Ultraviolet exposure to the face in patients with xeroderma pigmentosum and healthy controls: applying a novel methodology to define photoprotection behaviour

BACKGROUND

In Xeroderma Pigmentosum (XP), the main means of preventing skin and eye cancers is extreme protection against ultraviolet radiation (UVR). Protection is most important for the face.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess how well patients with XP adhere to medical advice to protect against UVR by objectively estimating the mean daily dose of UVR to the face.

METHODS

We objectively estimated the UVR dose to the face in 36 XP patients and 25 healthy individuals over 3 weeks in the summer. We used a new methodology which combined UVR dose measurements from a wrist-worn dosimeter with an activity diary record of face photoprotection behaviour for each 15 minute period spent outside. A protection factor was associated with each behaviour, and the data analysed using a negative binomial mixed-effects model.

RESULTS

The mean daily UVR dose (weighted for DNA damage capacity) to the face in the XP patients was 0.13 Standard Erythemal Doses (SED) (mean in healthy individuals = 0.51 SED). There was wide variation between patients (range <0.01 - 0.48 SED/day). Self-caring adult patients had a very similar UV dose to the face to cared-for patients (0.13 vs 0.12 SED/day) despite photoprotecting much more poorly when outside, because the self-caring adults were outside in daylight much less.

CONCLUSIONS

Photoprotection behaviour varies widely within the XP group indicating that non-adherence to photoprotection advice is a significant issue. Timing and duration of going outside are as important as photoprotective measures taken when outside, to determine the UVR exposure to the face. This new methodology will be of value in identifying the sources of UVR exposure in other conditions where facial UV exposure is a key outcome, particularly in patients with multiple non-melanoma skin cancers.

Acquired erythropoietic protoporphyria as a result of myelodysplasia causing loss of chromosome 18

We report a patient aged 73 years, who developed erythropoietic protoporphyria with typical photosensitivity, at the same time as she was diagnosed as having myelodysplastic syndrome. The myelodysplastic clone in her bone marrow completely lacked one of the two copies of chromosome 18. As chromosome 18 is the locus of the ferrochelatase gene, we postulate that this chromosomal deletion led to reduced synthesis of the enzyme in the bone marrow clone, so causing the porphyria. The nature of the remaining ferrochelatase allele was examined by polymorphism analysis and we discuss the insights that this patient's genotype may reveal about the pathogenesis of porphyria in myelodysplasia.

Ferrochelatase gene polymorphism analysis for accurate genetic counselling in erythropoietic protoporphyria

It has recently been shown that most cases of clinically overt erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP) result from coinheritance of a mutated ferrochelatase gene and a commonly occurring low-expression normal variant allele. The identification of two polymorphic variant sequences associated with this low-expression allele now enables improved predictive counselling for couples where one partner has EPP. We describe a patient and his spouse in whom we have used such genetic analysis to provide an accurate estimate of the chance that their future offspring may suffer from EPP.

Erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP) at 40. Where are we now?

Since Professor Magnus first defined erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP) in 1961, there has been considerable progress in the understanding this disease. The past decade has been a period of spectacular progress in understanding the genetics and pathogenesis of the disease by molecular investigation. However, progress in therapy for EPP has been slower, and has been dogged by difficulty in assessing treatment efficacy in patients. We are now entering an era in which advances in molecular genetics are directly affecting patient management. This review summarises laboratory and clinical progress in EPP in the past 40 years, and assesses the potential impact of molecular biology on clinical practice.