Spinal cord stimulation for axial low back pain: a prospective, controlled trial comparing dual with single percutaneous electrodes

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, controlled, clinical trial comparing single and dual percutaneous electrodes in the treatment of axial low back pain from failed back surgery syndrome.

OBJECTIVES

To clarify technical requirements and test the hypothesis that placing two linear arrays in parallel, thereby doubling the number of contacts, improves outcome.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Technical improvements have enhanced outcomes of spinal cord stimulation for chronic axial low back pain. Dual, parallel electrodes reportedly improve these outcomes.

METHODS

Acting as their own controls, 20 patients who passed screening with single, 4-contact electrodes received permanent dual, 4-contact electrodes with 7- or 10-mm intercontact distances at the same vertebral level(s). We quantified and compared the technical and clinical results of the single and dual electrodes, adjusting stimulation parameters to specific psychophysical thresholds.

RESULTS

Single electrodes provided significant (P < 0.01) advantages in patient- and computer-calculated ratings of pain coverage by paresthesias and in the scaled amplitude necessary to cover the low back, compared with dual 7-mm electrodes. Slight advantages without statistical significance were observed for the single over the dual 10-mm electrodes. Amplitude requirements were significantly lower for the single electrode than for either dual electrode. At long-term follow-up, 53% of patients met the criteria for clinical success.

CONCLUSIONS

While we observed disadvantages for dual electrodes in treating axial low back pain, we achieved technical success with single or dual electrodes in most patients and maintained this success clinically with dual electrodes in 53%.

Artificial neural networks: application to electrical stimulation of the human nervous system

Artificial neural networks are used increasingly in applications such as graphic pattern recognition, which are difficult to address with conventional statistical methods. In the management of chronic pain, graphic methods are used routinely; patients describe their patterns of pain using “pain drawings.” The authors have previously reported an automated, computerized pain drawing methodology, which has been used by patients with implanted spinal cord stimulators to represent a technical goal of the procedure, the overlap of pain by stimulation paresthesias. Standard linear discriminant statistical methods have shown associations between stimulation parameters and electrode positions as independent variables and technical outcome and relief of pain as dependent variables.

The authors have applied artificial neural networks to the problem of optimizing implanted stimulator adjustment. A data set of 3000 electrode combinations obtained in 41 patients was used to develop a linear discriminant statistical model on a mainframe computer and to train artificial neural networks on a personal computer. The performance of these two systems on a new data set obtained in 10 patients was compared with that of human “experts.” The best neural network model was marginally better than the linear discriminant model; the variance in patient ratings was predicted by these models to a degree that the human experts were unable to predict. The authors anticipate expanding the role of these models and incorporating them into expert sytems for clinical use.

Spinal Cord Compression Complicating Subarachnoid Infusion of Morphine: Case Report and Laboratory Experience

The intraspinal administration of morphine has been employed increasingly in the management of intractable pain of malignant as well as benign origin. We have encountered a previously unreported clinical complication: spinal cord compression by an inflammatory tissue mass surrounding a subarachnoid infusion catheter administering morphine. leading to paraplegia. The patient was referred to our institution after catheter and pump implantation for chronic, intractable pain associated with pre-existing lumbar arachnoid fibrosis, after multiple myelograms and surgeries. The patient may. therefore, have had an underlying propensity to foreign body reactions. We have encountered a similar phenomenon, however, in a canine laboratory model. The pathological features in both our patient and our laboratory preparation, with inflammatory tissue masses around the tip of the catheter but not around proximal subarachnoid segments, suggest an effect related to infusion. as opposed to infection or the presence of the catheter. We review the pathological features in both settings and the pertinent literature.

Spinal cord compression complicating subarachnoid infusion of morphine: case report and laboratory experience

The intraspinal administration of morphine has been employed increasingly in the management of intractable pain of malignant as well as benign origin. We have encountered a previously unreported clinical complication: spinal cord compression by an inflammatory tissue mass surrounding a subarachnoid infusion catheter administering morphine, leading to paraplegia. The patient was referred to our institution after catheter and pump implantation for chronic, intractable pain associated with pre-existing lumbar arachnoid fibrosis, after multiple myelograms and surgeries. The patient may, therefore, have had an underlying propensity to foreign body reactions. We have encountered a similar phenomenon, however, in a canine laboratory model. The pathological features in both our patient and our laboratory preparation, with inflammatory tissue masses around the tip of the catheter but not around proximal subarachnoid segments, suggest an effect related to infusion, as opposed to infection or the presence of the catheter. We review the pathological features in both settings and the pertinent literature.