Association of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis and Periodontal Disease: A Double-Blind Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Both osteoporosis (OP) and periodontitis are chronic inflammatory diseases associated with bone loss mediated by local and systemic factors. The two diseases share common risk factors. Previous studies have suggested that OP in itself is a predisposing factor for periodontal tissue destruction in postmenopausal women. However, only a moderate correlation has been shown between the two conditions. In this study, we compared the severity of periodontal disease in postmenopausal osteoporotic women and postmenopausal women without OP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study group consisted of 100 postmenopausal women in the age group of 50-65 years: Group 1 (50 osteoporotic) and Group 2 (50 non-osteoporotic women). Periodontal parameters included sulcus bleeding index, oral hygiene index simplified, probing pocket depth (PPD), and clinical attachment loss (CAL), interproximal alveolar bone loss (ABL), and number of missing teeth. The correlation of periodontal disease status with systemic bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

The results indicated that osteoporotic (Group 1) women had a significantly greater PPD, CAL, and ABL when compared with the non-osteoporotic Group 2 (P < 0.0001). There was no significant correlation between BMD and various parameters between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of the present study it was noted that postmenopausal OP is associated with an increased incidence and severity of periodontal disease. Educating postmenopausal osteoporotic women regarding the importance of good oral care should be part of their management regime. Hence, it could be inferred a possibility of a probable relationship between OP and periodontal disease, but long-term prospective studies are warranted in the future in order to provide definitive evidence.

A comparison of computed tomography scans and digital periapical radiographs ridge height measurements

To investigate the agreement between computerized tomography scans (CT) and intraoral periapical digital radiographs (PA) alveolar ridge height measurements in maxillary and mandibular posterior regions. We reviewed 100 implant patient radiographic records and identified 27 mandibular sites in 19 patients and 23 maxillary sites in 13 patients with available CT scans and matching PA radiographs. The distance from the crest of the ridge to the floor of the maxillary sinus or to the superior border of the inferior alveolar canal was measured. PAs were measured with Dexis software v. 8.0 and CTs were measured with Simplant software v. 11.02. Two examiners (RJ and MM) recorded the measurements separately; each examiner recorded two readings. The average of the 4 readings was used for data analysis. Absolute agreement: Paired t test comparing ridge-height measurements between the two imaging methods showed no differences for maxillary sites (P > 0.2) and significant differences for the mandibular sites (CT > PA, P = 0.0009). Relative agreement: Kendall rank correlation analysis of ridge-height measurements between the 2 imaging methods showed a high positive correlation for maxillary sites (Kendall's tau = 0.76, P = 0.0001) and moderate correlation for the mandibular sites (Kendall's tau = 0.46, P = 0.001). Maxillary PAs tend to approximate CT ridge-height measurements. By contrast mandibular PAs tend to underestimate the distance from the crest of the ridge to the inferior alveolar canal.