Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis recurrence temporally associated with allergen-specific immunotherapy in a female adolescent: a case report

Periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome is the most common periodic fever syndrome in pediatric patients. It is clinically characterized by fever flares lasting 3-7 days, reappearing every 2-8 weeks with a distinctive clockwork regularity. PFAPA generally begins before 5 years of age and usually ceases 3-5 years after onset. Recurrences may be observed in adolescence and adulthood in up to 20% of cases. The authors aim to describe a case of PFAPA recurrence in adolescence temporally associated with allergen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT). A 16-year-old female patient was referred to the rheumatology unit due to recurrent episodes of fever one month after initiating ASIT for allergic rhinitis. These episodes occurred every 4 weeks and lasted 3 days. During these episodes, she also presented with a sore throat, tonsillar exudates, and cervical lymphadenopathy. Abortive treatment with oral prednisolone was attempted in these episodes, with complete resolution of fever after a single dose. After reviewing her medical background, she had previously experienced febrile episodes accompanied by aphthous ulcers and tonsillar exudates occurring every 7-8 weeks from age 2-7. The etiopathogenesis of PFAPA remains uncertain. Environmental triggers, particularly those with immunomodulator effects, may interfere with the immune responses responsible for PFAPA occurrence, but the mechanisms are still unclear. The authors describe the first report of the reappearance of PFAPA flares, possibly due to ASIT. Further studies are needed to fully clarify if ASIT constitutes a true environmental trigger of PFAPA.

Uveitis in patients with oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis and juvenile spondyloarthritis/enthesitis related arthritis: is there any difference?

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common systemic disease causing uveitis in childhood and adolescence.

SAT0320 BONE MINERAL DENSITY AND FRACTURE RISK IN A COHORT OF PORTUGUESE SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS PATIENTS

Background:

Although poorly understood, patients with Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) seem to have higher prevalence of low bone mineral density (BMD) and an increased spine fracture risk.

Objectives:

We aim to determine, by conventional densitometry (DXA) and using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX), the prevalence of low BMD and the fracture risk, respectively, in our SSc cohort and its potential determinants.

Methods:

Observational transversal study was performed including consecutive patients with the diagnosis of SSc. We collected data regarding demographics, BMD (lumbar spine and femoral neck) and occurrence of fracture. Ten-year risk of osteoporotic fracture was estimated using FRAXv4.1with the Portuguese population reference. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 23.0; p<0.01 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

Median age of patients (n=97) was 62 years old [56, 70], 88.7% females (n=86). Seventy-eight patients (80.4%) had limited cutaneous form, 5 (5.2%) presented a diffuse cutaneous form and 13 (13.4%) an overlap syndrome. Regarding clinical features: digital ulcers in 30 patients (30.9%), interstitial lung disease (ILD) in 16 (6.5%), gastrointestinal involvement in 16 (16.5%), miositis in 4 (4.1%) and pulmonary arterial hypertension in 3 (3.1%). Anti-topoisomerase I antibody (anti-Scl70) positivity was present in 15 patients (15.5%) and anti-centromere antibody (ACA) positivity in 63 (64.9%). Nine patients (9.3%) were smokers and 6 (6.2%) reported an alcohol consumption of 3 or more units/day. Median body mass index (BMI) was 25.4 Kg/m2[21.4, 29.1], with 5 patients (5.2%) being underweight. Vitamin D insufficiency was reported in 19 patients (19.6%). Twenty-one patients (21.6%) have been exposed to oral glucocorticoids (GCT) for more than 3 months at a dose of 5mg daily or more. Eleven patients (11.3%) had previous low impact fractures: 10 of which were vertebral and 1 wrist fracture. Regarding the prescribed anti-osteoporotic treatment (AOP), we found: alendronate (n=7, 7.2%), zoledronic acid (n=7, 7.2%), denosumab (n=2, 2.1%) and teriparatide (n=1, 1%).

Low BMD was present in 45 patients (46.4%); median femoral neck BMD (FN-BMD) was 0.827 [0.709, 0.893].Ten year probability of fracture (%) was: median risk for major fracture was 5.1 [3.5, 9.7] and 3.8 [2.5, 8], with and without FN-BMD, respectively; for hip fracture the estimated risk was 1.2 [0.6, 3.1] and 1.0 [0.4, 2.5], with and without FN-BMD, respectively. According to FRAX thresholds for the Portuguese population, 25 patients (25.8%) met criteria to start AOP treatment. Among them, only 10 patients (40%) started it, as the agreement between the indication to treat by FRAX and the onset of treatment was weak (k= 0.338). A strong agreement was found between FRAX risk threshold with DXA and World Health Organization (WHO) threshold for starting AOP (k= 0.814) and no agreement was found between FRAX risk without DXA and WHO threshold.

FN-BMD presented a weak correlation with BMI (r = 0.393), a moderate inverse correlation with major fracture risk with and without FN-BMD (r = -0.704, r=-0.412, respectively) and with hip fracture risk with and without FN-BMD (r = -0.799, r=-0.412, respectively). Major fracture risk with and without FN-BMD presented a moderate correlation with spine fractures (r = 0.350; r=0.397, respectively).

No correlation was found between WHO threshold and spine fractures. No correlations were found between FN-BMD or fracture risk estimated by FRAX and disease manifestations, anti-Scl70 or ACA positivity, vitamin D insufficiency, smoking or GCT use.

Conclusion:

In our cohort, low BMD was prevalent and had correlation with BMI. FRAX appears to be an useful instrument as it correlated with spine fractures, contrary to what was verified when we used the WHO threshold. Early monitoring of BMD and estimating fracture risk using FRAX appear to be useful tools for the prevention of fractures in this population.

Disclosure of Interests:

Salomé Garcia: None declared, Bruno Miguel Fernandes: None declared, Sara Ganhão: None declared, Maria Rato: None declared, Filipe Pinheiro: None declared, Georgina Terroso: None declared, Miguel Bernardes Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli-Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Lúcia Costa: None declared

AB0825 TIME-COURSE CHANGE IN AXIAL MOBILITY IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS PATIENTS UNDER bDMARD

Background:

Spinal mobility is assessed frequently in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) usingBath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index(BASMI) to provide baseline measurement, monitor changes over time and to assess the impact of clinical interventions. BASMI comprises 4 measures of spinal mobility (cervical rotation, tragus-to-wall distance, modified Schober’s test and lumbar lateral flexion) and one hip mobility measurement (intermalleolar distance).

Objectives:

The aim of this study is to investigate the time-course change of BASMI in PsA patients after 6 months ofBiologic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drug(bDMARD) therapy. The authors also pretend to evaluated, at baseline and after 6 months of treatment, the association between BASMI, disease activity scores and physical function.

Methods:

An observational retrospective study was performed in patients with PsA under bDMARD followed in the Rheumatology department of a tertiary university hospital. Were included patients treated with only one bDMARD. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register. For spinal mobility calculation BASMI was used. Disease activity was evaluated withAnkylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score(ASDAS) andBath Ankylosing Spondylitis Activity Index(BASDAI). Physical function was assessed withBath Functional Index(BASFI). The variation of BASMI, ASDAS, BASDAI and BASFI was calculated as the difference between values registered at 6 months and at baseline and presented as Δ. Correlations between ΔBASMI, ΔASDAS and ΔBASFI was calculated using Pearson test.

Results:

A total of 55 patients were included. Thirty patients were males (54.5%). The mean age at diagnosis was 44.6 ± 12.6 years and the median disease duration at start of bDMARD was 5.4 years (min: 0.30; max: 25.5). In total, 19 (34.5%) patients had predominant axial involvement, 36 (65.5%) peripheric and 36 (65.5%) enthesopathic. Almost all patients fulfilled the CASPAR criteria for PsA (n=50, 90.9%). According to ASDAS criteria, at the baseline 20 patients (36.4%) had high disease activity and 34 (61,8%) very high. The most used bDMARD was etanercept (n=21, 38,3%) followed by golimumab (n=19, 34.5%) and adalimumab (n=8, 14.5%). Three patients were treated with infliximab, two with certolizumab and other two with secukinumab. Forty-one patients (75.9%) were concomitantly treated with conventional synthetic DMARDs. Axial PsA patients had more limitations in spinal mobility (BASMI mean 4.5 ± 1.5) and more functional limitation (BASFI mean 6.8±1.9) than patients with predominant peripheric involvement (BASMI mean 3.3± 1.2, p=0.004; BASFI mean 5.4±3, p=0,0048). Statistically significant differences in ASDAS and BASDAI in these two groups were not observed (p=0.332 and p=0.605, respectively). For all patients, BASMI did not vary significantly (p=0.691) at baseline (mean 3.7± 1.4) and after 6 months (mean 3.8±1.3) of treatment. Although the ΔBASMI for etanercept was negative (mean -0.12±0.9) and for golimumab positive (0.14±0.8), it was not statistically significant. At baseline there is a significant positive association between BASMI and ASDAS (r=0.435, p=0.001), BASMI and BASDAI (r=0.567, p<0.001) and BASMI and BASFI (r=0.510, p<0.001). However, there was not a statistically significant association between ΔBASMI and: ΔASDAS, ΔBASDAI and ΔBASFI (r=0.158; p=0.269, r=0.019; p=0.096 and r=0.121; p=0.397, respectively).

Conclusion:

In PsA patients treated with bDMARDs, at least in short-term follow-up, BASMI does not improve with time. Changes in BASMI did not correlate with changes in activity disease and in functional outcome. Studies with longer follow-up and with more patients are needed to better evaluate these associations.

Disclosure of Interests:

Maria Rato: None declared, Filipe Pinheiro: None declared, Salomé Garcia: None declared, Bruno Miguel Fernandes: None declared, Sara Ganhão: None declared, Rita Gaio: None declared, Miguel Bernardes Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli-Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Alexandra Bernardo: None declared, Lúcia Costa: None declared

AB0982 SERUM ALBUMIN LEVELS AND DEPRESSION IN JSLE

Background:

Albumin is a negative acute phase response protein synthesized in the liver, being an important marker of inflammation. Under inflammatory conditions, the transcapillary escape rate of albumin may increase, leading to hypoalbuminaemia. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic condition involving multiple organ systems, inducing functional disability and psychological burden responsible for noteworthy depressive symptoms1. Depression may be related with psychosocial, environmental and biological factors, disease activity and its severity, age and sex2. Several studies show that immune activation and increased concentrations of positive and decreased concentrations of negative acute phase proteins are involved in the pathogenesis of depression3. As albumin has the capacity to bind homocysteine, lowered serum albumin levels leads to hyperhomocysteinemia, a well-known risk factor for depression. Moreover, hypoalbuminaemia decrease the availability of tryptophan, an essential amino acid from which the neurotransmitter serotonin is derived, and induce oxidative stress, which further decreases antioxidant levels in people with depression.

Objectives:

To assess the association between serum albumin levels and depressive symptoms in juvenile-onset SLE (jSLE) patients.

Methods:

A cross-sectional sample of jSLE patients, currently aged ≥ 16 years, completed a psychosocial assessment including quality of life (SF-36) anxiety and depressive symptoms (HADS) and cognitive assessment (MMSE), between October 2018- May 2019. Local Ethics Committee approved the study. All patients fulfilled both 2012 and 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE. Juvenile-onset was defined as age at diagnosis <18 years. Demographics and clinical characteristics were collected. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS®. Variables were compared with spearman correlations tests.

Results:

30 jSLE patients were included (90%female) in the study, with median (min-max) age of 21 (16-35) years, with mean (SD) age of diagnosis of 15.8 ± 2.1. Median albumin serum level was 41.7 (16.7-46.3) g/dL. Psychosocial assessment revealed a mean (SD) score in HADS - Depression of 3.9 (3.3), HADS - Anxiety of 9 (4.3), MMSE of 27.7 (1.8), Physical health SF-36 of 66.8 (9.9) and Mental health SF-36 of 68.9 (17.5). 23.3 % jSLE showed mild cognitive impairment, 63.3% anxiety and 13.3% depression. We observed significant inverse linear relationships between serum albumin levels and depressive symptoms score (p=0.042, ρ=-0.380) and with anxiety symptoms score ((p=0.029, ρ=-0.406). No significant correlations were detected between albumin serum concentrations and cognitive assessment.

Conclusion:

Our findings are consistent with studies previously reporting the potentially protective effect of high serum albumin levels on mental health in different populations. A possible inflammation related aetiology for depression in jSLE patients is highlighted, further explained through the protective roles played by albumin in inflammation, infection, and oxidative damage.

References:

[1]Zhang, L. et al. Prevalence of depression and anxiety in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 17, 70 (2017)

[2]Figueiredo-Braga M et al. Depression and anxiety in systemic lupus erythematosus: The crosstalk between immunological, clinical, and psychosocial factors. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(28)

[3]Livia Ambrus & Sofie Westling. Inverse association between serum albumin and depressive symptoms among drug-free individuals with a recent suicide attempt, Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 73:4-5, 229-232

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

AB0769 THE IMPACT OF BODY MASS INDEX ON DISEASE ACTIVITY AND ENTHESITIS IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

Background:

Overweight/obesity has increased exponentially in the last decades, becoming a huge Public Health problem. Moreover, an increase in adipose tissue is associated with an increased production of several proinflammatory cytokines and acute phase reactants. Higher BMI has been related with new bone formation including syndesmophytes and enthesophytes. In fact, besides rheumatologic conditions including Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), enthesopathy can be a consequence of several clinical conditions including metabolic syndrome, mechanical injuries and degeneration.

Objectives:

To evaluate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on disease activity scores and enthesitis scores in Psoriatic Arthritis.

Methods:

Retrospective study including all the patients with PsA meeting the CASPAR criteria, beginning first-line biologic therapy at our centre. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the Portuguese database Reumapt. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS. Continuous variables were compared through Spearman/Pearson correlations.

Results:

The mean BMI was 26.8 (SD 0.5). In our sample of 119 PsA patients, 21.5% were overweight and 8.3% were obese. The mean age of patients was 46.3 ± 1.03 years; 60 female and 59 male. The median disease duration was 6.8 (0.3-33.8) years. At baseline mean (SD) disease activity variables were: DAS 28 4vESR 4.9 (0.2), ESR 33.2 (2.3) mm/h; CRP 2.35 (0.3) mg/dL, BASDAI 6.6 (0.2), ASDAS 3.9 (0.1), BASMI 3.7 (0.2), BASFI 5.8 (0.3), MASES 1.9 (0.3), SPARCC 2.3 (0.3). There were statistically significant positive correlations between BMI and MASES at baseline (p=0.024, r=0.411) but there weren’t with SPARCC, DAS 28 4vESR, ESR, CRP, BASDAI, ASDAS, BASMI and BASFI.

Conclusion:

The data showed that patients with higher BMI values had higher enthesitis scores suggesting that overweight/obesity may have a negative impact on enthesopathy. Further studies are still needed to further understand that possible relationship.

References:

[1]Bakirci S, Dabague J, Eder L, McGonagle D, Aydin SZ. The role of obesity on inflammation and damage in spondyloarthritis: a systematic literature review on body mass index and imaging. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019 Apr 29.

Disclosure of Interests:

Sara Ganhão: None declared, Bruno Miguel Fernandes: None declared, Salomé Garcia: None declared, Filipe Pinheiro: None declared, Maria Rato: None declared, Eva Mariz: None declared, Miguel Bernardes Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli-Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Lúcia Costa: None declared

SAT0478 OSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT IN PORTUGUESE PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS – WHAT IS THE VALUE OF THE FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT TOOL (FRAX)?

Background:

Few studies have evaluated the prevalence and treatment of osteoporosis (OP) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and many of these patients are not screened using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). FRAX makes it possible to stratify the risk and define which patients may benefit from anti-osteoporotic treatment, but its usefulness in this population is not well established.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to determine whether the application of FRAX changes the indication for anti-osteoporotic treatment in PsA patients, according to the Portuguese guidelines.

Methods:

In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated PsA patients from a tertiary hospital, registered in a national database (Reuma.pt), aged between 40 and 90 years and with a last consultation in 2019. FRAX was applied in all of them, regardless of being under anti-osteoporotic treatment and, when DXA was available, the femoral neck bone mineral density was used. Patients were stratified according to the risk of fracture, and those at high risk were considered candidates for anti-osteoporotic treatment, according to national guidelines [FRAX ≥11% for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) or ≥ 3% for hip fracture (HF) without DXA; FRAX ≥9% for MOF or ≥ 2.5% for HF, with DXA].

Results:

We included 100 patients, 52 females, with a mean age of 54,4 ±8,9 years and a median disease duration of 10 (6-17) years. Only 43 had already performed DXA and 6 had OP according to World Health Organization criteria. Seven patients were identified as having a high risk of fracture; applying femoral neck bone mineral density, 2 more patients with indication for treatment were recognized, totalizing 9 patients. There was a low agreement between the indication for treatment based only on DXA and FRAX (Cohen’s k 0.066). There was a moderate and significant correlation between percentage of risk of MOF by FRAX with and without DXA (Spearman’s ρ 0.804, p <0.001); for the risk of HF by FRAX with and without DEXA the correlation was weaker but still significant (Spearman’s ρ 0.439, p = 0.004). There was no association between the indication for treatment by FRAX and the performance of DXA (chi-square test, p = 0.597), nor the fact of performing DXA significantly affected the risk of MOF (Wilcoxon test, p = 0.185) or of HF (Wilcoxon test, p = 0.785) by FRAX.

Conclusion:

In line with Portuguese guidelines, FRAX seems to be, in itself, a very useful tool in patients with PsA, and the performance of DXA does not significantly alter the indication for anti-osteoporotic treatment.

References:

[1]Rodrigues AM, Canhao H, Marques A, Ambrosio C, Borges J, Coelho P, et al. Portuguese recommendations for the prevention, diagnosis and management of primary osteoporosis - 2018 update. Acta Reumatol Port. 2018;43(1):10-31.

[2]Del Puente A, Esposito A, Parisi A, Atteno M, Montalbano S, Vitiello M, et al. Osteoporosis and psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2012;89:36-8.

[3]Gulati AM, Michelsen B, Diamantopoulos A, Grandaunet B, Salvesen O, Kavanaugh A, et al. Osteoporosis in psoriatic arthritis: a cross-sectional study of an outpatient clinic population. RMD Open. 2018;4(1):e000631.

[4]Adami G, Fassio A, Rossini M, Caimmi C, Giollo A, Orsolini G, et al. Osteoporosis in Rheumatic Diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(23).

[5]Kanis JA, Harvey NC, Johansson H, Oden A, Leslie WD, McCloskey EV. FRAX Update. J Clin Densitom. 2017;20(3):360-7.

Disclosure of Interests:

Filipe Pinheiro: None declared, Maria Rato: None declared, Bruno Miguel Fernandes: None declared, Salomé Garcia: None declared, Sara Ganhão: None declared, Pedro Madureira: None declared, Miguel Bernardes Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli-Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Lúcia Costa: None declared

THU0387 THE IMPACT OF TREATMENT WITH A BIOLOGICAL DISEASE-MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUG ON SPINAL MOBILITY AND ITS CORRELATION WITH DISEASE ACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH SPONDYLOARTHRITIS

Background:

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) is an instrument developed to assess spinal and hip mobility. The relationship between BASMI and disease activity is not always linear and, above all, the data that correlate the variation in BASMI values (ΔBASMI) with the variation in disease activity scores and response to treatment are not unanimous.

Objectives:

Explore the effect of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) in spine mobility (as assessed by BASMI) and the associations between ΔBASMI and disease activity.

Methods:

Observational retrospective study was performed including consecutive patients with the diagnosis of Spondyloarthritis (SpA) followed at our Rheumatology Department. Demographic, clinical, including Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), BASMI, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score with erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein (ASDAS ESR and ASDAS CRP, respectively), and laboratorial data were collected from our national database at baseline, 6 and 12 months after initiation of a bDMARD. The variation of each parameter was calculated as the difference between the levels recorded at 6 and 12 months and the reference level and presented in the form of Δ. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 23.0. Correlations between variables were studied using Spearman correlation analysis and comparison between groups was performed using Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

Results:

Median age of patients (n=178) was 42 years old [34, 50], 92 (51.7%) were males with a median disease duration of 4.9 [1.0, 10.3] years. One hundred and twenty-six patients (70.8%) had Ankylosing Spondylitis, 15 (8.4%) Inflammatory Bowel Disease related SPA and 30 (16.9%) Undifferentiated SpA. Fifty four (30.3%) patients were taking glucocorticoids and regarding conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs use before starting the bDMARD: Sulfasalazine (52, 29.2%), Methotrexate (31, 17.4%) and Leflunomide (3, 1.7%). Regarding the bDMARD, only one patient started Secukinumab and the others a Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) [Golimumab (n= 64, 36.0%), Adalimumab (n=36, 20.2%), Infliximab (n= 35, 19.7%), Etanercept (n= 32, 18.0%) and Certolizumab (n= 10, 5.6%)].

The majority of the patients had very high disease activity at baseline (86.0%, n=153); median ESR was 29 mm/h [15, 47], median CRP was 13.7 mg/L, [6.60, 27.3], median ASDAS CRP was 7.6 [6.0, 9.0] and median BASMI was 8.0 [7-0, 9.0]. After 6 and 12 months of treatment, mean ESR, CRP, ASDAS-CRP and BASMI were significantly lower than mean baseline values (p<0.01), with median ASDAS-CRP at 12 months of 2.20 [1.50, 2.90] and median ΔBASMI of -4.10 [-5.50, -2.40].

BASMI at baseline showed a moderate correlation with ASDAS CRP (r=0.468, p<0.01), BASDAI (r=0.496, p<0.01) and patient visual analogic scale (VAS) (r=0.563, p<0.01). No correlations were found between BASMI and CRP, ESR, physician VAS or the consumption of nonsteroidal anti inflammatory drugs at baseline.

A significant positive correlation was found between ΔBASMI and ΔASDAS at 6 months and 12 months (r=0.243, p=0.02; r=0.286; p<0.01) and also between ΔBASMI and ΔBASDAI at 6 and 12 months (r=0.183, p=0.04; r=0.291, p=0.02). No correlations were found between ΔBASMI and ΔCRP or ΔESR. No differences were observed in ΔBASMI, regarding the bDMARD of choice.

Conclusion:

In our cohort, starting a bDMARD improved BASMI scores through a 12 month period and there was a correlation between the variation of BASMI and disease activity improvement. As such, a TNFi may retard the progression of spinal mobility dysfunction in SpA patients. We cannot draw conclusions regarding differences between TNFi and interleukin 17 inhibitors and further work is needed to clarify possible differences in their impact in improving spine mobility.

Disclosure of Interests:

Salomé Garcia: None declared, Bruno Miguel Fernandes: None declared, Sara Ganhão: None declared, Maria Rato: None declared, Filipe Pinheiro: None declared, Georgina Terroso: None declared, Miguel Bernardes Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli-Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Lúcia Costa: None declared

SAT0465 FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT BY FRAX IN A SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS PORTUGUESE COHORT

Background:

Osteoporosis is commonly seen in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), even in pre-menopausal patients. The etiology is multifactorial and chronic glucocorticoid therapy seems to play a central role.

Objectives:

To investigate the ten-year risk of fracture assessed by Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), with and without dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to determine possible demographic or clinical factors associated with an increased risk of fracture in a SLE population.

Methods:

Retrospective study including all the over 40 years-old patients with the diagnosis of SLE (2012 SLICC classification criteria) followed at our Rheumatology Department registered in our national database. Demographic, clinical and laboratorial data were collected at the last follow-up visit. Data from the last DXA (until 3 years prior to the last visit) were collected. Indication for pharmacological treatment by FRAX was assessed according to the national recommendations: estimated fracture risk, without DXA, ≥11% for major osteoporotic fracture or ≥3% for hip fracture and/or estimated fracture risk, with DXA, ≥9% for major osteoporotic fracture or ≥2.5% for hip fracture.

Results:

We included 104 patients, 101 (97.1%) females, aged 54.5±9.9 years, with a median disease duration of 19.3 years [4.3-51.6]. Twelve patients (11.5%) were current smokers, 31 (29.8%) had elevated anti-dsDNA antibodies (≥100 IU/mL) and 27 (26.0%) had complement consumption (C3c<83mg/dL or C4<12mg/dL). 73 patients (70.2%) were taking glucocorticoids with a mean daily prednisolone equivalent dosage of 4.4±5.2 mg/day. Regarding SLE treatment, 69 patients (66.3%) were under hydroxychloroquine, 22 (21.2%) under azathioprine, 16 (15.4%) under mycophenolate mofetil, 5 (4.8%) under belimumab, 4 (3.8%) under methotrexate, 1 (1.0%) under leflunomide and 1 (1.0%) under rituximab.

Ten patients (9.6%) had previous fragility fractures, 54 patients (51.9%) had DXA in the last 3 years and 81 (77.9%) were taking calcium and/or vitamin D supplements.

Sixteen (15.4%) had indication for treatment by FRAX without DXA and 8 of these (50%) were under treatment. Moreover, thirteen (12.5%) had indication for treatment by FRAX with DXA and 8 of these (61.5%) were under treatment.

Five patients (4.8%) were reclassified in FRAX with DXA: 3 patients (2.9%) had no indication for treatment by FRAX without DXA but conquered it by FRAX with DXA and 2 patients (1.9%) had indication for treatment by FRAX without DXA but lost it by FRAX with DXA. We found a good level of agreement in the indication for treatment between FRAX with and without DXA (kappa=0.741; p<0.001).

There was no significant difference in the risk of fracture estimated by FRAX with or without DXA, both for major osteoporotic fracture and for hip fracture. Correlations between fracture risk and some clinical variables can be seen in table 1.

Table 1.

Correlations between the risk of fracture estimated by FRAX and disease related features.

Age at SLE diagnosisDisease DurationESRSLEDAIEstimated fracture risk by FRAX:without DXAmajor osteoporotic fracturer=0.483p<0.001n.s.r=0.249p=0.012r=-0.586p=0.028hip fracturer=0.481p<0.001n.s.r=-0.552p=0.041n.s.with DXAmajor osteoporotic fracturer=0.386p=0.005r=0.299p=0.033n.s.n.s.hip fracturer=0.338p=0.015n.s.n.s.n.s.

Conclusion:

A higher number of patients had indication for pharmacological treatment by FRAX with DXA in comparison with FRAX without DXA. However, we found no statistically significant difference in the estimated fracture risk with and without DXA. This, together with the good level of agreement between FRAX with and without DXA, suggests that the fracture risk estimation, even without DXA, may be an appropriate approach. The low number of patients with indication for pharmacological treatment by FRAX, with and without DXA, may be explained by their low mean age and the high number of them under vitamin D/calcium supplementation.

Disclosure of Interests:

Bruno Miguel Fernandes: None declared, Salomé Garcia: None declared, Sara Ganhão: None declared, Maria Rato: None declared, Filipe Pinheiro: None declared, Miguel Bernardes Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli-Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Lúcia Costa: None declared

SAT0416 ENTHESITIS AND CLINICAL RESPONSE IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: REAL-LIFE DATA

Background:

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory arthritis that is characterized by a broad spectrum of clinical conditions, including axial skeletal involvement, enthesitis, dactylitis, uveitis and arthritis. Among those, enthesitis, the inflammation of the junction where the tendon, ligament or joint capsule inserts into the bone, is assigned to be the hallmark, affecting 35–50% of patients. Several clinical methods have been developed to measure it, including The Maastricht AS Enthesitis Score (MASES) index, which tests 13 entheses and the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) index that assesses 16.

Objectives:

To assess the relationship between enthesitis and clinical response in psoriatic arthritis.

Methods:

Retrospective study including all the patients with PsA meeting the CASPAR criteria, beginning first-line biologic therapy at our centre. Demographic and clinical data including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, physical examination findings such as presence of enthesitis, dactylitis, chronic back pain, tender and swollen joint counts (TJC/ SJC), ESR, CRP, DAS 28 4vESR, BASDAI, BASFI, BASMI, ASDAS, HAQ, patient VAS score, MASES and SPARCC were collected from the Portuguese database Reumapt. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS. Continuous variables were analysed through Spearman correlations.

Results:

We included 119 patients with PsA (60 female), of which 14.9% were active smokers. The mean age of patients was 46.3 ± 1.03 years. The median disease duration was 6.8 (0.3-33.8) years and the mean BMI was 26.8 ± 0.5 Kg/m2.

Enthesitis, dactylitis, inflammatory back pain, peripheral arthritis, ungueal distrophy, and psoriasis were present in 53 (45.7%), 45 (38.8%), 76 (65.5%), 109 (94%), 45 (38.8%), 104 (89.7%) patients, respectively.

At baseline, mean (SD) disease activity parameters were: DAS 28 4vESR 4.9 (0.2), ESR 33.2 (2.3) mm/h; CRP 2.35 (0.3) mg/dL, HAQ 1.3 (0.1), BASDAI 6.6 (0.2), ASDAS 3.9 (0.1), BASMI 3.7 (0.2), BASFI 5.8 (0.3), MASES 1.9 (0.3), SPARCC 2.3 (0.3). Median (min-max) values of TJC, SJC and patient VAS score at baseline were 4 (0-28), 3 (0-19), 76 (0-100), respectively.

There were statistically significant positive correlations (0-12 months) between ΔMASES and ΔDAS 28 4vESR (p=0.02, rho=0.432), Δpatient VAS score (p=0.027, rho=0.307), ΔHAQ (p=0.02, rho=0.411), ΔBASDAI (p=0.025, rho=0.326), ΔBASFI (p=0.037, rho=0.315), ΔASDAS (p=0.023, rho= 0.331). Correlations between ΔSPARCC and ΔDAS 28 4vESR (p=0.023, rho=0.332), Δpatient VAS score (p=0.003, rho=0.402), ΔHAQ (p=0.012, rho=0.440), ΔBASDAI (p=0.011, rho=0.368), ΔBASFI (p=0.001, rho=0.445), ΔASDAS (p=0.002, rho= 0.437), ΔCDAI (p=0.039, rho=0.320) and ΔSDAI (p=0.039, rho=0.319), were also significant. However, there weren’t strong correlations between ΔMASES neither ΔSPARCC and PsARC response at 12 months.

Conclusion:

Our results suggest that enthesitis is correlated with clinical response in PsA, supporting the idea that it is a major determinant of disease activity. It should be given more importance, namely by incorporating it in daily clinical practice, due to its major role, both in establishing an early diagnosis and in assessing treatment response.

References:

[1]Sunar I, Ataman S, Nas K, Kilic E, Sargin B, Kasman SA, et al. Enthesitis and its relationship with disease activity, functional status, and quality of life in psoriatic arthritis: a multi‑center study. Rheumatol Int. 2019 Nov 26. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04480-9.

Disclosure of Interests:

Sara Ganhão: None declared, Salomé Garcia: None declared, Bruno Miguel Fernandes: None declared, Maria Rato: None declared, Filipe Pinheiro: None declared, Eva Mariz: None declared, Miguel Bernardes Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli-Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Lúcia Costa: None declared

SAT0449 SPONDYLOARTHRITIS AND FRACTURE RISK: DOES DXA REALLY HAVE AN IMPACT IN THE RISK OF FRACTURE ESTIMATED BY FRAX?

Background:

Low bone mineral density (BMD) is common in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The fracture risk (FR) is increased and its reduction with pharmacologic therapy is not clearly defined in this population. However, early screening and bisphosphonates as first-line treatment are recommended.

Objectives:

To investigate the influence of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the ten-year risk of fracture assessed by FR Assessment Tool (FRAX) and to determine possible demographic or clinical factors associated with an increased FR in a spondyloarthritis (SpA) population.

Methods:

Retrospective study including all the over 40 years-old SpA patients (ASAS classification criteria) followed at our Rheumatology Department and registered in the national database. Demographic, clinical and laboratorial data were collected at the time of the last follow-up visit. Data from the last DXA (until 3 years prior to the last visit) were collected. Indication for pharmacological treatment by FRAX was assessed according to the national recommendations.

Results:

A total of 231 SpA patients were included: 126 males (54.5%), 53 (22.9%) smokers; 171 (74%) had AS, 23 (10%) had Inflammatory Bowel Disease Associated SpA and 37 (16%) had Undifferentiated SpA. At the last follow-up visit, the mean age was 52.9 years (±9.6) and the median disease duration was 21.9 years [1.0-55.5]. The mean ASDAS-CRP was 2.5 (±0.9) and the majority of patients had moderate (25.5%) or high (48.5%) disease activity (according to ASDAS). One hundred and thirty patients (56.3%) were taking NSAIDs, 45 (19.5%) were taking glucocorticoids, 85 (36.8%) were under csDMARDs and 170 (73.6%) under bDMARDs [157 (68%) under TNFi, 11 (4.8%) under secukinumab and 2 (0.9%) under ustekinumab].

Eleven patients (4.8%) had previous fragility fractures, 118 (51.1%) had DXA in the last 3 years and 167 (72.3%) were taking calcium and/or vitamin D supplements.

Sixteen patients (6.9%) had indication for treatment by FRAX without DXA and 9 of these (56.3%) were already under treatment. Similarly, 16 (6.9%) had indication for treatment by FRAX with DXA and 13 of these (81.3%) were already under treatment. Ten patients (4.3%) were reclassified in FRAX with DXA: 7 (3%) had no indication for treatment by FRAX without DXA but obtained it by FRAX with DXA and 3 (1.3%) had indication for treatment by FRAX without DXA but they lost it by FRAX with DXA. We found a moderate level of agreement in the indication for treatment between FRAX with and without DXA (kappa=0.595; p<0.001). The use of DXA in FRAX estimated a significant higher median FR, both for major osteoporotic fracture (2.4% [0.8-31.0] vs 1.8% [0.6-20.0]; p<0.001) and for hip fracture (0.5% [0.0-23.0] vs 0.2% [0.0-14.0]; p<0.001).

We found significant correlations between FR and some disease-related variables (table 1).

Table 1.

Correlations between the risk of fracture estimated by FRAX and disease-related variables.

Disease durationBASDAIASDAS-CRPBASMIBASFIEstimated fracture risk by FRAX:without DXAmajor osteoporotic fracturer=0.352p<0.001r=0.204p=0.002r=0.214p=0.001r=0.301p<0.001r=0.317p<0.001hip fracturer=0.389p<0.001r=0.142p=0.034r=0.170p=0.011r=0.305p<0.001r=0.275p<0.001with DXAmajor osteoporotic fracturer=0.227p=0.014r=0.314p=0.001r=0.356p<0.001r=0.293p=0.002r=0.379p<0.001hip fracturen.s.r=0.197p=0.036r=0.269p=0.004r=0.271p=0.004r=0.258p=0.006

Conclusion:

Our results showed that a similar number of patients had indication for pharmacological treatment by FRAX both with and without DXA. Although the inclusion of DXA resulted in a higher estimated FR by FRAX, the observed moderate level of agreement between FRAX with and without DXA suggests that the FR estimation by FRAX, even without DXA, may be a reasonable approach in SpA patients. In line with literature, we found significant associations between the estimated risk fracture by FRAX and some disease activity and function measures.

Disclosure of Interests:

Bruno Miguel Fernandes: None declared, Salomé Garcia: None declared, Sara Ganhão: None declared, Maria Rato: None declared, Filipe Pinheiro: None declared, Miguel Bernardes Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli-Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Lúcia Costa: None declared

SAT0482 FRAX 10-YR FRACTURE RISK IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS ASSESSED WITH AND WITHOUT BONE MINERAL DENSITY – ARE WE TREATING OUR PATIENTS UNDER bDMARDs?

Background:

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a higher risk of osteoporosis not only due to chronic inflammation status, but also due to the treatment with glucocorticoids. FRAX is a computer-based algorithm developed by the World Health Organization for estimation of the 10-year risk of a hip or major osteoporotic fracture. Inclusion of femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) in the estimation is optional.

Objectives:

The study aimed to identify the RA patients under treatment with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD), who have FRAX scores, calculated with and without BMD, classified as high fracture risk and evaluate if they are receiving treatment for osteoporosis. The authors also investigated the intra-individual agreement between FRAX fracture risk calculated with and without BMD.

Methods:

Demographic and clinical data and BMD results from RA patients followed in a tertiary university hospital and registered in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register were used for analysis. Patients under 40 years of age at the last visit were excluded. McNemar test was applied for the identification of discordance of risk categories. The Wilcoxon test was used to characterize the intraindividual differences between paired FRAX risks with and without BMD. Correlations between pairs of variables were evaluated by the Spearman test. For independent variables Mann-Whitney test was used.

Results:

A total of 303 patients were included, 244 were females (80.5%) and 49 current smokers (16.2%). Mean age was 59.5 ± 9.54 years and mean disease duration 18.5 ± 10.4 years. Two hundred and twenty patients (72.4%) and 243 (80.2%) were RF and ACPA positive, respectively, and 51.5% had erosive disease. Mean disease activity score (DAS28-4V-CRP) was 3.08 ± 1.18 and mean femoral neck BMD 0.84 ± 0.12 g/cm2. One hundred and seventy nine patients (58.9%) were concomitantly treated with conventional synthetic DMARDs and 215 (70.7%) with glucocorticoids. Among all the patients, 35 (11.6%) had previous fractures and 19 (6.3%) have family history of fracture. The median 10-year risk of a major fracture and a hip fracture, calculated without BMD, was 6.0 (1.2-50) and 1.5 (0.1-39), respectively; with BMD it was 6.9 (1.3-61) and 1.7 (0-49). When FRAX score is calculated without BMD (n=303), 76 (25.1%) patients were categorized as high fracture risk. Among them, only 41 (54%) were receiving osteoporosis treatment. FRAX assessment with BMD (n=231) identified 99 (32.7%) patients with high fracture risk, 51 (51,5%) in treatment for osteoporosis. Thirty patients (21%) previously classified as low fracture risk using FRAX without BMD were recategorized as high risk (p<0.001). Despite that, there was a strong correlation between fracture risks assessed with and without BMD for both major and hip fracture (r = 0.867, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.728, p < 0.0001, respectively). ACPA and RF positive patients did not have higher FRAX scores (including or not BMA). Patients with erosive disease had a higher 10-year probability of major fracture evaluated by FRAX when it includes BMD (p=0.041).

Conclusion:

It is very important to accurately assess the risk of osteoporotic fractures in RA patients to treat them properly. The authors highlight the high number of patients who are not receiving treatment according to FRAX categorization. In spite of the correlation between estimated fracture risk by FRAX with and without BMD, there is a discordance in fracture risk categorization, as one fifth of patients of low risk were reclassified as high risk. For the RA population treated with bDMARDS, our findings raise the need to request a DXA not only for patients classified as having an intermediate risk of fracture, but also for low-risk patients.

Disclosure of Interests:

Maria Rato: None declared, Filipe Pinheiro: None declared, Salomé Garcia: None declared, Bruno Miguel Fernandes: None declared, Sara Ganhão: None declared, Rita Gaio: None declared, Miguel Bernardes Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli-Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Alexandra Bernardo: None declared, Lúcia Costa: None declared

AB0983 LIPID METABOLISM AND DISEASE ACTIVITY IN JSLE PATIENTS

Background:

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune systemic disease associated with premature atherosclerosis. Risk factors include dyslipoproteinemia, inflammation, oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL), hyperhomocysteinemia and antiphospholipid antibodies. Hyperlipidemic condition is being reported to promote the production of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-27 and lowering blood lipid levels improves the disease. Oxidative stress is elevated, mainly due to mitochondrial dysfunction, further disrupting lipid metabolism. Some drugs also have an impact on lipid profile, such as chronic steroid use, which worsens LDL, HDL, and TG levels.

Objectives:

To assess the relationship between lipid profile and disease activity in juvenile SLE (jSLE) patients.

Methods:

Retrospective study of jSLE patients, fulfilling both 2012 and 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE. Juvenile-onset was defined as age at diagnosis <18 years. Demographics and clinical characteristics were collected. To evaluate the activity of jSLE, the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) was used. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS®. Spearman’s rank non-parametric test or Pearson’s parametric test were used to assess the bivariate correlation for inflammatory and metabolic variables. P value <0.05 was considered significant for all the statistical tests.

Results:

35 patients were included, with current median (min-max) age of 22 (16-35) years, mean (SD) age of diagnosis of 15.8 (2.4) years; 91.4%female. Median ESR was 19 (2-75) mm/h, CRP 1.65 (0.1-9.6) mg/L, albumin 41.6 (16.7-46.3) g/L, proteinuria 0.2 (0-3) g/dL, leukocyturia 0 (0-1362.7)/uL, erythrocyturia 0 (0-501.9)/uL and anti-double stranded DNA 89.3 (10-800) U/mL. Mean C3 was 102.1 (21.6), C4 17.1 (7.4) mg/dL and creatinine 0.63 (0.1) mg/dL. Median SLEDAI was 2 (0-12). All were ANA positive, 40 % positive for antinucleossome antibodies, 25.7% anti-ribossomal P protein antibody, 11.4% anti-Sm, 8.6% autoantibodies againstβ2-glycoproteinI, 8.6% anti-cardiolipin, 14.3% lupus anticoagulant, 37.1% anti-SSA and 8.6% anti-SSB. Articular manifestations were present in 48.6%, mucocutaneous in 77.1%, haematological in 45.7%, lupus nephritis in 42.9%, serositis in 8.6% and pulmonary interstitial disease in 2.9%. Mean (SD) total cholesterol values (TC) was 165.5 (44.7) mg/dL and LDL 94.5 (29.9) mg/dL. Median high-density lipoprotein was 52 (28-92) and triglycerides (TG) 81.5 (41-253) mg/dL. Median daily prednisolone dose was 5 (0-40) mg. 88.6% were treated with hydroxychloroquine, 31.4% with mychophenolate mophetil and 14.3% with azathioprine. TC was negatively correlated with serum albumin (p=0.043, rho=-378) and positively with SLEDAI (p=0.032; rho= 0.392), proteinuria (p=0.009; rho= 0.469) and leukocyturia (p=0.031; rho= 0.394). A positive correlation was found between LDL and proteinuria (p=0.043; rho= 0.385) and between TG and CRP (p=0.001; rho= 0.575). TG were also positively correlated with prednisolone daily dose (p=0.035; rho= 0.394). Mean LDL was higher in anti-Sm positive patients (p=0.022). No differences were found regarding anti-phospholipids antibodies. Nephritic lupus patients had worse lipid metabolism, but this did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion:

In out cohort, increased expression of TC, LDL and TGs is associated with disease activity in SLE. As expected, higher doses of prednisolone also correlated with lipid metabolism.

References:

[1]Machado D et al. Lipid profile among girls with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Int. 2017 Jan;37(1):43-48

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

FRI0299 EVALUATION OF ENTHESITIS INDICES AND RESPONSE TO BDMARD THERAPY IN PORTUGUESE PATIENTS WITH SPONDYLOARTHRITIS

Background:

Enthesitis is a hallmark clinical feature of spondyloarthritis (SpA), but to date, few studies have investigated how the overall response to biological treatment relates to the evolution of enthesitis counts.

Objectives:

Assess whether the variation in enthesitis indices reflects the overall response to bDMARD therapy in SpA.

Methods:

This longitudinal, retrospective study included patients who met Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria for SpA followed at the Rheumatology Department of a tertiary hospital, under bDMARD therapy. Demographic, laboratorial and clinical data were collected, including Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Activity Index (BASDAI), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP), Maastrich Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES), Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) and Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) scores. All were evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after starting the first biological therapy. The variation in each parameter compared with the baseline values was calculated at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months and represented in the form of delta. Correlations between variables were assessed using Spearman test and comparison between groups using Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

Results:

We included 273 patients, 123 (45,1%) females, aged 42,0±12,3 years and with diagnosis of SpA for 15,4±11,2 years at the start of bDMARD therapy. Eighteen (6,6%) had depression. At baseline, mean BASDAI was 6,43 ±1,62, ASDAS-CRP was 4,01 ± 0,86, median MASES was 1 (0-4), LEI 0 (0-1,75) and SPARCC 1 (0-4). Seventy-two patients (26,4%) started golimumab, 71 (26,0%) adalimumab, 66 (24,2%) infliximab, 54 (19,8%) etanercept, 9 (3,3%) certolizumab and 1 (0,4%) secukinumab. Enthesitis indices were significantly higher at baseline in females [median MASES-females 2 (0-5) vs 0 (0-2), p<0,001; LEI-females 0 (0-2) vs 0 (0-1), p=0,03; and SPARCC-females 2 (0-5) vs 0 (0-2), p<0,001], and remained so at 24 months [median MASES-females 1 (0-3,5) vs 0 (0-0), p<0,001; LEI-females 0 (0-0,5) vs 0 (0-0), p<0,001; and SPARCC-females 1 (0-3) vs 0 (0-0), p<0,001]. MASES and SPARCC, but not LEI, at baseline were significantly higher in patients with depression [median MASES-depression 3,5 (2-6) vs 1 (0-4), p=0,01; SPARCC-depression 4 (0-8) vs 1 (0-3), p=0,03], but at 24 months no differences were observed. There was a significant difference between each of the 3 scores of enthesitis when assessed at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, compared to baseline (p <0.004). No differences were observed regarding the choice of bDMARD. At baseline, MASES had a significant correlation with patient visual analogic scale (VAS) (r=0,18; p=0,01), BASDAI (r=0,36; p<0,001) and BASFI (r=0,21; p=0,003); LEI had a significant correlation with BASDAI (r=0,31; p<0,001) and BASFI (r=0,21; p=0,003); SPARCC had a significant correlation with patient VAS (r=0,19; p=0,01), BASDAI (r=0,37; p<0,001) and BASFI (r=0,26; p<0,001). ΔLEI at 6 months had a significant correlation with ΔBASDAI (r=0,25; p=0,005), ΔASDAS (r=0,190; p=0,03), Δpatient VAS (r=0,23; p=0,01) and Δphysician VAS (r=0,25; p=0,01), but not with ΔESR, ΔCRP and ΔBASMI; no correlation was found at 6 months for ΔMASES or ΔSPARCC. At 12 months, ΔMASES had a significant correlation with ΔBASDAI (r=0,18; p=0,03); ΔLEI with ΔBASDAI (r=0,23; p=0,01) and Δpatient VAS (r=0,19; p=0,03); for ΔSPARCC no significant correlations were found. At 18 months and 24 months, no correlations were found.

Conclusion:

The initiation of bDMARD led to improved enthesitis indices over a 24-month period. ΔLEI correlates better with SpA activity scores and measurements than the other indices, especially at the first 12 months of initiation of bDMARD therapy.

Disclosure of Interests:

Filipe Pinheiro: None declared, Maria Rato: None declared, Bruno Miguel Fernandes: None declared, Salomé Garcia: None declared, Sara Ganhão: None declared, Pedro Madureira: None declared, Miguel Bernardes Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli-Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Lúcia Costa: None declared