1
|
Brokus C, Kattakuzhy S, Gayle B, Narayanan S, Davis A, Cover A, Eyasu R, Ebah E, Ogbumbadiugha-Weekes O, Hoffmann J, Silk R, Stevens J, Mount J, Gannon C, Nussdorf L, Mathur P, Bijole P, Jones M, Kier R, Sternberg D, Greenblatt A, Weintraub E, Masur H, Kottilil S, Rosenthal E. Suboptimal uptake, retention, and adherence of daily oral PrEP among people with OUD receiving HCV treatment. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021; 9:ofab658. [PMID: 35187191 PMCID: PMC8849288 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Daily oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC) prevents human immunodeficiency (HIV) among people who inject drugs (PWID). Despite rising HIV incidence and injection drug use (IDU), PrEP use remains low and there is limited research about uptake, adherence, and retention among PWID. Methods The ANCHOR investigation evaluated a community-based care model collocating hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, medication for opioid use disorder (OUD), and PrEP in individuals in Washington, DC, and Baltimore, Maryland. PrEP counseling was conducted from HCV treatment day 0 until week 24. Subjects could start any time during this window, were followed for 48 weeks, and were assessed for adherence by self-report and dried blood spot TDF analysis. Results One hundred ninety-eight participants were enrolled, of whom 185 (93%) were HIV negative. Twenty-nine individuals (15.7% of HIV-negative cohort) initiated PrEP. One hundred sixteen participants (62.7%) met 2014 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) PrEP criteria due to IDU (82 [44.3%]), sex (9 [4.9%]), or both practices (25 [13.5%]). Providers recommended PrEP to 94 individuals (50.8%), and recommendation was associated with PrEP uptake. Median treatment duration was 104 days (interquartile range, 28–276 days), with 8 participants retained through week 48. Adherence was variable over time by self-report and declined by TDF analysis. No HIV seroconversions occurred. Conclusions This cohort of people with HCV and OUD experienced low uptake of PrEP despite the majority meeting CDC criteria. High rates of disruption and discontinuation, compounded by variable adherence, made TDF/FTC a suboptimal prevention strategy. Emerging modalities like long-acting formulations may address these barriers, but PWID have been excluded from their development to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Brokus
- DC Partnership for HIV/AIDS Progress, Washington, DC, United States
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - S Kattakuzhy
- DC Partnership for HIV/AIDS Progress, Washington, DC, United States
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - B Gayle
- DC Partnership for HIV/AIDS Progress, Washington, DC, United States
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - S Narayanan
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - A Davis
- DC Partnership for HIV/AIDS Progress, Washington, DC, United States
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - A Cover
- DC Partnership for HIV/AIDS Progress, Washington, DC, United States
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - R Eyasu
- DC Partnership for HIV/AIDS Progress, Washington, DC, United States
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - E Ebah
- DC Partnership for HIV/AIDS Progress, Washington, DC, United States
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - O Ogbumbadiugha-Weekes
- DC Partnership for HIV/AIDS Progress, Washington, DC, United States
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - J Hoffmann
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - R Silk
- DC Partnership for HIV/AIDS Progress, Washington, DC, United States
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - J Stevens
- DC Partnership for HIV/AIDS Progress, Washington, DC, United States
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - J Mount
- DC Partnership for HIV/AIDS Progress, Washington, DC, United States
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - C Gannon
- DC Partnership for HIV/AIDS Progress, Washington, DC, United States
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - L Nussdorf
- DC Partnership for HIV/AIDS Progress, Washington, DC, United States
| | - P Mathur
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - P Bijole
- HIPS, org, Washington, DC, United States
| | - M Jones
- Division of Addiction Research and Treatment, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - R Kier
- Division of Addiction Research and Treatment, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - D Sternberg
- Division of Addiction Research and Treatment, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - A Greenblatt
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Division of Addiction Research and Treatment, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - E Weintraub
- Division of Addiction Research and Treatment, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - H Masur
- DC Partnership for HIV/AIDS Progress, Washington, DC, United States
- Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - S Kottilil
- DC Partnership for HIV/AIDS Progress, Washington, DC, United States
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - E Rosenthal
- DC Partnership for HIV/AIDS Progress, Washington, DC, United States
- Division of Clinical Care and Research, Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Sofosbuvir is the first pan-genotypic direct acting antiviral agent to be approved. This article provides an overview of the pharmacology of sofosbuvir and ribavirin and a comprehensive summary of the phase 2 and 3 studies supporting dual sofosbuvir and ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C infection. With the production of generic formulations of sofosbuvir, we anticipate this regimen leading the first wave for widespread, IFN-free treatment and becoming first line for all genotypes (including genotype 1) for much of the world-in particular in developing and middle income countries. We discuss the continued challenges with this regimen including among patients with decompensated liver disease and post-liver transplant, and renal failure. We address concerns of emerging resistance. We also discuss the future prospects including the global uptake of sofosbuvir and ribavirin for the treatment of all genotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Tang
- a Division of Clinical Care and Research , Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA
| | - H Ward
- a Division of Clinical Care and Research , Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA
| | - S Kattakuzhy
- a Division of Clinical Care and Research , Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA
| | - E Wilson
- a Division of Clinical Care and Research , Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA
| | - S Kottilil
- a Division of Clinical Care and Research , Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA
| |
Collapse
|