A Comparison of Isotoxic Dose-escalated Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer with Moderate Deep Inspiration Breath Hold, Mid-ventilation and Internal Target Volume Techniques

AIMS

With interest in normal tissue sparing and dose-escalated radiotherapy in the treatment of inoperable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, this study investigated the impact of motion-managed moderate deep inspiration breath hold (mDIBH) on normal tissue sparing and dose-escalation potential and compared this to planning with a four-dimensional motion-encompassing internal target volume or motion-compensating mid-ventilation approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients underwent four-dimensional and mDIBH planning computed tomography scans. Internal and mid-ventilation target volumes were generated on the four-dimensional scan, with mDIBH target volumes generated on the mDIBH scan. Isotoxic target dose-escalation guidelines were used to generate six plans per patient: three with a target dose cap and three without. Target dose-escalation potential, normal tissue complication probability and differences in pre-specified dose-volume metrics were evaluated for the three motion-management techniques.

RESULTS

The mean total lung volume was significantly greater with mDIBH compared with four-dimensional scans. Lung dose (mean and V21 Gy) and mean heart dose were significantly reduced with mDIBH in comparison with four-dimensional-based approaches, and this translated to a significant reduction in heart and lung normal tissue complication probability with mDIBH. In 20/21 patients, the trial target prescription dose cap of 79.2 Gy was achievable with all motion-management techniques.

CONCLUSION

mDIBH aids lung and heart dose sparing in isotoxic dose-escalated radiotherapy compared with four-dimensional planning techniques. Given concerns about lung and cardiac toxicity, particularly in an era of consolidation immunotherapy, reduced normal tissue doses may be advantageous for treatment tolerance and outcome.

What Can Proton Beam Therapy Achieve for Patients with Pectus Excavatum Requiring Left Breast, Axilla and Internal Mammary Nodal Radiotherapy?

AIMS

Exposure of the heart to radiation increases the risk of ischaemic heart disease, proportionate to the mean heart dose (MHD). Radiotherapy techniques including proton beam therapy (PBT) can reduce MHD. The aims of this study were to quantify the MHD reduction achievable by PBT compared with volumetric modulated arc therapy in breath hold (VMAT-BH) in patients with pectus excavatum (PEx), to identify an anatomical metric from a computed tomography scan that might indicate which patients will achieve the greatest MHD reductions from PBT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients with PEx (Haller Index ≥2.7) were identified from radiotherapy planning computed tomography images. Left breast/chest wall, axilla (I-IV) and internal mammary node (IMN) volumes were delineated. VMAT and PBT plans were prepared, all satisfying target coverage constraints. Signed-rank comparisons of techniques were undertaken for the mean dose to the heart, ipsilateral lung and contralateral breast. Spearman's rho correlations were calculated for anatomical metrics against MHD reduction achieved by PBT.

RESULTS

The mean MHD for VMAT-BH plans was 4.1 Gy compared with 0.7 Gy for PBT plans. PBT reduced MHD by an average of 3.4 Gy (range 2.8-4.4 Gy) compared with VMAT-BH (P < 0.001). PBT significantly reduced the mean dose to the ipsilateral lung (4.7 Gy, P < 0.001) and contralateral breast (2.7 Gy, P < 0.001). The distance (mm) at the most inferomedial extent of IMN volume (IMN to heart distance) negatively correlated with MHD reduction achieved by PBT (Spearman's rho -0.88 (95% confidence interval -0.96 to -0.67, P < 0.001)).

CONCLUSION

For patients with PEx requiring left-sided breast and IMN radiotherapy, a clinically significant MHD reduction is achievable using PBT, compared with the optimal photon technique (VMAT-BH). This is a patient group in whom PBT could have the greatest benefit.

Retrospective Planning Study of Patients with Superior Sulcus Tumours Comparing Pencil Beam Scanning Protons to Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy

AIMS

Twenty per cent of patients with non-small cell lung cancer present with stage III locally advanced disease. Precision radiotherapy with pencil beam scanning (PBS) protons may improve outcomes. However, stage III is a heterogeneous group and accounting for complex tumour motion is challenging. As yet, it remains unclear as to whom will benefit. In our retrospective planning study, we explored if patients with superior sulcus tumours (SSTs) are a select cohort who might benefit from this treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with SSTs treated with radical radiotherapy using four-dimensional planning computed tomography between 2010 and 2015 were identified. Tumour motion was assessed and excluded if greater than 5 mm. Photon volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and PBS proton single-field optimisation plans, with and without inhomogeneity corrections, were generated retrospectively. Robustness analysis was assessed for VMAT and PBS plans involving: (i) 5 mm geometric uncertainty, with an additional 3.5% range uncertainty for proton plans; (ii) verification plans at maximal inhalation and exhalation. Comparative dosimetric and robustness analyses were carried out.

RESULTS

Ten patients were suitable. The mean clinical target volume D95 was 98.1% ± 0.4 (97.5-98.8) and 98.4% ± 0.2 (98.1-98.9) for PBS and VMAT plans, respectively. All normal tissue tolerances were achieved. The same four PBS and VMAT plans failed robustness assessment. Inhomogeneity corrections minimally impacted proton plan robustness and made it worse in one case. The most important factor affecting target coverage and robustness was the clinical target volume entering the spinal canal. Proton plans significantly reduced the mean lung dose (by 21.9%), lung V5, V10, V20 (by 47.9%, 36.4%, 12.1%, respectively), mean heart dose (by 21.4%) and thoracic vertebra dose (by 29.2%) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this planning study, robust PBS plans were achievable in carefully selected patients. Considerable dose reductions to the lung, heart and thoracic vertebra were possible without compromising target coverage. Sparing these lymphopenia-related organs may be particularly important in this era of immunotherapy.

Comparing Proton to Photon Radiotherapy Plans: UK Consensus Guidance for Reporting Under Uncertainty for Clinical Trials

In the UK, the recent introduction of high-energy proton beam therapy into national clinical practice provides an opportunity for new clinical trials, particularly those comparing proton and photon treatments. However, comparing these different modalities can present many challenges. Although protons may confer an advantage in terms of reduced normal tissue dose, they can also be more sensitive to uncertainty. Uncertainty analysis is fundamental in ensuring that proton plans are both safe and effective in the event of unavoidable discrepancies, such as variations in patient setup and proton beam range. Methods of evaluating and mitigating the effect of these uncertainties can differ from those approaches established for photon therapy treatments, such as the use of expansion margins to assure safety. These differences should be considered when comparing protons and photons. An overview of the effect of uncertainties on proton plans is presented together with an introduction to some of the concepts and terms that should become familiar to those involved in proton therapy trials. This report aims to provide guidance for those engaged in UK clinical trials comparing protons and photons. This guidance is intended to take a pragmatic approach considering the tools that are available to practising centres and represents a consensus across multidisciplinary groups involved in proton therapy in the UK.

Radiotherapy Quality Assurance for the CHHiP Trial: Conventional Versus Hypofractionated High-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer

AIMS

The CHHiP trial investigated the use of moderate hypofractionation for the treatment of localised prostate cancer using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). A radiotherapy quality assurance programme was developed to assess compliance with treatment protocol and to audit treatment planning and dosimetry of IMRT. This paper considers the outcome and effectiveness of the programme.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Quality assurance exercises included a pre-trial process document and planning benchmark cases, prospective case reviews and a dosimetry site visit on-trial and a post-trial feedback questionnaire.

RESULTS

In total, 41 centres completed the quality assurance programme (37 UK, four international) between 2005 and 2010. Centres used either forward-planned (field-in-field single phase) or inverse-planned IMRT (25 versus 17). For pre-trial quality assurance exercises, 7/41 (17%) centres had minor deviations in their radiotherapy processes; 45/82 (55%) benchmark plans had minor variations and 17/82 (21%) had major variations. One hundred prospective case reviews were completed for 38 centres. Seventy-one per cent required changes to clinical outlining pre-treatment (primarily prostate apex and base, seminal vesicles and penile bulb). Errors in treatment planning were reduced relative to pre-trial quality assurance results (49% minor and 6% major variations). Dosimetry audits were conducted for 32 centres. Ion chamber dose point measurements were within ±2.5% in the planning target volume and ±8% in the rectum. 28/36 films for combined fields passed gamma criterion 3%/3 mm and 11/15 of IMRT fluence film sets passed gamma criterion 4%/4 mm using a 98% tolerance. Post-trial feedback showed that trial participation was beneficial in evolving clinical practice and that the quality assurance programme helped some centres to implement and audit prostate IMRT.

CONCLUSION

Overall, quality assurance results were satisfactory and the CHHiP quality assurance programme contributed to the success of the trial by auditing radiotherapy treatment planning and protocol compliance. Quality assurance supported the introduction of IMRT in UK centres, giving additional confidence and external review of IMRT where it was a newly adopted technique.

Defining bowel dose volume constraints for bladder radiotherapy treatment planning

AIMS

Increases to radiotherapy dose are constrained by normal tissue effects. The relationship between bowel dose volume data and late bowel toxicity in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with radical radiotherapy was assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The bowel was contoured retrospectively on radiotherapy plans of 47 patients recruited to the BC2001 trial (CRUK/01/004). The relationship between bowel volume at various dose levels and prospectively collected late bowel toxicity was explored.

RESULTS

Fifteen per cent and 6% of patients experienced grade 1 and grade 2 or more late bowel toxicity, respectively. The mean bowel volume was significantly less at doses ≥50 Gy in those treated with reduced high dose volume radiotherapy compared with standard radiotherapy. The probability of late bowel toxicity increased as bowel volume increased (P ≤ 0.05 for dose levels 30-50 Gy). No grade 2 or more late bowel toxicity was observed in patients with bowel volumes under the thresholds given in the model that predict for 25% probability of late bowel toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a dose volume effect for late bowel toxicity in radical bladder radiotherapy. We have modelled the probability of late bowel toxicity from absolute bowel volumes to guide clinicians in assessing radical bladder radiotherapy plans. Thresholds predicting for a 25% probability of late bowel toxicity are proposed as dose volume constraints.

SU-E-T-255: A Novel Rectal Obturator for Prostate Radiotherapy Improves the Spatial Distribution of Dose and Reduces the Predicted Risk for Rectal Bleeding and Subjective Sphincter Control

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of an endorectal device during prostate radiotherapy on the spatial distribution of dose to the ano-rectal region and quantify implications for normal-tissue-complication probabilities.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients with localised prostate cancer, referred for external beam radiotherapy had 2 CT scans acquired, without and with the rectal obturator (ProSpare) in-situ. For each patient two dose distributions were generated, based on both CT scans. Dose-surface maps for the rectal surface and the anal surface were generated and mean dose as well as a spatial measure (circumference of the dose distribution) were determined for all patients, with and without ProSpare. Using previously published NTCP models, the effect of ProSpare on NTCP was investigated for rectal bleeding and subjective sphincter control.

RESULTS

In a previous study subjective sphincter control correlated strongest with mean dose and lateral extent at 53 Gy. The use of ProSpare resulted in a highly significant reduction of the lateral extent at 53 Gy (p=0.006), mean dose (p=0.0009) and NTCP according to the LKB model (p=0.002 for grade 2 and p=0.001 for grade >=1). In a previous study we reported that rectal bleeding correlated most strongly with the lateral extent at 55 Gy and presented the constraint that it should not exceed 42% of the circumference. Using ProSpare resulted in a significant reduction of the lateral extent at 55 Gy (p=0.001) and significantly more patients met that proposed constraint (p=0.047). ProSpare resulted in a significant reduction of NTCP for grade-2 rectal bleeding (p=0.007) and a reduction for rectal bleeding grade >=1 (p=0.053).

CONCLUSIONS

ProSpare resulted in a significant reduction of mean dose to the anal sphincter and a significant reduction of the lateral extent at 55 Gy. This corresponded to a significant reduction in the predicted risk of reporting subjective sphincter control and grade-2 rectal bleeding.

Quantitative estimates of the effects of concomitant chemotherapy on acute dysphagia in patients receiving radical treatment for head and neck cancer

e22134

Purpose: To generate quantitative parameters describing the effect of concomitant chemotherapy on incidence of grade 3 dysphagia (CTCAE v3.0, assisted feeding) using dose response curves in patients receiving radical treatment for head and neck cancer. Methods: Patients treated at a single centre in prospective phase I and II trials of concomitant chemo-IMRT (CRT) (n=85) and the phase III trial of IMRT vs. conventional radiotherapy (PARSPORT) (n=82) formed the basis of this non-randomized comparison. Patients in the PARSPORT trial received radiation alone (RT). Radiation dose for all patients was radiobiologically equivalent to at least 70Gy in 35 fractions. Concomitant chemotherapy was cisplatin (100 mg/m2) on days 1 and 29. G3 dysphagia was recorded prospectively. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were generated for the pharyngeal mucosa. The mean dose (converted to equivalent dose in 2Gy/fraction, MD2) was used as a univariate descriptor of the DVH, for the generation of the dose response curves. A logistic function of the form p=1/[1+(MD50/D)k] was fitted where, p is the probability of the incidence of toxicity, D is the mean dose, MD50 is the mean dose at which 50% of patients experience toxicity and k describes the increase in incidence with increasing dose. The dose response curves were fitted using non-linear logistic regression. Results: The mean MD2 to the pharyngeal mucosa were 56Gy and 55.8Gy respectively, in the CRT and RT groups. There was a statistically significant difference of 25% (95% CI: 10–38, p=0.002) in the incidence of G3 dysphagia between the CRT (68%) and RT (43%) groups. Fitting dose response curves to the clinical data yielded parameter values (95% CIs) of MD50=46 Gy (42–49), k=4.8 (2.3–7.2) for the CRT group and MD50= 58 Gy (55–61), k=3 (1.6-.45) for RT group. Dose response gradients for CRT and RT showed approximately 1.95% and 1.3% increase (respectively) in probability of G3 dysphagia resulting from an increase in mean dose of 1Gy between doses of 30Gy to 70Gy. Conclusions: Addition of concomitant chemotherapy increases the incidence of G3 dysphagia by 0.65% for every 1 Gy increase in radiation dose. The observed MD50 for G3 dysphagia is lower for RT alone (46 Gy vs. 58 Gy).

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Generating compensation designs for tangential breast irradiation with artificial neural networks

In this paper we discuss a study comparing an algorithm implemented clinically to design intensity-modulated fields with two artificial neural networks (ANNs) trained to design the same fields. The purpose of the algorithm is to produce compensation for tangential breast radiotherapy in order to improve dose homogeneity. This was achieved by creating intensity-modulated fields to supplement standard wedged fields. Portal image data were used to create thickness maps of the medial and lateral fields, which in turn were used to design the wedged and intensity-modulated fields. The ANNs were developed to design the intensity-modulated fields from the portal image data and corresponding fluence map alone. One used localized groups of portal image pixels related to the fluence map (method 2), and the other used a one-to-one mapping between spatially corresponding pixels (method 3). A dosimetric comparison of the methods was performed by calculating the overall dose distribution. The volume of tissue outside the dose range 95-105% was used to assess dose homogeneity. The average volume outside 95-105%, averaged over 80 cases, was shown to be 2.3% for the algorithm, whilst average values of 9.9% and 13.5% were obtained for methods 2 and 3, respectively. The results of this study demonstrate the ability of an ANN to learn the general shape of compensation required and explore the use of image-based ANNs in the design of intensity-modulated fields.