Adoption of adjuvant bisphosphonates for early breast cancer into standard clinical practice: Challenges and lessons learnt from comparison of the UK and Australian experience

•

Adoption of adjuvant bisphosphonates for early breast cancer into standard clinical practice.

•

UK and Australian experience of adjuvant bisphosphonates in early breast cancer.

•

Pathway taken for adjuvant bisphosphonates implementation in the UK.

•

Steps to increase update of adjuvant bisphosphonates in early breast cancer.

•

Improve the care of women with early breast cancer.

International guidelines recommend adjuvant bisphosphonates (BPs) for post-menopausal women with early breast cancer to reduce recurrence and mortality. However, globally, wide variation exists in their adoption. In the UK, adjuvant BPs were a recommendation in the breast cancer Clinical Reference Group service specification and were included as a priority for implementation by the national oncologists group UK Breast Cancer Group in November 2015, promoting national uptake, guidance and funding arrangements. In 2018, adjuvant BPs were recommended by the UKs National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. In Australia, adjuvant BPs are still ‘off-label’ and do not receive national reimbursement or endorsement. To date there has been no research into the prescribing habits of these agents in Australia. With the aim to gather data on adjuvant BPs prescribing practices, online surveys were developed and disseminated to breast oncologists in both countries between December 2018 and June 2019. Almost all of the UK oncologists prescribed adjuvant BPs, demonstrating that education, endorsement from professional bodies, presence of national guidelines and funding decisions have been critical to implementation. In contrast, only 48% of the Australian responders prescribed adjuvant BPs, while 83% reported that they would prescribe them if funding was available. Lack of local protocol guidance was also seen as a major barrier. This study was intended to assess the pathway taken for adjuvant BP implementation in the UK and how it might inform changes in Australian practice and also guide other countries with similar issues with the ultimate aim of improving the care of women with early breast cancer globally.

P5-22-01: Feasibility and Patient Safety of Serial Biopsies (bx) in Metastatic HER2−Positive Breast Cancer (BC) To Evaluate Alterations in Molecular Biomarkers (BM): Preliminary Results of SHERsig (Study of HER2 Signature in Metastatic Breast Cancer) a Prospective Phase II Study

Background

The use of trastuzumab (H)-based therapy for HER2−positive BC has significantly altered outcomes. Yet up to 64% of metastatic patients (pts) fail to respond (Robert JCO 2006) and most pts will progress within 24–42 months (m) following an initial response for metastatic disease. Preclinical data suggest several in vitro resistance mechanisms but confirmatory in vivo data are lacking, preventing optimal personalized care. This ongoing proof-of-concept study examines serial bx in pts with HER2−positive metastatic BC in order to assess BM profiles across multiple lines of treatment.

Methods: Key eligibility criteria include: centrally confirmed HER2 status, minimum of 1 disease site considered suitable for serial bx, normal coagulation profile and cardiac function, prior adjuvant/neoadjuvant taxane and H completed ≥12 m and ≥6 m respectively, ECOG ≤2. Pts receive q3wk H with clinician choice of taxane (docetaxel 75–100 mg/m2 q21, paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly or 175 mg/m2 q21 [TH]). At the time of progressive disease, pts receive capecitabine (X) and H. Two core bx and 1 optional fine needle aspirate are performed at the following times: baseline (after 3 weeks [w] of TH), at 6 w, at time of first progression prior to XH, and at the time of progression on XH. Tumor assessments are performed at 6 w, then 9 w intervals, with cardiac assessment every 6 m. Primary endpoint aims to explore and potentially define BM signatures that could alter during HER2−targeted therapy and predict for decreased or increased sensitivity to H-based treatment. Secondary endpoints include bx safety, ORR and TTP. At time of baseline bx, pts have the option to complete a pt satisfaction questionnaire.

Results: Between August 2009 and June 2011, 58 pts were screened; 29 enrolled. The other 29 pts were screen failures, with 3 pts (5%) specifically declining entry due to the requirement for serial bx. Median age is 53 y (range 37–86), with 9 and 20 pts having recurrent or de novo metastatic disease. Eight pts received adjuvant systemic treatment, including H in 4 pts. Baseline bx performed in the breast, n (%): 15 (52), bone: 6 (21), liver: 4 (14), and lymph nodes: 4 (14); 14 and 27 pts underwent bx at 3 and 6 w respectively. After a median of 34 w of treatment 11 pts progressed on TH and 7 pts underwent planned bx. There were 12 SAEs, none related to bx. Most AEs were grade 1/2 (95%) with 3% grade 3 and 1 death due to intercurrent illness. From a total of 43 bx, 12 (27%) grade 1/2 AEs (hematoma 2, transient hypotension 2, mild pain 8) were reported, with resolution in all instances. Fifteen pts consented to the pt satisfaction substudy.

Conclusions: Preliminary results of the first reported serial bx study in metastatic BC demonstrated 95% pt acceptance of this approach. Evaluation of BM profiles will be conducted following planned recruitment of 50 pts. To date, the feasibility and safety of obtaining serial bx in metastatic BC is supported by the current safety profile and patient uptake. Updated recruitment data will be presented.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-22-01.

A distinct molecular profile associated with mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer

Mucinous epithelial ovarian cancers (MOC) are clinically and morphologically distinct from the other histological subtypes of ovarian cancer. To determine the genetic basis of MOC and to identify potential tumour markers, gene expression profiling of 49 primary ovarian cancers of different histological subtypes was performed using a customised oligonucleotide microarray containing >59 000 probesets. The results show that MOC express a genetic profile that both differs and overlaps with other subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer. Concordant with its histological phenotype, MOC express genes characteristic of mucinous carcinomas of varying epithelial origin, including intestinal carcinomas. Differences in gene expression between MOC and other histological subtypes of ovarian cancer were confirmed by RT–PCR and/or immunohistochemistry. In particular, galectin 4 (LGALS4) was highly and specifically expressed in MOC, but expressed at lower levels in benign mucinous cysts and borderline (atypical proliferative) tumours, supporting a malignant progression model of MOC. Hence LGALS4 may have application as an early and differential diagnostic marker of MOC.

Small cell of the ovary, hypercalcemic type—Analysis of combined experience and recommendation for management. A GCIG study

Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) is a rare tumor typically affecting young women. It is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis and few long-term survivors.

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the outcome of patients with SCCOHT.

METHOD

Data were collected for patients with SCCOHT treated in Australia, Canada and Europe. Information included stage, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, recurrence and survival.

RESULTS

The median follow-up is 13 months for all patients and 35.5 months in surviving patients. Ten patients had FIGO stage I tumors, six stage III tumors and one stage unknown. All underwent surgical resection. Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy was given to all patients. Seven received adjuvant radiotherapy with either pelvic and para-aortic radiotherapy, average dose 46.5 Gy (40 Gy/25# - 50.4 Gy/23#), or pelvic and whole abdominal radiotherapy, average dose 45 Gy to pelvis and 25 Gy (22.5 Gy/22# - 30 Gy/25#) to abdomen. The median survival for stage I tumors was not reached and was 6 months for stage III tumors. For the ten patients with stage I tumors: six received adjuvant radiotherapy with five alive and disease-free; four received no adjuvant radiotherapy with one alive and disease-free, while three have relapsed with one alive and disease-free after resection. Of the seven patients with stage III or unknown stage tumors, all but one have died. Recurrences were most frequent in the pelvis and the abdomen. Patients receiving salvage treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy did poorly.

CONCLUSION

We advocate a multi-modality treatment approach including surgery, chemotherapy with the addition of radiotherapy either sequentially or concurrently.

Life threatening laryngeal toxicity following treatment with combined chemoradiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer: a case report with review of the literature

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a rare cancer in Western society, however there is a higher incidence in Asian. Chinese and African populations. A significant number of Asians reside in Australia, and consequently patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma are an increasing clinical problem. Radiotherapy has been the predominant treatment in the past, but more recently multi-modality treatments have been utilised. The results of an Intergroup trial, coordinated by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) demonstrated markedly superior progression free and overall survival for combined chemoradiotherapy compared to radiotherapy alone. At three years progression free survival was 24% for the radiotherapy arm and 69% for the chemoradiotherapy group (P < 0.001), and three-year survival was 47% for the radiotherapy arm compared with 78% for the combined arm (P = 0.005). There was minimum toxicity reported for either of the arms and no treatment related deaths. Based on these survival data the administration of concomitant cisplatin and radiotherapy has become standard of care for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the USA. Our institution has also adopted a similar combined therapy protocol for patients with stage III and IV nasopharyngeal cancer and good performance status. The patients treated at our institution have experienced significant side effects. We describe the case of a woman so treated with this protocol who subsequently developed severe life threatening laryngeal necrosis.