible, colonoscopy to detect synchronous lesions. The recommended treatment is then discussed at an MDT conference and neoadjuvant radio- or chemoradiotherapy given according to national guidelines. A new digital rectal examination (DRE) and proctoscopy, CT and pelvic MRI should be performed around six weeks after treatment. The purpose is to detect potential new metastases and to assess tumour response after treatment. It is crucial to do a second MDT with careful MRI evaluation to detect a possible clinical complete response. If the post-treatment MRI shows a complete or near complete response, corresponding to clinical findings on DRE and endoscopy, the patient should be offered a prospective watch and wait protocol in a dedicated institution. With proper management of patients with rectal cancer, 20-25 procent may be saved from a rectal resection and the potential risk of a permanent stoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torbjörn Holm
- adj professor, överläkare, kirurgi, Södersjukhuset; institutionen för klinisk forskning och utbildning Södersjukhuset, Karolinska institutet
| | - Per J Nilsson
- docent, kolorektalsektionen, ME bäckencancer, Karolinska universitetssjukhuset, Solna; institutionen för molekylär medicin och kirurgi, Karolinska institutet
| | - Chikako Suzuki
- med dr, överläkare, dia-gnostisk radiologi, bild och funktion, Karolinska universitetssjukhuset, Solna; institutionen för molekylär medicin och kirurgi, Karolinska institutet
| | - Sylwester Szczegielniak
- bitr överläkare, enheten för GI-endoskopi, ME övre buk, Karolinska universitetssjukhuset, Solna
| | - Shahrzad Kordnejad
- kontakt-/forskningssjuksköterska, kolorektalsektionen, ME bäckencancer, Karolinska universitetssjukhuset, Solna
| | - Peter T Schmidt
- docent, överläkare, medicinkliniken, Ersta sjukhus; institutionen för medicin Solna, Karolinska institutet
| | - Lennart Blomqvist
- professor, överläkare, diagnostisk radiologi, bild och funktion, Karolinska universitetssjukhuset, Solna; institutionen för molekylär medicin och kirurgi, Krolinska institutet
| | - Anna Martling
- professor, överläkare, professor, överläkare, kolorektalsektionen, ME bäckencancer, Karolinska universitetssjukhuset, Solna; institutionen för molekylär medicin och kirurgi, Karolinska institutet
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Elliot AH, Othman BN, Suzuki C, Blomqvist L, Martling A, Johansson H, Glimelius B, Nilsson PJ, Iversen H. Pretreatment MRI in Primary Rectal Cancer as a Predictor for Oncological Outcomes After Surgery for Local Recurrence. Anticancer Res 2021; 41:2459-2465. [PMID: 33952471 DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM For patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) extensive surgery is often the only curative option and patient selection is crucial. This study aimed to investigate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of the primary tumour can predict oncological outcome after surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients undergoing surgery for LRRC with a curative intent at the Karolinska University Hospital 2003-2013 were included. MRI examinations of the primary tumour were re-evaluated. RESULTS In total, 54 patients were included. A tumour volume decrease of <70% after preoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (C)RT for the primary tumour was correlated with a lower proportion of R0 resection of the LRRC (OR=0.07, 95% CI=0.01-0.84). No association between MRI characteristics of the primary tumour and prognosis after LRRC surgery was found. CONCLUSION Long-term outcomes after surgery for LRRC were not significantly associated with MRI characteristics of the index tumour. However, factors associated with increased risk of R1 resection of LRRC were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders H Elliot
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Division of Coloproctology, Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden;
| | - Barwar N Othman
- Department of Imaging and Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Chikako Suzuki
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Department of Imaging and Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lennart Blomqvist
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Department of Imaging and Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Division of Coloproctology, Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hemming Johansson
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Division of Coloproctology, Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Iversen
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Division of Coloproctology, Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Baloch N, Nordenvall C, Johansson H, Nygren J, Nilsson PJ. Perineal healing following salvage surgery for anal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:1102-1108. [PMID: 33336448 PMCID: PMC8246882 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
AIM Approximately 25% of anal cancer patients undergo abdominoperineal excision or more extensive surgery. Following surgery, a high perineal complication rate has been reported. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based multimodal interventional programme introduced to mitigate the risk of complications. This study aims to describe perineal healing in relation to ERAS compliance, type of resection and method of perineal reconstruction in patients with anal cancer after salvage surgery. METHOD This is a retrospective cohort study including all patients undergoing abdominal surgery for squamous cell anal cancer in Stockholm between January 2005 and December 2015. Data collection was from registers supplemented by chart review. All patients were followed until death or 1 year after surgery. The associations between ERAS compliance, patient and treatment characteristics and perineal wound healing were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS In total, 101 patients (67 women) were included, of whom 72 were ERAS compliant. Of patients alive, healing after surgery occurred in 61/98 and 84/89 at 3 months and 1 year, respectively. Perineal healing at 3 months was statistically significantly associated with younger age and type of perineal reconstruction (in favour of vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap). No associations were observed at 1 year but almost all wounds were healed. CONCLUSION Age and type of perineal reconstruction appear to be significantly associated with improved healing at 3 months whereas compliance to an ERAS protocol and type of resection do not. Nearly all patients had a fully healed perineal wound 1 year after surgery for anal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naseer Baloch
- Department of Pelvic CancerDivision of ColoproctologyKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden,Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Caroline Nordenvall
- Department of Pelvic CancerDivision of ColoproctologyKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden,Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Hemming Johansson
- Department of Oncology‐PathologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Jonas Nygren
- Department of SurgeryErsta HospitalStockholmSweden,Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyds HospitalKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Per J. Nilsson
- Department of Pelvic CancerDivision of ColoproctologyKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden,Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Båverud Olsson L, Buchli C, Villard C, Nilsson PJ. Differences in management and outcome for colon and rectal carcinoma with synchronous liver metastases: a population-based cohort study. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:860-867. [PMID: 33259702 PMCID: PMC8246906 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Surgical treatment of colorectal cancer with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCRLM) can follow three different strategies with regard to the timing of liver resection. The aim of this study was to describe the selection of surgical strategy, focusing on differences between colon and rectal cancer with SCRLM, postoperative morbidity/mortality and survival. METHOD This was a retrospective population-based study of patients with SCRLM registered in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry in the Stockholm/Gotland region during 2010-2017 and treated with surgical resection of the primary tumour and liver metastases (LM). Patients were followed for 5 years or censored at 22 November 2018. RESULTS A total of 238 patients met the inclusion criteria during the study period. Patients with rectal cancer were treated with the 'liver first' strategy in 70% of cases, whereas the main treatment strategies for colonic tumours were 'simultaneous resection' (44%) and 'primary first' (37%). Rectal cancer had a superior 5-year survival rate compared with colon tumours with SCRLM (62 vs. 47%; p = 0.033). There was no difference in survival between treatment strategies irrespective of primary tumour location. Postoperative complications occurred most commonly among rectal tumours treated with simultaneous resection (p = 0.024). CONCLUSION Patients with rectal cancer and SCRLM were more often treated with the 'liver first' strategy than patients with colon cancer. Patients with rectal cancer and SCRLM where both primary tumour and LM were operated on had significantly better survival than corresponding patients with colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisen Båverud Olsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Christian Buchli
- Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden,Centre for Digestive DiseasesKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Christina Villard
- Department of Medicine HuddingeUnit of Gastroenterology and RheumatologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Per J. Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden,Centre for Digestive DiseasesKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bahadoer RR, Dijkstra EA, van Etten B, Marijnen CAM, Putter H, Kranenbarg EMK, Nilsson PJ, Glimelius B, van de Velde CJH, Hospers GAP. Interpreting the RAPIDO trial: factors to consider - Authors' reply. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e90-e91. [PMID: 33662297 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00087-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Renu R Bahadoer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Esmée A Dijkstra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, Netherlands
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hein Putter
- Department of Biomedical Datasciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Geke A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen 9700 RB, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Villard C, Habib M, Nordenvall C, Nilsson PJ, Jorns C, Sparrelid E. Conversion therapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2038-2045. [PMID: 33640172 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The occurrence of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) impairs prognosis, yet long-term survival can be achieved by enabling liver resection. This study aims to describe factors associated with conversion therapy leading to liver surgery and treatment outcome. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all patients with CRLM discussed at multidisciplinary team conference at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, from 2013 to 2018. Factors associated with conversion therapy and outcome following conversion therapy were analysed with logistic regression and survival analyses. RESULTS Out of 1023 patients with CRLM, 100 patients (10%) received conversion chemotherapy, out of whom 31 patients (31%) subsequently underwent liver resection. Patients in whom conversion chemotherapy resulted in liver resection were younger (median age 61 vs. 66 years, p = .024), less likely to have a KRAS/NRAS-mutated primary tumours (25% vs. 53%, p = .039) and more likely to have received anti-EGFR agents (32% vs. 4%, p = .001) than patients progressing during conversion chemotherapy. The median OS for patients treated with conversion chemotherapy leading to liver resection was 24 months, compared to 14 months for patients progressing during conversion chemotherapy, p < .001. The OS for patients progressing during conversion chemotherapy was similar to patients given palliative chemotherapy, approximately 13 months. CONCLUSION Conversion therapy offers a survival benefit in selected patients. Despite treatment advances, the majority of patients undergoing conversion chemotherapy never become eligible for curative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Villard
- Department of Cancer, Division of Upper GI, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - M Habib
- Centre Hépato-Biliaire AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Equipe Recherche, Chronothérapie, Cancers et Transplantation, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - C Nordenvall
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C Jorns
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Sparrelid
- Department of Cancer, Division of Upper GI, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bahadoer RR, Dijkstra EA, van Etten B, Marijnen CAM, Putter H, Kranenbarg EMK, Roodvoets AGH, Nagtegaal ID, Beets-Tan RGH, Blomqvist LK, Fokstuen T, Ten Tije AJ, Capdevila J, Hendriks MP, Edhemovic I, Cervantes A, Nilsson PJ, Glimelius B, van de Velde CJH, Hospers GAP. Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:29-42. [PMID: 33301740 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30555-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 619] [Impact Index Per Article: 206.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic relapses remain a major problem in locally advanced rectal cancer. Using short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy and delayed surgery, the Rectal cancer And Preoperative Induction therapy followed by Dedicated Operation (RAPIDO) trial aimed to reduce distant metastases without compromising locoregional control. METHODS In this multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, participants were recruited from 54 centres in the Netherlands, Sweden, Spain, Slovenia, Denmark, Norway, and the USA. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, had a biopsy-proven, newly diagnosed, primary, locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma, which was classified as high risk on pelvic MRI (with at least one of the following criteria: clinical tumour [cT] stage cT4a or cT4b, extramural vascular invasion, clinical nodal [cN] stage cN2, involved mesorectal fascia, or enlarged lateral lymph nodes), were mentally and physically fit for chemotherapy, and could be assessed for staging within 5 weeks before randomisation. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a management system with a randomly varying block design (each block size randomly chosen to contain two to four allocations), stratified by centre, ECOG performance status, cT stage, and cN stage, to either the experimental or standard of care group. All investigators remained masked for the primary endpoint until a prespecified number of events was reached. Patients allocated to the experimental treatment group received short-course radiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy over a maximum of 8 days) followed by six cycles of CAPOX chemotherapy (capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, and a chemotherapy-free interval between days 15-21) or nine cycles of FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, leucovorin [folinic acid] 200 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 2, followed by bolus fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 intravenously and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 intravenously for 22 h on days 1 and 2, and a chemotherapy-free interval between days 3-14) followed by total mesorectal excision. Choice of CAPOX or FOLFOX4 was per physician discretion or hospital policy. Patients allocated to the standard of care group received 28 daily fractions of 1·8 Gy up to 50·4 Gy or 25 fractions of 2·0 Gy up to 50·0 Gy (per physician discretion or hospital policy), with concomitant twice-daily oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2 followed by total mesorectal excision and, if stipulated by hospital policy, adjuvant chemotherapy with eight cycles of CAPOX or 12 cycles of FOLFOX4. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-related treatment failure, defined as the first occurrence of locoregional failure, distant metastasis, new primary colorectal tumour, or treatment-related death, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed by intention to treat. This study is registered with the EudraCT, 2010-023957-12, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01558921, and is now complete. FINDINGS Between June 21, 2011, and June 2, 2016, 920 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a treatment, of whom 912 were eligible (462 in the experimental group; 450 in the standard of care group). Median follow-up was 4·6 years (IQR 3·5-5·5). At 3 years after randomisation, the cumulative probability of disease-related treatment failure was 23·7% (95% CI 19·8-27·6) in the experimental group versus 30·4% (26·1-34·6) in the standard of care group (hazard ratio 0·75, 95% CI 0·60-0·95; p=0·019). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse event during preoperative therapy in both groups was diarrhoea (81 [18%] of 460 patients in the experimental group and 41 [9%] of 441 in the standard of care group) and neurological toxicity during adjuvant chemotherapy in the standard of care group (16 [9%] of 187 patients). Serious adverse events occurred in 177 (38%) of 460 participants in the experimental group and, in the standard of care group, in 87 (34%) of 254 patients without adjuvant chemotherapy and in 64 (34%) of 187 with adjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment-related deaths occurred in four participants in the experimental group (one cardiac arrest, one pulmonary embolism, two infectious complications) and in four participants in the standard of care group (one pulmonary embolism, one neutropenic sepsis, one aspiration, one suicide due to severe depression). INTERPRETATION The observed decreased probability of disease-related treatment failure in the experimental group is probably indicative of the increased efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy as opposed to adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting. Therefore, the experimental treatment can be considered as a new standard of care in high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer. FUNDING Dutch Cancer Foundation, Swedish Cancer Society, Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, and Spanish Clinical Research Network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renu R Bahadoer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Esmée A Dijkstra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hein Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Annet G H Roodvoets
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Lennart K Blomqvist
- Department of Imaging and Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tone Fokstuen
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Jaume Capdevila
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall Hebron University Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ibrahim Edhemovic
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, University of Ljubljana Faculty of Medicine, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Andrés Cervantes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Biomedical Research Institute Incliva, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Geke A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
van der Valk MJM, Marijnen CAM, van Etten B, Dijkstra EA, Hilling DE, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Putter H, Roodvoets AGH, Bahadoer RR, Fokstuen T, Jan Ten Tije A, Capdevila J, Hendriks MP, Edhemovic I, Cervantes AMR, de Groot DJA, Nilsson PJ, Glimelius B, van de Velde CJH, Hospers GAP. Erratum to "Compliance and tolerability of short-course radiotherapy followed by preoperative chemotherapy and surgery for high-risk rectal cancer - Results of the international randomized RAPIDO-trial" [Radiother. Oncol. 147 (2020) 75-83]. Radiother Oncol 2020; 147:e1. [PMID: 32564889 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Esmée A Dijkstra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Denise E Hilling
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hein Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Annet G H Roodvoets
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Renu R Bahadoer
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tone Fokstuen
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Jaume Capdevila
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall Hebron University Hospital, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mathijs P Hendriks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Ibrahim Edhemovic
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Andrès M R Cervantes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | | | - Geke A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hospers G, Bahadoer RR, Dijkstra EA, van Etten B, Marijnen C, Putter H, Meershoek – Klein Kranenbarg E, Roodvoets AG, Nagtegaal ID, Beets-Tan RGH, Blomqvist LK, Fokstuen T, ten Tije AJ, Capdevila J, Hendriks MP, Edhemovic I, Cervantes A, Nilsson PJ, Glimelius B, Van De Velde CJH. Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before TME in locally advanced rectal cancer: The randomized RAPIDO trial. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.4006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
4006 Background: Local control in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has improved. However, systemic relapses remain high even with postoperative chemotherapy, possibly due to low compliance. Short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by delayed surgery with, in the waiting period, chemotherapy, may lead to better compliance, downstaging and fewer distant metastases. The main objective of the international multicenter phase III RAPIDO trial is to decrease Disease-related Treatment Failure (DrTF), defined as locoregional failure, distant metastasis, a new primary colon tumor or treatment-related death, by reducing the risk of systemic relapse without compromising local control. Methods: MRI-diagnosed LARC patients with either cT4a/b, extramural vascular invasion, cN2, involved mesorectal fascia or enlarged lateral lymph nodes considered to be metastatic were randomly assigned to SCRT (5x5 Gy) with subsequent six cycles of CAPOX or nine cycles of FOLFOX4 followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) (experimental arm) or, capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy (25-28 x 2.0-1.8 Gy) followed by TME and optional, predefined by hospital policy, postoperative eight cycles of CAPOX or twelve cycles of FOLFOX4 (standard arm). Results: Between June 2011 and June 2016, 920 patients were randomized. Pathological complete response rates were 27.7% vs 13.8% (OR 2.40 [1.70 – 3.39]; p < 0.001) in the experimental and standard arms, respectively. At three years, cumulative probability of DrTF was 23.7% in the experimental arm and 30.4% in the standard arm (HR 0.76 [0.60 – 0.96]; p = 0.02). Probability at three years of distant metastasis and locoregional failure were, in the experimental and standard arms, 19.8% vs 26.6% (HR 0.69 [0.53 – 0.89]; p = 0.004) and 8.7% vs 6.0% (HR 1.45 [0.93 – 2.25]; p = 0.10), respectively. No differences in DrTF between hospitals with or without policy for postoperative chemotherapy were found (p = 0.37). Overall health ( p = 0.192), quality of life ( p = 0.125) and low anterior resection syndrome score ( p = 0.136) were comparable between the two treatment arms. Conclusions: A lower rate of DrTF, as a result of a lower rate of distant metastases, in high-risk LARC patients can be achieved with preoperative short-course radiotherapy, followed by chemotherapy and TME than by conventional chemoradiotherapy. In addition, the high pCR rate, achieved with the experimental treatment regimen can contribute to organ preservation. This treatment can be considered as a new standard of care. Clinical trial information: NCT01558921 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geke Hospers
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Oncology, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Renu R. Bahadoer
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Esmee A. Dijkstra
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Oncology, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn van Etten
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Surgery, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Corrie Marijnen
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hein Putter
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Annet G. Roodvoets
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Iris D. Nagtegaal
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Regina GH Beets-Tan
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Radiology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lennart K. Blomqvist
- Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Department of Imaging and Physiology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tone Fokstuen
- Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Oncology and Pathology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Jaume Capdevila
- Vall Hebron University Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ibrahim Edhemovic
- Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Department of Surgical Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Andres Cervantes
- Biomedical Research Institute Incliva, University of Valencia, Department of Medical Oncology, Valencia, Spain
| | - Per J. Nilsson
- Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Uppsala University, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
van der Valk MJM, Marijnen CAM, van Etten B, Dijkstra EA, Hilling DE, Kranenbarg EMK, Putter H, Roodvoets AGH, Bahadoer RR, Fokstuen T, Ten Tije AJ, Capdevila J, Hendriks MP, Edhemovic I, Cervantes AMR, de Groot DJA, Nilsson PJ, Glimelius B, van de Velde CJH, Hospers GAP. Compliance and tolerability of short-course radiotherapy followed by preoperative chemotherapy and surgery for high-risk rectal cancer - Results of the international randomized RAPIDO-trial. Radiother Oncol 2020; 147:75-83. [PMID: 32240909 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 03/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision is widely accepted as the standard of care for high-risk rectal cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy is advised in several international guidelines, although the survival benefit remains unclear and compliance is poor. The current multidisciplinary approach has led to major improvements in local control, yet the occurrence of distant metastases has not decreased accordingly. The combination of short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and chemotherapy in the waiting period before surgery might have several benefits, including higher compliance, downstaging and better effect of systemic therapy. METHODS This is an investigator-initiated, international multicentre randomized phase III trial. High-risk rectal cancer patients were randomized to SCRT followed by chemotherapy (6 cycles CAPOX or alternatively 9 cycles FOLFOX4) and subsequent surgery, or long-course radiotherapy (25-28 × 2-1.8 Gy) with concomitant capecitabine followed by surgery and optional postoperative chemotherapy (8 cycles CAPOX or 12 cycles FOLFOX4) according to local institutions' policy. The primary endpoint is time to disease-related treatment failure. Here, we report the compliance, toxicity and postoperative complications in both study groups. FINDINGS Between June 2011 and June 2016, 920 patients were enrolled. Of these, 901 were evaluable (460 in the experimental arm and 441 in the standard arm). All patients in the experimental arm received 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy, and 84% of all patients received at least 75% of the prescribed chemotherapy. In the standard arm, the compliance for CRT was 93% and 58% for postoperative chemotherapy. Toxicity ≥grade 3 occurred in 48% of patients in the experimental arm, compared to 25% of patients in the standard arm during preoperative treatment and 35% of patients during postoperative chemotherapy. No statistically significant differences in surgical procedures or postoperative complications were observed. INTERPRETATION High compliance (84%) of preoperative systemic treatment could be achieved with the experimental approach. Although considerable toxicity was observed during preoperative therapy, this did not lead to differences in surgical procedures or postoperative complications. Longer follow-up time is needed to assess the primary endpoint and related outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands; Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn van Etten
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Esmée A Dijkstra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Denise E Hilling
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hein Putter
- Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | | | - Renu R Bahadoer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Tone Fokstuen
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Jaume Capdevila
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall Hebron University Hospital, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO). Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mathijs P Hendriks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Ibrahim Edhemovic
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Andrès M R Cervantes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Spain
| | - Derk Jan A de Groot
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | | | - Geke A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Affiliation(s)
- P J Nilsson
- Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Elliot AH, Blomqvist L, Sigurdsson A, Martling A, Johansson H, Glimelius B, Nilsson PJ. An audit of performance, interpretation, and influence of pretherapeutic MRI in rectal cancer: a Swedish population-based cohort study. Acta Radiol 2019; 60:955-961. [PMID: 30322292 DOI: 10.1177/0284185118806638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background The performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretation and communication of findings and its implication on treatment decisions has not fully been explored in rectal cancer. Purpose To investigate in a region the adherence to MRI protocol standards and the relation between MRI interpretation and selection to preoperative therapy in rectal cancer. Material and Methods Data on consecutive patients who underwent elective rectal cancer surgery in the region from January to June 2010 were obtained from the National Colorectal Cancer Registry. Pretherapeutic MRI images were re-evaluated. Agreement between the original reports and the re-evaluation was compared using Cohen’s kappa coefficient. Results Among the 94 patients included, 81 (86%) had pretherapeutic MRI in accordance with defined imaging guidelines. In 34% of the original MR reports, data on extramural venous invasion (mrEMVI) and mrT category were not reported. Complete tumor staging was not possible because of missing data in 33 (35%) of the patients. The agreement between the original MR reports and the re-evaluation regarding tumor stage was moderate (κ = 0.48). For decided treatment compared to recommended preoperative treatment according to the re-evaluation, the agreement was fair (κ = 0.33). Conclusion Established MRI protocol standards were not universally applied. Missing data and inadequacies in original MRI reports resulted in moderate agreement between the original report and the re-evaluation indicating a risk of inappropriate treatment selection. The results call for further educational efforts in rectal cancer MRI acquisition and repeated audits of image protocol adherence and interpretation quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders H Elliot
- 1 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lennart Blomqvist
- 2 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Department of Imaging and Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Anna Martling
- 1 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hemming Johansson
- 4 Karolinska Institutet, Department of Oncology-Pathology (OnkPat), Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- 5 Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Per J Nilsson
- 1 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Aslam MI, Baloch N, Mann C, Nilsson PJ, Maina P, Chaudhri S, Singh B. Simultaneous stoma reinforcement and perineal reconstruction with biological mesh - A multicentre prospective observational study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2018; 38:28-33. [PMID: 30595839 PMCID: PMC6308243 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2018.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The optimal method for perineal reconstruction after extralevator abdominoperineal excision (elAPE) for low rectal cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to assess whether simultaneous perineal reconstruction and parastomal reinforcement with Strattice™ Reconstructive Tissue Matrix after elAPE could prevent hernia formation. Methods In this prospective, multicentre, observational, non-comparative study of consecutive patients undergoing elAPE for low rectal cancer underwent simultaneous perineal reconstruction and colostomy site reinforcement with Strattice™ mesh. All patients underwent long course chemoradiotherapy prior to surgery and had excision of the coccyx. Patients were assessed for perineal wound healing at 7 day, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, perineal and parastomal hernia defects on clinical and radiological assessment at 1 year following surgery. Results 19 patients (median age = 67 years, median BMI = 26, M:F = 11:8) were entered the study. 10 (52.6%) patients underwent laparoscopic elAPE. The median length of post-operative stay was 9 days. Complete wound healing was observed for 8(42%) patients at 1 month, 12(63%) at 3 months, and 19(100%) patients at 12 months. Median time for radiological and clinical assessment for hernias was 12 months. No perineal hernia was detected in 17 patients following CT assessment. Dynamic MRI was undertaken in 11 patients at 12 months and all showed no evidence of perineal hernia. 3 (16%) patients had a parastomal hernia detected radiologically. No mesh was removed during the 12 months follow up period. Conclusion Perineal and parastomal reconstruction with biological mesh is a feasible approach for parastomal and perineal hernia prevention after laparoscopic and open elAPE. In this case series, consecutive patients underwent simultaneous perineal reconstruction and colostomy site reinforcement with Strattice™ biological mesh. Simultaneous perineal and parastomal reconstruction with Strattice™ mesh is an effective method of hernia prevention after elAPE. High quality prospective RCTs and national/international collaborative audits are required to compare this technique with others for perineal reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Imran Aslam
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicestershire, UK
| | - Naseer Baloch
- Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christopher Mann
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicestershire, UK
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pierre Maina
- Department of Surgery, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - Sanjay Chaudhri
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicestershire, UK
| | - Baljit Singh
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicestershire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
|
42
|
Bolmstrand B, Nilsson PJ, Holm T, Buchli C, Palmer G. Patterns of complications following urinary tract reconstruction after multivisceral surgery in colorectal and anal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 44:1513-1517. [PMID: 30017328 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multi-visceral resection, including parts of the urinary tract, is sometimes warranted to achieve cancer clear resection margins and optimize survival in patients with locally advanced colorectal and anal cancer. The aim of this study was to assess morbidity after urinary tract reconstruction dictated by colorectal and anal malignancy and to identify potential predictors of urological complications. METHODS All patients undergoing surgery for colorectal or anal malignancy, including urinary tract resection and synchronous reconstruction, performed at the Karolinska University Hospital during 2004-2015 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Data was collected from medical records with follow-up until at least one year after the index surgery. Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system of surgical complications. RESULTS The study included 189 patients; 121 underwent cystectomy and 68 partial ureter resection. The rate of high grade urological complications was 22%. The risk of major urological complications was significantly higher in patients subjected to ureter resection compared to after cystectomy (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.23-5.49). Also, preoperative radiotherapy and intestinal anastomotic dehiscence significantly increased the risk of high grade urological complications. CONCLUSION To achieve potentially curative resections with uninvolved margins in patients with locally advanced colorectal and anal cancer, multi-visceral resection including urinary tract reconstruction can be performed with reasonable morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Björn Bolmstrand
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Center of Digestive Diseases, P9:03, Karolinska University Hospital, S-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Center of Digestive Diseases, P9:03, Karolinska University Hospital, S-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Torbjörn Holm
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Center of Digestive Diseases, P9:03, Karolinska University Hospital, S-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christian Buchli
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Center of Digestive Diseases, P9:03, Karolinska University Hospital, S-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gabriella Palmer
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Center of Digestive Diseases, P9:03, Karolinska University Hospital, S-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Baloch N, Nilsson PJ, Nordenvall C, Abraham-Nordling M. Perineal Wound Closure Using Biological Mesh Following Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision. Dig Surg 2018; 36:281-288. [PMID: 29763916 DOI: 10.1159/000489134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2017] [Accepted: 04/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
AIMS This study aimed to describe the short-term perineal healing rates in patients with perineal reconstruction using a biological mesh following extralevator abdominoperineal excision (elAPE). METHODS In a retrospective, descriptive single-centre cohort study, 88 consecutive patients treated with elAPE and perineal closure using a biological mesh between January 2011 and December 2015 were reviewed. All available data from electronic hospital records was collected. Patients were followed for 1 year following surgery and perineal wound status assessed at 3 months and at 1 year. RESULTS In total, 63 patients were male and all but 8 patients were treated for primary rectal cancer. All patients but 3 had received radiotherapy prior to surgery. Multivisceral excisions were performed in 19 patients. Omentoplasty was performed in 55 patients and 3 different types of meshes were used during the study period. At 3 months, 58 patients (66%) had a healed perineum. No association was detected between patient, tumour or perioperative characteristics and perineal wound status at 3 months. At 1 year, 4 patients were deceased and among the remaining 84, the perineal wound was healed in 77 patients (92%). CONCLUSION The use of biological meshes in perineal reconstruction following elAPE is feasible and safe, and the perineal wound is healed in the majority of the patients within 3 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naseer Baloch
- Division of Coloproctology, Center of Digestive Diseases, Karolinska, University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Division of Coloproctology, Center of Digestive Diseases, Karolinska, University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Caroline Nordenvall
- Division of Coloproctology, Center of Digestive Diseases, Karolinska, University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mirna Abraham-Nordling
- Division of Coloproctology, Center of Digestive Diseases, Karolinska, University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, .,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden,
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Iversen H, Martling A, Johansson H, Nilsson PJ, Holm T. Pelvic local recurrence from colorectal cancer: surgical challenge with changing preconditions. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:399-406. [PMID: 29161761 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Although the rate of local recurrence (LR) after colorectal cancer surgery has decreased, it still poses major surgical and oncological challenges. The aims of this study, based on an audit from a tertiary referral centre, was to evaluate determinants associated with outcomes after surgery for pelvic LR and how these have changed over time. METHOD Retrospective analysis of all resections for pelvic LR of colorectal cancer performed at the Karolinska University Hospital from January 2003 until August 2009 (period 1) and from September 2009 until November 2013 (period 2) . RESULTS Ninety-five patients with pelvic LR were operated on with a curative intent. An R0 resection was achieved in 77% and an R1 resection in 23%. Lateral compartments were invaded in 48% and this proportion increased in resections performed in period 2 (37% vs 60%, P = 0.05). R1 resections were associated with a higher risk of local re-recurrence than R0 resections (64% vs 16%; OR = 8.90, 95% CI: 2.71-29.78). Lateral recurrences were associated with a lower R0-resection rate than nonlateral recurrences (63% vs 90%; OR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05-0.64) and a higher risk of treatment failure in terms of local re-recurrence or distant metastases, or death, as first event (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.06-2.75). However, in a multivariate analysis only R1 resections remained a significant prognostic factor for treatment failure (HR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.32-4.27). CONCLUSION The proportion of lateral pelvic recurrences has increased over time. In comparison with non-lateral LRs, lateral LRs are more difficult to resect radically and are associated with worse overall and disease-free survival. However, with radical surgery many patients with pelvic locally recurrent colorectal cancer may be offered curative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Iversen
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H Johansson
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - T Holm
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Segelman J, Mattsson I, Jung B, Nilsson PJ, Palmer G, Buchli C. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage following ileosigmoid or ileorectal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:304-311. [PMID: 29059489 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM Reconstruction with an ileosigmoidal anastomosis (ISA) or ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) is a surgical option after a subtotal colectomy. Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a problematic complication and high rates have been reported, but there is limited understanding of the risk factors involved. The aim of this study was to assess the established and potential predictors of AL following ISA and IRA. METHOD This was a retrospective cohort study including all patients who had undergone ISA or IRA at three Swedish referral centres for colorectal surgery between January 2007 and March 2015. Data regarding clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome were collected from medical records. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the association between patient and treatment related factors and the cumulative incidence of AL. RESULTS In total, 227 patients were included. Overall, AL was detected amongst 30 patients (13.2%). Amongst patients undergoing colectomy with synchronous ISA or IRA (one-stage procedure), AL occurred in 23 out of 120 (19.2%) compared with seven out of 107 (6.5%) after stoma reversal with ISA or IRA (two-stage procedure) (P = 0.004). In addition, the multivariate analyses revealed a statistically significantly lower odds ratio for AL following a two-stage procedure (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.03-0.41, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study confirms high rates of AL following ISA and IRA. In particular, a synchronous procedure with colectomy and ISA/IRA carries a high risk of AL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Segelman
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - I Mattsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - B Jung
- Department of Surgery and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G Palmer
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C Buchli
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Nordenvall C, Olén O, Nilsson PJ, von Seth E, Ekbom A, Bottai M, Myrelid P, Bergquist A. Colectomy prior to diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis is associated with improved prognosis in a nationwide cohort study of 2594 PSC-IBD patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2018; 47:238-245. [PMID: 29064110 DOI: 10.1111/apt.14393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2017] [Revised: 06/12/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the close relationship between primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the association between colectomy and the prognosis of PSC remains controversial. AIM To explore whether colectomy prior to PSC-diagnosis is associated with transplant-free survival. METHODS A nationwide cohort study in Sweden including all patients aged 18 to 69 years in whom both PSC and IBD was diagnosed between 1987 and 2014 was undertaken. Each patient was followed from date of both PSC and IBD diagnoses until liver transplantation or death, or 31 December 2014. Patients with colon in situ, and colectomy prior to PSC-diagnosis were compared. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS Of the 2594 PSC-IBD patients, 205 patients were treated with colectomy before PSC-diagnosis. During follow-up, liver transplantations were performed in 327 patients and 509 died. The risk of liver transplantation or death was lower in patients treated with colectomy prior to PSC-diagnosis (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.95) than in patients with colon in situ. Male gender, longer time between IBD and PSC-diagnosis and older age were all associated with an increased risk of liver transplantation or death. Colectomy after PSC-diagnosis was however not associated with an increased risk of liver transplantation or death during long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS In PSC-IBD patients, colectomy prior to PSC-diagnosis is associated with a decreased risk of liver transplantation or death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Nordenvall
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Coloproctology, Center for Digestive Disease, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - O Olén
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Sachs' Children's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Coloproctology, Center for Digestive Disease, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E von Seth
- Department of Medicine Huddinge, Division of Hepatology, Karolinska Institutet Center for Digestive Disease, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Ekbom
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Bottai
- Unit of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Myrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden
| | - A Bergquist
- Department of Medicine Huddinge, Division of Hepatology, Karolinska Institutet Center for Digestive Disease, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Aapro M, Astier A, Audisio R, Banks I, Bedossa P, Brain E, Cameron D, Casali P, Chiti A, De Mattos-Arruda L, Kelly D, Lacombe D, Nilsson PJ, Piccart M, Poortmans P, Riklund K, Saeter G, Schrappe M, Soffietti R, Travado L, van Poppel H, Wait S, Naredi P. Identifying critical steps towards improved access to innovation in cancer care: a European CanCer Organisation position paper. Eur J Cancer 2017; 82:193-202. [PMID: 28692951 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
In recent decades cancer care has seen improvements in the speed and accuracy of diagnostic procedures; the effectiveness of surgery, radiation therapy and medical treatments; the power of information technology; and the development of multidisciplinary, specialist-led approaches to care. Such innovations are essential if we are to continue improving the lives of cancer patients across Europe despite financial pressures on our healthcare systems. Investment in innovation must be balanced with the need to ensure the sustainability of healthcare budgets, and all health professionals have a responsibility to help achieve this balance. It requires scrutiny of the way care is delivered; we must be ready to discontinue practices or interventions that are inefficient, and prioritise innovations that may deliver the best outcomes possible for patients within the limits of available resources. Decisions on innovations should take into account their long-term impact on patient outcomes and costs, not just their immediate costs. Adopting a culture of innovation requires a multidisciplinary team approach, with the patient at the centre and an integral part of the team. It must take a whole-system and whole-patient perspective on cancer care and be guided by high-quality real-world data, including outcomes relevant to the patient and actual costs of care; this accurately reflects the impact of any innovation in clinical practice. The European CanCer Organisation is committed to working with its member societies, patient organisations and the cancer community at large to find sustainable ways to identify and integrate the most meaningful innovations into all aspects of cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ian Banks
- ECCO Patient Advisory Committee (PAC)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Denis Lacombe
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Nordenvall C, Olén O, Nilsson PJ, Ekbom A, Bottai M, Myrelid P. The Fate of Reconstructive Surgery Following Colectomy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Sweden: A Population-based Cohort Study. J Crohns Colitis 2016; 10:1165-71. [PMID: 26975385 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Previous studies describing the cumulative failure rate after reconstructive surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease have been restricted to specific hospitals, and the generalizability of these results in a population-based setting is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the cumulative failure rate and risk factors for failure after reconstructive surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS The study cohort includes all patients with inflammatory bowel disease in Sweden who underwent colectomy in 2000 through 2013 who were later treated with reconstructive surgery with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis or ileorectal anastomosis. Each patient was followed from admission for reconstructive surgery until admission for failure (a diverting stoma or permanent stoma), date of death, migration or December 31, 2013. Cumulative failure distributions were obtained with the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable Cox regression models were used to calculate the risk of failure. RESULTS Of the 1809 patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with colectomy and reconstructive surgery, 83% had ulcerative colitis. During follow-up, 270 patients failed, and the cumulative failure rate was 4.1%, 13.2%, and 15.3% after 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The risk of failure was lower after treatment with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis than with ileorectal anastomosis [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.72 (0.56-0.93)]. Gender, hospital volume, and timing of reconstruction were not significantly associated with the risk of failure. CONCLUSIONS The 5-year cumulative failure rate in a nationwide setting was 15.3%, and hospital volume was not associated with the risk of failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Nordenvall
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Center for Digestive Disease, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ola Olén
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Sachs' Children's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Center for Digestive Disease, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Ekbom
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Matteo Bottai
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pär Myrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Saraste D, Martling A, Nilsson PJ, Blom J, Törnberg S, Janson M. Screening vs. non-screening detected colorectal cancer: Differences in pre-therapeutic work up and treatment. J Med Screen 2016; 24:69-74. [PMID: 27470598 DOI: 10.1177/0969141316656216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To compare preoperative staging, multidisciplinary team-assessment, and treatment in patients with screening detected and non-screening detected colorectal cancer. Methods Data on patient and tumour characteristics, staging, multidisciplinary team-assessment and treatment in patients with screening and non-screening detected colorectal cancer from 2008 to 2012 were collected from the Stockholm-Gotland screening register and the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Results The screening group had a higher proportion of stage I disease (41 vs. 15%; p < 0.001), a more complete staging of primary tumour and metastases and were more frequently multidisciplinary team-assessed than the non-screening group ( p < 0.001). In both groups, patients with endoscopically resected cancers were less completely staged and multidisciplinary team-assessed than patients with surgically resected cancers ( p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the screening and non-screening groups in the use of neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer (68 vs.76%), surgical treatment with local excision techniques in stage I rectal cancer (6 vs. 9%) or adjuvant chemotherapy in stages II and III disease (46 vs. 52%). Emergency interventions for colorectal cancer occurred in 4% of screening participants vs. 11% of non-compliers. Conclusions Screening detected cancer patients were staged and multidisciplinary team assessed more extensively than patients with non-screening detected cancers. Staging and multidisciplinary team assessment prior to endoscopic resection was less complete compared with surgical resection. Extensive surgical and (neo)adjuvant treatment was given in stage I disease. Participation in screening reduced the risk of emergency surgery for colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Saraste
- 1 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Martling
- 1 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P J Nilsson
- 1 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Blom
- 1 Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S Törnberg
- 2 Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Regional Cancer Centre Stockholm/Gotland, Sweden
| | - M Janson
- 3 Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Saraste D, Martling A, Nilsson PJ, Blom J, Törnberg S, Hultcrantz R, Janson M. Complications after colonoscopy and surgery in a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme. J Med Screen 2016; 23:135-40. [PMID: 26940962 DOI: 10.1177/0969141315625701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2015] [Accepted: 12/15/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report complications after colonoscopy and surgery in patients with neoplasia detected through a population based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme in the capital region of Sweden. METHODS Patients who after a positive FOBT screening result underwent colonoscopy from 1 January 2008 to 30 June 2012 were included. Mortality and complications within 30 days after colonoscopy or subsequent surgery were identified through national registers, and complications were assessed through review of medical charts. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS After 2984 colonoscopies, the complication rate was 1%. The risk of post-polypectomy bleeding was 14/1000. The risk of perforation was 1/1000 after a diagnostic colonoscopy and 2.5/1000 after a colonoscopy with polypectomy. One patient developed a post-polypectomy syndrome. There was one death which was not related to the colonoscopy. After surgery for 37 adenomas and 155 CRCs, the total complication rates were 27% and 50%, respectively. The rate of anastomotic leakage was 13% and 12% after surgery for adenomas and CRC, respectively. There were no deaths after surgery. The overall complication rate after colonoscopy and surgery for adenomas and cancer was 4%. CONCLUSIONS Overall complication rates were acceptable and mortality low; however, the rate of anastomotic leakage after surgery for both adenomas and CRC was higher than expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Saraste
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johannes Blom
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sven Törnberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Regional Cancer Centre, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rolf Hultcrantz
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Janson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|