1
|
Slim K, Villet R. Glossary of sustainable development for the ecofriendly surgeon. J Visc Surg 2024; 161:3-6. [PMID: 38216345 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2023.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Karem Slim
- Department of Digestive Surgery, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Collectif d'eco-responsabilité en santé (CERES), Paris, France.
| | - Richard Villet
- Académies nationales de médecine et de chirurgie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Caton J, Villet R. The long tale of medical device certification… Open your registers…. J Visc Surg 2023; 160:321-322. [PMID: 37770320 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jacques Caton
- Académie nationale de médecine, 16, rue Bonaparte, 75006 Paris, France
| | - Richard Villet
- Académie nationale de médecine, 16, rue Bonaparte, 75006 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Houvenaeghel G, de Nonneville A, Chopin N, Classe JM, Mazouni C, Chauvet MP, Reyal F, Tunon de Lara C, Jouve E, Rouzier R, Daraï E, Gimbergues P, Coutant C, Azuar AS, Villet R, Crochet P, Rua S, Bannier M, Cohen M, Boher JM. The need to tailor the omission of axillary lymph node dissection to patients with good prognosis and sentinel node micro-metastases. Cancer Med 2023; 12:4023-4032. [PMID: 36127853 PMCID: PMC9972015 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Results of IBCSG-23-01-trial which included breast cancer patients with involved sentinel nodes (SN) by isolated-tumor-cells or micro-metastases supported the non-inferiority of completion axillary-lymph-node-dissection (cALND) omission. However, current data are considered insufficient to avoid cALND for all patients with SN-micro-metastases. METHODS To investigate the impact of cALND omission on disease-free-survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), we analyzed a cohort of 1421 patients <75 years old with SN-micro-metastases who underwent breast conservative surgery (BCS). We used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to obtain adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimators representing the experience in the analysis cohort, based on whether all or none had been subject to cALND omission. RESULTS Weighted log-rank tests comparing adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed significant differences in OS (p-value = 0.002) and borderline significant differences in DFS (p-value = 0.090) between cALND omission versus cALND. Cox's regression using stabilized IPTW evidenced an average increase in the risk of death associated with cALND omission (HR = 2.77, CI95% = 1.36-5.66). Subgroup analyses suggest that the rates of recurrence and death associated with cALND omission increase substantially after a large period of time in the half sample of women less likely to miss cALND. CONCLUSIONS Using IPTW to estimate the causal treatment effect of cALND in a large retrospective cohort, we concluded cALND omission is associated with an increased risk of recurrence and death in women of <75 years old treated by BCS in the absence of a large consensus in favor of omitting cALND. These results are particularly contributive for patients treated by BCS where cALND omission rates increase over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilles Houvenaeghel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CRCM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, INSERM, Marseille, France
| | - Alexandre de Nonneville
- Department of Medical Oncology, CRCM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, INSERM, Marseille, France
| | | | - Jean-Marc Classe
- Institut René Gauducheau, Site hospitalier Nord, St Herblain, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Eva Jouve
- Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sandrine Rua
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CRCM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, INSERM, Marseille, France
| | - Marie Bannier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CRCM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, INSERM, Marseille, France
| | - Monique Cohen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CRCM, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, INSERM, Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Marie Boher
- Department of Biostatistics and Methodology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 13009 and Aix-Marseille University, Unité Mixte de Recherche S1252, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pierre B, Allilaire JF, Villet R. Expression de la douleur et de sa puissance créatrice dans la peinture. Bulletin de l'Académie Nationale de Médecine 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.banm.2023.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
5
|
Villet R. The surgery and surgeons of tomorrow in the treatment of cancer. J Visc Surg 2021; 158:459-461. [PMID: 34876252 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2021.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- R Villet
- 16, rue de l'Abbé de l'Epée, 75005 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Michel JP, Villet R. [How do you feel about retirement…?]. Bull Acad Natl Med 2020; 204:924-926. [PMID: 32952177 PMCID: PMC7486211 DOI: 10.1016/j.banm.2020.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J-P Michel
- Académie nationale de médecine, 16, rue Bonaparte, 75006 Paris, France
| | - R Villet
- Académie nationale de médecine, 16, rue Bonaparte, 75006 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
The study of anatomy has played a large part in the progress of scientific observation throughout the centuries and was pivotal in elevating anatomy from the magical thinking of the Hippocrates era and freeing it from subservience to medicine which was all-powerful in the past. Anatomy theaters appeared in Northern Italy in the 14th century and developed in Western Europe from the early 16th century to the beginning of the 19th century. Anatomy theaters lived their golden age in France during the 18th century when the Royal Academy of Surgery (Académieroyaledechirurgie) was created in 1743. These theaters were open to the public, and therefore offered the double vocation of teaching and public entertainment: they were used to teach anatomy and surgery to students and surgeons and offered distraction for the well-informed public that was fascinated by death, ever-present and familiar to all. Anatomical dissection accomplished a double ritual: the "profane" ritual of valorization of scientific knowledge and the "sacred" ritual, where mankind, obsessed with death, respected the human body considered as a divine image. Anatomy theaters declined as they became overshadowed by progress in anatomical teaching using well-illustrated works in well-equipped medical schools while exhibition of anatomic oddities for public amusement was relegated to fairs and circus sideshows. Nonetheless they opened the way to modern anatomo-clinical methods and surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Marre
- Académie nationale de chirurgie, Les Cordeliers, 15, rue de l'École de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France.
| | - R Villet
- Académie nationale de chirurgie, Les Cordeliers, 15, rue de l'École de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Affiliation(s)
- R Villet
- 16, rue de l'Abbé de l'Epée, 75005 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jacques Rouëssé
- Académie de médecine, 16, rue Bonaparte, 75006 Paris, France.
| | - Richard Villet
- Académie de médecine, 16, rue Bonaparte, 75006 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Berthelot A, De Nonneville A, Classe JM, Cohen M, Reyal F, Mazouni C, Chauvet M, Martinez A, Chopin N, Daraï E, Coutant C, Rouzier R, Azuar AS, Guimbergues P, De Lara CT, Villet R, Bannier M, Gonçalves A, Houvenaeghel G. Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly breast cancer patients: Pattern of use and impact on overall survival. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz240.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
11
|
Tibi B, Vincens E, Durand M, Bentellis I, Salet-Lizee D, Kane A, Gadonneix P, Severac F, Ahallal Y, Chevallier D, Villet R. Comparison of different surgical techniques for pelvic floor repair in elderly women: a multi-institutional study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019; 299:1007-1013. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05076-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2018] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
12
|
Houvenaeghel G, Lambaudie E, Classe JM, Mazouni C, Giard S, Cohen M, Faure C, Charitansky H, Rouzier R, Daraï E, Hudry D, Azuar P, Villet R, Gimbergues P, Tunon de Lara C, Martino M, Fraisse J, Dravet F, Chauvet MP, Boher JM. Lymph node positivity in different early breast carcinoma phenotypes: a predictive model. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:45. [PMID: 30630443 PMCID: PMC6327612 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-5227-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2018] [Accepted: 12/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A strong correlation between breast cancer (BC) molecular subtypes and axillary status has been shown. It would be useful to predict the probability of lymph node (LN) positivity. Objective: To develop the performance of multivariable models to predict LN metastases, including nomograms derived from logistic regression with clinical, pathologic variables provided by tumor surgical results or only by biopsy. Methods A retrospective cohort was randomly divided into two separate patient sets: a training set and a validation set. In the training set, we used multivariable logistic regression techniques to build different predictive nomograms for the risk of developing LN metastases. The discrimination ability and calibration accuracy of the resulting nomograms were evaluated on the training and validation set. Results Consecutive sample of 12,572 early BC patients with sentinel node biopsies and no neoadjuvant therapy. In our predictive macro metastases LN model, the areas under curve (AUC) values were 0.780 and 0.717 respectively for pathologic and pre-operative model, with a good calibration, and results with validation data set were similar: AUC respectively of 0.796 and 0.725. Among the list of candidate’s regression variables, on the training set we identified age, tumor size, LVI, and molecular subtype as statistically significant factors for predicting the risk of LN metastases. Conclusions Several nomograms were reported to predict risk of SLN involvement and NSN involvement. We propose a new calculation model to assess this risk of positive LN with similar performance which could be useful to choose management strategies, to avoid axillary LN staging or to propose ALND for patients with high level probability of major axillary LN involvement but also to propose immediate breast reconstruction when post mastectomy radiotherapy is not required for patients without LN macro metastasis. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-5227-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilles Houvenaeghel
- Institut Paoli Calmettes et CRCM, 232 boulevard de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France. .,Aix-Marseille University, Unité Mixte de Recherche S912, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, 13385, Marseille, France.
| | - Eric Lambaudie
- Institut Paoli Calmettes et CRCM, 232 boulevard de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.,Aix-Marseille University, Unité Mixte de Recherche S912, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, 13385, Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Marc Classe
- Institut René Gauducheau, Site Hospitalier Nord, St Herblain, France
| | - Chafika Mazouni
- Institut Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, France
| | - Sylvia Giard
- Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 rue Frédéric Combenal, Lille, France
| | - Monique Cohen
- Institut Paoli Calmettes et CRCM, 232 boulevard de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | | | | | - Roman Rouzier
- Centre René Huguenin, 35 rue Dailly, Saint Cloud, France
| | - Emile Daraï
- Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris, France
| | - Delphine Hudry
- Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, France
| | - Pierre Azuar
- Hôpital de Grasse, Chemin de Clavary, Grasse, France
| | - Richard Villet
- Hôpital des Diaconnesses, 18 rue du Sergent Bauchat, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Marc Martino
- Institut Paoli Calmettes et CRCM, 232 boulevard de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Jean Fraisse
- Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, France
| | - François Dravet
- Institut René Gauducheau, Site Hospitalier Nord, St Herblain, France
| | | | - Jean Marie Boher
- Institut Paoli Calmettes et CRCM, 232 boulevard de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Houvenaeghel G, Cohen M, Raro P, De Troyer J, de Lara CT, Gimbergues P, Gauthier T, Faure-Virelizier C, Vaini-Cowen V, Lantheaume S, Regis C, Darai E, Ceccato V, D'Halluin G, Del Piano F, Villet R, Jouve E, Beedassy B, Theret P, Gabelle P, Zinzindohoue C, Opinel P, Marsollier-Ferrer C, Dhainaut-Speyer C, Colombo PE, Lambaudie E, Tallet A, Boher JM. Overview of the pathological results and treatment characteristics in the first 1000 patients randomized in the SERC trial: axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with involved sentinel node. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:1153. [PMID: 30463611 PMCID: PMC6249981 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-5053-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Three randomized trials have concluded at non inferiority of omission of complementary axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) for patients with involved sentinel node (SN). However, we can outline strong limitations of these trials to validate this attitude with a high scientific level. We designed the SERC randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01717131) to compare outcomes in patients with SN involvement treated with ALND or no further axillary treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze results of the first 1000 patients included. Methods SERC trial is a multicenter non-inferiority phase 3 trial. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with adjuvant chemotherapy administration and non-sentinel node (NSN) involvement. Results Of the 963 patients included in the analysis set, 478 were randomized to receive cALND and 485 SLNB alone. All patient demographics and tumor characteristics were balanced between the two arms. SN ITC was present in 6.3% patients (57/903), micro metastases in 33.0% (298), macro metastases in 60.7% (548) and 289 (34.2%) were non eligible to Z0011 trial criteria. Whole breast or chest wall irradiation was delivered in 95.9% (896/934) of patients, adjuvant chemotherapy in 69.5% (644/926), endocrine therapy in 89.6% (673/751) and the proportions were similar in the two arms. The overall rate of positive NSN was 19% (84/442) for patients with cALND. Crude rates of positive NSN according to SN status were 4.5% for ITC (1/22), 9.5% for micro metastases (13/137), 23.9% for macro metastases (61/255) and were respectively 29.36% (64/218), 9.33% (7/75) and 7.94% (10/126) when chemotherapy was administered after cALND, before cALND and for patients without chemotherapy. Conclusion The main objective of SERC trial is to demonstrate non inferiority of cALND omission. A strong interaction between timing of cALND and chemotherapy with positive NSN rate was observed. Trial registration This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01717131 October 19, 2012. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-5053-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilles Houvenaeghel
- Institut Paoli Calmettes & CRCM & Aix Marseille Univ, 232 Bd de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France. .,Department of surgery, Institut Paoli Calmettes & CRCM & Aix Marseille Univ, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France.
| | - Monique Cohen
- Institut Paoli Calmettes & CRCM & Aix Marseille Univ, 232 Bd de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.,Department of surgery, Institut Paoli Calmettes & CRCM & Aix Marseille Univ, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Pédro Raro
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, 15 rue André Boquel, 10059 49055, Angers Cedex 02, CS, France
| | - Jérémy De Troyer
- Polyclinique Urbain V, Chemin du Pont des Deux Eaux, 84000, Avignon, France
| | | | - Pierre Gimbergues
- Centre Jean Perrin, 58 rue Montalembert BP 392, 63011, Clermont Ferrand Cedex, France
| | - Tristan Gauthier
- HME CHU Dupuytren, 2 avenue Martin Luther King, 87000, Limoges, France
| | | | | | - Stéphane Lantheaume
- Clinique Pasteur, 294 boulevard Charles de Gaulle, 07500, Guilherand Granges, France
| | - Claudia Regis
- Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 rue F. Combemal, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Emile Darai
- Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Vivien Ceccato
- Institut Jean Godinot, 1 rue du Général Koenig, 51056, Reims, France
| | - Gauthier D'Halluin
- Centre Clinical, 2 chemin Frégenueil CS 42510 Soyaux, 16025, Angoulème, France
| | | | - Richard Villet
- Groupe Hospitalier Des Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Site Reuilly, 18 rue Sergent Bauchat, 75012, Paris, France
| | - Eva Jouve
- Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse, Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Bassoodéo Beedassy
- Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Service de chirurgie viscérale, Rue Henri Sainte-Claire Deville, 83056, Toulon, France
| | - Pierrick Theret
- CH Saint Quentin, 1 avenue Michel de l'Hospital, B.P. 608, 02321, Saint Quentin Cedex, France
| | - Philippe Gabelle
- GHM de Grenoble, La Clinique des Eaux Claires, 8 rue du Dr Calmette, 38028, Grenoble Cedex 1, France
| | | | - Pierre Opinel
- CHR du Pays d'Aix, Avenue des Tamaris, 13616, Aix en Provence Cedex 1, France
| | | | | | - Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo
- ICM - Institut Régional du Cancer Montpellier, 208 avenue des Apothicaires - Parc Euromédecine, 34298, Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - Eric Lambaudie
- Institut Paoli Calmettes & CRCM & Aix Marseille Univ, 232 Bd de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.,Department of surgery, Institut Paoli Calmettes & CRCM & Aix Marseille Univ, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Agnès Tallet
- Institut Paoli Calmettes & CRCM & Aix Marseille Univ, 232 Bd de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.,Department of radiotherapy, Institut Paoli Calmettes & CRCM & Aix Marseille Univ, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Marie Boher
- Institut Paoli Calmettes & CRCM & Aix Marseille Univ, 232 Bd de Sainte Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.,Department of biostatistics, Institut Paoli Calmettes & CRCM & Aix Marseille Univ, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
De Nonneville A, Gonçalves A, Boher JM, Classe JM, Cohen M, Colombo PE, Reyal F, Chauvet MP, Jouve E, Darai E, Blache G, Coutant C, Gimbergues P, Mazouni C, Rouzier R, Villet R, Crochet P, Azuar AS, Lambaudie E, Houvenaeghel G. Benefit of adjuvant systemic therapies in HR+ HER2- pT1ab node-negative breast carcinomas. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy270.193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
15
|
De Nonneville A, Gonçalves A, Boher JM, Cohen M, Reyal F, Classe JM, Giard S, Colombo PE, Muracciol X, Darai E, Jouve E, Mazouni C, Gimbergues P, Azuar AS, Barranger E, Rouzier R, Villet R, Chopin N, Lambaudie E, Houvenaeghel G. Impact of hormone receptor status in HER2+ early breast cancer: A paradigm shift in the trastuzumab era. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy270.214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
16
|
Nessi A, Kane A, Vincens E, Salet-Lizée D, Lepigeon K, Villet R. Descending Perineum Associated With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treated by Sacral Colpoperineopexy and Retrorectal Mesh Fixation: Preliminary Results. Front Surg 2018; 5:50. [PMID: 30294601 PMCID: PMC6159753 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Descending Perineum Syndrome (DPS) is a coloproctologic disease and the best treatment for it is yet to be defined. DPS is frequently associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and it is reasonable to postulate, that treatment of POP will also have an impact on DPS. We aimed to evaluate the subjective satisfaction and improvement of DPS for patients who have undergone a sacral colpoperineopexy associated with retrorectal mesh for concomitant POP. Methods: This retrospective cohort study, conducted between February 2010 and May 2016 included all women who had undergone surgery to treat POP and DPS. Improvement of POP was assessed clinically and subjective satisfaction was assessed with a survey. Results: Among the 37 operated patients, 31 responded to the questionnaire and 77.4% were satisfied with this surgical procedure. 94.6% were objectively cured for POP. There was a 60% improvement rate for constipation, 63.5 and 68% were cured or improved for ODS and the need for digital maneuvers respectively. Conclusion: Sacral colpoperineopexy associated with retrorectal dorsal mesh appears to objectively and subjectively improve POP associated with DPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aude Nessi
- Département Femme Mère Enfant, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Aminata Kane
- Visceral and Gynaecologic Surgery Unit, Diaconesses Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Etienne Vincens
- Visceral and Gynaecologic Surgery Unit, Diaconesses Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Karine Lepigeon
- Département Femme Mère Enfant, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Richard Villet
- Visceral and Gynaecologic Surgery Unit, Diaconesses Hospital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ferry P, Bertherat P, Gauthier A, Villet R, Del Piano F, Hamid D, Fernandez H, Broux PL, Salet-Lizée D, Vincens E, Ntshaykolo P, Debodinance P, Pocholle P, Thirouard Y, de Tayrac R. Transvaginal treatment of anterior and apical genital prolapses using an Ultra lightweight mesh: Restorelle ® Direct Fix™. A retrospective study on feasibility and morbidity. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2018; 47:443-449. [PMID: 29920380 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaginal mesh safety information is limited, especially concerning single incision techniques using ultra lightweight meshes for the treatment of anterior pelvic organ prolapse (POP). OBJECTIVE To determine the intraoperative and postoperative complication rates after anterior POP repair involving an ultralight mesh (19g/m2): Restorelle® Direct Fix™. METHODS A case series of 218 consecutive patients, operated on between January 2013 and December 2016 in ten tertiary and secondary care centres, was retrospectively analyzed. Eligible patients had POP vaginal repair (recurrent or not) planned with anterior Restorelle® Direct Fix™ mesh (with or without posterior mesh). Surgical complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS Intraoperative complications were bladder wound (0.5%), rectal wound (0.5%), ureteral injuries (0.9%). 98.2% of the patient did not have per operative complications. We observed one fail of procedure. Early complications mainly included urinary retention (8.7%) urinary tract infections (5.5%) and haematoma (2.7%). One haematoma required surgical treatment and another, embolization. 80.7% of the patient did not have complications during hospitalization and 80.3% did not have complication at the follow up visit. None of the analyzed factors (age, body mass index, surgical history, grade of prolapse or concomitant procedure) was significantly associated with the risk of perioperative complications. A total of 2.8% patients had grade III complications according Clavien Dindo. None had grade IV or V. CONCLUSIONS This multicentre case-series on the early experience of the use of anterior Restorelle® Direct Fix™ mesh showed a satisfactory technical feasibility and a low rate of grade III complications according Clavien Dindo. Long term studies are necessary to assess anterior Restorelle® Direct Fix™ mesh performances and to appraise patient satisfaction feedback.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pauline Bertherat
- Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis, 17000 La Rochelle, France
| | - Anne Gauthier
- CHU du Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Richard Villet
- Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, 75012 Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Etienne Vincens
- Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, 75012 Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Yannick Thirouard
- Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis, 17000 La Rochelle, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Affiliation(s)
- R Villet
- Service de chirurgie viscerale et gynécologique, groupe hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, 120, rue d'Avron, 75020 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Roy P, Leizorovicz A, Villet R, Mercier C, Bobin JY. Systematic versus sentinel-lymph-node-driven axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with operable breast cancer. Results of the GF-GS01 randomized trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018. [PMID: 29526019 PMCID: PMC5999168 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4733-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Sentinel-lymph-node (SLN) resection seems to minimize systematic axillary-lymph-node dissection (sALND) side effects in operated breast cancer patients. We explored whether SLN resection achieves similar therapeutic outcomes as sALND but with fewer side effects. Methods A randomized, controlled, open-label trial with parallel-group design compared sALND restricted to cases with positive SLN biopsy (test arm, n = 774) versus SLN biopsy followed by sALND (control arm, n = 770).
Results The five-year overall survivals in control and test arms were 96.42 and 95.64% (P = 0.2925). The estimated difference was nearly zero (precisely, − 0.79%, one-tailed 95% confidence interval (CI) limit − 2.44%). In a multivariate Cox model, the adjusted hazard ratio in the test arm was HR 0.81 (upper 95% CI limit 1.17). Advanced age (HR 1.05 per additional year, CI [1.03–1.08]), negative progesterone receptor (HR 2.17 [1.35–3.45]), SLN metastasis (HR 1.69 [1.03–2.79]), and only one SLN identification technique (HR 4.14 [1.21–14.18]) were associated with lower survival. Patients with ≥ 1 severe side effect at 1 month in control and test arms were 173/703 = 24.6% [21.5–28.0%] and 91/693 = 13.1% [10.7–15.9%] (P < 0.001). The estimated sensitivity of SLN biopsy (control arm) was 145/178 = 81.5% [74.8–86.7%].
Conclusions Restricting ALND to cases with positive SLN biopsy does not affect the overall survival but reduces by 11.5% [7.5–15.6%] (P < 0.001) the risk of severe short-time side effects of sALND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Roy
- Service de Biostatistique-Bioinformatique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 162 Avenue Lacassagne, 69003, Lyon, France. .,Université de Lyon, Lyon, France. .,Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France. .,Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive, CNRS, UMR 5558, Villeurbanne, France.
| | - A Leizorovicz
- Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.,Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive, CNRS, UMR 5558, Villeurbanne, France.,Service de pharmacologie clinique et essais thérapeutiques, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | - R Villet
- Service de chirurgie viscérale et gynécologique, Groupe hospitalier Diaconesses-Croix-Saint-Simon, Paris, France
| | - C Mercier
- Service de Biostatistique-Bioinformatique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 162 Avenue Lacassagne, 69003, Lyon, France.,Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.,Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive, CNRS, UMR 5558, Villeurbanne, France
| | - J Y Bobin
- Service de Chirurgie Oncologique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lucot JP, Cosson M, Bader G, Debodinance P, Akladios C, Salet-Lizée D, Delporte P, Savary D, Ferry P, Deffieux X, Campagne-Loiseau S, de Tayrac R, Blanc S, Fournet S, Wattiez A, Villet R, Ravit M, Jacquetin B, Fritel X, Fauconnier A. Safety of Vaginal Mesh Surgery Versus Laparoscopic Mesh Sacropexy for Cystocele Repair: Results of the Prosthetic Pelvic Floor Repair Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol 2018; 74:167-176. [PMID: 29472143 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2017] [Accepted: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic mesh sacropexy (LS) or transvaginal mesh repair (TVM) are surgical techniques used to treat cystoceles. Health authorities have highlighted the need for comparative studies to evaluate the safety of surgeries with meshes. OBJECTIVE To compare the rate of complications, and functional and anatomical outcomes between LS and TVM. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Multicenter randomized controlled trial from October 2012 to April 2014 in 11 French public hospitals. Women with cystocele stage ≥2 (pelvic organ prolapse quantification), aged 45-75 yr, without previous prolapse surgery. INTERVENTION Synthetic nonabsorbable mesh placed in the vesicovaginal space, sutured to the promontory (LS) or maintained by arms through pelvic ligaments (TVM). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Rate of surgical complications ≥grade II according to the modified Clavien-Dindo classification at 1 yr. Secondary outcomes were reintervention rate, and functional and anatomical results. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 130 women were randomized in LS and 132 in TVM; five women withdrew before intervention, leaving 129 in LS and 128 in TVM. The rate of complications ≥grade II was lower after LS than after TVM, but did not meet statistical significance (17% vs 26%, treatment difference 8.6% [95% confidence interval, CI -1.5 to 18]; p=0.088). The rate of complications of grade III or higher was nonetheless significantly lower after LS (LS=0.8%, TVM=9.4%, treatment difference 8.6% [95% CI 3.4%; 15%]; p=0.001). LS was converted to TVM in 6.3%. The total reoperation rate was lower after LS but did not meet statistical significance (LS=4.7%, TVM=10.9%, treatment difference 6.3% [95% CI -0.4 to 13.3]; p=0.060). There was no difference in symptoms, quality of life, improvement, composite definition of success, anatomical results rates between groups except for the vaginal apex and length, and dyspareunia (in favor of LS). CONCLUSIONS LS is a valuable option for primary repair of cystocele in sexually active patients. LS is safer than TVM, but may not be feasible in all cases. Both techniques offer same functional outcomes, success rates, and anatomical outcomes, but sexual function is better preserved by LS. PATIENT SUMMARY Our study demonstrates that laparoscopic sacropexy (LS) is a valuable option for primary repair of cystocele. LS offers equivalent success rates to vaginal mesh procedures, but is safer with a lower rate of complications and reoperations, and sexual function is better preserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Philippe Lucot
- Service de Gynécologie médico chirurgicale Pôle Femme, mère, nouveau-né, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU de Lille, France.
| | - Michel Cosson
- Service de Gynécologie médico chirurgicale Pôle Femme, mère, nouveau-né, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU de Lille, France
| | - Georges Bader
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique CHI Poissy-St-Germain, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin, Poissy, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Philippe Ferry
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Centre Hospitalier, La Rochelle, France
| | - Xavier Deffieux
- Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | | | | | - Sébastien Blanc
- Service de Gynécologie, Centre Hospitalier de la Région d'Annecy, Pringy, France
| | | | | | - Richard Villet
- Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix St-Simon, Paris, France
| | - Marion Ravit
- Unité de recherche EA 7285, Université Versailles St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | | | - Xavier Fritel
- Université de Poitiers, INSERM CIC 1402, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Arnaud Fauconnier
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique CHI Poissy-St-Germain, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin, Poissy, France; Unité de recherche EA 7285, Université Versailles St-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Houvenaeghel G, Cohen M, Raro P, De Troyer J, Tunon De Lara C, Guimbergues P, Gauthier T, Faure C, Vaini-Cowen V, Lantheaume S, Regis C, Darai E, Ceccato V, D'Halluin G, Del Piano F, Villet R, Jouve E, Beedassy B, Theret P, Gabelle P, Zinzindohoue C, Opinel P, Marsollier-Ferrer C, Dhainaut-Speyer C, Colombo PE, Di Beo V, Lambaudie E, Tallet A, Boher JM. Abstract P3-01-02: Overview of the pathological results and treatment characteristics in the first 1000 patients randomized in the SERC trial: Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with involved sentinel node. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p3-01-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Three randomized trials have concluded at non inferiority of omission of complementary axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) for patients with involved sentinel node (SN). However, we can outline strong limitations of these trials to validate this attitude with a high scientific level. We designed the SERC randomized trial to compare outcomes in patients with SN involvement treated with ALND or no further axillary treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze results of the first 1000 patients included.
Patients and Methods: SERC trial is a multicenter non-inferiority phase 3 trial. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with adjuvant chemotherapy administration and non-sentinel node (NSN) involvement.
Results : Of the 963 patients included in the analysis set, 478 were randomized to receive cALND and 485 SLNB alone. All patient demographics and tumor characteristics were balanced between the two arms. SN ITC was present in 6.3% patients (57/903), micro metastases in 33.0% (298), macro metastases in 60.7% (548) and 289 (34.2%) were non eligible to Z0011 trial criteria.
Whole breast or chest wall irradiation was delivered in 95.9% (896/934) of patients, adjuvant chemotherapy in 69.5% (644/926), endocrine therapy in 89.6% (673/751) and the proportions were similar in the two arms. The overall rate of positive NSN was 19% (84/442) for patients with cALND. Crude rates of positive NSN according to SN status were 4.5% for ITC (1/22), 9.5% for micro metastases (13/137), 23.9% for macro metastases (61/255) and were respectively 29.36% (64/218), 9.33% (7/75) and 7.94% (10/126) when chemotherapy was administered after cALND, before cALND and for patients without chemotherapy.
Conclusion: The main objective of SERC trial is to demonstrate non inferiority of cALND omission. A strong interaction between timing of cALND and chemotherapy with positive NSN rate was observed.
Citation Format: Houvenaeghel G, Cohen M, Raro P, De Troyer J, Tunon De Lara C, Guimbergues P, Gauthier T, Faure C, Vaini-Cowen V, Lantheaume S, Regis C, Darai E, Ceccato V, D'Halluin G, Del Piano F, Villet R, Jouve E, Beedassy B, Theret P, Gabelle P, Zinzindohoue C, Opinel P, Marsollier-Ferrer C, Dhainaut-Speyer C, Colombo P-E, Di Beo V, Lambaudie E, Tallet A, Boher J-M. Overview of the pathological results and treatment characteristics in the first 1000 patients randomized in the SERC trial: Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with involved sentinel node [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-01-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Houvenaeghel
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - M Cohen
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - P Raro
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - J De Troyer
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - C Tunon De Lara
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - P Guimbergues
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - T Gauthier
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - C Faure
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - V Vaini-Cowen
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - S Lantheaume
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - C Regis
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - E Darai
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - V Ceccato
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - G D'Halluin
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - F Del Piano
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - R Villet
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - E Jouve
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - B Beedassy
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - P Theret
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - P Gabelle
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - C Zinzindohoue
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - P Opinel
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - C Marsollier-Ferrer
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - C Dhainaut-Speyer
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - P-E Colombo
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - V Di Beo
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - E Lambaudie
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - A Tallet
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| | - J-M Boher
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France; Polyclinique Urbain V, Avignon, France; Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; CHU Limoges, Limoges, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Clinique d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; Hopital Privé Drome Ardèche - Clinique Pasteur, Guilherand Granges, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France; Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; Centre Clinical, Angoulème, France; Hôpitaux du Leman, Thonon, France; Groupe Hospitalier des Diaconesses, Paris, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France; Hôpital Sainte Musse (CHITS), Toulon, France; CHU Amiens-Picardie - Hopital Nord, Amiens, France; Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Clinique Clemenville, Montpellier, France; Centre Hospitalier du Pays d'Aix, Aix-en-Provence, France; CHRU Nimes, Nimes, France; GCS Recherche et Innovation, Sainte
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Houvenaeghel G, Quilichini O, Cohen M, Reyal F, Classe JM, Mazouni C, Giard S, Carrabin N, Charitansky H, Darai E, Hudry D, Azuar P, Villet R, Gimbergues P, Tunon-DE-Lara C, Lambaudie E. Sentinel lymph node biopsy validation for large tumors. Int J Surg 2017; 48:275-280. [PMID: 29175020 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.10.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2017] [Revised: 10/06/2017] [Accepted: 10/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) remains under discussion for large size tumors. The aim of this work has been to study the false negative rate (FNR) of SLNB for large tumors and predictive factors of false negative (FN). MATERIALS AND METHODS A study of a multicentric cohort, involved patients presenting N0 breast cancer with a SLNB eventually completed by complementary axillary lymph node dissection (cALND). The main criteria were the FNR and the predictive factors of FN. RESULTS 12.415 patients were included: 748 with tumors ≥30 mm, 1101 with tumors >20 and < 30 mm and 10.566 with tumors ≤20 mm, with a cALND respectively for 501 patients (67%), 523 (62.1%) and 2775 (26.3%). The FNR were respectively: 3.05% (IC95%: 1.3-4.8) for tumors ≥30 mm*, 3.5% (1.8-5.2) for tumors >20 and < 30 mm*, 1.8% (1-2.4) for tumors ≤20 mm (p < 0.05) (*Not significant). At multivariate analysis, SN number harvested ≤2 (OR:2.0, p = 0.023) and tumor size >20 and < 30 mm (OR:2.07, p = 0.017) were significant predictive factors of FN, without significant value for tumor size ≥30 mm (OR:1.83, p = 0.073). CONCLUSION The FNR of SLNB was not higher amongst large size tumors compared to tumors of a smaller size. These results support the validation of SNLB for tumors up to 50 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilles Houvenaeghel
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Université, Site Timone, 25 Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, France.
| | - Olivia Quilichini
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France.
| | - Monique Cohen
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France.
| | - Fabien Reyal
- Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75248 Paris Cedex 05, France; Hôpital René Huguenin, 35 rue Dailly, Saint Cloud, France.
| | - Jean-Marc Classe
- Institut René Gauducheau, Site hospitalier Nord, St Herblain, France.
| | - Chafika Mazouni
- Institut Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, France.
| | - Sylvie Giard
- Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 rue Frédéric Combenal, Lille, France.
| | | | | | - Emile Darai
- Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris, France.
| | - Delphine Hudry
- Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, France.
| | - Pierre Azuar
- Hôpital de Grasse, Chemin de Clavary, Grasse, France.
| | - Richard Villet
- Hôpital des Diaconnesses, 18 rue du Sergent Bauchat, Paris, France.
| | | | | | - Eric Lambaudie
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Université, Site Timone, 25 Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Houvenaeghel G, Lambaudie E, Cohen M, Classe JM, Reyal F, Garbay JR, Giard S, Chopin N, Martinez A, Rouzier R, Daraï E, Colombo PE, Coutant C, Gimbergues P, Azuar P, Villet R, Tunon de Lara C, Barranger E, Sabiani L, Goncalves A. Therapeutic escalation - De-escalation: Data from 15.508 early breast cancer treated with upfront surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Breast 2017; 34:24-33. [PMID: 28475932 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2017] [Revised: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 04/17/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to examine changes in therapeutic practices for early breast cancer T0-2 N0 managed by upfront surgery and SLNB. POPULATION Between 1999 and 2012, 15.508 patients were treated. Four periods were determined: 1999-2003, 2004-2006, 2007-2009 and > 2009. Five tumor subtypes were defined according to hormonal receptors (HR) and Her2: Luminal A (HR + Her2- Grade 1-2), Her2 (Her2+ HR-), Triple-negative (HR- Her2-), Luminal B Her2- (HR + Her2- Grade 3), Luminal B Her2+ (HR + HER2+). METHODS Rates of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), adjuvant chemotherapy ± trastuzumab, endocrine treatment, mastectomy and post mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) were analyzed according to treatment periods with univariate and multivariate analysis. Overall and disease-free survivals were analyzed according to treatment periods adjusted for HR and then for tumor subtypes. RESULTS Rates of ALND, adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine treatment varied significantly according to treatment periods, for HR positive and negative tumors. ALND rate decreased for all tumor subtypes with a decrease of adjuvant chemotherapy rate for Luminal A tumors and an increase for Luminal B Her2+ and Her2-tumors. Endocrine treatment rate decreased for Luminal A and increased for Luminal B Her2+ tumors. In multivariate analysis, these modifications with time remained significant. Mastectomy and PMRT rates increased. In multivariate analysis, overall and disease-free survivals increased during successive periods. CONCLUSION A global therapeutic de-escalation in ALND and adjuvant systemic treatment, combined with an actual escalation in some specific subsets was demonstrated, but without negative impact on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilles Houvenaeghel
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Université, Faculté Timone, 25 Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, France.
| | - Eric Lambaudie
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Monique Cohen
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Marc Classe
- Institut René Gauducheau, Site Hospitalier Nord, St Herblain, France
| | - Fabien Reyal
- Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm 75248, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Rémy Garbay
- Institut Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, France
| | - Sylvia Giard
- Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 Rue Frédéric Combenal, Lille, France
| | | | - Alejandra Martinez
- Centre Institut Claudius Regaud Claudius Regaud, 20-24 Rue du Pont St Pierre, Toulouse, France
| | - Roman Rouzier
- Centre René Huguenin, 35 Rue Dailly, Saint Cloud, France
| | - Emile Daraï
- Hôpital Tenon, 4 Rue de la Chine, Paris, France
| | | | - Charles Coutant
- Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 Rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, France
| | | | - Pierre Azuar
- Hôpital de Grasse, Chemin de Clavary, Grasse, France
| | - Richard Villet
- Hôpital des Diaconnesses, 18 Rue du Sergent Bauchat, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Anthony Goncalves
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Université, Faculté Timone, 25 Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
de Nonneville A, Gonçalves A, Zemmour C, Classe JM, Cohen M, Lambaudie E, Reyal F, Scherer C, Muracciole X, Colombo PE, Giard S, Rouzier R, Villet R, Chopin N, Darai E, Garbay JR, Gimbergues P, Sabiani L, Coutant C, Sabatier R, Bertucci F, Boher JM, Houvenaeghel G. Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab in pT1ab node-negative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast carcinomas: results of a national multi-institutional study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 162:307-316. [PMID: 28155054 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4136-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2017] [Accepted: 01/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Benefit of adjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy for node-positive and/or >1 cm human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast carcinomas has been clearly demonstrated in randomized clinical trials. Yet, evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab is effective in pT1abN0 HER2+ tumors is still limited. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy ± trastuzumab on outcome in this subpopulation. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 356 cases of pT1abN0M0 HER2 + breast cancers were retrospectively identified from a large cohort of 22,334 patients, including 1248 HER2+ patients who underwent primary surgery at 17 French centers, between December 1994 and January 2014. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). A multivariate Cox model was built, including adjuvant chemotherapy, tumor size, hormone receptor status, and Scarff Bloom Richardson (SBR) grade. RESULTS A total of 138 cases (39%) were treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy, 29 (8%) with chemotherapy alone, and 189 (53%) received neither trastuzumab nor chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy ± trastuzumab was associated with a significant DFS benefit (3-year 99 vs. 90%, and 5-year 96 vs. 84%, Hazard ratio, HR 0.26 [0.10-0.67]; p = 0.003, logrank test) which was maintained in multivariate analysis (HR 0.19 [0.07-0.52]; p = 0.001). Metastasis-free survival was also increased (HR 0.25 [0.07-0.86]; p = 0.018, logrank test) at 3-year (99 vs. 95%) and 5-year (98 vs. 89%) censoring. Exploratory subgroup analysis found DFS benefit to be significant in hormone receptor-negative, hormone receptor-positive, and pT1b tumors, but not in pT1a tumors. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant chemotherapy ± trastuzumab is associated with a significantly reduced risk of recurrence in subcentimeter node-negative HER2+ breast cancers. Most of the benefit may be driven by pT1b tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre de Nonneville
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille, France.
- Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
| | - Anthony Gonçalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille, France
- Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Christophe Zemmour
- Department of Clinical Research and Investigation, Biostatistics and Methodology UnitInstitut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | | | - Monique Cohen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | - Eric Lambaudie
- Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | - Pierre E Colombo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CRLC Val-d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | - Nicolas Chopin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Emile Darai
- Department of Gynecologic and Breast Cancers, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Jean R Garbay
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Pierre Gimbergues
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Laura Sabiani
- Department of Obstetrics Gynecology, Hôpital de la Conception, Marseille, France
| | - Charles Coutant
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Renaud Sabatier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille, France
- Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - François Bertucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille, France
- Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Jean M Boher
- Department of Clinical Research and Investigation, Biostatistics and Methodology UnitInstitut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Gilles Houvenaeghel
- Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, CRCM, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lambaudie E, Houvenaeghel G, Ziouèche A, Knight S, Dravet F, Garbay JR, Giard S, Charitansky H, Cohen M, Faure C, Hudry D, Azuar P, Villet R, Gimbergues P, de Lara CT, Tallet A, Bannier M, Minsat M, Resbeut M. Exclusive intraoperative radiotherapy for invasive breast cancer in elderly patients (>70 years): proportion of eligible patients and local recurrence-free survival. BMC Surg 2016; 16:74. [PMID: 27846840 PMCID: PMC5111202 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-016-0191-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2016] [Accepted: 11/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To estimate the proportion of elderly patients (>70 years) with breast cancer eligible for an Exclusive IntraOperative RadioTherapy (E-IORT) and to evaluate their local recurrence-free survival rate. Methods This retrospective study examining two cohorts focuses on patients over 70 years old: a multi-centric cohort of 1411 elderly patients and a mono-centric cohort of 592 elderly patients. All patients underwent conservative surgery followed by external radiotherapy for T0-T3 N0-N1 invasive breast cancer, between 1980 and 2008. Results Within each cohort two groups were identified according to the inclusion criteria of the RIOP trial (R group) and TARGIT E study (T group). Each group was divided into two sub-groups, patients eligible (E) or non-eligible (nE) for IORT. The population of patients that were eligible in the TARGIT E study but not in the RIOP trial were also studied in both cohorts. The proportion of patients eligible for IORT was calculated, according to the eligibility criteria of each study. A comparison of the 5-year local or locoregional recurrence-free survival rate between eligible vs non-eligible patients was made. In both cohorts, the proportion of patients eligible according to the RIOP trial’s eligibility criteria was 35.4 and 19.3%, and according to the TARGIT E study criteria was 60.9 and 45.3%. The 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival rate was not significantly different between RE and RnE groups, TE and TnE groups. In both cohorts RE and (TE-RE) groups were not significantly different. Conclusions Our results encourage further necessary studies to define and to extend the eligibility criteria for per operative exclusive radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Lambaudie
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France. .,CRCM, Marseille, France. .,Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
| | - Gilles Houvenaeghel
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.,CRCM, Marseille, France.,Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Amira Ziouèche
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.,CRCM, Marseille, France.,Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Sophie Knight
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.,CRCM, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Monique Cohen
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.,CRCM, Marseille, France.,Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Agnès Tallet
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.,CRCM, Marseille, France.,Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Marie Bannier
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.,CRCM, Marseille, France.,Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Mathieu Minsat
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.,CRCM, Marseille, France.,Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Michel Resbeut
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France.,CRCM, Marseille, France.,Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Vigoureux S, Perreaud A, Legendre G, Salet-Lizée D, Villet R. [Urogynecology pelvic organ prolapse French surgical training during and after residency]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 44:664-668. [PMID: 27751745 DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Accepted: 09/09/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES For the treatment of prolapse, the vaginal route is less standardized than laparoscopy and seems abandoned by younger doctors. Our objectives were to evaluate the surgical experience of resident and youth gynecology and obstetrics assistants in pelviperineology and the level of confidence and mastery of the different surgical treatment of pelvic. METHODS An anonymous questionnaire sent via an Internet platform interviewing residents and young assistants of gynecology and obstetrics (promotion 2005 to 2010) in France on their surgical training in pelviperineology. RESULTS Twenty-nine percent (208/724) of the persons contacted responded with two thirds of residents and one third of young assistants, all regions of France were represented. Sixty-four percent of respondents wanted to favor a surgical career. The laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy was declared to be the best method mastered while residents and young assistants reported being more often leading operator in vaginal techniques during their medical training. CONCLUSION Surgical practice during medical training of resident and young assistants did not seem associated with declared mastery level of technique. Different clinical surgical practice training techniques such as simulation, cadaveric study, movies on surgical technics may also improve the level of confidence and mastery of young doctors for surgical techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Vigoureux
- CESP-Inserm, U1018, équipe 7 « Genre, santé sexuelle et reproductive », université Paris Sud, 94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre cedex, France; Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hôpital Bicêtre, GHU Sud, AP-HP, 94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Faculté de médecine, université Paris Sud, 94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
| | - A Perreaud
- Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, 40, rue Worth, 92151 Suresnes cedex, France
| | - G Legendre
- CESP-Inserm, U1018, équipe 7 « Genre, santé sexuelle et reproductive », université Paris Sud, 94276 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre cedex, France; Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU d'Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49033 Angers cedex 01, France
| | - D Salet-Lizée
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique et viscérale, groupe hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, 18, rue du Sergent-Bauchat, 75012 Paris, France
| | - R Villet
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique et viscérale, groupe hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, 18, rue du Sergent-Bauchat, 75012 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Affiliation(s)
- R Villet
- Service de chirurgie viscérale et gynécologique, groupe hospitalier Diaconesses-Croix-Saint-Simon, site Reuilly, 18, rue du Sergent-Bauchat, 75012 Paris, France.
| | - D Collard
- Service d'anesthésiologie, groupe hospitalier Diaconesses-Croix-Saint-Simon, site Reuilly, 18, rue du Sergent-Bauchat, 75012 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Houvenaeghel G, Sabatier R, Reyal F, Classe JM, Giard S, Charitansky H, Rouzier R, Faure C, Garbay JR, Daraï E, Hudry D, Gimbergues P, Villet R, Lambaudie E. Axillary lymph node micrometastases decrease triple-negative early breast cancer survival. Br J Cancer 2016; 115:1024-1031. [PMID: 27685443 PMCID: PMC5117781 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2016] [Revised: 07/19/2016] [Accepted: 08/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are the most deadly form of breast cancer (BC) subtypes. Axillary lymph node involvement (ALNI) has been described to be prognostic in BC taken as a whole, but its prognostic value in each subtype is unclear. We explored the prognostic impact of ALNI and especially of small size axillary metastases in early TNBCs. METHODS We analysed in this multicentre study all patients treated for early TNBC in 12 French cancer centres. We explored the correlation between clinicopathological data and ALNI, with a specific focus on the dichotomisation between macrometastases and occult metastases, which is defined as the presence of isolated tumour cells or micrometastases. The prognostic value of ALNI both in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was also explored. RESULTS We included 1237 TNBC patients. Five-year DFS and OS were 83.7% and 88.5%, respectively. The identified independent prognostic features for DFS were tumour size >20 mm (hazard ratio (HR)=1.86; 95% CI: 1.11-3.10, P=0.018), lymphovascular invasion (HR=1.69; 95% CI: 1.21-2.34, P=0.002) and ALNI both in case of macrometastases (HR=1.97; 95% CI: 1.38-2.81, P<0.0001) and occult metastases (HR=1.72; 95% CI: 1.1-2.71, P=0.019). DFS and OS were similar between tumours with occult metastases and macrometastases. Tumours presenting at least two pejorative features (out of ALNI, lymphovascular invasion and large tumour size) displayed a significantly poorer DFS in both the training set and validation set, independently of chemotherapy administration. Tumours with no more than one of the above-cited pejorative features had a 5-year OS of ⩾90% vs 70% for other cases (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Axillary lymph node involvement is a key prognostic feature for early TNBC when isolated tumour cells were identified in lymph nodes. This impact is independent of chemotherapy use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Houvenaeghel
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, INSERM U1068, CNRS U7258, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - R Sabatier
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, INSERM U1068, CNRS U7258, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - F Reyal
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - J M Classe
- Institut René Gauducheau, Site hospitalier Nord, St Herblain, France
| | - S Giard
- Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 rue Frédéric Combenal, Lille, France
| | - H Charitansky
- Centre Claudius Regaud, 20-24 rue du Pont St Pierre, Toulouse, France
| | - R Rouzier
- Centre René Huguenin, 35 rue Dailly, Saint Cloud, France
| | - C Faure
- Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, Lyon, France
| | - J R Garbay
- Institut Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, France
| | - E Daraï
- Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris, France
| | - D Hudry
- Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, France
| | - P Gimbergues
- Centre Jean Perrin, 58 rue Montalembert, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - R Villet
- Hôpital des Diaconnesses, 18 rue du Sergent Bauchat, Paris, France
| | - E Lambaudie
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, INSERM U1068, CNRS U7258, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Houvenaeghel G, Boher JM, Reyal F, Cohen M, Garbay JR, Classe JM, Rouzier R, Giard S, Faure C, Charitansky H, Tunon de Lara C, Daraï E, Hudry D, Azuar P, Gimbergues P, Villet R, Sfumato P, Lambaudie E. Impact of completion axillary lymph node dissection in patients with breast cancer and isolated tumour cells or micrometastases in sentinel nodes. Eur J Cancer 2016; 67:106-118. [PMID: 27640137 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2016] [Revised: 07/21/2016] [Accepted: 08/04/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Omission of completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is a standard practice in patients with breast cancer (BC) and negative sentinel nodes (SNs) but has shown insufficient evidence to be recommended in those with SN invasion. METHODS A retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients with BC and micrometastases (Mic) or isolated tumour cells (ITCs) in SN. Factors associated with ALND were identified, and patients with ALND were matched to patients without ALND. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated in the overall population, in Mic and in ITC cohorts. FINDINGS Among 2009 patients analysed, 1390 and 619 had Mic and ITC in SN, respectively. Factors significantly associated with ALND were SN status, histological type, age, number of SN harvested and absence of adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 60.4 months, ALND omission was independently associated with reduced OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.41, 90 confidence interval [CI] 1.36-4.27, p = 0.0102), but not with increased RFS (HR 1.21, 90 CI 0.74-2.0, p = 0.52) in the overall population. In matched patients, the increased risk of death in case of ALND omission was found only in the Mic cohort (HR 2.88, 90 CI 1.46-5.69), not in the ITC cohort. The risk of recurrence was also significantly increased in the subgroup of matched Mic patients (HR 1.56, 90 CI 0.90-2.73). INTERPRETATION A separate analysis of Mic and ITC groups, matched for the determinants of ALND, suggested that patients with Mic had increased recurrence rates and shorter OS when ALND was not performed. Our results are consistent with those of previous studies for patients with ITC but not for those with Mic. Randomised controlled clinical trials are still warranted to show with a high level of evidence if ALND can be safely omitted in patients with micrometastatic disease in SN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Houvenaeghel
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Université, France.
| | - J M Boher
- Department of Biostatistics and Methodology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 13009, France; Aix-Marseille University, Unité Mixte de Recherche S912, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, 13385, Marseille, France
| | - F Reyal
- Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75248, Paris, France
| | - M Cohen
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | - J R Garbay
- Institut Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, France
| | - J M Classe
- Institut René Gauducheau, Site hospitalier Nord, St Herblain, France
| | - R Rouzier
- Centre René Huguenin, 35 rue Dailly, Saint Cloud, France
| | - S Giard
- Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 rue Frédéric Combenal, Lille, France
| | - C Faure
- Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, Lyon, France
| | - H Charitansky
- Centre Claudius Regaud, 20-24 rue du Pont St Pierre, Toulouse, France
| | | | - E Daraï
- Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris, France
| | - D Hudry
- Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, France
| | - P Azuar
- Hôpital de Grasse, Chemin de Clavary, Grasse, France
| | - P Gimbergues
- Centre Jean Perrin, 58 rue Montalembert, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - R Villet
- Hôpital des Diaconnesses, 18 rue du Sergent Bauchat, Paris, France
| | - P Sfumato
- Department of Biostatistics and Methodology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 13009, France; Aix-Marseille University, Unité Mixte de Recherche S912, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, 13385, Marseille, France
| | - E Lambaudie
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Villet R. Is experience the name each surgeon gives to his mistakes? J Visc Surg 2016; 153:241-2. [PMID: 27499246 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- R Villet
- Service de chirurgie, groupe hospitalier Diaconesses Croix St-Simon, site Reuilly, 18, rue du Sergent-Bauchat, 75012 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
de Nonneville A, Goncalves A, Zemmour C, Classe JM, Cohen M, Lambaudie E, Reyal F, Giard S, Rouzier R, Villet R, Boher JM, Houvenaeghel G. Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy and/or trastuzumab in T1ab node-negative human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive breast carcinomas: Results of a national multi-institutional study. J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sylvia Giard
- Department of Surgery, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Houvenaeghel G, Classe JM, Garbay JR, Giard S, Cohen M, Faure C, Charytansky H, Rouzier R, Daraï E, Hudry D, Azuar P, Villet R, Gimbergues P, Tunon de Lara C, Martino M, Fraisse J, Dravet F, Chauvet MP, Goncalves A, Lambaudie E. Survival impact and predictive factors of axillary recurrence after sentinel biopsy. Eur J Cancer 2016; 58:73-82. [PMID: 26971077 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2015] [Revised: 01/11/2016] [Accepted: 01/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rate of axillary recurrence (AR) after sentinel lymph node biopsy is usually low but few studies investigated its impact on survival. Our aim was to determine the rate and predictive factors of AR in a large cohort of breast cancer patients and its impact on survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1999 to 2013, 14,095 patients who underwent surgery for clinically N0 previously untreated breast cancer and had sentinel lymph node biopsy were analysed. A simplified score predictive of AR was established. RESULTS Median follow-up was 55.2 months. AR was observed in 0.51% of cases, with a median time to onset of 43.4 months. In multivariate analysis, the occurrence of AR was significantly correlated with grade 2 or 3 disease, absence of radiotherapy and tumour subtype (hormonal receptor [HR]- / human estrogen receptor [HER]+). AR rates were 1% for triple-negative tumours, 2.8% for HER2-positive tumours, 0.4% for luminal A tumours, 0.9% for HER2-negative luminal B tumours, and 0.5% for HER2-positive luminal B tumours. A simplified score predictive of the occurrence of AR was established. Patients could be divided into three different score groups (p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, overall survival was significantly lower in cases of AR (p < 0.0001), age >50, lymphovascular invasion, grade 3 disease, sentinel node (SN) macrometastases, tumour size >20 mm, absence of chemotherapy and triple-negative phenotype. Survival in patients with AR was significantly lower in case of early-onset (2 years) AR (p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS Isolated AR is more common in Her2-positive/HR-negative triple-negative tumours with a more severe prognosis in triple-negative and Her2-positive/HR-negative tumours, and represents an independent adverse factor justifying an indication for systemic treatment for AR treatment. However, the benefit of any systemic treatment remains to be proven.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilles Houvenaeghel
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Biostatistic Department, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Université, 25 Bd Jean Moulin, 13005 Marseille, France.
| | - Jean Marc Classe
- Institut René Gauducheau, Site hospitalier Nord, Boulevard Professeur Jacques Monod, 44805 St Herblain, France
| | - Jean-Rémy Garbay
- Institut Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - Sylvie Giard
- Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 rue Frédéric Combenal, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Monique Cohen
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Biostatistic Department, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France
| | | | - Hélène Charytansky
- Centre Claudius Regaud, 20-24 rue du Pont St Pierre, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - Roman Rouzier
- Centre René Huguenin, 35 rue Dailly, 92210 Saint Cloud, France
| | - Emile Daraï
- Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Delphine Hudry
- Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Pierre Azuar
- Hôpital de Grasse, Chemin de Clavary, 06130 Grasse, France
| | - Richard Villet
- Hôpital des Diaconnesses, 18 rue du Sergent Bauchat, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Pierre Gimbergues
- Centre Jean Perrin, 58 rue Montalembert, 63000 Clermont Ferrand, France
| | | | - Marc Martino
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Jean Fraisse
- Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - François Dravet
- Institut René Gauducheau, Site hospitalier Nord, Boulevard Professeur Jacques Monod, 44805 St Herblain, France
| | | | - Anthony Goncalves
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Biostatistic Department, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Université, 25 Bd Jean Moulin, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Eric Lambaudie
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France; Institut Paoli Calmettes, Biostatistic Department, 232 Bd Ste Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Université, 25 Bd Jean Moulin, 13005 Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tibi B, Vincens E, Durand M, Salet-Lizet D, Gadonneix P, Kane A, Carpentier X, Marsaud A, Rouscoff Y, Chevallier D, Amiel J, Villet R. Quelle est la meilleure prise en charge chirurgicale du prolapsus chez la femme âgée de 70 à 80ans ? Prog Urol 2015; 25:843. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2015.08.255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
34
|
Jauffret C, Houvenaeghel G, Classe JM, Garbay JR, Giard S, Charitansky H, Cohen M, Bélichard C, Faure C, Darai É, Hudry D, Azuar P, Villet R, Gimbergues P, Tunon de Lara C, Martino M, Coutant C, Dravet F, Chauvet MP, Chéreau Ewald E, Penault-Llorca F, Goncalves A, Lambaudie É. Facteurs pronostiques des carcinomes lobulaires infiltrants du sein : à propos de 940 cas. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 43:712-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2015.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
|
35
|
Affiliation(s)
- P Gadonneix
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique et viscérale, groupe hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, 18, rue du Sergent-Bauchat, 75012 Paris, France
| | - A Kane
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique et viscérale, groupe hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, 18, rue du Sergent-Bauchat, 75012 Paris, France
| | - E Vincens
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique et viscérale, groupe hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, 18, rue du Sergent-Bauchat, 75012 Paris, France
| | - D Salet Lizee
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique et viscérale, groupe hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, 18, rue du Sergent-Bauchat, 75012 Paris, France
| | - R Villet
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique et viscérale, groupe hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, 18, rue du Sergent-Bauchat, 75012 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ziouèche-Mottet A, Houvenaeghel G, Classe JM, Garbay JR, Giard S, Charitansky H, Cohen M, Belichard C, Faure C, Chéreau Ewald E, Hudry D, Azuar P, Villet R, Gimbergues P, Tunon de Lara C, Tallet A, Bannier M, Minsat M, Lambaudie E, Resbeut M. Eligibility criteria for intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer: study employing 12,025 patients treated in two cohorts. BMC Cancer 2014; 14:868. [PMID: 25417756 PMCID: PMC4256742 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2014] [Accepted: 11/13/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We wished to estimate the proportion of patients with breast cancer eligible for an exclusive targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT) and to evaluate their survival without local recurrence. METHODS We undertook a retrospective study examining two cohorts. The first cohort was multicentric (G3S) and contained 7580 patients. The second cohort was monocentric (cohort 2) comprising 4445 patients. All patients underwent conservative surgery followed by external radiotherapy for invasive breast cancer (T0-T3, N0-N1) between 1980 and 2005. Within each cohort, two groups were isolated according to the inclusion criteria of the TARGIT A study (T group) and RIOP trial (R group).In the multicentric cohort (G3S) eligible patients for TARGIT A and RIOP trials were T1E and R1E subgroups, respectively. In cohort number 2, the corresponding subgroups were T2E and R2E. Similarly, non-eligible patients were T1nE, R1nE and T2nE, and R2nE.The eligible groups in the TARGIT A study that were not eligible in the RIOP trial (TE-RE) were also studied. The proportion of patients eligible for TARGIT was calculated according to the criteria of each study. A comparison was made of the 5-year survival without local or locoregional recurrence between the TE versus TnE, RE versus RnE, and RE versus (TE-RE) groups. RESULTS In G3S and cohort 2, the proportion of patients eligible for TARGIT was, respectively, 53.2% and 33.9% according the criteria of the TARGIT A study, and 21% and 8% according the criteria of the RIOP trial. Survival without five-year locoregional recurrence was significantly different between T1E and T1nE groups (97.6% versus 97% [log rank=0.009]), R1E and R1nE groups (98% versus 97.1% [log rank=0.011]), T2E and T2nE groups (96.6% versus 93.1% [log rank<0. 0001]) and R2E and R2nE groups (98.6% versus 94% [log rank=0.001]). In both cohorts, no significant difference was found between RE and (TE-RE) groups. CONCLUSIONS Almost 50% of T0-2 N0 patients could be eligible for TARGIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amira Ziouèche-Mottet
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille and CRCM France, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Delmas V, Jacquetin B, Villet R, Campagne-Loiseau S, Salet-Lizée D. Amarrage sur le ligament sacro-épineux, fixation antérieure ou postérieure ? Prog Urol 2014; 24:850. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2014.08.148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
38
|
Houvenaeghel G, Classe JM, Garbay JR, Giard S, Cohen M, Faure C, Hélène C, Belichard C, Uzan S, Hudry D, Azuar P, Villet R, Penault Llorca F, Tunon de Lara C, Goncalves A, Esterni B. Prognostic value of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases of lymph nodes in early-stage breast cancer: a French sentinel node multicenter cohort study. Breast 2014; 23:561-6. [PMID: 24874284 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2013] [Revised: 03/19/2014] [Accepted: 04/13/2014] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
To define the prognostic value of isolated tumor cells (ITC), micrometastases (pN1mi) and macrometastases in early stage breast cancer (ESBC). We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study at 13 French sites. All the eligible patients who underwent SLNB from January 1999 to December 2008 were identified, and appropriate data were extracted from medical records and analyzed. Among 8001 patients, including 70% node-negative (n = 5588), 4% ITC (n = 305), 10% pN1mi (n = 794) and 16% macrometastases (n = 1314) with a median follow-up of 61.3 months, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates at 84 months were not statistically different in ITC or pN1mi compared to tumor-free nodes. Axillary recurrence (AR) was significantly more frequent in ITC (1.7%) and pN1mi (1.5%) compared to negative nodes (0.6%). Survival and AR rates of single macrometastases were not different from those of ITC or pN1mi. In case of 2 macrometastases or more, survival rates decreased and recurrence rates increased significantly. Micrometastases and ITC do not have a negative prognostic value. Single macrometastases might have an intermediate prognostic value while 2 macrometastases or more are associated with poorer prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilles Houvenaeghel
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Sainte Marguerite, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Université, France.
| | - Jean-Marc Classe
- Institut René Gauducheau, Site hospitalier Nord, St Herblain, France
| | - Jean-Rémy Garbay
- Institut Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, France
| | - Sylvia Giard
- Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 rue Frédéric Combenal, Lille, France
| | - Monique Cohen
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Sainte Marguerite, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | - Serge Uzan
- Hôpital Tenon, 4 rue de la Chine, Paris, France
| | - Delphine Hudry
- Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue du Professeur Marion, Dijon, France
| | - Pierre Azuar
- Hôpital de Grasse, Chemin de Clavary, Grasse, France
| | - Richard Villet
- Hôpital des Diaconnesses, 18 rue du Sergent Bauchat, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Anthony Goncalves
- Institut Paoli Calmettes and CRCM, 232 Bd Sainte Marguerite, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Université, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Houvenaeghel G, Goncalves A, Classe JM, Garbay JR, Giard S, Charytensky H, Cohen M, Belichard C, Faure C, Uzan S, Hudry D, Azuar P, Villet R, Gimbergues P, Tunon de Lara C, Martino M, Lambaudie E, Coutant C, Dravet F, Chauvet MP, Chéreau Ewald E, Penault-Llorca F, Esterni B. Characteristics and clinical outcome of T1 breast cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Ann Oncol 2014; 25:623-628. [PMID: 24399079 PMCID: PMC4433506 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2013] [Revised: 10/23/2013] [Accepted: 10/24/2013] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A subgroup of T1N0M0 breast cancer (BC) carries a high potential of relapse, and thus may require adjuvant systemic therapy (AST). PATIENTS AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of all patients with T1 BC, who underwent surgery from January 1999 to December 2009 at 13 French sites. AST was not standardized. RESULTS Among 8100 women operated, 5423 had T1 tumors (708 T1a, 2208 T1b and 2508 T1c 11-15 mm). T1a differed significantly from T1b tumors with respect to several parameters (lower age, more frequent negative hormonal status and positive HER2 status, less frequent lymphovascular invasion), exhibiting a mix of favorable and poor prognosis factors. Overall survival was not different between T1a, b or c tumors but recurrence-free survival was significantly higher in T1b than in T1a tumors (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, tumor grade, hormone therapy and lymphovascular invasion were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION Relatively poor outcome of patients with T1a tumors might be explained by a high frequency of risk factors in this subgroup (frequent negative hormone receptors and HER2 overexpression) and by a less frequent administration of AST (endocrine treatment and chemotherapy). Tumor size might not be the main determinant of prognosis in T1 BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Houvenaeghel
- Department of Surgery, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Aix Marseille Université, Marseilleand CRCM.
| | - A Goncalves
- Department of Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille
| | - J M Classe
- Department of Surgery, Institut René Gauducheau, Nantes
| | - J R Garbay
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - S Giard
- Department of Surgery, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
| | - H Charytensky
- Department of Surgery, Centre Claudius Regaud, Toulouse
| | - M Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Aix Marseille Université, Marseilleand CRCM
| | - C Belichard
- Department of Surgery, Centre René Huguenin, Saint Cloud
| | - C Faure
- Department of Surgery, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon
| | - S Uzan
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Tenon, Paris
| | - D Hudry
- Department of Surgery, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon
| | - P Azuar
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital de Grasse, Grasse
| | - R Villet
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital des Diaconnesses, Paris
| | - P Gimbergues
- Department of Surgery, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand
| | | | - M Martino
- Department of Surgery, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Aix Marseille Université, Marseilleand CRCM
| | - E Lambaudie
- Department of Surgery, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Aix Marseille Université, Marseilleand CRCM
| | - C Coutant
- Department of Surgery, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon
| | - F Dravet
- Department of Surgery, Institut René Gauducheau, Nantes
| | - M P Chauvet
- Department of Surgery, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille
| | - E Chéreau Ewald
- Department of Surgery, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Aix Marseille Université, Marseilleand CRCM; Department of Surgery, Hôpital Tenon, Paris
| | | | - B Esterni
- Biostatistic, Department of Surgery, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseilleand CRCM, France
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
El Kassis N, Atallah D, Moukarzel M, Ghaname W, Chalouhy C, Suidan J, Villet R, Salet-Lizee D. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: how to choose the best approach. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013; 61:36-47. [PMID: 24260839 DOI: 10.12816/0000399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Although benign, pelvic organ prolapse is a real public health problem, affecting mostly women above sixty-five. Eighty-year-old women have an 11.1% lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for prolapse or stress urinary incontinence and 29% will need a second procedure. Surgical approach may be abdominal (sacrocolpopexy by laparotomy, laparoscopy or robot-assisted) or vaginal (autologous, or prosthetic reinforcement). In addition to anatomical correction, surgical objectives include: improvement of the patient's quality of life, prolapse symptoms relief, normal urinary, digestive and sexual functions and especially, avoiding iatrogenic sequelae. Thus, the choice of the surgical approach does not only depend upon the site and the severity of the prolapse. Urogynecological surgeons should take into consideration the patient's expectations and life style, her age--a determinant factor in deciding upon the best approach -, and her relapse risk factors. They should master both approaches, and the management of surgical complications. Therefore, an apprenticeship in a reference pelviperineology center is a must. In addition, surgeons should be aware of and consider contraindications to each procedure, for instance contraindications to transvaginal prosthesis reinforcement like risk factors of bad healing or infection. Urogynecology specialists have to take into consideration known anatomical and functional results of each technique as cited in the medical literature and act in accordance with international recommendations. The surgery's main objective is to ameliorate the patient's discomfort and her quality of life without causing iatrogenic dysfunctional symptoms (urinary, digestive, sexual). The pelvic organ prolapse being a benign pathology, the patient's satisfaction is the main marker of the procedure success. In short, regarding the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women the answer to the question How to choose the best approach? is not binary. It depends on several factors, and regardless of the choice, it must
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine El Kassis
- Visceral & Gynecological Surgery Dept., Groupe hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Atallah D, El Kassis N, Moukarzel M, Ghaname W, Suidan J, Chalouhy C, Gadonneix P, Villet R. [From the open approach to laparoscopy. Background, rationale, technique]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013; 61:55-60. [PMID: 24260841 DOI: 10.12816/0000401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Genital prolapse is a frequent functional pathology in women. Its surgical treatment depends specially upon the suspension and fixation of the vaginal vault. Thus, sacrocolpopexy has become a gold standard technique to correct genital prolapse. Laparoscopy is a procedure resulting in less bleeding and decreased hospital stay than open sacrocolpopexy and is presently the approach of choice. Its objective and subjective correction rates are > 90%. Some authors proposed a dual abdominal and perineal approach to help fixing the posterior mesh and repairing the perineal body. Robotics is the actual surgeons' gadget.Its results are similar to laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy albeit a higher cost and a longer operating time. The ideal mesh is monofilamentous with large pores. Sacrocolpopexy consists in fixing two meshes, one on the anterior vaginal wall and one on the posterior vaginal wall, on the anterior sacral ligament, without tension for the posterior mesh, with or without subtotal hysterectomy, and with closure of the peritoneum at the end. In the case of associated stress urinary incontinence, proved on the clinical exam or urodynamical exam, appropriate surgical treatment is done with sacrocolpopexy. In the near future, robotics will replace laparoscopy when costs will be reduced and medical staff well trained to perform robotic or robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Atallah
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Hôtel-Dieu de France, Université Saint-Joseph, Faculté de médecine, Beyrouth, Liban.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
|
43
|
Gonçalves A, Classe JM, Garbay JR, Giard S, Helene C, Cohen M, Belichard M, Faure C, Uzan S, Hudry D, Azuar P, Villet R, Gimbergues P, Tunon de Lara C, Esterni B, Houvenaeghel G. Characteristics and clinical outcome of T1 breast cancer: A national multicenter retrospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
566 Background: T1N0M0 breast cancer (BC) are generally considered as carrying good prognosis and cancer-specific survival rates after 5 to 10 years are as high as 90 or 95% in many studies. However, they constitute a heterogeneous group and many studies identified biologically-defined at-risk patients within T1 BC. The objectives of our study were to describe the main characteristics of T1a, b, and c (11-15mm) BC and to identify prognostic factors for survival. Methods: We retrospectively collected the medical files of all patients diagnosed with BC who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) between January 1999 and December 2008 in 13 French sites and examined overall survival (OS) and Relapse-free survival (RFS) in T1a, T1b and T1c 11-15 mm. Results: Among 8,100 women operated, 5,423 had T1 tumors (708 T1a, 2,208 T1b and 2,508 T1c 11-15mm). T1a differed significantly from T1b tumors with respect to several parameters : younger age, more frequent negative hormonal status and positive HER2 status, less frequent lymphovascular invasion (LVI), exhibiting a mix of favorable and poor prognosis factors. After a median follow-up of 60.5 months, OS rate was 97.6% (95CI: 97.1-98) at 60 months, 95.4%(94.5-96.4) at 84 months and 90.7% (85.2-96.4) at 120 months. No significant difference was observed between T1a, T1b and T1c tumors (p=0.335). RFS rates were 94% (95CI: 93.8-95.2), 92.1% [91.1-93.2] and 83.8% (77.6-90.5) at 60, 84 and 120 months respectively. RFS was significantly higher in T1b tumors (95.9%, 95CI: 95-96.9) as compared to T1a (93.2%, 91-95.4) or T1c tumors (93.8%, 92.8-94.9), p=0.0099. In multivariate analysis, SBR tumor grade, hormone therapy and LVI were independent prognostic factors for RFS, while hormone therapy and SBR grade were independently associated with OS. Conclusions: Relatively poor outcome of patients with T1a tumors might be explained by a high frequency of risk factors in this subgroup (frequent negative hormone receptors and HER2 overexpression) and by a less frequent administration of adjuvant systemic therapy (endocrine treatment and chemotherapy). Tumor size might not be the main determinant of prognosis in T1 breast cancer.
Collapse
|
44
|
Jacquetin B, Hinoul P, Gauld J, Fatton B, Rosenthal C, Clavé H, Garbin O, Berrocal J, Villet R, Salet-Lizée D, Debodinance P, Cosson M. Total transvaginal mesh (TVM) technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a 5-year prospective follow-up study. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24:1679-86. [PMID: 23563891 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2080-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2012] [Accepted: 02/23/2013] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS To evaluate clinical effectiveness and complication rates at 5 years following the total Trans Vaginal Mesh (TVM) technique to treat pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS Prospective, observational, multi-centre study in patients with prolapse of stage II or higher. RESULTS Of the 90 women enrolled in the study, 82 (91%) were available for the 5-year follow-up period. At the 5-year endpoint, success, defined as no surgical prolapse reintervention and leading edge <-1 (International Continence Society [ICS] criteria) or above the level of the hymen, was 79% and 87% respectively. A composite criterion of success defined as: leading edge above the hymen (<0) and no bulge symptoms and no reintervention for prolapse was met by 90%, 88% and 84% at the 1-, 3-, and 5-year endpoints respectively. Quality of life improvement was sustained over the 5 years. Over the 5-year follow-up period, a total of only 4 patients (5%) required re-intervention for prolapse, while a total of 14 patients (16%) experienced mesh exposure for which 8 resections needed to be performed. Seven exposures were still ongoing at the 5-year endpoint, all asymptomatic. Only 33 out of 61 (54%) sexually active patients at baseline remained so at 5 years. De novo dyspareunia was reported by 10%, but no new cases at the 5-year endpoint. One patient reported de novo unprovoked mild pelvic pain at 5 years, 5 reported pains during pelvic examination only. CONCLUSIONS Five-year results indicated that TVM provided a stable anatomical repair. Improvements in QOL and associated improvements in prolapse-specific symptoms were sustained. Minimal new morbidity emerged between the 1- and 5-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Jacquetin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Estaing University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Giard S, Villet R. Les 2es Réunions de concertation pluridisciplinaire de la SFSPM au Liban, avril 2012. ONCOLOGIE 2012. [DOI: 10.1007/s10269-012-2200-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
46
|
Affiliation(s)
- R Villet
- Service de chirurgie viscérale et gynécologique, hôpital des Diaconesses, 18, rue du Sergent-Bauchat, 75012 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Classe JM, Cerato E, Boursier C, Dauplat J, Pomel C, Villet R, Cuisenier J, Lorimier G, Rodier JF, Mathevet P, Houvenaeghel G, Leveque J, Lécuru F. [Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival of patients treated for an advanced ovarian cancer: the CARACO trial]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 40:201-4. [PMID: 21482037 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2011] [Revised: 02/24/2011] [Accepted: 02/25/2011] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The standard management for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer is optimum cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum based chemotherapy. However, retroperitoneal lymph node resection remains controversial. The multiple directions of the lymph drainage pathway in ovarian cancer have been recognized. The incidence and pattern of lymph node involvement depends on the extent of the disease and the histological type. Several published cohorts suggest the survival benefit of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. A recent large randomized trial have demonstrated the potential benefit for surgical removal of bulky lymph nodes in term of progression-free survival but failed to show any overall survival benefit because of a critical methodology. Further randomised trials are needed to balance risks and benefits of systematic lymphadenectomy in advanced-stage disease. CARACO is a French ongoing trial, built to bring a reply to this important question. A huge effort for inclusion of the patients, and involving new teams, are mandatory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J-M Classe
- Département de chirurgie oncologique, centre René-Gauducheau-ICO, boulevard Jean-Monod, Nantes-Saint-Herblain, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ngô C, Villet R, Salet-Lizée D, Gadonneix P. Rectocele repair--review and update. J Med Liban 2011; 59:100-104. [PMID: 21834495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Ngô
- Department of Gynecological and Visceral Surgery, Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon Hospital Center, Paris.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Villet R. [Lymph node surgery in ovarian cancer]. J Med Liban 2011; 59:94-99. [PMID: 21834494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Villet
- Service de chirurgie viscérale et gynécologique, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, 18 rue du Sergent Bauchat, 75012 Paris.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Malka I, Villet R, Fitoussi A, Salmon RJ. Oncoplastic conservative treatment for breast cancer (part 3): Techniques for the upper quadrants. J Visc Surg 2010; 147:e365-72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2010.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|