[Validation of a French version of the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (fPQ16) in adolescents and young adults seeking help]

INTRODUCTION

The duration of untreated psychosis has been largely associated with poor outcomes in psychosis. Actual diagnostic tools may be used by very specialized teams and need sustained evaluation. We present a French version of a self-report questionnaire: the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (fPQ16). Our objective was to evaluate its predictive value for an ultra-high-risk state (UHR) or psychosis. The population enrolled was consulting in a young adults and adolescents center in Sainte-Anne hospital, Paris, France.

METHODS

PQ16 had first been translated into French and independently back translated and validated by the original authors. Between November 2016 and May 2018, every C'JAAD consulting patient was proposed to fill in the fPQ16. Each patient was next evaluated with the French version of the comprehensive assessment of at-risk mental state (CAARMS), which detects UHR or psychosis. Statistical analysis of fPQ16 concurrent validity was performed using ROC curves. fPQ16 acceptability was studied by four additional questions especially designed for that purpose.

RESULTS

One hundred participants were included. Mean age was 19.85years (SD 3.3 y). Fifty-eight percent of patients included were diagnosed with UHR (40%) or psychotic (18%) state after CAARMS evaluation. Mean score at fPQ16 was 5.7 (SD 3.8). Best cut-off score was 4 positive items, with excellent sensibility (91%) and correct specificity (60%). Positive predictive value of fPQ16 was 76%. Area under the curve was 0.85 (P<0.0001). fPQ16 showed good acceptability.

DISCUSSION

fPQ16 had good screening performances in our population. Cut-off score was lower than in previous studies, but performances were equal or better. As a well-accepted and short questionnaire, the fPQ16 could be a great screening tool in primary care. A version with 18-items, including two items focused on thought content and disorganization that are missing in PQ16, is under evaluation.

Patients' satisfaction with community treatment: a pilot cross-sectional survey adopting multiple perspectives

ACCESSIBLE SUMMARY

Patients' satisfaction is scarcely studied within the context of community treatment for adolescents. Thus, this study adopts a multiple perspective on patients' satisfaction (including service users as well as staff members). The results highlighted that all informants (patients, foster carers in foster homes and professional caregivers from community treatment teams) perceived the patients to be satisfied, with foster carers reporting the highest patient satisfaction rate. Considering the patient satisfaction rate from multiple perspectives provides complementary understandings. Clinical outcomes and, specifically, a reduction in emotional difficulties were related to patient's satisfaction, but only from the patients' perspective.

ABSTRACT

Community treatment (CT) teams in Switzerland provide care to patients who are unable to use regular child and adolescent mental health services (i.e. inpatient and outpatients facilities). No study has considered patients' self-rated satisfaction alongside with staff members' perspectives on patient satisfaction. Thus, adopting a cross-sectional survey design, we collected patients' satisfaction using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8), rated by multiple informants (patients, foster carers in foster homes and professional caregivers from CT teams). Professional caregivers assessed clinical outcomes using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents. The results indicated that all informants were satisfied with the community treatment teams. The satisfaction scores were not correlated across informants; however, the alleviation of emotional symptoms was correlated with patients' satisfaction. This study indicated that the use of a combined approach including the views of service users and professionals gives important complementary information. Finally, in our sample, lower emotional symptoms were linked to enhanced patient satisfaction. This study demonstrated the importance of considering multiple perspectives to obtain the most accurate picture of patients' satisfaction. Second, focusing on the reduction of emotional symptoms might lead to a higher degree of patients' satisfaction.

[Extension of mobile team services to the home: pilot project in the Vaud canton]

The main objective of this project about mobile team service extension to the socio-educational home of the whole Vaud canton targets to decompartmentalize the socio-educational and youth-psychiatry domains. 64 patient were assessed during this pilot phase (after one-year functioning). In addition, a satisfaction survey was done either at the end of the follow up or at the end of the pilot phase of the project (31.12.2012). This experience was very positive as highlighted by the vast majority of the person involved in the socio-educational and youth-psychiatric domains taking care of youth. A desire of extension of mobile team service to other institutional structure or other situations was expressed.

Quetiapine in adolescents with non-affective psychotic disorders: an open-label trial

INTRODUCTION

There is a need for more studies on the clinical effectiveness, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of atypical antipsychotics in adolescents with psychotic disorders, as this represents a vulnerable and difficult population to treat. According to recent concerns regarding disabling side effects of antipsychotics, particularly weight gain, further monitoring of their safety profiles is needed. This situation prompted the authors to carry out an investigation on the clinical effectiveness of quetiapine in psychotic adolescents.

METHODS

23 adolescents (13-18 years old) with psychotic disorders participated in a 12-week open label trial, including 6 visits assessing clinical efficacy, tolerability and safety of quetiapine (50-750 mg daily).

RESULTS

Adolescents were treated with lower doses compared to adults. Significant decreases in CGI and PANSS total scores were observed after both 4 and 12 weeks of quetiapine treatment compared to baseline. Sedation was the main adverse effect, but medication was generally well tolerated. Irregular compliance, (as assessed by pill counts, a questionnaire and by plasma quetiapine concentration monitoring), and alcohol and/or cannabis consumption were factors identified in this study which add to the difficulty in treating this population.

DISCUSSION

The results of the present study help to consolidate evidence of the usefulness of quetiapine as a treatment for adolescents with psychotic disorders. However, this study also highlights the issues encountered in treating this group, including the presence of comorbidities such as drug abuse.