Targeted therapy for advanced salivary gland carcinoma based on molecular profiling: results from MyPathway, a phase IIa multiple basket study

BACKGROUND

Systemic therapy options for salivary cancers are limited. MyPathway (NCT02091141), a phase IIa study, evaluates targeted therapies in non-indicated tumor types with actionable molecular alterations. Here, we present the efficacy and safety results for a subgroup of MyPathway patients with advanced salivary gland cancer (SGC) matched to targeted therapies based on tumor molecular characteristics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MyPathway is an ongoing, multiple basket, open-label, non-randomized, multi-center study. Patients with advanced SGC received pertuzumab + trastuzumab (HER2 alteration), vismodegib (PTCH-1/SMO mutation), vemurafenib (BRAF V600 mutation), or atezolizumab [high tumor mutational burden (TMB)]. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

As of January 15, 2018, 19 patients with SGC were enrolled and treated in MyPathway (15 with HER2 amplification and/or overexpression and one each with a HER2 mutation without amplification or overexpression, PTCH-1 mutation, BRAF mutation, and high TMB). In the 15 patients with HER2 amplification/overexpression (with or without mutations) who were treated with pertuzumab + trastuzumab, 9 had an objective response (1 complete response, 8 partial responses) for an ORR of 60% (9.2 months median response duration). The clinical benefit rate (defined by patients with objective responses or stable disease >4 months) was 67% (10/15), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.6 months, and median overall survival was 20.4 months. Stable disease was observed in the patient with a HER2 mutation (pertuzumab + trastuzumab, n = 1/1, PFS 11.0 months), and partial responses in patients with the PTCH-1 mutation (vismodegib, n = 1/1, PFS 14.3 months), BRAF mutation (vemurafenib, n = 1/1, PFS 18.5 months), and high TMB (atezolizumab, n = 1/1, PFS 5.5+ months). No unexpected toxicity occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 12 of 19 patients (63%) with advanced SGC, treated with chemotherapy-free regimens matched to specific molecular alterations, experienced an objective response. Data from MyPathway suggest that matched targeted therapy for SGC has promising efficacy, supporting molecular profiling in treatment determination.

Short-term orlistat treatment does not affect mineral balance and bone turnover in obese men

Orlistat is a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor that is used to reduce dietary fat absorption and to enhance weight loss in subjects consuming a hypocaloric diet. To assess whether orlistat has an effect on the metabolism of six minerals, a 21-d, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled mineral balance study was conducted in obese (body mass index > 30 kg/m(2)) men. Subjects consumed a hypocaloric diet with a constant daily mineral content and received daily oral treatment with orlistat (120 mg three times daily) (n = 14) or placebo (three times daily) (n = 14) for 21 d. After a 14-d equilibration period, calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, iron, copper and zinc balances were assessed for d 15-21. In addition, the effect of diet and orlistat treatment on bone metabolism was estimated from measurement of biomarkers of bone formation and bone resorption. Serum and urine electrolytes were also measured at baseline and at the end of treatment. Orlistat inhibited fat absorption by approximately 33% (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in mineral apparent absorption, urinary mineral loss or mineral balance between the orlistat and placebo groups. Markers of bone turnover and serum and urine electrolytes did not differ between the orlistat and placebo groups. Orlistat was well tolerated; adverse events were of mild or moderate intensity, and the majority of these events were unrelated or remotely related to study treatment. In obese men consuming a hypocaloric diet, the administration of orlistat had no significant effect on the balance of six selected minerals. In addition, biomarkers of bone turnover, as well as serum and urine electrolytes, were not affected by orlistat treatment.

Orlistat fails to alter postprandial plasma lipid excursions or plasma lipases in normal-weight male volunteers

OBJECTIVES

After 10 d of orlistat administration (120 mg three times/day), the primary objective was to determine the drug's effect on postprandial plasma lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and hepatic triglyceride lipase (HTGL) activities on day 10 after an oral fat-load. The secondary objectives were to determine the effects of orlistat on 12 h postprandial measures of: (1) preheparin HTGL and LPL; and (2) serum triglycerides, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and free fatty acids.

METHODS

Twenty-four normal-weight, healthy male volunteers were randomized to either 120 mg orlistat (n=12) or placebo (n=12) three times a day with meals for 10 d. Preheparin LPL and HTGL activities and LPL specific activity were measured in the fasted state on days 1, 5, and 10. On days 5 and 10 the study medication (orlistat or placebo) was taken at the beginning of a fat-rich breakfast and serum lipid and lipoprotein levels monitored for 12 h postprandially. On day 10, 15 min postheparin HTGL activity was measured 8 h after the fat-rich breakfast.

RESULTS

No differences were found between groups in fasting levels of preheparin LPL or HTGL activity or in LPL-specific activity on days 1, 5 and 10. No difference was found between the two treatment groups in postheparin HTGL activity 8 h after the fat-rich breakfast. Also, no differences were found between the two groups in plasma triglycerides or lipoproteins.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that the oral administration of orlistat (120 mg t. i.d.) does not significantly alter plasma triglycerides or lipoproteins, and that the inhibitory effect of orlistat on lipases is limited to the gastrointestinal tract and is not manifested systemically.