Understanding familial risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a deadly disease that is the result of an accumulation of sequential genetic alterations. These genetic alterations can either be inherited, such as pathogenic germline variants that are associated with an increased risk of cancer, or acquired, such as somatic mutations that occur during the lifetime of an individual. Understanding the genetic basis of inherited risk of PDAC is essential to advancing patient care and outcomes through improved clinical surveillance, early detection initiatives, and targeted therapies. In this review we discuss factors associated with an increased risk of PDAC, the prevalence of genetic variants associated with an increased risk in patients with PDAC, estimates of PDAC risk in carriers of pathogenic germline variants in genes associated with an increased risk of PDAC. The role of common variants in pancreatic cancer risk will also be discussed.

Somatic loss of ATM is a late event in pancreatic tumorigenesis

Understanding the timing and spectrum of genetic alterations that contribute to the development of pancreatic cancer is essential for effective interventions and treatments. The aim of this study was to characterize somatic ATM alterations in noninvasive pancreatic precursor lesions and invasive pancreatic adenocarcinomas from patients with and without pathogenic germline ATM variants. DNA was isolated and sequenced from the invasive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and precursor lesions of patients with a pathogenic germline ATM variant. Tumor and precursor lesions from these patients as well as colloid carcinoma from patients without a germline ATM variant were immunolabeled to assess ATM expression. Among patients with a pathogenic germline ATM variant, somatic ATM alterations, either mutations and/or loss of protein expression, were identified in 75.0% of invasive pancreatic adenocarcinomas but only 7.1% of pancreatic precursor lesions. Loss of ATM expression was also detected in 31.0% of colloid carcinomas from patients unselected for germline ATM status, significantly higher than in pancreatic precursor lesions [pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasms (p = 0.0013); intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, p = 0.0040] and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (p = 0.0076) unselected for germline ATM status. These data are consistent with the second hit to ATM being a late event in pancreatic tumorigenesis. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Functional CDKN2A assay identifies frequent deleterious alleles misclassified as variants of uncertain significance

Pathogenic germline CDKN2A variants are associated with an increased risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). CDKN2A variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) are reported in up to 4.3% of patients with PDAC and result in significant uncertainty for patients and their family members as an unknown fraction are functionally deleterious, and therefore, likely pathogenic. Functional characterization of CDKN2A VUSs is needed to reclassify variants and inform clinical management. Twenty-nine germline CDKN2A VUSs previously reported in patients with PDAC or in ClinVar were evaluated using a validated in vitro cell proliferation assay. Twelve of the 29 CDKN2A VUSs were functionally deleterious (11 VUSs) or potentially functionally deleterious (1 VUS) and were reclassified as likely pathogenic variants. Thus, over 40% of CDKN2A VUSs identified in patients with PDAC are functionally deleterious and likely pathogenic. When incorporating VUSs found to be functionally deleterious, and reclassified as likely pathogenic, the prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic CDKN2A in patients with PDAC reported in the published literature is increased to up to 4.1% of patients, depending on family history. Therefore, CDKN2A VUSs may play a significant, unappreciated role in risk of pancreatic cancer. These findings have significant implications for the counselling and care of patients and their relatives.

Oncogenic switch and single-agent MET inhibitor sensitivity in a subset of EGFR-mutant lung cancer

[Figure: see text].

Abstract 1732: Switch to MET oncogene dependence as a novel mechanism of drug resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer

Introduction: Non-small cell lung cancers harboring sensitizing gain-of-function mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are treated with small molecule EGFR kinase inhibitors including erlotinib and osimertinib. Unfortunately, the clinical efficacy of these inhibitors is limited by progression to drug resistance. Genomic amplification of the hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET) is a prevalent mechanism of resistance to clinical EGFR inhibitors. EGFR mutant lung cancers with MET amplification are co-dependent on signaling through EGFR and MET kinases, whereby either oncogene can phosphorylate the EGFR family receptor ERBB3, activating downstream signaling and promoting survival. These EGFR/MET co-dependent cancers are characteristically resistant to treatment with individual drugs, but retain sensitivity to combination treatment with EGFR and MET inhibitors. Here, we describe three patient-derived EGFR mutant, MET amplified lung cancer models that exhibit a switch away from EGFR, to MET oncogene dependence. Methods: We established and characterized patient-derived lung cancer cell lines and xenograft models harboring concurrent EGFR activating mutations (EGFR L858R or EGFR Del19) and genomic MET copy number gain. Three patient-derived models—DFCI81, DFCI161, and DFCI307—were developed from pleural effusion and core biopsy specimens of patients whose tumors progressed on erlotinib. Clinical samples were immediately sorted and stably cultured in vitro or engrafted into immunodeficient mice. Results: DFCI81, DFCI161, and DFCI307 cell lines and xenograft models retained mutant EGFR expression, but exhibited resistance to clinical EGFR inhibitors and sensitivity to single-agent c-MET inhibitors, including crizotinib and savolitinib. Comparing our EGFR-mutant and MET-dependent cell lines to EGFR/MET-codependent models, we observed that EGFR expression was significantly reduced in our models compared to controls. Ectopic overexpression of EGFR Del19 and EGFR L858R in DFCI81 and DFCI161 cell lines, respectively, was sufficient to confer crizotinib resistance and induce EGFR/MET co-dependency. We demonstrated that MET-mediated ERBB3 phosphorylation drives downstream PI3K activation to promote cell proliferation and survival in DFCI81 and DFCI161 cells. In these contexts, ERBB3 reactivation by recombinant ligand treatment was sufficient to induce EGFR-mediated ERBB3 activation, conferring resistance to single-agent crizotinib treatment. Conclusions: We have identified and characterized three patient-derived models of treatment refractory EGFR mutant lung cancer that exhibit a switch to MET oncogene dependency. Clinically, we predict a subset of EGFR mutant, MET-dependent tumors exists, and can be identified de novo by a reduced EGFR to MET expression ratio: a potential biomarker predictive of sensitivity to single-agent MET inhibition.

Citation Format: Pinar Ö. Eser, Raymond M. Paranal, Michael J. Poitras, Man Xu, Stephen Wang, Atsuko Ogino, Jihyun Choi, Pavlos Missios, Heidi M. Haikala, Jieun Son, Mika Lin, Masahiko Yanagita, Prafulla C. Gokhale, George Q. Daley, Pasi A. Jänne. Switch to MET oncogene dependence as a novel mechanism of drug resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1732.

Potent and Selective Covalent Quinazoline Inhibitors of KRAS G12C

Targeted covalent small molecules have shown promise for cancers driven by KRAS G12C. Allosteric compounds that access an inducible pocket formed by movement of a dynamic structural element in KRAS, switch II, have been reported, but these compounds require further optimization to enable their advancement into clinical development. We demonstrate that covalent quinazoline-based switch II pocket (SIIP) compounds effectively suppress GTP loading of KRAS G12C, MAPK phosphorylation, and the growth of cancer cells harboring G12C. Notably we find that adding an amide substituent to the quinazoline scaffold allows additional interactions with KRAS G12C, and remarkably increases the labeling efficiency, potency, and selectivity of KRAS G12C inhibitors. Structural studies using X-ray crystallography reveal a new conformation of SIIP and key interactions made by substituents located at the quinazoline 2-, 4-, and 7-positions. Optimized lead compounds in the quinazoline series selectively inhibit KRAS G12C-dependent signaling and cancer cell growth at sub-micromolar concentrations.

Response Heterogeneity of EGFR and HER2 Exon 20 Insertions to Covalent EGFR and HER2 Inhibitors

Insertion mutations in EGFR and HER2 both occur at analogous positions in exon 20. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with tumors harboring these mutations seldom achieve clinical responses to dacomitinib and afatinib, two covalent quinazoline-based inhibitors of EGFR or HER2, respectively. In this study, we investigated the effects of specific EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations from NSCLC patients that had clinically achieved a partial response after dacomitinib treatment. We identified Gly770 as a common feature among the drug-sensitive mutations. Structural modeling suggested that this mutation may facilitate inhibitor binding to EGFR. Introduction of Gly770 into two dacomitinib-resistant EGFR exon 20 insertion mutants restored sensitivity to dacomitinib. Based on these findings, we used afatinib to treat an NSCLC patient whose tumor harbored the HER2 V777_G778insGSP mutation and achieved a durable partial response. We further identified secondary mutations in EGFR (T790M or C797S) and HER2 (C805S) that mediated acquired drug resistance in drug-sensitive EGFR or HER2 exon 20 insertion models. Overall, our findings identified a subset of EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations that are sensitive to existing covalent quinazoline-based EGFR/HER2 inhibitors, with implications for current clinical treatment and next-generation small-molecule inhibitors. Cancer Res; 77(10); 2712-21. ©2017 AACR.