1
|
Andresen V, Becker G, Frieling T, Goebel-Stengel M, Gundling F, Herold A, Karaus M, Keller J, Kim M, Klose P, Krammer H, Kreis ME, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R, Langhorst J, Layer P, Lenzen-Großimlinghaus R, Madisch A, Mönnikes H, Müller-Lissner S, Rubin D, Schemann M, Schwille-Kiuntke J, Stengel A, Storr M, van der Voort I, Voderholzer W, Wedel T, Wirz S, Witzigmann H, Pehl C. Aktualisierte S2k-Leitlinie chronische Obstipation der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurogastroenterologie & Motilität (DGNM) – April 2022 – AWMF-Registriernummer: 021–019. Z Gastroenterol 2022; 60:1528-1572. [PMID: 36223785 DOI: 10.1055/a-1880-1928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- V Andresen
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - G Becker
- Klinik für Palliativmedizin, Freiburg, Deutschland
| | - T Frieling
- Medizinische Klinik II, Helios-Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Deutschland
| | | | - F Gundling
- Medizinische Klinik II (Gastroenterologie, Gastroenterologische Onkologie, Hepatologie, Diabetologie, Stoffwechsel, Infektiologie), Klinikum am Bruderwald, Bamberg, Deutschland
| | - A Herold
- Sozialstiftung Bamberg, End- und Dickdarm-Zentrum Mannheim, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - M Karaus
- Abt. Innere Medizin, Evang. Krankenhaus Göttingen-Weende, Göttingen, Deutschland
| | - J Keller
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - M Kim
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie (Chirurgische Klinik I) des Universitätsklinikums, Zentrum Operative Medizin (ZOM), Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - P Klose
- Universität Duisburg-Essen, Medizinische Fakultät, Essen, Deutschland
| | - H Krammer
- Sozialstiftung Bamberg, End- und Dickdarm-Zentrum Mannheim, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - M E Kreis
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - J Langhorst
- Knappschafts-Krankenhaus, Essen, Deutschland
| | - P Layer
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | | | - A Madisch
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, interventionelle Endoskopie und Diabetologie, Klinikum Siloah-Oststadt-Heidehaus, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - H Mönnikes
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - D Rubin
- Klinik für Innere Medizin Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, DRK Kliniken Berlin Mitte, Berlin, Deutschland.,Klinik für Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, Vivantes Klinikum Spandau, Spandau, Deutschland
| | - M Schemann
- Lehrstuhl für Humanbiologie, TU München, Freising, Deutschland
| | - J Schwille-Kiuntke
- Innere Medizin VI Psychosomat. Medizin u. Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.,Institut für Arbeitsmedizin, Sozialmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - A Stengel
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Psychosomatik, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - M Storr
- Zentrum für Endoskopie, Starnberg, Deutschland
| | - I van der Voort
- Klinik für Innere Medizin Gastroenterologie und Diabetologie, Jüdisches Krankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - T Wedel
- Anatomisches Institut, Universität Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - S Wirz
- Cura Krankenhaus Bad Honnef, Bad Honnef, Deutschland
| | - H Witzigmann
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Krankenhaus Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - C Pehl
- Medizinische Klinik, Krankenhaus Vilsbiburg, Vilsbiburg, Deutschland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Keller J, Wedel T, Seidl H, Kreis ME, van der Voort I, Gebhard M, Langhorst J, Lynen Jansen P, Schwandner O, Storr M, van Leeuwen P, Andresen V, Preiß JC, Layer P, Allescher H, Andus T, Bischoff SC, Buderus S, Claßen M, Ehlert U, Elsenbruch S, Engel M, Enninger A, Fischbach W, Freitag M, Frieling T, Gillessen A, Goebel-Stengel M, Gschossmann J, Gundling F, Haag S, Häuser W, Helwig U, Hollerbach S, Holtmann G, Karaus M, Katschinski M, Krammer H, Kruis W, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R, Lynen Jansen P, Madisch A, Matthes H, Miehlke S, Mönnikes H, Müller-Lissner S, Niesler B, Pehl C, Pohl D, Posovszky C, Raithel M, Röhrig-Herzog G, Schäfert R, Schemann M, Schmidt-Choudhury A, Schmiedel S, Schweinlin A, Schwille-Kiuntke J, Stengel A, Tesarz J, Voderholzer W, von Boyen G, von Schönfeld J. Update S3-Leitlinie Intestinale Motilitätsstörungen: Definition, Pathophysiologie, Diagnostik und Therapie. Gemeinsame Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurogastroenterologie und Motilität (DGNM). Z Gastroenterol 2022; 60:192-218. [PMID: 35148561 DOI: 10.1055/a-1646-1279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jutta Keller
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus in Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Thilo Wedel
- Institut für Anatomie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Holger Seidl
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Gastroenterologische Onkologie, Isarklinikum München, München, Deutschland
| | - Martin E Kreis
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Ivo van der Voort
- Klinik für Innere Medizin - Gastroenterologie und Diabetologie, Jüdisches Krankenhaus Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - Jost Langhorst
- Klinik für Integrative Medizin und Naturheilkunde, Klinikum Bamberg, Bamberg, Deutschland
| | - Petra Lynen Jansen
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Oliver Schwandner
- Abteilung für Proktologie, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg
| | - Martin Storr
- Zentrum für Endoskopie, Gesundheitszentrum Starnberger See, Starnberg
| | - Pia van Leeuwen
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Viola Andresen
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus in Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Jan C Preiß
- Klinik für Innere Medizin - Gastroenterologie, Diabetologie und Hepatologie, Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin
| | - Peter Layer
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus in Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Layer P, Andresen V, Allescher H, Bischoff SC, Claßen M, Elsenbruch S, Freitag M, Frieling T, Gebhard M, Goebel-Stengel M, Häuser W, Holtmann G, Keller J, Kreis ME, Kruis W, Langhorst J, Jansen PL, Madisch A, Mönnikes H, Müller-Lissner S, Niesler B, Pehl C, Pohl D, Raithel M, Röhrig-Herzog G, Schemann M, Schmiedel S, Schwille-Kiuntke J, Storr M, Preiß JC, Andus T, Buderus S, Ehlert U, Engel M, Enninger A, Fischbach W, Gillessen A, Gschossmann J, Gundling F, Haag S, Helwig U, Hollerbach S, Karaus M, Katschinski M, Krammer H, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R, Matthes H, Menge D, Miehlke S, Posovszky MC, Schaefert R, Schmidt-Choudhury A, Schwandner O, Schweinlin A, Seidl H, Stengel A, Tesarz J, van der Voort I, Voderholzer W, von Boyen G, von Schönfeld J, Wedel T. Update S3-Leitlinie Reizdarmsyndrom: Definition, Pathophysiologie, Diagnostik und Therapie. Gemeinsame Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurogastroenterologie und Motilität (DGNM) – Juni 2021 – AWMF-Registriernummer: 021/016. Z Gastroenterol 2021; 59:1323-1415. [PMID: 34891206 DOI: 10.1055/a-1591-4794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- P Layer
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - V Andresen
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - H Allescher
- Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Gastroent., Hepatologie u. Stoffwechsel, Klinikum Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Deutschland
| | - S C Bischoff
- Institut für Ernährungsmedizin, Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Deutschland
| | - M Claßen
- Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Klinikum Links der Weser, Bremen, Deutschland
| | - S Elsenbruch
- Klinik für Neurologie, Translational Pain Research Unit, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland.,Abteilung für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - M Freitag
- Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin Department für Versorgungsforschung, Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Deutschland
| | - T Frieling
- Medizinische Klinik II, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Deutschland
| | - M Gebhard
- Gemeinschaftspraxis Pathologie-Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - M Goebel-Stengel
- Innere Medizin II, Helios Klinik Rottweil, Rottweil, und Innere Medizin VI, Psychosomat. Medizin u. Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - W Häuser
- Innere Medizin I mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Saarbrücken, Deutschland
| | - G Holtmann
- Faculty of Medicine & Faculty of Health & Behavioural Sciences, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australien
| | - J Keller
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - M E Kreis
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - J Langhorst
- Klinik für Integrative Medizin und Naturheilkunde, Sozialstiftung Bamberg, Klinikum am Bruderwald, Bamberg, Deutschland
| | - P Lynen Jansen
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - A Madisch
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, interventionelle Endoskopie und Diabetologie, Klinikum Siloah, Klinikum Region Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - H Mönnikes
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - B Niesler
- Abteilung Molekulare Humangenetik Institut für Humangenetik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - C Pehl
- Medizinische Klinik, Krankenhaus Vilsbiburg, Vilsbiburg, Deutschland
| | - D Pohl
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz
| | - M Raithel
- Medizinische Klinik II m.S. Gastroenterologie und Onkologie, Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | | | - M Schemann
- Lehrstuhl für Humanbiologie, TU München, Deutschland
| | - S Schmiedel
- I. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Deutschland
| | - J Schwille-Kiuntke
- Abteilung für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Medizinische Universitätsklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.,Institut für Arbeitsmedizin, Sozialmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - M Storr
- Zentrum für Endoskopie, Gesundheitszentrum Starnberger See, Starnberg, Deutschland
| | - J C Preiß
- Klinik für Innere Medizin - Gastroenterologie, Diabetologie und Hepatologie, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Frieling T, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R, Weingardt C, Heise J, Kreysel C, Blank M, Müller D. Esophageal function tests are not helpful in symptoms suspicious of extraesophageal reflux – a prospective study in 74 patients. Z Gastroenterol 2016; 54:1061-8. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-107358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
5
|
Frieling T, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R, Weingardt C, Heise J, Kreysel C, Blank M, Müller D. Clinical impact of esophageal function tests and argon plasma coagulation in heterotopic gastric mucosa of the esophagus and extraesophageal reflux symptoms - a prospective study. Z Gastroenterol 2015; 53:101-7. [PMID: 25668711 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1385554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Globus, chronic cough, mucous obstruction and hoarseness are frequently interpreted and classified as manifestation of extraesophageal reflux (EER) or laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Recent studies have indicated that ablation of heterotopic gastric mucosa of the proximal esophagus (HGMPE) by argon plasma coagulation (APC) significantly reduces EER/LPR symptoms. METHODS In a prospective study we evaluated 14 patients with HGMPE and EER/LPR symptoms by esophageal function testing (esophageal manometry, combined 24 h-pH-metry-impedance - oropharyngeal-pH measurement), standardized symptom questionnaire (visual analogue scales), and esophagealgastroduodenoscopy (EGD). The patients were stratified into 3 groups: GERD (n = 5), functional heartburn (n = 5) and non-GERD-non-functional heartburn (n = 4). Patients (n = 12) received endoscopic ablation of HGMPE by APC. RESULTS 73 % of the patients responded to APC with a reduction of frequency and intensity of their EER/LPR symptoms. The response to APC varied between the quality of symptoms and was most frequently seen in globus, swallowing difficulty and mucous obstruction. The magnitude of symptom reduction was highest in heartburn, sore throat, and globus. The response to APC was comparable between the three groups of patients irrespective of GERD and the presence or absence of reflux symptoms. Although 50 % of the patients showed an increased Ryan Score as measured by acid reflux in the posterior oropharynx, comparison between responders and non-responders to APC showed no significant differences with regard to symptom quality, acid and non-acid reflux, LES resting pressure, esophageal motility and Ryan Score. CONCLUSION The study indicates that a large proportion of patients with HGMPE and EER/LPR symptoms responded to APC. However, we could not demonstrate a clinical or functional parameter that differentiated between responders and non-responders to APC or could predict the response to APC.
Collapse
|
6
|
Frieling T, Neuhaus F, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R, Heise J, Kreysel C, Hülsdonk A, Blank M, Czypull M. Prospective and randomized study to evaluate the clinical impact of cap assisted colonoscopy (CAC). Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51:1383-8. [PMID: 24338756 DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1335637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although colonoscopy is the standard procedure in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia, a significant number of clinical relevant lesions may be missed even by experienced endoscopists using current technology. A transparent cap mounted at the tip of a colonoscope may be an easy way to extend the visual field during colonoscopy and may improve the detection rate of mucosal lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS The significance of cap assisted (CAC) vs. conventional colonoscopy (CC) on polyp detection rate was evaluated in a prospective randomized controlled trial in 504 patients. RESULTS CC and CAC detected polyps in 39.3 % and 31.8, not significantly different. There was also no significant difference between CAC and CC according to age, sex, indication for colonoscopy, diverticulosis, sedation, bowel cleansing, withdrawal time, time/number of attempts to intubate the cecal walve, number, localization, size or histology of polyps,. However, the time to reach the cecal floor and the overall time of colonoscopy were significantly lower for CAC (1 minute). CONCLUSION CAC was without clinical impact on polyp detection rate or performance of colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
7
|
Andresen V, Enck P, Frieling T, Herold A, Ilgenstein P, Jesse N, Karaus M, Kasparek M, Keller J, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R, Krammer H, Kreis M, Layer P, Madisch A, Matthes H, Mönnikes H, Müller-Lissner S, Preiss J, Sailer M, Schemann M, Schwille-Kiuntke J, Voderholzer W, van der Voort I, Wedel T, Pehl C. S2k-Leitlinie Chronische Obstipation: Definition, Pathophysiologie, Diagnostik und Therapie. Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51:651-72. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1335808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
8
|
Pehl C, Keller J, Allescher HD, Feussner H, Frieling T, Goebel-Stengel M, Gschossmann J, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R, Mönnikes H, Nguyen HN, Müller M, Schirra J, Storr M, van der Voort I, Yüce B. [Diagnosis of oesophageal reflux by PH, impedance, and bilirubin measurement: recommendations of the German Society of Neurogastroenterology and of the working group for neurogastroenterology of the German Society for Digestive and Metabolic Diseases]. Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50:1310-32. [PMID: 23225560 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
The current recommendations on indications, technical performance, and interpretation of diagnostic techniques for oesophageal reflux update the German recommandations about 24 hour pH measurement of 2003. The recommendations encompass conventional pH measurement, wireless pH measurement, pH and impedance measurements, and bilirubin measurement (duodenogastro-oesophageal reflux).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Pehl
- Medizinische Klinik, Kreiskrankenhaus Vilsbiburg, Vilsbiburg.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Frieling T, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R, Kalde S, Heise J, Hülsdonk A, Kreysel C. Fructose malabsorption: how much fructose can a healthy subject tolerate? Digestion 2012; 84:269-72. [PMID: 21952629 DOI: 10.1159/000329570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2011] [Accepted: 05/24/2011] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS In a prospective study, we evaluated fructose absorption capacity in 17 healthy female volunteers aged 16-27 years. METHODS All volunteers underwent analysis of their daily food intake diary and standardized breath tests. The volunteers were challenged consecutively with oral intake of 50, 25 and 15 g of fructose. RESULTS The average daily ingestion of fructose (19.54 ± 14.95 g) was not different between volunteers with positive and negative breath tests. On day 1, 53% of subjects exhibited a significant (≥20 ppm) increase in breath hydrogen and gastrointestinal symptoms upon challenge with 50 g of fructose. Moreover, 37.5% of the volunteers with a negative breath test became positive upon a second challenge with 50 g of fructose but remained asymptomatic. On day 2, 1 of the 9 volunteers (12.5%) with a positive breath test on day 1 exhibited an asymptomatic positive breath test upon exposure to 25 and 15 g of fructose on day 3. The 8 volunteers with a negative test (25 g of fructose) remained negative after a second exposure to 25 g of fructose. CONCLUSION The results of this study indicate that hydrogen breath tests with fructose challenge of 50 g of fructose are inappropriate to characterize clinically significant fructose malabsorption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Frieling
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectiology, Neurogastroenterology, Hematology and Oncology, HELIOS Clinic Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Layer P, Andresen V, Pehl C, Allescher H, Bischoff SC, Classen M, Enck P, Frieling T, Haag S, Holtmann G, Karaus M, Kathemann S, Keller J, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R, Kruis W, Langhorst J, Matthes H, Mönnikes H, Müller-Lissner S, Musial F, Otto B, Rosenberger C, Schemann M, van der Voort I, Dathe K, Preiss JC. [Irritable bowel syndrome: German consensus guidelines on definition, pathophysiology and management]. Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49:237-93. [PMID: 21287438 DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- P Layer
- Für die Konsensusgruppe Reizdarmsyndrom; Konsensuskonferenz 18./ 19.9.2009.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Frieling T, Schindler P, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R, Heise J, Hülsdonk A, Kreysel C. Krefeld CONTRA study: conventional peroral Esophago-Gastro-Duodenoscopy (EGD) vs. transnasal EGD--a prospective and randomised study with independent evaluation of conscious sedation, endoscope diameter, and access path. Z Gastroenterol 2010; 48:818-24. [PMID: 20687017 DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The guidelines of the German Gastroenterology Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten, DGVS) demand the presence of an additional qualified person solely responsible for patient monitoring during sedated endoscopy. Transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) allows easy access to the upper gastrointestinal tract and may avoid the complications induced by conscious sedation and reduce medical costs. PATIENT AND METHOD 120 patients referred to diagnostic EGD were assigned to six groups: group 1, unsedated peroral EGD with normal-caliber endoscope; group 2, unsedated peroral EGD with small-caliber endoscope; group 3, sedated peroral EGD with normal-caliber endoscope; group 4, sedated peroral EGD with small-caliber endoscope; group 5, unsedated transnasal EGD with small-caliber endoscope; group 6, sedated transnasal EGD with small-caliber endoscope. Outcome parameters included objective (duration, oxygen saturation) and subjective measures (standardised visual analogue scales) of the endoscopy staff (handling, insertion, retroflexion, tolerability, overall assessment) and patients (pain, unpleasantness, sore throat, choking, gagging, meteorism, anxiety, acceptability). RESULTS The patients were comparable according to age, sex, anxiety, and respiratory function before EGD. Sedoanalgesia was without effect on EGD handling and duration, patient tolerability and overall assessment by endoscopists and assistants. Negative effects of sedoanalgesia (decreased oxygen saturation, patient acceptability) were much lower and without significance for transnasal compared to peroral EGD. Patient tolerability and acceptability of the endoscopic staff (handling, insertion, retroflexion) were significantly better for the small-caliber endoscope. Duration of unsedated transnasal EGD was slightly but significantly longer, pain, unpleasantness, and anxiety slightly but significantly higher compared to sedated peroral EGD. However, these differences could no loner be detected seven days after endoscopy. Cost analysis revealed major advantage for transnasal EGD. CONCLUSION Unsedated transnasal EGD may replace diagnostic peroral EGD, reduces costs with acceptable patient discomfort and has advantagous acceptability of the endoscopic staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Frieling
- Medizinische Klinik II, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie, Neurogastroenterologie, Hämatologie und Onkologie, HELIOS-Klinikum Krefeld, Deutschland.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pehl C, Enck P, Franke A, Frieling T, Heitland W, Herold A, Hinninghofen H, Karaus M, Keller J, Krammer HJ, Kreis M, Kuhlbusch-Zicklam R, Mönnikes H, Münnich U, Schiedeck T, Schmidtmann M. Empfehlungen zur Anorektalen Manometrie im Erwachsenenalter. Z Gastroenterol 2007; 45:397-417. [PMID: 17503320 DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-963099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
This document contains the guidelines of the German Societies of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Gastroenterology (committee for proctology), Abdominal Surgery (coloproctology working group), and Coloproctology for anorectal manometry in adults. Recommendations are given about technical notes, study preparation (equipment; patient), technique for performing manometry and data analysis, reproducibility, and indications. Minimum standards for anorectal manometry are measurement of resting and squeeze pressure, testing of rectoanal inhibitory reflex, determination of rectal sensation (first perception and urge), and calculation of rectal compliance. Anorectal manometry is indicated in patients with fecal incontinence and constipation in the context of a structured programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Pehl
- Medizinische Klinik, Kreiskrankenhaus Vilsbiburg.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|