1
|
Bisgaard ALH, Keesman R, van Lier ALHMW, Coolens C, van Houdt PJ, Tree A, Wetscherek A, Romesser PB, Tyagi N, Lo Russo M, Habrich J, Vesprini D, Lau AZ, Mook S, Chung P, Kerkmeijer LGW, Gouw ZAR, Lorenzen EL, van der Heide UA, Schytte T, Brink C, Mahmood F. Recommendations for improved reproducibility of ADC derivation on behalf of the Elekta MRI-linac consortium image analysis working group. Radiother Oncol 2023; 186:109803. [PMID: 37437609 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), a potential imaging biomarker for radiotherapy response, needs to be reproducible before translation into clinical use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the multi-centre delineation- and calculation-related ADC variation and give recommendations to minimize it. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nine centres received identical diffusion-weighted and anatomical magnetic resonance images of different cancerous tumours (adrenal gland, pelvic oligo metastasis, pancreas, and prostate). All centres delineated the gross tumour volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), and viable tumour volume (VTV), and calculated ADCs using both their local calculation methods and each of the following calculation conditions: b-values 0-500 vs. 150-500 s/mm2, region-of-interest (ROI)-based vs. voxel-based calculation, and mean vs. median. ADC variation was assessed using the mean coefficient of variation across delineations (CVD) and calculation methods (CVC). Absolute ADC differences between calculation conditions were evaluated using Friedman's test. Recommendations for ADC calculation were formulated based on observations and discussions within the Elekta MRI-linac consortium image analysis working group. RESULTS The median (range) CVD and CVC were 0.06 (0.02-0.32) and 0.17 (0.08-0.26), respectively. The ADC estimates differed 18% between b-value sets and 4% between ROI/voxel-based calculation (p-values < 0.01). No significant difference was observed between mean and median (p = 0.64). Aligning calculation conditions between centres reduced CVC to 0.04 (0.01-0.16). CVD was comparable between ROI types. CONCLUSION Overall, calculation methods had a larger impact on ADC reproducibility compared to delineation. Based on the results, significant sources of variation were identified, which should be considered when initiating new studies, in particular multi-centre investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne L H Bisgaard
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 19, 5000 Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19.3, 5000 Odense Denmark.
| | - Rick Keesman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Astrid L H M W van Lier
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX,Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Catherine Coolens
- Department of Medical Physics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, M5G 2M9 Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Petra J van Houdt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Postbus 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Alison Tree
- Department of Urology, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT London, UK.
| | - Andreas Wetscherek
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, SM2 5NG London, UK.
| | - Paul B Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box 22, NY 10065, New York, USA.
| | - Neelam Tyagi
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 545 E. 73rd street, NY 10021, New York, USA.
| | - Monica Lo Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Jonas Habrich
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, M4N 3M5 Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Angus Z Lau
- Physical Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute. Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, M4N 3M5 Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Stella Mook
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX,Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Peter Chung
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, M5G 2M9 Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Zeno A R Gouw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Postbus 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Ebbe L Lorenzen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 19, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Postbus 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Tine Schytte
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19.3, 5000 Odense Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 19, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
| | - Carsten Brink
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 19, 5000 Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19.3, 5000 Odense Denmark.
| | - Faisal Mahmood
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 19, 5000 Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19.3, 5000 Odense Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kooreman ES, van Houdt PJ, Keesman R, van Pelt VWJ, Nowee ME, Pos F, Sikorska K, Wetscherek A, Müller AC, Thorwarth D, Tree AC, van der Heide UA. Daily Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) In Prostate Cancer Patients During MR-Guided Radiotherapy-A Multicenter Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:705964. [PMID: 34485138 PMCID: PMC8415108 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.705964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Daily quantitative MR imaging during radiotherapy of cancer patients has become feasible with MRI systems integrated with linear accelerators (MR-linacs). Quantitative images could be used for treatment response monitoring. With intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI, it is possible to acquire perfusion information without the use of contrast agents. In this multicenter study, daily IVIM measurements were performed in prostate cancer patients to identify changes that potentially reflect response to treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-three patients were included, treated with 20 fractions of 3 Gy on a 1.5 T MR-linac. IVIM measurements were performed on each treatment day. The diffusion coefficient (D), perfusion fraction (f), and pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*) were calculated based on the median signal intensities in the non-cancerous prostate and the tumor. Repeatability coefficients (RCs) were determined based on the first two treatment fractions. Separate linear mixed-effects models were constructed for the three IVIM parameters. RESULTS In total, 726 fractions were analyzed. Pre-treatment average values, measured on the first fraction before irradiation, were 1.46 × 10-3 mm2/s, 0.086, and 28.7 × 10-3 mm2/s in the non-cancerous prostate and 1.19 × 10-3 mm2/s, 0.088, and 28.9 × 10-3 mm2/s in the tumor, for D, f, and D*, respectively. The repeatability coefficients for D, f, and D* in the non-cancerous prostate were 0.09 × 10-3 mm2/s, 0.05, and 15.3 × 10-3 mm2/s. In the tumor, these values were 0.44 × 10-3 mm2/s, 0.16, and 76.4 × 10-3 mm2/s. The mixed effects analysis showed an increase in D of the tumors over the course of treatment, while remaining stable in the non-cancerous prostate. The f and D* increased in both the non-cancerous prostate and tumor. CONCLUSIONS It is feasible to perform daily IVIM measurements on an MR-linac system. Although the repeatability coefficients were high, changes in IVIM perfusion parameters were measured on a group level, indicating that IVIM has potential for measuring treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernst S. Kooreman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Petra J. van Houdt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rick Keesman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Vivian W. J. van Pelt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marlies E. Nowee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Floris Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Karolina Sikorska
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Andreas Wetscherek
- Joint Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section of Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Alison C. Tree
- Joint Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Uulke A. van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Houdt PJ, Saeed H, Thorwarth D, Fuller CD, Hall WA, McDonald BA, Shukla-Dave A, Kooreman ES, Philippens MEP, van Lier ALHMW, Keesman R, Mahmood F, Coolens C, Stanescu T, Wang J, Tyagi N, Wetscherek A, van der Heide UA. Integration of quantitative imaging biomarkers in clinical trials for MR-guided radiotherapy: Conceptual guidance for multicentre studies from the MR-Linac Consortium Imaging Biomarker Working Group. Eur J Cancer 2021; 153:64-71. [PMID: 34144436 PMCID: PMC8340311 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.04.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) derived from MRI techniques have the potential to be used for the personalised treatment of cancer patients. However, large-scale data are missing to validate their added value in clinical practice. Integrated MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) systems, such as hybrid MRI-linear accelerators, have the unique advantage that MR images can be acquired during every treatment session. This means that high-frequency imaging of QIBs becomes feasible with reduced patient burden, logistical challenges, and costs compared to extra scan sessions. A wealth of valuable data will be collected before and during treatment, creating new opportunities to advance QIB research at large. The aim of this paper is to present a roadmap towards the clinical use of QIBs on MRIgRT systems. The most important need is to gather and understand how the QIBs collected during MRIgRT correlate with clinical outcomes. As the integrated MRI scanner differs from traditional MRI scanners, technical validation is an important aspect of this roadmap. We propose to integrate technical validation with clinical trials by the addition of a quality assurance procedure at the start of a trial, the acquisition of in vivo test-retest data to assess the repeatability, as well as a comparison between QIBs from MRIgRT systems and diagnostic MRI systems to assess the reproducibility. These data can be collected with limited extra time for the patient. With integration of technical validation in clinical trials, the results of these trials derived on MRIgRT systems will also be applicable for measurements on other MRI systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra J van Houdt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 102, Amsterdam, 1066CX, the Netherlands.
| | - Hina Saeed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Av, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0097, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - William A Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Av, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
| | - Brigid A McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0097, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Ernst S Kooreman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 102, Amsterdam, 1066CX, the Netherlands.
| | - Marielle E P Philippens
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Astrid L H M W van Lier
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Rick Keesman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 32, Nijmegen, 6525GA, the Netherlands.
| | - Faisal Mahmood
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 19, Odense C, 5000, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 19.3, Odense C, 5000, Denmark.
| | - Catherine Coolens
- Department of Medical Physics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5M 1G7, Canada.
| | - Teodor Stanescu
- Department of Medical Physics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5M 1G7, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada.
| | - Jihong Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0097, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Neelam Tyagi
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Andreas Wetscherek
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 15 Cotswold Road, London, SM2 5NG, United Kingdom.
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 102, Amsterdam, 1066CX, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Keesman R, van der Bijl E, Janssen TM, Vijlbrief T, Pos FJ, van der Heide UA. Clinical workflow for treating patients with a metallic hip prosthesis using magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 15:85-90. [PMID: 33458331 PMCID: PMC7807622 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background & purpose Metallic prostheses distort the magnetic field during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), leading to geometric distortions and signal loss. The purpose of this work was to develop a method to determine eligibility for MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) on a per patient basis by estimating the magnitude of geometric distortions inside the clinical target volume (CTV). Materials & methods Three patients with prostate cancer and hip prosthesis, treated using MRIgRT, were included. Eligibility for MRIgRT was based on computed tomography and associated CTV delineations, together with a field-distortion (B0) map and anatomical images acquired during MR simulation. To verify the method, B0 maps made during MR simulation and each MRIgRT treatment fraction were compared. Results Estimates made during MR simulation of the magnitude of distortions inside the CTV were 0.43 mm, 0.19 mm and 2.79 mm compared to the average over all treatment fractions of 1.40 mm, 0.32 mm and 1.81 mm, per patient respectively. Conclusions B0 map acquisitions prior to treatment can be used to estimate the magnitude of distortions during MRIgRT to guide the decision on eligibility for MRIgRT of prostate cancer patients with metallic hip implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rick Keesman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik van der Bijl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tomas M Janssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tineke Vijlbrief
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Floris J Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kooreman ES, van Houdt PJ, Keesman R, Pos FJ, van Pelt VWJ, Nowee ME, Wetscherek A, Tijssen RHN, Philippens MEP, Thorwarth D, Wang J, Shukla-Dave A, Hall WA, Paulson ES, van der Heide UA. ADC measurements on the Unity MR-linac - A recommendation on behalf of the Elekta Unity MR-linac consortium. Radiother Oncol 2020; 153:106-113. [PMID: 33017604 PMCID: PMC8327388 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for treatment response monitoring is feasible on hybrid magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-linac) systems. The MRI scanner of the Elekta Unity system has an adjusted design compared to diagnostic scanners. We investigated its impact on measuring the DWI-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) regarding three aspects: the choice of b-values, the spatial variation of the ADC, and scanning during radiation treatment. The aim of this study is to give recommendations for accurate ADC measurements on Unity systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurements with increasing b-values were done to determine the highest bvalue that can be measured reliably. The spatial variation of the ADC was assessed on six Unity systems with a cylindrical phantom of 40 cm diameter. The influence of gantry rotation and irradiation was investigated by acquiring DWI images before and during treatment of 11 prostate cancer patients. RESULTS On the Unity system, a maximum b-value of 500 s/mm2 should be used for ADC quantification, as a trade-off between SNR and diffusion weighting. Accurate ADC values were obtained within 7 cm from the iso-center, while outside this region ADC values deviated more than 5%. The ADC was not influenced by the rotating linac or irradiation during treatment. CONCLUSION We provide Unity system specific recommendations for measuring the ADC. This will increase the consistency of ADC values acquired in different centers on the Unity system, enabling large cohort studies for biomarker discovery and treatment response monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernst S Kooreman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Petra J van Houdt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rick Keesman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Floris J Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vivian W J van Pelt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies E Nowee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andreas Wetscherek
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research, and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rob H N Tijssen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jihong Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Departments of Medical Physics and Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - William A Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States
| | - Eric S Paulson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Keesman R, Van der Bijl E, Janssen T, Vijlbrief T, Pos F, Van der Heide U. PD-0433: Clinical workflow for treating patients with a metallic hip prosthesis on the MR-linac. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)00455-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
7
|
van den Ende RPJ, Ercan E, Keesman R, Kerkhof EM, Marijnen CAM, van der Heide UA. Applicator visualization using ultrashort echo time MRI for high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2020; 19:618-623. [PMID: 32747144 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The individual channels in an endorectal applicator for high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy are not visible on standard MRI sequences. The aim of this study was to test whether an ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI sequence could be used to visualize the individual channels to enable MR-only treatment planning for rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS We used a radial three-dimensional (3D) UTE pulse sequence and acquired images of phantoms and two patients with rectal cancer. We rigidly registered a UTE image and CT scan of an applicator phantom, based on the outline of the applicator. One observer compared channel positions on the UTE image and CT scan in five slices spaced 25 mm apart. To quantify geometric distortions, we scanned a commercial 3D geometric quality assurance phantom and calculated the difference between detected marker positions on the UTE image and corresponding marker positions on two 3D T1-weighted images with opposing readout directions. RESULTS On the UTE images, there is sufficient contrast to discern the individual channels. The difference in channel positions on the UTE image compared with the CT was on average -0.1 ± 0.1 mm (left-right) and 0.1 ± 0.3 mm (anteroposterior). After rigid registration to the 3D T1-weighted sequences, the residual 95th percentile of the geometric distortion inside a 550-mm-diameter sphere was 1.0 mm (left-right), 0.9 mm (anteroposterior), and 0.9 mm (craniocaudal). CONCLUSIONS With a UTE sequence, the endorectal applicator and individual channels can be adequately visualized in both phantom and patients. The geometrical fidelity is within an acceptable range.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy P J van den Ende
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Ece Ercan
- C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rick Keesman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen M Kerkhof
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Keesman R, van de Lindt TN, Juan‐Cruz C, van den Wollenberg W, van der Bijl E, Nowee ME, Sonke J, van der Heide UA, Fast MF. Correcting geometric image distortions in slice‐based 4D‐MRI on the MR‐linac. Med Phys 2019; 46:3044-3054. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Revised: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rick Keesman
- Department of Radiation Oncology The Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Tessa N. van de Lindt
- Department of Radiation Oncology The Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Celia Juan‐Cruz
- Department of Radiation Oncology The Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Wouter van den Wollenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology The Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Erik van der Bijl
- Department of Radiation Oncology The Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Marlies E. Nowee
- Department of Radiation Oncology The Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Jan‐Jakob Sonke
- Department of Radiation Oncology The Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Uulke A. van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology The Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Martin F. Fast
- Department of Radiation Oncology The Netherlands Cancer Institute Plesmanlaan 121 1066CX Amsterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fast M, Keesman R, Van den Wollenberg W, Juan-Cruz C, Van de Lindt T, Van der Heide U, Sonke J. PO-0982 The dosimetric impact of geometric image distortions in slice-based 4D-MRI on the MR-linac. Radiother Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(19)31402-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
10
|
Dinis Fernandes C, van Houdt PJ, Heijmink SWTPJ, Walraven I, Keesman R, Smolic M, Ghobadi G, van der Poel HG, Schoots IG, Pos FJ, van der Heide UA. Quantitative 3T multiparametric MRI of benign and malignant prostatic tissue in patients with and without local recurrent prostate cancer after external-beam radiation therapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 50:269-278. [PMID: 30585368 PMCID: PMC6618021 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Post‐radiotherapy locally recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients are candidates for focal salvage treatment. Multiparametric MRI (mp‐MRI) is attractive for tumor localization. However, radiotherapy‐induced tissue changes complicate image interpretation. To develop focal salvage strategies, accurate tumor localization and distinction from benign tissue is necessary. Purpose To quantitatively characterize radio‐recurrent tumor and benign radiation‐induced changes using mp‐MRI, and investigate which sequences optimize the distinction between tumor and benign surroundings. Study Type Prospective case–control. Subjects Thirty‐three patients with biochemical failure after external‐beam radiotherapy (cases), 35 patients without post‐radiotherapy recurrent disease (controls), and 13 patients with primary PCa (untreated). Field Strength/Sequences 3T; quantitative mp‐MRI: T2‐mapping, ADC, and Ktrans and kep maps. Assessment Quantitative image‐analysis of prostatic regions, within and between cases, controls, and untreated patients. Statistical Tests Within‐groups: nonparametric Friedman analysis of variance with post‐hoc Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests; between‐groups: Mann–Whitney tests. All with Bonferroni corrections. Generalized linear mixed modeling to ascertain the contribution of each map and location to tumor likelihood. Results Benign imaging values were comparable between cases and controls (P = 0.15 for ADC in the central gland up to 0.91 for kep in the peripheral zone), both with similarly high peri‐urethral Ktrans and kep values (min−1) (median [range]: Ktrans = 0.22 [0.14–0.43] and 0.22 [0.14–0.36], P = 0.60, kep = 0.43 [0.24–0.57] and 0.48 [0.32–0.67], P = 0.05). After radiotherapy, benign central gland values were significantly decreased for all maps (P ≤ 0.001) as well as T2, Ktrans, and kep of benign peripheral zone (all with P ≤ 0.002). All imaging maps distinguished recurrent tumor from benign peripheral zone, but only ADC, Ktrans, and kep were able to distinguish it from benign central gland. Recurrent tumor and peri‐urethral Ktrans values were not significantly different (P = 0.81), but kep values were (P < 0.001). Combining all quantitative maps and voxel location resulted in an optimal distinction between tumor and benign voxels. Data Conclusion Mp‐MRI can distinguish recurrent tumor from benign tissue. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:269–278.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Petra J van Houdt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Iris Walraven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rick Keesman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Milena Smolic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ghazaleh Ghobadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Floris J Pos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
We perform a numerical study of the F model with domain-wall boundary conditions. Various exact results are known for this particular case of the six-vertex model, including closed expressions for the partition function for any system size as well as its asymptotics and leading finite-size corrections. To complement this picture we use a full lattice multicluster algorithm to study equilibrium properties of this model for systems of moderate size, up to L=512. We compare the energy to its exactly known large-L asymptotics. We investigate the model's infinite-order phase transition by means of finite-size scaling for an observable derived from the staggered polarization in order to test the method put forward in our recent joint work with Duine and Barkema. In addition we analyze local properties of the model. Our data are perfectly consistent with analytical expressions for the arctic curves. We investigate the structure inside the temperate region of the lattice, confirming the oscillations in vertex densities that were first observed by Syljuåsen and Zvonarev and recently studied by Lyberg et al. We point out "(anti)ferroelectric" oscillations close to the corresponding frozen regions as well as "higher-order" oscillations forming an intricate pattern with saddle-point-like features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rick Keesman
- Instituut-Lorentz, Universiteit Leiden, Niels Bohrweg 2, 2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jules Lamers
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg, SE-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|