Quantitative Analysis of Supraspinatus Tendon Pathologies via T2/T2* Mapping Techniques with 1.5 T MRI

The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess supraspinatus tendon pathologies with T2/T2* mapping techniques, which are sensitive to biochemical changes. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and T2/T2* mapping techniques were applied to 41 patients with shoulder pathology, and there were also 20 asymptomatic cases included. The patients were divided into two groups: tendinosis and rupture. The supraspinatus tendon was divided into medial, middle, and lateral sub-regions, and the T2/T2* values were measured in both the coronal and sagittal planes for intergroup comparison. Intra-class and inter-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess test reproducibility. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the cut-off value in each group. A total of 61 patients (27 males and 34 females)-including 20 asymptomatic individuals, 20 with tendinosis, and 21 with rupture-were evaluated using T2/T2* mapping techniques. In the rupture group, there were significant differences in the values of the lateral region (p < 0.001), as well as in the middle and medial regions (p < 0.05) of the supraspinatus tendon compared to the tendinosis and asymptomatic groups. These were determined using both T2* and T2 mapping in both the coronal and sagittal plane measurements. In the tendinosis group, there were significant differences in the values of the lateral region with T2* mapping (p < 0.001) in both the coronal and sagittal planes, and also with the T2 mapping in the coronal plane (p < 0.05) compared to the asymptomatic groups. The cut-off values for identifying supraspinatus pathology ranged from 85% to 90% for T2 measurements and above 90% for T2* measurements in both planes of the lateral section. The ICC values showed excellent reliability (ICC > 0.75) for all groups. In conclusion, T2 and T2* mapping techniques with 1.5 T MRI can be used to assess tendon rupture and tendinosis pathologies in the supraspinatus tendon. For an accurate evaluation, measurements from the lateral region in both the coronal and sagittal planes are more decisive.

Correlation of prognostic factors with MRI findings in malignant breast lesions

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast represents the most sensitive imaging modality in the detection of breast cancer, with a reported sensitivity between 94 and 100%. We aim to detect the correlation between MRI findings and pathologically detected prognostic factors in malignant breast lesions.

Breast parenchymal density distribution, background parenchymal enhancement pattern, lesion’s morphologic features, T2WI signal characteristics, contrast enhancement, time/signal intensity curves, and lesions localizations in breast were evaluated using dynamic MRI images. Histopathological diagnosis, maximum measurements of the lesion, histological grade, presence of estrogen and/or progesterone receptors, c-erb B2, and Ki-67 parameters were noted as prognostic factors.

Results

We cannot detect any relationship between the breast parenchymal density and prognostic factors. Mild background breast enhancement is related with ER presence, a good prognostic factor. Histopathological grade of the lesions augmented with the increase in the lesion diameters. ADC values are not related with prognostic factors.

Conclusion

A mild background enhancement, an intermediate signal intensity on T2WI, a high tpeak value, and absence of pathological axillary lymph node are found to be related with good prognostic factors. An irregular contour, a huge diameter, having a type III kinetic curve, a high slopei value, and presence of pathological axillary lymph node are found to be related with poor prognostic factors. MRI can be used to predict prognostic factors in breast cancer cases.

Acute Appendicitis or Lymphoid Hyperplasia: How to Distinguish More Safely?

PURPOSE

Lymphoid hyperplasia can be an important mimicker of acute appendicitis by creating a non-compressible appendix more than 6 mm in diameter. The aim of this study was to evaluate methods of distinguishing lymphoid hyperplasia and appendicitis on the basis of sonography, lamina propria thickness, and Alvarado scoring.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 259 patients (142 appendicitis, 117 lymphoid hyperplasia). The US (ultrasound) reports of the patients were reviewed and the maximum diameter of the appendix, the presence or absence of increased echogenicity of the surrounding pericaecal fat, local fluid collection, the presence of reactive lymph nodes in the periappendiceal area, and mural hyperemia within the appendix were recorded.

RESULTS

The use of additional sonographic criteria, lamina propria thickness (≤1 mm is indicative for appendicitis), or Alvarado scoring (>6 mm is indicative for appendicitis) provided a true-positive diagnosis for acute appendicitis.

CONCLUSION

The presence of local fluid collection in the periappendiceal area and a lamina propria thickness ≤ 1 mm are the most successful parameters for distinguishing appendicitis from lymphoid hyperplasia.

Isolated hydatid cyst of thyroid: An unusual case

Introduction

Hydatid cystic disease is a parasitic infestation that is mostly caused by Echinococcus granulosus, which is common in sheep-rearing areas of the Mediterranean, Middle East, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, and South America. Canines are the definitive hosts, and herbivores (e.g. sheep, horses, deer) or humans are intermediate hosts. Ingested eggs from animal feces hatch in the gut and release oncospheres (immature forms of the parasite enclosed in an embryonic envelope).

Case report

A very rare case of isolated, thyroidal, hydatic cyst is presented.

Conclusion

Non-vascular cysts may be seen on ultrasonographic examination that are not specific for hydatid disease. Clinical and laboratory findings are therefore important. Definitive diagnosis is based on histopathological findings. Treatment is surgical and antiparasitic drugs are required after surgery.

X-ray Use in Chest Imaging in Emergency Department on the Basis of Cost and Effectiveness

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The increasing use of imaging in the emergency department (ED) services has become an important problem on the basis of cost and unnecessary exposure to radiation. Radiographic examination of the chest has been reported to be performed in 34.4% of ED visits, and chest computerized tomography (CCT) in 15.8%, whereas some patients receive both chest radiography and CCT in the same visit. In the current study, it was aimed to establish instances of medical waste and unnecessary radiation exposure and to show how the inclusion of radiologists in the ordering process would affect the amount of unnecessary imaging studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 1012 ED patients who had both chest radiography and CCT during the same visit at Ankara Training and Research Hospital between April 2015 and January 2016. The patients were divided into subgroups of trauma and nontrauma. To detect unnecessary imaging examinations, data were analyzed according to the presence of additional findings on CCT images and the recommendation of a radiologist for CCT imaging.

RESULTS

In the trauma group, 77.1% (461/598) and in the nontrauma group, 80.4% (334/414) of patients could be treated without any need for CCT. In the trauma group, the radiologist recommendation only, and in the nontrauma group, both the radiologist recommendation and the age were determined to be able to predict the risk of having additional findings on CCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering only the age of the patient before ordering CCT could decrease the rate of unnecessary imaging. Including radiologists into both the evaluation and the ordering processes may help to save resources and decrease exposure to ionizing radiation.

Imaging Findings in Patients with Granulomatous Mastitis

BACKGROUND

Granulomatous mastitis (GM) is a rare inflammatory breast disease that may mimic the clinical characteristics and radiologic imaging findings of breast carcinoma. Considering the importance of making a correct diagnosis, careful radiologic evaluations and recognition of imaging features are necessary.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to review the radiological findings and diagnostic value of the imaging in GM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study involved a total of 29 patients who were diagnosed with GM between 2009 and 2013 and who underwent mammography (MG) and/or ultrasound (US) examination in addition to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among 14 patients over 35 years of age who underwent MG imaging, focal asymmetric, ill-defined nodular, or diffusely increased densities were detected in nine (64.3%), two (14.3%), and one (7.1%) subjects, respectively, while there were no pathological findings in two (14.3%) patients. In the overall group of 29 patients, US showed heterogeneous hypoechoic lesions with tubular extensions in 16 (55.2%), well-demarcated heterogeneous hypoechoic lesions in eight (27.6%), parenchymal heterogeneous appearance in three (10.3%), and a heterogeneous hypoechoic lesion with irregular margins in one (3.4%), with another (3.4%) patient having normal US findings. MRI findings included lesions consistent with solitary or multiple separate or confluent abscesses with marked peripheral ring enhancement in 25 (86.2%) patients, accompanied by intensity changes suggesting edematous inflammation in the peripheral parenchyma, as well as non-mass-like heterogeneous segmental and regional contrast enhancement. Four (13.8%) patients had non-mass-like segmental and regional contrast enhancement only. A histopathological diagnosis of GM was established in all patients with biopsy.

CONCLUSION

GM presents with a wide range of conventional radiological findings, hampering the diagnosis. In patients with inconclusive conventional findings, MRI may assist in the differential diagnosis and assessment of the extent of disease. However, a definitive diagnosis and relevant treatment require histopathological confirmation.

Spontaneous Isolated Celiac Artery and Superior Mesenteric Artery Dissections: A Rare Case

BACKGROUND

Arterial dissection is defined as the cleavage of the arterial wall by an intramural hematoma. Reports of dissection of the celiac and/or superior mesenteric artery are rare; as far as we know, only 24 cases of spontaneous isolated celiac trunk dissection, and 71 cases of spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection have been reported.

CASE REPORT

The case presents a 48-year-old male with a sudden-onset epigastric pain. A Computed Tomography Angiography of the thoracoabdominal aorta was applied and dissections of both the celiac artery and SMA were determined. A conservative therapeutic approach was preferred and the patient was discharged with anticoagulant and antihypertensive therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rare, spontaneous isolated celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery dissections must be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis of the epigastric pain in the emergency room. Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography Angiography examination is the method of choice in the diagnosis.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast as a problem-solving method: to be or not to be?

The use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast as a complementary problem-solving tool was explored in a heterogeneous population sample. A total of 3,076 patients that underwent breast MRI examination between January 2008 and June 2012 in our center were screened retrospectively. Of these, 868 met the following inclusion criteria and were considered eligible for the study: available data on clinical signs, symptoms and on the results of mammography and ultrasound examinations in medical records; at least 1 year of follow-up; and documented pathology findings. Lesions with a stable course over a follow-up period of at least 12 months were considered benign. MRI was suggestive of a suspicious abnormality (BI-RADS 4) or highly suggestive of malignancy (BI-RADS 5) in 129 (15%) of 868 patients, leading to a biopsy examination in these cases. On the other hand, MRI findings were considered normal in 739 (85%) subjects based on normal (BI-RADS 1), benign (BI-RADS 2) or probably benign (BI-RADS 3) findings. Of the 129 patients undergoing a histopathologic examination based on MRI findings, 63 were diagnosed with cancer, and in 66, the biopsy proved to be benign. Forty of the 63 patients (40/63) with a diagnosis of malignancy and 34 of the 66 patients (34/66) with a benign diagnosis had been categorized as BI-RADS 4 with conventional methods. A total of 23 patients with BI-RADS category of 0 to 3 according to conventional methods were diagnosed as having cancer with MRI. In six of these, the family history was positive. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) of MRI for the detection of cancer were 100%, 92%, 52%, and 100%, respectively. In cases with inconclusive findings on conventional imaging studies or in patients with clinical/radiological suspicion of malignancy, MRI should be more effectively used as a problem-solving approach owing to its high sensitivity and NPV in this condition. Use of MRI as a problem-solving method in such cases may decrease rather than increase unnecessary biopsy procedures and patient anxiety.