A Comparison of Plain Radiography with Computer Tomography in Determining Coronal and Sagittal Alignments following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction: Optimal coronal and sagittal component positioning is important in achieving a successful outcome following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Modalities to determine post-operative alignment include plain radiography and computer tomography (CT) imaging. This study aims to determine the accuracy and reliability of plain radiographs in measuring coronal and sagittal alignment following TKA.

Materials and Methods: A prospective, consecutive study of 58 patients undergoing TKA was performed comparing alignment data from plain radiographs and CT imaging. Hip-knee-angle (HKA), sagittal femoral angle (SFA) and sagittal tibial angle (STA) measurements were taken by two observers from plain radiographs and compared with CT alignment. Intra- and inter-observer correlation was calculated for each measurement.

Results: Intra-observer correlation was excellent for HKA (r>0.89) with a mean difference of <1.9°. The least intra-observer correlation was for SFA (mean r=0.58) with a mean difference of 8°. Inter-observer correlation was better for HKA (r>0.95) and STA (r>0.8) compared to SFA (r=0.5). When comparing modalities (radiographs vs CT), HKA estimations for both observers showed the least maximum and mean differences while SFA observations were the least accurate.

Conclusion: Radiographic estimation of HKA showed excellent intra- and inter-observer correlation and corresponds well with CT imaging. However, radiographic estimation of sagittal plane alignment was less reliably measured and correlated less with CT imaging. Plain radiography was found to be inferior to CT for estimation of biplanar prosthetic alignment following TKA.

Pedicle fracture after instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion: a case report

STUDY DESIGN

The case report of a 60-year-old man with late onset back pain after lumbar spine fusion is presented.

OBJECTIVE

To report the rare complication of bilateral pedicle stress fractures after instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A 56-year-old man underwent revision spinal surgery for ongoing back pain secondary to pseudoarthroses. A posterolateral L4-S1 instrumented fusion using pedicle screws was performed. Autologous bone graft was applied to the decorticated lateral masses. The internal fixation was removed 2 years later, at which time plain radiographs showed that the fusion mass was solid. At the age of 60 years, the man presented with worsening back pain. Plain radiographs and computed tomographic scans demonstrated bilateral L4 pedicle stress fractures. A bone scan indicated that these were recent in origin.

METHOD

The clinical assessment was undertaken by the senior author and surgeon. Investigations included plain radiography, computer tomography, and scintographic imaging. A systematic literature review of the relevant publications was performed.

RESULTS

In the reported patient, bilateral pedicle stress fractures developed 2 years after pedicle screw removal from an L4-S1 instrumented posterolateral lumbar spine fusion. This occurred at the uppermost level of the fusion mass.

CONCLUSIONS

The pedicle is the weakest point in the neural arch after posterolateral fusion. Although movement continues at the level of the disc space anteriorly, the pedicle is susceptible to fracture. Pedicle fracture is a rare late complication of posterolateral lumbar spine fusion.