Comparative analysis of robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: the HUGO™ RAS system versus the DaVinci® Xi system

BACKGROUND

Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy (RASP) has emerged as a promising alternative in the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). However, there is currently a lack of comparative studies evaluating different robotic platforms for performing RASP. Therefore, we aimed to compare perioperative and functional outcomes of RASP performed using the HUGO™ RAS System versus the DaVinci® Xi System.

METHODS

Forty consecutive cases of RASP performed between May 2021 and March 2023 with the HUGO™ RAS and the DaVinci® Xi at OLV Hospital (Aalst, Belgium) were included in this retrospective study. All surgeries were performed by three experienced surgeons using the same approach. Baseline characteristics, peri-operative and functional outcomes were collected and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The population was equally divided between the two groups with 20 patients in each group. There were no significant differences in preoperative patient characteristics between the two groups, except for the presence of bladder stones prior to the surgery (p = 0.03). No significant differences in total operative time and console time between the two groups were reported (p = 0.3). No cases required conversion to open surgery or additional port placement. During one case performed with the HUGO™ RAS, a malfunctioning monopolar curved shear had to be replaced. However, there was no statistically significant differences in terms of technical robotic problems between the groups (p = 0.3). There was no significant difference between the two groups in perioperative and functional outcomes (all p ≥ 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not observe any statistically significant difference in perioperative and functional outcomes in case of RASP performed with the HUGO™ RAS System and with the DaVinci® Xi System. These findings provide compelling support for considering the HUGO™ RAS as a promising tool for robot-assisted procedures, thereby expanding the utilization of robotics for benign conditions.

283 Salvage Versus Primary Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity-Matched Comparative Effectiveness Study from A High-Volume Tertiary Centre

Aim

Salvage Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (sRARP) is a potential treatment option for locally recurrent Prostate Cancer after non-surgical primary treatment. There are minimal data comparing outcomes between propensity-matched salvage and primary Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP). We compare perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of sRARP with primary RARP and between sRARP post-whole and focal gland therapy.

Method

1:1 propensity-matched comparison of 146 sRARP with primary RARP from a cohort of 3,852 consecutive patients from a high-volume tertiary centre.

Results

There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the salvage and primary RARP groups. Grade III-V Clavien-Dindo complication rates were 1.3% and 0% in the salvage and primary groups, respectively (p = 0.310). Median (IQR) follow-up was 16 (10,30) and 21 (13,33) months in the salvage and primary groups, respectively. BCR rates were 30.8% and 13.7% in the salvage and primary groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Pad-free continence rates were 79.1% and 85.4% at two years in the salvage and primary groups, respectively (p = 0.160). ED rates were 95.2% and 77.4% in the salvage and primary groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Comparing the whole gland and focal gland groups, BCR rates were 33.3% and 29.1%, respectively (p = 0.687), pad-free continence rates were 66% and 89.3%, respectively (p = 0.001), and ED rates were 98.3% and 93%, respectively (p = 0.145).

Conclusions

SRARP has similar perioperative but inferior oncological outcomes to primary RARP. Continence rates are similar to primary RARP, but potency is worse. Perioperative and oncological outcomes of sRARP after focal gland therapy are similar but continence outcomes are superior compared to sRARP after whole gland therapy.

Techniques and Outcomes of Salvage Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (sRARP)

BACKGROUND

Salvage Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (sRARP) has been described as feasible treatment for the management of localised prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence after primary treatment. However, no large reports have published cancer and quality outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To report perioperative, functional and oncologic outcomes of sRARP in patients with localised PCa recurrence.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We retrospectively evaluated 106 patients with local recurrence eligible for sRARP.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

Surgery was performed using the DaVinci Si system similar to the standard approach but with adaptation to the primary treatment.

MEASUREMENTS

Peri-operative outcomes included 90-day complication rate. Functional outcomes included rates of incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Oncological outcomes included tumour staging, margin rate and recurrence.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Primary treatment was High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) in 59 (56%) patients, 27 (25%) radiotherapy, 10 (9%) seed brachytherapy, 8 (8%) solitary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), one (1%) cryotherapy and one (1%) electroporation / Nanoknife. Median follow-up was 2.1 years. 90-day complication rate was 8%. At two years or more, 50% were fully continent and 33% were socially continent. Continence rates tended to be better after focal compared to whole-gland treatments. Erectile dysfunction was present in 95%. Positive surgical margin rate was 39%. Biochemical recurrence occurred in 13% and local or metastatic recurrence in 11%.

CONCLUSIONS

sRARP is technically more challenging but is a feasible option in high-volume centres for treatment of recurrent PCa. Patients should be counselled that functional outcomes are inferior to primary RARP. Adjustment of surgical technique according to the primary treatment is key for good surgical outcomes.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We report our experience with sRARP for the management of localised PCa recurrence after primary treatment. This represents a feasible approach with acceptable peri-operative complications and cancer outcomes. Functional outcomes are inferior to RARP in the primary setting.

Robot-assisted resection of ectopic kidney in children: An anatomical illustration

INTRODUCTION

Failure of kidney migration during embryonic life results in an ectopic kidney, with an incidence varying from 1 in 500 to 1 in 1200. Pelvic kidney can be a rare cause of recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI), warranting nephrectomy in some cases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A 7-year-old girl with a history of recurrent UTIs and vaginal discharge was diagnosed with a dysplastic afunctional ectopic kidney located in the pelvis, with ureter draining into the cervix or vaginal wall.

RESULTS

A robot-assisted approach was chosen, with side docking of the robot to allow concurrent vaginoscopic/hysteroscopic exploration. A uterus bicornis was found. The ectopic ureter was dissected toward its drainage in the vaginal wall, where it was sutured and resected. The dysplastic kidney and ureter were removed. Compared to pure laparoscopic approach, dissection deep into the pelvis toward the vaginal wall is aided by the robotic dexterity and facilitates complete resection of the structure, which avoids leaving a ureteric stump into the vaginal wall.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted surgery is a safe and effective option for resection of ectopic kidneys with ectopic ureter in children. Dissection up until the vaginal wall in children is aided by robotic dexterity, making this kind of surgery the ideal indication for robotic-assisted surgery.