The oncology acute toxicity unit (OATU): an outpatient facility for improving the management of chemotherapy toxicity

OBJECTIVE

To provide an outpatient facility to improve the management of chemotherapy toxicity in cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We set up an oncology acute toxicity unit (OATU) to improve toxicity management. A telephone helpline was the initial contact which filters out inappropriate non-toxicity-related events. Patients were provided an information booklet describing the possible side effects of the chemotherapy and the helpline telephone number. A specialist nurse received the calls and consulted the doctor if necessary. Depending on requirements, the patient's problem was resolved by telephone, or a consultation visit at the OATU was arranged.

RESULTS

Between February 1999 and August 2001, 1126 patients made 2007 contacts with the OATU. The most common tumours were breast (26%), colorectal (20%) and lung (20%). The telephone helpline was used in 87% of contacts and 37% were considered inappropriate. Of the 1263 appropriate contacts, the most frequent chemotherapy schedules that had been administered were 5FU-leucovorin (11.2%) and CMF (10.4%). The most frequent side effects were fever (35.5%), diarrhoea (18.5%), mucositis (16.2%) and emesis (13%). The problem was resolved by telephone in 48% of cases and 52% required attendance in the OATU, of which 40% required hospital admission, i.e., 21.1% of the initial appropriate helpline contacts. The most frequent reason was Grade 3-4 neutropenic fever (56.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The OATU enables prompt and efficient access of patients to medical oncology facilities in the event of toxicity due to chemotherapy. Unnecessary emergency room use is avoided while oncology outpatient and hospitalisation facilities are optimised.

[Palliative care in cancer patients. Frequency and priority of symptoms]

BACKGROUND

The presence of multiple symptoms is very frequent in patients with advanced cancer disease. In this situation in which cure is not a realistic aim, the goal is to achieve symptom control and to give support to the patient and family. This study was designed to identify the most common and priority symptoms in patients with advanced cancer.

METHODS

Patients were given a questionnaire with a list of symptoms and were asked to underline those they presented, and also number those they considered most distressful from 1-3. Physicians and nurse independently answered the same questionnaire.

RESULTS

Asthenia was the most frequent symptom (patient evaluation 84%, nurse 82% and doctor 93%). Psychopathological disturbances showed a high prevalence. Regarding patient evaluation, dry mouth was the third symptom in frequency (73%), but it was detected by nurses in 39% and by physicians in 16%. Priority symptoms for the three groups were pain, asthenia, anorexia and anxiety. Pain was controlled in 19/22 patients (86%), while psychopathological symptoms were only controlled in 7/19 patients (27%).

CONCLUSIONS

In order to optimize treatment patient participation is mandatory. An interdisciplinary team (physicians, nurses, social workers, and psychologists) is necessary to take care of these patients.