Outcome Heterogeneity in Prehabilitation Trials-Are We Comparing Apples and Oranges?

INTRODUCTION

Over the last decade, the number of prehabilitation randomised controlled trials (RCTs) has increased significantly. Therefore, this review aimed to describe the outcomes reported in prehabilitation RCTs in patients undergoing cancer surgery.

METHODS

A search was conducted in Embase, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception to July 2021. We included RCTs evaluating the effectiveness of preoperative exercise, nutrition, and psychological interventions on postoperative complications and length of hospital stay in adult oncology patients who underwent thoracic and gastrointestinal cancer surgery. The verbatim outcomes reported in each article were extracted, and each outcome was assessed to determine whether it was defined and measured using a validated tool. Verbatim outcomes were grouped into standardized outcomes and categorized into domains. The quality of outcome reporting in each identified article was assessed using the Harman tool (score range 0-6, where 0 indicated the poorest quality).

RESULTS

A total of 74 RCTs were included, from which 601 verbatim outcomes were extracted. Only 110 (18.3%) of the verbatim outcomes were defined and 270 (44.9%) were labeled as either "primary" or "secondary" outcomes. Verbatim outcomes were categorized into 119 standardized outcomes and assigned into one of five domains (patient-reported outcomes, surgical outcomes, physical/functional outcomes, disease activity, and intervention delivery). Surgical outcomes were the most common outcomes reported (n = 71 trials, 95.9%). The overall quality of the reported outcomes was poor across trials (median score: 2.0 [IQR = 0.00-3.75]).

CONCLUSIONS

Prehabilitation RCTs display considerable heterogeneity in outcome reporting, and low outcome reporting quality. The development of standardized core outcome sets may help improve article quality and enhance the clinical utility of prehabilitation following cancer surgery.

1424The diagnosis of non-adherence in hypertension using a urine biochemical screen is unaffected by drug pharmacokinetics

Introduction

Suboptimal drug adherence in hypertension is pandemic and traditional diagnostic tools to detect non-adherence have lacked accuracy and robustness. The inability to identify non-adherence has therefore driven the development of biochemical drug screening by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC- MS/MS) in urine and blood, which are the most accurate metrics presently available. Urinary antihypertensive testing is evidenced to improve non-adherence rates, significantly decrease blood pressure after physician intervention, and be cost effective. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Society of Hypertension (ESH) 2018 guidelines have recommended the use of biochemical testing for non-adherence diagnosis. However, it has been argued that the variable pharmacokinetic parameters of the medication (such as their half-lives and clearance rates) may affect the detection of medications in urine and hence the determination of adherence. We hypothesized that pharmacokinetic parameters do not affect the detection of antihypertensive medications in urine.

Aim

This study compared the pharmacokinetic parameters of the most commonly prescribed antihypertensive medications against their detection in urine by LC-MS/MS.

Methods

Results of urinary drug screens from 463 hypertensive patients (total prescribed medications N=1709) were collated. An adherence score termed as the C score (number of detected vs. prescribed medication) was generated for each of the 27 common antihypertensive medications. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as bioavailability, plasma concentration, volume of distribution, half-life, plasma clearance and urinary excretion values for each drug were obtained from published literature. Partial linear correlation was conducted between the C score of all the medications and each pharmacokinetic parameter studied.

Results

40% of patients were non-adherent. The average number of prescribed medications was high (N=3.7, SD: 1.5), and the average number of drugs detected was lower (N=2.5, SD: 1.6). Amlodipine was the most prescribed (N=224), and clonidine was the least (N=10). The half-lives ranged from 0.87 to 39 hours for bumetanide and amlodipine respectively. The urinary excretion percentage varied from <1% for nifedipine, and 94% for benfroflumethiazide. No significant correlation was found between any drug C score and their respective pharmacokinetic variables such as the medication half-lives (figure1).

Half-life versus adherence score

Conclusion

This study reports no significant correlation between drug pharmacokinetics and adherence. To the best of our knowledge this is the first study of its kind. Urinary biochemical testing by LC-MS/MS for non-adherence remains a valid tool for diagnosis although further detailed pharmacokinetic studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Acknowledgement/Funding

None

Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities

National and local initiatives focused on the transformation of STEM teaching in higher education have multiplied over the last decade. These initiatives often focus on measuring change in instructional practices, but it is difficult to monitor such change without a national picture of STEM educational practices, especially as characterized by common observational instruments. We characterized a snapshot of this landscape by conducting the first large scale observation-based study. We found that lecturing was prominent throughout the undergraduate STEM curriculum, even in classrooms with infrastructure designed to support active learning, indicating that further work is required to reform STEM education. Additionally, we established that STEM faculty’s instructional practices can vary substantially within a course, invalidating the commonly-used teaching evaluations based on a one-time observation.

Although lecture is prominent throughout the undergraduate STEM curriculum, STEM faculty employ varied teaching practices within the same course.