Rethinking HDL-C: An In-Depth Narrative Review of Its Role in Cardiovascular Health

The interplay between HDL-C and LDL levels are closely intertwined with the cardiovascular system. High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) is a well-known biomarker traditionally being interpreted as higher the HDL-C levels, minimal the risk of adverse cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes. However, recent research has unveiled a more complex relationship between HDL-C levels and cardiovascular outcomes, including genetic influences and potential risks associated with extremely high HDL-C levels. Intriguingly, extremely high HDL-C levels have been linked to unexpected cardiovascular risks. Up To date research suggests that individuals with genetically linked ultra-high HDL-C levels may depict an increased susceptibility to CVD, challenging the conventional realm that higher HDL-C is always beneficial. The mechanisms underlying this mystery are not fully understood but may involve HDL particle functionality and composition. In a nutshell, the relationship between HDL-C levels and cardiovascular outcomes is multifactorial. While low HDL-C remains a recognized risk factor for CVD, the genetic determinants of HDL-C levels add complexity to this association. Furthermore, extremely high HDL-C levels may not exhibit the expected protective benefits and may even pose unprecedented cardiovascular risks. A comprehensive understanding of these dynamics is essential for advancing our knowledge of CVD risk assessment and developing targeted therapeutic interventions. Further studies are needed to unravel the intricacies of HDL-C's role in cardiovascular health and disease.

Comparison of Cardiovascular Outcomes and All-Cause Mortality Between Patients With and Without Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

This meta-analysis aimed to assess the all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes among patients diagnosed with epilepsy. The entire process of this systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure transparency and reporting completeness. A comprehensive search strategy was employed to identify relevant studies in electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), from January 1, 2010, to January 15, 2024. Outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, and arrhythmias. A total of 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis with a pooled sample size of 7,026,313. The majority of included studies were conducted in Taiwan (n=4). Our study revealed that individuals with epilepsy faced a higher risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and stroke. Although there was a higher incidence of myocardial infarction and arrhythmias among epilepsy patients, this disparity did not reach statistical significance. There is a need for future research to explore the impact of epilepsy types, antiepileptic drugs, and lifestyle factors on cardiovascular outcomes.

'From Gut to Heart': A rare case of Salmonella Typhimurium Bacteremia and native valve endocarditis

Background

Salmonella species are very rarely associated with infective endocarditis, accounting for less than 0.01-2.9 % of total bacterial endocarditis cases. Since 1976, there have less than 90 reported cases of non-Typhoidal Salmonella bacteremia and endocarditis.

Case presentation

We present the case of a 57-year-old homeless man with a past medical history significant only for polysubstance abuse. He presented to the emergency department with a 3-day history of severe, non-bloody diarrhea, nausea, chills, and oliguria. Due to the patient's history of substance use, screening laboratory tests were conducted and were positive for rapid plasma reagin, treponemal antibodies, and hepatitis C. For the profuse diarrhea and severe volume loss, C. difficile, stool white blood cells and stool ova and parasites were ordered but were ultimately negative. Both sets of blood cultures were found to be positive for Salmonella Typhimurium bacteremia. Further workup with transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiogram displayed small mobile masses attached to the aortic surface of the right and non-coronary cusps, confirming endocarditis on the aortic valve. Treatment included penicillin-G once a week for 3 weeks for latent syphilis and ceftriaxone and levofloxacin for bacteremia and endocarditis.

Conclusions

Patients with Salmonella typically present early with gastrointestinal symptoms, but clinicians should consider cardiovascular imaging if blood cultures are found to be positive in order to potentially identify and promptly treat highly fatal Salmonella endocarditis.

Clinical and Microbiological Profile of Urinary Tract Infections in Diabetic versus Non-Diabetic Individuals

Introduction

Diabetic patients have a higher tendency of developing all infections, especially infections of the genitourinary tract. In most cases, urinary tract infections (UTI) in diabetic patients are asymptomatic. The aim of this study to was to compare the incidence and clinical and microbiological features of UTI between diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

Methods

In this prospective, comparative study, the incidence and clinical and microbiological features of UTI were compared between diabetic and non-diabetic patients via consecutive non-probability sampling technique. For every diabetic patient, one non-diabetic control was included. All patients were screened for UTI through a midstream urinary sample. Their demographic characteristics, clinical profile, and urinary microscopy were compared. Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 22.0.

Results

In the diabetes group, 35/256 (13.67%) patients had culture-positive UTI as compared to 18/250 (7.2%) in the non-diabetic group. Diabetic group had twice the risk of UTI (p = 0.01; odds ratio [OR]: 2.04; confidence interval [CI]: 1.12, 3.71) and female gender in the diabetic group had a risk of almost five times (p = 0.01; OR: 4.93; CI: 1.12, 20.16) that of the non-diabetic group. In the diabetic group, 31.4% patients were asymptomatic as compared to 5.6% in the non-diabetic group (p = 0.03; OR: 7.79; CI: 0.92, 66.18). E. coli was the most commonly identified microorganism in both groups. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was identified in 14% of diabetic cases and none in the non-diabetic.

Conclusions

UTIs are more frequent among diabetics. Asymptomatic bacteriuria is a more common entity in diabetic patients and does not require any treatment.