Sublingual allergoid immunotherapy: a new 4-day induction phase in patients allergic to house dust mites

Sublingual immunotherapy with monomeric allergoid (allergoid SLIT), given according to the standard scheme, has proved effective and safe in many clinical trials. However, its build-up phase requires a long time ranging from 16 days to 14 weeks. This study therefore investigated whether, with a four-day up-dosing, the same benefit could be achieved in a shorter time. Thirty rhinitic and/or asthmatic patients (16 M and 14 F, mean age 36+/-8.2 years) allergic to house dust mites (HDM) with or without other sensitizations were randomized to allergoid SLIT or standard drug therapy. The build-up phase lasted four days. The first day the patients took a 300 AU tablet, the second day two 300 AU tablets, the third day three 300 AU tablets and the fourth day four 300 AU tablets. The total amount taken during the up-dosing was 3000 AU. Patients were then treated for 12 months at the dosage of 2000 AU/week (total amount of allergen: 104,000 AU/year). The symptom score and drug consumption were recorded from November to February on monthly diary cards. At baseline and after 12 months a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to rate the patients? well-being. Skin prick test reactivity was evaluated before and after the 12-month treatment in both groups using 10 mg/mL histamine as reference. VAS scores rose significantly (about 45%) in both groups in comparison to baseline (p=0.001). In addition, there was a significantly greater reduction of the global symptoms score (about 52%) - but not in drug consumption - in the SLIT group in comparison to controls (p=0.0004). The SLIT group showed a highly significant reduction (about 39%) in skin prick test reactivity (p=0.000003) while the control group remained unchanged (p=0.5226). No severe adverse events were observed. Even with this short four-day up-dosing, the allergoid SLIT proves to be safe. In addition, it is already effective in patients allergic to HDM after 12 months, and significantly reduces allergen-specific skin reactivity.

Olea sublingual allergoid immunotherapy administered with two different treatment regimens

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with monomeric carbamylated allergoid administered in accordance with the standard regimen has proven to be effective and safe. Achieving clinical benefit, however, requires a lengthy period of time so it is not very suitable for short-lasting allergies. We thus performed this study to compare an administration protocol starting in the coseasonal period (with a 4-day build-up phase) with a precoseasonal scheme to verify if the former regimen provides the same benefit in a shorter period of time. The prospective, randomized, drug therapy-controlled study was conducted in 33 rhinitic patients monosensitized to Olea with or without asthma. Ten patients were assigned to the coseasonal therapy with 5000 allergic units (AU)/week for 6 weeks, 11 to the precoseasonal therapy with 3000 AU/week for 10 weeks, and 12 to drug therapy. They were treated from April or May to June 2008. A visual analog scale (VAS) was performed at baseline and after treatment to assess the well being of the patients. Drug consumption was evaluated by means of a monthly diary. There was greater VAS improvement in both the SLIT groups versus the controls, but it was statistically significant only in the coseasonal group (p < 0.01). Furthermore, there was a reduction in the rescue medication only in the coseasonal SLIT (p < 0.05 versus drug therapy). One mild adverse event was observed. The allergoid SLIT was shown to be effective and safe in Olea allergy in particular when a coseasonal regimen was used.

Parietaria sublingual allergoid immunotherapy with a co-seasonal treatment schedule

BACKGROUND

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with monomeric allergoid, given according to the standard scheme, resulted effective and safe. However, the achievement of a clinical benefit requires a long time. We thus performed this study using an administration protocol starting in the co-seasonal period with a 3-day build-up phase and lasting only 6 months, in order to obtain the above benefit in a shorter time.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study, prospective, randomised and controlled versus drug therapy, was conducted on 65 rhinitic and/or asthmatic patients allergic to Parietaria with or without other sensitisations. Twenty-four were allocated to 1,000 AU/week, 21 to 3,000 AU/week and 21 to drug therapy. They were treated from April to September 2006. At baseline, 3 and 6 months a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was performed to assess the patients' well-being. Drug consumption was evaluated by means of monthly diary cards. Bronchial reactivity was investigated at baseline and 6 months by methacholine challenge test. There was a greater VAS improvement in both the SLIT groups than in the controls after 6 months (p<0.05). In patients taking 3,000 AU/week this was already evident after 3 months. There was a significant reduction in rescue medication consumption between 3 and 6 months (p<0.05) in all three groups. The bronchial reactivity was reduced only in the SLIT groups (p<0.001). No adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

At 6 months the allergoid SLIT showed itself to be effective and safe. In addition the subjective clinical benefit was obtained in a more rapid period, i.e. 3 instead of 6 months, when a higher maintenance dose was administered.