1
|
Usman S, Anjum A, Usman M, Imran MS, Ali M, Moustafa M, Rehman MS, Hussain T, Sarwar F, Azad A, Hussain I, Naseer J, Tiwana U, Hafeez S. Antibiotic resistance pattern and pathological features of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli O78:K80 in chickens. BRAZ J BIOL 2024; 84:e257179. [DOI: 10.1590/1519-6984.257179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) induces colibacillosis, an acute and systemic disease, resulting in substantial economic losses in the poultry sector. This study aimed to investigate the antibiotic resistance pattern associated with frequent virulence gene distribution in APEC O78:K80 that may cause pathological alterations in chickens. The antibiogram profile showed high resistance to erythromycin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, ampicillin, and co-trimoxazole, followed by intermediate resistance to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, enrofloxacin, norfloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and doxycycline hydrochloride, and sensitive to amikacin, streptomycin, gentamicin, and colistin. Virulence gene distribution identifies eight (irp-2, iutA, ompT, iss, iucD, astA, hlyF, iroN) genes through a conventional polymerase chain reaction. APEC O78:K80 caused significantly high liver enzyme concentrations, serum interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels in experimental birds. Also, infected birds have hypoproteinemia, hypoalbuminemia, and hyperglobulinemia. Necropsy examination revealed fibrinous perihepatitis and pericarditis, congested lungs, intestinal ecchymotic hemorrhages and necrotizing granulomatosis of the spleen. Histopathological examination depicted hepatocellular degeneration, myocardial necrosis, interstitial nephritis, intestinal hemorrhages and lymphopenia in the spleen. This study is the first evidence to assess the antibiotic resistance profile linked with virulence genes and clinicopathological potential of APEC O78:K80 in chickens in Pakistan, which could be a useful and rapid approach to prevent and control the disease by developing the control strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Usman
- University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pakistan
| | - A. Anjum
- Muhammad Nawaz Shareef University of Agriculture Multan, Pakistan
| | - M. Usman
- University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pakistan
| | - M. S. Imran
- University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pakistan
| | - M. Ali
- BZU Bahadur sub campus Layyah, Pakistan
| | - M. Moustafa
- King Khalid University; South Valley University, Egypt
| | | | - T. Hussain
- The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan
| | - F. Sarwar
- Poultry Research Institute, Pakistan
| | - A. Azad
- Poultry Research Institute, Pakistan
| | | | - J. Naseer
- The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan
| | - U. Tiwana
- Range Land Research Institute, Pakistan
| | - S. Hafeez
- University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huddart R, Hafeez S, Omar A, Alonzi R, Birtle A, Cheung KC, Choudhury A, Foroudi F, Gribble H, Henry A, Hilman S, Hindson B, Lewis R, Muthukumar D, McLaren DB, McNair H, Nikapota A, Olorunfemi A, Parikh O, Philipps L, Rimmer Y, Syndikus I, Tolentino A, Varughese M, Vassallo-Bonner C, Webster A, Griffin C, Hall E. Acute Toxicity of Hypofractionated and Conventionally Fractionated (Chemo)Radiotherapy Regimens for Bladder Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis from the RAIDER Trial. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:586-597. [PMID: 37225552 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Adding concurrent (chemo)therapy to radiotherapy improves outcomes for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients. A recent meta-analysis showed superior invasive locoregional disease control for a hypofractionated 55 Gy in 20 fractions schedule compared with 64 Gy in 32 fractions. In the RAIDER clinical trial, patients undergoing 20 or 32 fractions of radical radiotherapy were randomised (1:1:2) to standard radiotherapy or to standard-dose or escalated-dose adaptive radiotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concomitant therapy were permitted. We report exploratory analyses of acute toxicity by concomitant therapy-fractionation schedule combination. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants had unifocal bladder urothelial carcinoma staged T2-T4a N0 M0. Acute toxicity was assessed (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) weekly during radiotherapy and at 10 weeks after the start of treatment. Within each fractionation cohort, non-randomised comparisons of the proportion of patients reporting treatment emergent grade 2 or worse genitourinary, gastrointestinal or other adverse events at any point in the acute period were carried out using Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS Between September 2015 and April 2020, 345 (163 receiving 20 fractions; 182 receiving 32 fractions) patients were recruited from 46 centres. The median age was 73 years; 49% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 71% received concomitant therapy, with 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C most commonly used: 44/114 (39%) receiving 20 fractions; 94/130 (72%) receiving 32 fractions. The acute grade 2+ gastrointestinal toxicity rate was higher in those receiving concomitant therapy compared with radiotherapy alone in the 20-fraction cohort [54/111 (49%) versus 7/49 (14%), P < 0.001] but not in the 32-fraction cohort (P = 0.355). Grade 2+ gastrointestinal toxicity was highest for gemcitabine, with evidence of significant differences across therapies in the 32-fraction cohort (P = 0.006), with a similar pattern but no significant differences in the 20-fraction cohort (P = 0.099). There was no evidence of differences in grade 2+ genitourinary toxicity between concomitant therapies in either the 20- or 32-fraction cohorts. CONCLUSION Grade 2+ acute adverse events are common. The toxicity profile varied by type of concomitant therapy; the gastrointestinal toxicity rate seemed to be higher in patients receiving gemcitabine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Huddart
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Radiotherapy Department, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - S Hafeez
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Radiotherapy Department, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Omar
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R Alonzi
- Clinical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Middlesex, UK
| | - A Birtle
- Cancer Oncology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Lancashire, UK
| | - K C Cheung
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Choudhury
- Translational Radiobiology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - F Foroudi
- Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - H Gribble
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Henry
- University of Leeds and the Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - S Hilman
- Clinical Oncology, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - B Hindson
- Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Service, Te Whatu Ora, Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - R Lewis
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - D Muthukumar
- Oncology, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester, UK
| | - D B McLaren
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - H McNair
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Radiotherapy Department, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Nikapota
- Clinical Oncology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - A Olorunfemi
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - O Parikh
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Burnley, UK
| | - L Philipps
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Y Rimmer
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - I Syndikus
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Tolentino
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - M Varughese
- Department of Oncology, Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - C Vassallo-Bonner
- Patient Representative, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Webster
- National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA), University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - C Griffin
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - E Hall
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Philipps L, Porta N, James N, Huddart R, Hafeez S, Hall E. Correlation of Clinician- and Patient-Reported Outcomes in the BC2001 Trial. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:331-338. [PMID: 36918330 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate whether there is sufficient correlation between patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinician-reported outcomes (CROs) in bladder cancer follow-up post-radiotherapy to streamline data collection and to reduce trial follow-up burden on patients, clinicians and trial programmes. MATERIALS AND METHODS PROs data were collected within the BC2001 trial using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy specific to bladder cancer (FACT-BL) questionnaire. CROs data were collected by clinicians using Late Effects in Normal Tissues Subjective, Objective and Management (LENT/SOM). Data were collected at baseline, post-treatment, at 6 and 12 months post-randomisation and then annually to 5 years. The percentage agreement between CROs and PROs measures was evaluated at 2 and 5 years post-randomisation. Concordance was tested using the weighted Kappa statistic with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Correlation was evaluated between six categories of the FACT-BL and LENT/SOM scores. At 2 years the percentage agreement across these domains ranged from 45 to 78%, with the weighted Kappa statistic between 0.07 and 0.35. Results were similar in year 5 with 48-83% agreement and kappa statistics between -0.02 and 0.21. CONCLUSION The correlation between CROs and PROs in patients treated with radiotherapy for bladder cancer were generally poor. PROs appear to be more sensitive, with higher grade events reported. Further work is needed to evaluate whether PROs alone can be used to evaluate toxicity-related outcomes in randomised controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Philipps
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - N Porta
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - N James
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - R Huddart
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - S Hafeez
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - E Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Philipps L, Porta N, James N, Huddart R, Hafeez S, Ballas L, Hall E. Differences in Quality of Life and Toxicity for Male and Female Patients following Chemo(radiotherapy) for Bladder Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e336-e343. [PMID: 36906497 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
AIMS BC2001, a randomised trial of treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer, demonstrated no difference in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or late toxicity between patients receiving radical radiotherapy with and without chemotherapy. This secondary analysis explored sex-based differences in HRQoL and toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Bladder (FACT-BL) HRQoL questionnaires at baseline, end of treatment, 6 months and annually until 5 years. Clinicians assessed toxicity with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and Late Effects in Normal Tissues Subjective, Objective and Management (LENT/SOM) scoring systems at the same timepoints. The impact of sex on patient-reported HRQoL was evaluated using multivariate analyses of change in FACT-BL subscores from baseline to the timepoints of interest. For clinician-reported toxicity, differences were compared by calculating the proportion of patients with grade 3-4 toxicities occurring over the follow-up period. RESULTS For both males and females, all FACT-BL subscores had a reduction in HRQoL at the end of treatment. For males, the mean bladder cancer subscale (BLCS) score remained stable through to year 5. For females, there was a decline in BLCS from baseline at years 2 and 3 with a return to baseline at year 5. At year 3, females had a statistically significant and clinically meaningful worsening of mean BLCS score (-5.18; 95% confidence interval -8.37 to -1.99), which was not seen in males (0.24; -0.76 to 1.23). RTOG toxicity was more frequent in females than males (27% versus 16%, P = 0.027). CONCLUSION Results suggest that female patients treated with radiotherapy ± chemotherapy for localised bladder cancer report worse treatment-related toxicity in post-treatment years 2 and 3 than males.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Philipps
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - N Porta
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - N James
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - R Huddart
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - S Hafeez
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - L Ballas
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - E Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ingle M, White I, Chick J, Stankiewicz H, Mitchell A, Barnes H, Herbert T, Nill S, Oelfke U, Huddart R, Ng-Cheng-Hin B, Hafeez S, Lalondrelle S, Dunlop A, Bhide S. Understanding the Benefit of Magnetic Resonance-guided Adaptive Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Patients: a Single-centre Study. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e135-e142. [PMID: 36336579 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is the mainstay of treatment for patients with rectal cancer. Standard clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins of 10 mm are used to accommodate inter- and intrafraction motion of target. Treating on magnetic resonance-integrated linear accelerators (MR-linacs) allows for online manual recontouring and adaptation (MRgART) enabling the reduction of PTV margins. The aim of this study was to investigate motion of the primary CTV (CTVA; gross tumour volume and macroscopic nodes with 10 mm expansion to cover microscopic disease) in order to develop a simultaneous integrated boost protocol for use on MR-linacs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients suitable for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were recruited for treatment on MR-linac using a two-phase technique; only the five phase 1 fractions on MR-linac were used for analysis. Intrafraction motion of CTVA was measured between pre-treatment and post-treatment MRI scans. In MRgART, isotropically expanded pre-treatment PTV margins from 1 to 10 mm were rigidly propagated to post-treatment MRI to determine overlap with 95% of CTVA. The PTV margin was considered acceptable if overlap was >95% in 90% of fractions. To understand the benefit of MRgART, the same methodology was repeated using a reference computed tomography planning scan for pre-treatment imaging. RESULTS In total, nine patients were recruited between January 2018 and December 2020 with T3a-T4, N0-N2, M0 disease. Forty-five fractions were analysed in total. The median motion across all planes was 0 mm, demonstrating minimal intrafraction motion. A PTV margin of 3 and 5mm was found to be acceptable in 96 and 98% of fractions, respectively. When comparing to the computed tomography reference scan, the analysis found that PTV margins to 5 and 10 mm only acceptably covered 51 and 76% of fractions, respectively. CONCLUSION PTV margins can be reduced to 3-5 mm in MRgART for rectal cancer treatment on MR-linac within an simultaneous integrated boost protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ingle
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - I White
- Guys and St Thomas NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - J Chick
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - A Mitchell
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - H Barnes
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - T Herbert
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - S Nill
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - U Oelfke
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R Huddart
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - S Hafeez
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - S Lalondrelle
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Dunlop
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - S Bhide
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huddart R, Jones K, Bucinskaite G, Pillai S, Tree A, Greenlay E, Potts L, Hafeez S. Phase 1 trial of Hypofractionated radiotherapy and Pembrolizumab in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: Results of dose escalation phase of the PLUMMB trial (NCT02560636). EUR UROL SUPPL 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(22)02584-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
7
|
Hafeez S, Koh M, Jones K, El Ghzal A, D'Arcy J, Kumar P, Khoo V, Lalondrelle S, McDonald F, Thompson A, Scurr E, Sohaib A, Huddart R. Assessing Bladder Radiotherapy Response With Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:630-641. [PMID: 35534398 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Radiotherapy with radiosensitisation offers opportunity for cure with organ preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Treatment response assessment and follow-up are reliant on regular endoscopic evaluation of the retained bladder. In this study we aim to determine the role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) analysis to assess bladder radiotherapy response. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with T2-T4aN0-3M0 MIBC suitable for radical radiotherapy were recruited prospectively to an ethics approved protocol. Following transurethral resection of the bladder tumour and prior to any treatment, magnetic resonance imaging including DWI was performed on a 1.5T system using b values of 0, 100, 150, 250, 500, 750 s/mm2. DWI was repeated 3 months after completing radiotherapy. Cystoscopy and tumour site biopsy were undertaken following this. The response was dichotomised into response ( RESULTS Thirty-four patients were evaluated. Response was associated with a significant increase in ΔADC mean compared with poor response at ΔADCall (0.57 × 10-3 mm2/s versus -0.01 × 10-3 mm2/s; P < 0.0001) and ΔADCb100 (0.58 × 10-3 mm2/s versus -0.10 x 10-3 mm2/s; P = 0.007). A 48.50% increase in %ΔADCall mean was seen in response compared with a 1.37% decrease in poor response (P < 0.0001). This corresponded to a %ΔADCb100 mean increase of 50.34% in response versus a 7.36% decrease for poor response (P < 0.0001). Significant area under the curve (AUC) values predictive of radiotherapy response were identified at ΔADC and %ΔADC for ADCall and ADCb100 mean, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th percentiles (AUC >0.9, P < 0.01). ΔADCall mean of 0.16 × 10-3 mm2/s and ΔADCb100 mean 0.12 × 10-3 mm2/s predicted radiotherapy response with sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value/negative predictive value of 92.9%/100.0%/100.0%/75.0% and 89.3%/100.0%/100.0%/66.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Quantitative DWI analysis can successfully provide non-invasive assessment of bladder radiotherapy response. Multicentre validation is required before prospective testing to inform MIBC radiotherapy follow-up schedules and decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hafeez
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - M Koh
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K Jones
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A El Ghzal
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J D'Arcy
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P Kumar
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - V Khoo
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Lalondrelle
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - F McDonald
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Thompson
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - E Scurr
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Sohaib
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Huddart
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abdel-Aty H, Warren-Oseni K, Bagherzadeh-Akbari S, Hansen VN, Jones K, Harris V, Tan MP, Mcquaid D, McNair HA, Huddart R, Dunlop A, Hafeez S. Mapping Local Failure Following Bladder Radiotherapy According to Dose. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:e421-e429. [PMID: 35691760 PMCID: PMC9515812 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To determine the relationship between local relapse following radical radiotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and radiation dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with T2-4N0-3M0 MIBC were recruited to a phase II study assessing the feasibility of intensity-modulated radiotherapy to the bladder and pelvic lymph nodes. Patients were planned to receive 64 Gy/32 fractions to the bladder tumour, 60 Gy/32 fractions to the involved pelvic nodes and 52 Gy/32 fractions to the uninvolved bladder and pelvic nodes. Pre-treatment set-up was informed by cone-beam CT. For patients who experienced local relapse, cystoscopy and imaging (CT/MRI) was used to reconstruct the relapse gross tumour volume (GTVrelapse) on the original planning CT . GTVrelapse D98% and D95% was determined by co-registering the relapse image to the planning CT utilising deformable image registration (DIR) and rigid image registration (RIR). Failure was classified into five types based on spatial and dosimetric criteria as follows: A (central high-dose failure), B (peripheral high-dose failure), C (central elective dose failure), D (peripheral elective dose failure) and E (extraneous dose failure). RESULTS Between June 2009 and November 2012, 38 patients were recruited. Following treatment, 18/38 (47%) patients experienced local relapse within the bladder. The median time to local relapse was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval 6.3-11.7). Seventeen of 18 patients were evaluable based on the availability of cross-sectional relapse imaging. A significant difference between DIR and RIR methods was seen. With the DIR approach, the median GTVrelapse D98% and D95% was 97% and 98% of prescribed dose, respectively. Eleven of 17 (65%) patients experienced type A failure and 6/17 (35%) patients type B failure. No patients had type C, D or E failure. MIBC failure occurred in 10/17 (59%) relapsed patients; of those, 7/11 (64%) had type A failure and 3/6 (50%) had type B failure. Non-MIBC failure occurred in 7/17 (41%) patients; 4/11 (36%) with type A failure and 3/6 (50%) with type B failure. CONCLUSION Relapse following radiotherapy occurred within close proximity to the original bladder tumour volume and within the planned high-dose region, suggesting possible biological causes for failure. We advise caution when considering margin reduction for future reduced high-dose radiation volume or partial bladder radiotherapy protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Abdel-Aty
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K Warren-Oseni
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Bagherzadeh-Akbari
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - V N Hansen
- Department of Oncology, Section of Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - K Jones
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - V Harris
- Department of Radiotherapy, Guy's & St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M P Tan
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D Mcquaid
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H A McNair
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Huddart
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Dunlop
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Hafeez
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
James N, Pirrie S, Liu W, Jefferson K, Gallagher J, Hughes A, Knight A, Nanton V, Mintz H, Pope A, Doyle H, Singh J, Hafeez S, Patel P, Catto J, Bryan R. 1733MO First results from BladderPath: A randomised trial of MRI versus cystoscopic staging for newly diagnosed bladder cancer. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.1811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
10
|
Mitchell A, Ingle M, Smith G, Chick J, Diamantopoulos S, Goodwin E, Herbert T, Huddart R, McNair H, Oelfke U, Nill S, Dunlop A, Hafeez S. Feasibility of tumour-focused adaptive radiotherapy for bladder cancer on the MR-linac. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 35:27-32. [PMID: 35571274 PMCID: PMC9092067 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Bladder tumour-focused magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiotherapy using a 1.5 Tesla MR-linac is feasible. A full online workflow adapting to anatomy at each fraction is achievable in approximately 30 min. Intra-fraction bladder filling did not compromise target coverage with the class solution employed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Mitchell
- The Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M. Ingle
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - G. Smith
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J. Chick
- The Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S. Diamantopoulos
- The Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - E. Goodwin
- The Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - T. Herbert
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R. Huddart
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H. McNair
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - U. Oelfke
- The Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S. Nill
- The Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A. Dunlop
- The Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S. Hafeez
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Westerhoff J, Daamen L, Christodouleas J, Blezer E, Choudhury A, Westley R, Erickson B, Fuller C, Hafeez S, van der Heide U, Intven M, Kirby A, Lalondrelle S, Minsky B, Mook S, Nowee M, Marijnen C, Orrling K, Sahgal A, Schultz C, Tersteeg R, Tree A, Tseng C, van der Voort van Zyp J, Verkooijen H, Hall W. OC-0419 Patterns of Care and Safety in 1800 patients treated on a high-field MR-Linac platform registry. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)02555-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
12
|
Ingle M, Blackledge M, Wetscherek A, Huddart R, Lalondrelle S, Bhide S, Hafeez S. PO-1749 Evaluating diffusion weighted signal change on the MR-Linac during bladder cancer radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)03713-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
13
|
Alexander S, Chick J, Herbert T, Huddart R, Ingle M, Mitchell A, Nill S, Oelfke U, Dunlop A, Hafeez S. MO-0312 Systematic multi-disciplinary sequence evaluation for integration into the MR-linac workflow. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)02344-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
14
|
Ingle M, Blackledge M, White I, Lalondrelle S, Hafeez S, Bhide S. OC-0397 Quantitative analysis of diffusion weighted imaging in rectal cancer during MR-Linac radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)06884-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
15
|
Huddart R, Hafeez S, Omar A, Choudhury A, Birtle A, Syndikus I, Hindson B, Varughese M, Henry A, McLaren D, Foroud F, Webster A, McNair H, Tolentino A, Webster L, Gribble H, Philipps L, Nikapota A, Parikh O, Alonzi R, Mahmood R, Hilman S, Rimmer Y, Griffin C, Hall E. OC-0513 Acute toxicity of hypo- and conventionally-fractionated radiosensitised bladder radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)06939-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
16
|
Webster A, Hafeez S, Lewis R, Griffins C, Warren-Oseni K, Patel E, Hansen VN, Hall E, Huddart R, Miles E, McNair HA. The Development of Therapeutic Radiographers in Imaging and Adaptive Radiotherapy Through Clinical Trial Quality Assurance. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:461-467. [PMID: 33766503 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is an emerging advanced treatment option for bladder cancer patients. Therapeutic radiographers (RTTs) are central to the successful delivery of this treatment. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and ART experience of RTTs before participating in the RAIDER trial. A plan of the day (PoD) quality assurance programme was then implemented. Finally, the post-trial experience of RTTs was evaluated, together with the impact of trial quality assurance participation on their routine practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS A pre-trial questionnaire to assess the experience of the RTT staff group in IGRT and ART in bladder cancer was sent to each centre. Responses were grouped according to experience. The PoD quality assurance programme was implemented, and the RAIDER trial commenced. During stage 1 of the trial, RTTs reported difficulties in delivering PoD and the quality assurance programme was updated accordingly. A follow-up questionnaire was sent assessing experience in IGRT and ART post-trial. Any changes in routine practice were also recorded. RESULTS The experience of RTTs in IGRT and ART pre-trial varied. For centres deemed to have RTTs with more experience, the initial PoD quality assurance programme was streamlined. For RTTs without ART experience, the full quality assurance programme was implemented, of which 508 RTTs completed. The quality assurance programme was updated (as the trial recruited) and it was mandated that at least one representative RTT (regardless of pre-trial experience) participated in the update in real-time. The purpose of the updated quality assurance programme was to provide further support to RTTs in delivering a complex treatment. Engagement with the updated quality assurance programme was high, with RTTs in 24/33 centres participating in the real-time online workshop. All 33 UK centres reported all RTTs reviewed the updated training offline. Post-trial, the RTTs' experience in IGRT and ART was increased. CONCLUSION Overall, 508 RTTs undertook the PoD quality assurance programme. There was a high engagement of RTTs in the PoD quality assurance programme and trial. RTTs increased their experience in IGRT and ART and subsequently updated their practice for bladder cancer and other treatment sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Webster
- National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, UK.
| | - S Hafeez
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Lewis
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - C Griffins
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - E Patel
- University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - V N Hansen
- Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - E Hall
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R Huddart
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - E Miles
- National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, UK
| | - H A McNair
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hafeez S, Dunlop A, Mitchell A, Nill S. Comment on Hunt et al., "Feasibility of magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy for the treatment of bladder cancer". Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 29:9-10. [PMID: 34027138 PMCID: PMC8122149 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S. Hafeez
- Divsion of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A. Dunlop
- The Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - A. Mitchell
- The Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - S. Nill
- The Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hafeez S, Lewis R, Hall E, Huddart R. Advancing Radiotherapy for Bladder Cancer: Randomised Phase II Trial of Adaptive Image-guided Standard or Dose-escalated Tumour Boost Radiotherapy (RAIDER). Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:e251-e256. [PMID: 33766502 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S Hafeez
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - R Lewis
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UKS
| | - E Hall
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UKS
| | - R Huddart
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Technological advancement has facilitated patient-specific radiotherapy in bladder cancer. This has been made possible by developments in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Particularly transformative has been the integration of volumetric imaging into the workflow. The ability to visualise the bladder target using cone beam computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging initially assisted with determining the magnitude of inter- and intra-fraction target change. It has led to greater confidence in ascertaining true anatomy at each fraction. The increased certainty of dose delivered to the bladder has permitted the safe reduction of planning target volume margins. IGRT has therefore improved target coverage with a reduction in integral dose to the surrounding tissue. Use of IGRT to feed back into plan and dose delivery optimisation according to the anatomy of the day has enabled adaptive radiotherapy bladder solutions. Here we undertake a review of the stepwise developments underpinning IGRT and adaptive radiotherapy strategies for external beam bladder cancer radiotherapy. We present the evidence in accordance with the framework for systematic clinical evaluation of technical innovations in radiation oncology (R-IDEAL).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Kong
- Radiation Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - V N Hansen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - S Hafeez
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gadour E, Musharaf M, Hafeez S, Shafiq Y. Timing Of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) In Patients With Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis During The First Wave Of Covid-19 Pandemic, Are We Following The Guidelines! ESGE Days 2021 2021. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1724835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- E Gadour
- University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Gastroenterology
| | - M Musharaf
- University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Gastroenterology
| | - S Hafeez
- University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Gastroenterology
| | - Y Shafiq
- University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Gastroenterology
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hafeez S, Lewis R, Griffin C, Hall E, Huddart R. Failing to Close the Gap Between Evidence and Clinical Practice in Radical Bladder Cancer Radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:46-49. [PMID: 32762980 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S Hafeez
- Department of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - R Lewis
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - C Griffin
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - E Hall
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R Huddart
- Department of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hunt A, Hanson I, Dunlop A, Bower L, Barnes H, Chick J, Herbert T, Lawes R, McNair H, Mitchell A, Mohajer J, Morgan T, Smith G, Nill S, Oelfke U, Huddart R, Hafeez S. OC-0469: MR-guided online adaptive radiotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer: First UK experience. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)00491-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
23
|
Hunt A, Hanson I, Dunlop A, Barnes H, Bower L, Chick J, Cruickshank C, Hall E, Herbert T, Lawes R, McQuaid D, McNair H, Mitchell A, Mohajer J, Morgan T, Oelfke U, Smith G, Nill S, Huddart R, Hafeez S. Feasibility of magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy for the treatment of bladder cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 25:46-51. [PMID: 33015380 PMCID: PMC7522378 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Whole bladder magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy using the 1.5 Telsa MR-linac is feasible. Full online adaptive planning workflow based on the anatomy seen at each fraction was performed. This was delivered within 45 min. Intra-fraction bladder filling did not compromise target coverage. Patients reported acceptable tolerance of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Hunt
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - I. Hanson
- The Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A. Dunlop
- The Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H. Barnes
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - L. Bower
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J. Chick
- The Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C. Cruickshank
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - E. Hall
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - T. Herbert
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R. Lawes
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D. McQuaid
- The Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H. McNair
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A. Mitchell
- The Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J. Mohajer
- The Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - T. Morgan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - U. Oelfke
- The Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - G. Smith
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S. Nill
- The Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R. Huddart
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S. Hafeez
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Webster A, McNair H, Hansen V, Hafeez S, Lewis R, Griffin C, Hall E, Huddart R. OC-0590: Multicentre dual-trial implementation of plan of the day (PoD) adaptive radiotherapy: lessons learnt. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)00612-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
25
|
Hafeez S, Warren-Oseni K, Jones K, Amir E, Komel K, Dearnaley D, Harris V, Horwich A, Khan A, Kumar P, Lalondrelle S, McDonald F, Tan M, Thompson A, McNair H, Hansen V, Huddart R. Dose Escalated Adaptive Bladder Radiotherapy: Clinical Outcomes of a Phase I Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.2123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
26
|
Tan MP, Harris V, Warren-Oseni K, McDonald F, McNair H, Taylor H, Hansen V, Sharabiani M, Thomas K, Jones K, Dearnaley D, Hafeez S, Huddart RA. The Intensity-Modulated Pelvic Node and Bladder Radiotherapy (IMPART) Trial: A Phase II Single-Centre Prospective Study. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:93-100. [PMID: 31400946 PMCID: PMC6966321 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2019] [Revised: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Node-positive bladder cancer (NPBC) carries a poor prognosis and has traditionally been treated palliatively. However, surgical series suggest that a subset of NPBC patients can achieve long-term control after cystectomy and lymph node dissection. There is little published data regarding the use of radiotherapy to treat NPBC patients. This is in part due to concerns regarding the toxicity of whole-pelvis radiotherapy using conventional techniques. We hypothesised that, using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), the pelvic nodes and bladder could be treated within a radical treatment volume with acceptable toxicity profiles. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Intensity-modulated Pelvic Node and Bladder Radiotherapy (IMPART) trial was a phase II single-centre prospective study designed to assess the feasibility of delivering IMRT to treat the bladder and pelvic nodes in patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative bladder cancer (NNBC). The primary end point was meeting predetermined dose constraints. Secondary end points included acute and late toxicity, pelvic relapse-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS In total, 38 patients were recruited and treated between June 2009 and November 2012; 22/38 (58%) had NPBC; 31/38 (81.6%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 18/38 (47%) received concurrent chemotherapy; 37/38 (97%) patients had radiotherapy planned as per protocol. Grade 3 gastrointestinal and genitourinary acute toxicity rates were 5.4 and 20.6%, respectively. At 1 year, the grade 3 late toxicity rate was 5%; 1-, 2- and 5-year pelvic relapse-free survival rates were 55, 37 and 26%, respectively. The median overall survival was 1.9 years (95% confidence interval 1.1-3.8) with 1-, 2- and 5-year overall survival rates of 68, 50 and 34%, respectively. CONCLUSION Delivering IMRT to the bladder and pelvic nodes in NPBC and high-risk NNBC is feasible, with low toxicity and low pelvic nodal recurrence rates. Long-term control seems to be achievable in a subset of patients. However, relapse patterns suggest that strategies targeting both local recurrence and the development of distant metastases are required to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Tan
- Academic Radiotherapy Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - V Harris
- Academic Radiotherapy Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK; Guy's & St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K Warren-Oseni
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - F McDonald
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - H McNair
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - H Taylor
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - V Hansen
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK; Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - M Sharabiani
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK; The School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - K Thomas
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK; ICBARC, London, UK
| | - K Jones
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - D Dearnaley
- Academic Radiotherapy Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - S Hafeez
- Academic Radiotherapy Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - R A Huddart
- Academic Radiotherapy Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Eccles C, Adair Smith G, Bower L, Hafeez S, Herbert T, Hunt A, McNair H, Ofuya M, Oelfke U, Nill S, Huddart R. Magnetic resonance imaging sequence evaluation of an MR Linac system; early clinical experience. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2019; 12:56-63. [PMID: 32095556 PMCID: PMC7033780 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2019.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Revised: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically identify the preferred magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences following volunteer imaging on a 1.5 Tesla (T) MR-Linear Accelerator (MR Linac) for future protocol development. METHODS Non-patient volunteers were recruited to a Research and Ethics committee approved prospective MR-only imaging study on a 1.5T MR Linac system. Volunteers attended 1-3 imaging sessions that included a combination of mDixon, T1w, T2w sequences using 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) acquisitions. Each sequence was acquired over 2-7 minutes and reviewed by a panel of 3 observers to evaluate image quality using a visual grading analysis based on a 4-point Likert scale. Sequences were acquired and modified iteratively until deemed fit for purpose (online image matching or re-planning) and all observers agreed they were suitable in 3 volunteers. RESULTS 26 volunteers underwent 31 imaging sessions of six general anatomical regions. Images were acquired in one or two of six general anatomical regions: male pelvis (n = 9), female pelvis (n = 4), chestwall/breast (n = 5), lung/oesophagus (n = 5), abdomen (n = 3) and head and neck (n = 5). Images were acquired using a pre-defined exam-card that on average, included six sequences (range 2-10), with a maximum scan time of approximately one hour. The majority of observers preferred T2-weighted sequences. The thorax teams were the only groups to prefer T1-weighted imaging. CONCLUSIONS An iterative process identified sequence agreement in all anatomical regions. These sequences will now be evaluated in patient volunteers. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This manuscript is the first publication sharing the results of the first systematic selection of MRI sequences for use in on-board MRI-guided radiotherapy by end-users (therapeutic radiographers and clinical oncologists) in healthy volunteers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C.L. Eccles
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, and the University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - G. Adair Smith
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - L. Bower
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - S. Hafeez
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - T. Herbert
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - A. Hunt
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - H.A. McNair
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mercy Ofuya
- Clinical Trials and Statistic Unit, The Institute for Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Joint Department of Physics at the Royal Marsden and The Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
| | - Simeon Nill
- Joint Department of Physics at the Royal Marsden and The Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
| | - R.A. Huddart
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Horwich A, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, Bruins HM, De Reijke TM, De Santis M, Gillessen S, James N, Maclennan S, Palou J, Powles T, Ribal MJ, Shariat SF, Van Der Kwast T, Xylinas E, Agarwal N, Arends T, Bamias A, Birtle A, Black PC, Bochner BH, Bolla M, Boormans JL, Bossi A, Briganti A, Brummelhuis I, Burger M, Castellano D, Cathomas R, Chiti A, Choudhury A, Compérat E, Crabb S, Culine S, De Bari B, DeBlok W, De Visschere PJL, Decaestecker K, Dimitropoulos K, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Frydenberg M, Futterer JJ, Gakis G, Geavlete B, Gontero P, Grubmüller B, Hafeez S, Hansel DE, Hartmann A, Hayne D, Henry AM, Hernandez V, Herr H, Herrmann K, Hoskin P, Huguet J, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kamat AM, Khoo V, Kiltie AE, Krege S, Ladoire S, Lara PC, Leliveld A, Linares-Espinós E, Løgager V, Lorch A, Loriot Y, Meijer R, Carmen Mir M, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Müller AC, Müller CR, N'Dow J, Necchi A, Neuzillet Y, Oddens JR, Oldenburg J, Osanto S, Oyen WJG, Pacheco-Figueiredo L, Pappot H, Patel MI, Pieters BR, Plass K, Remzi M, Retz M, Richenberg J, Rink M, Roghmann F, Rosenberg JE, Rouprêt M, Rouvière O, Salembier C, Salminen A, Sargos P, Sengupta S, Sherif A, Smeenk RJ, Smits A, Stenzl A, Thalmann GN, Tombal B, Turkbey B, Vahr Lauridsen S, Valdagni R, Van Der Heijden AG, Van Poppel H, Vartolomei MD, Veskimäe E, Vilaseca A, Vives Rivera FA, Wiegel T, Wiklund P, Williams A, Zigeuner R, Witjes JA. EAU-ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer-an international collaborative multi-stakeholder effort: under the auspices of the EAU and ESMO Guidelines Committees†. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1697-1727. [PMID: 31740927 PMCID: PMC7360152 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management. DESIGN A steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts before voting during a consensus conference. SETTING Online Delphi survey and consensus conference. PARTICIPANTS The European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1-3 (disagree), 4-6 (equivocal), 7-9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement and ≤15% disagreement, or vice versa. In the Delphi survey, a second analysis was restricted to stakeholder group(s) considered to have adequate expertise relating to each statement (to achieve level 2 consensus). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 116 statements were included in the Delphi survey. Of these, 33 (28%) statements achieved level 1 consensus and 49 (42%) statements achieved level 1 or 2 consensus. At the consensus conference, 22 of 27 (81%) statements achieved consensus. These consensus statements provide further guidance across a broad range of topics, including the management of variant histologies, the role/limitations of prognostic biomarkers in clinical decision making, bladder preservation strategies, modern radiotherapy techniques, the management of oligometastatic disease and the evolving role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS These consensus statements provide further guidance on controversial topics in advanced and variant bladder cancer management until a time where further evidence is available to guide our approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Horwich
- Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - M Babjuk
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - J Bellmunt
- IMIM-Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - H M Bruins
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - T M De Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M De Santis
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Gillessen
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - N James
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
| | - S Maclennan
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - J Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Powles
- The Royal Free NHS Trust, London; Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - M J Ribal
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S F Shariat
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - T Van Der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris; Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - N Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah (NCI-CCC), Salt Lake City, USA
| | - T Arends
- Urology Department, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Dept of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A Birtle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK
| | - P C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - B H Bochner
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - M Bolla
- Emeritus Professor of Radiation Oncology, Grenoble - Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - J L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Bossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - A Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Milan; Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - I Brummelhuis
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - M Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - D Castellano
- Medical Oncology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - R Cathomas
- Department Innere Medizin, Abteilung Onkologie und Hämatologie, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - A Chiti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - A Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - E Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, HUEP, Paris; Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - S Crabb
- Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - S Culine
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris
| | - B De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz" of Besançon, INSERM UMR 1098, Besançon, France; Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - W DeBlok
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P J L De Visschere
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Genitourinary Radiology and Mammography, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent
| | - K Decaestecker
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - K Dimitropoulos
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - J L Dominguez-Escrig
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Fanti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - V Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - J J Futterer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G Gakis
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Julius-Maximillians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - B Geavlete
- Department of Urology, Saint John Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - P Gontero
- Division of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - B Grubmüller
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Hafeez
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D E Hansel
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego Pathology, La Jolla, USA
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - D Hayne
- Department of Urology, UWA Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - A M Henry
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - V Hernandez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - H Herr
- Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - K Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - P Hoskin
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, London, UK
| | - J Huguet
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - R Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - A M Kamat
- Department of Urology - Division of Surgery, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - V Khoo
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A E Kiltie
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - S Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - P C Lara
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Roque, Canarias; Universidad Fernando Pessoa, Canarias, Spain
| | - A Leliveld
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - V Løgager
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - A Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Y Loriot
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, INSERM U981, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - R Meijer
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, MS Oncologic Urology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - M Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - H Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - A-C Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - C R Müller
- Cancer Treatment Centre, Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - J N'Dow
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - A Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Hospital Foch, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - J R Oddens
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Osanto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - W J G Oyen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - L Pacheco-Figueiredo
- Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto; Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - H Pappot
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M I Patel
- Department of Urology, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - B R Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
| | - K Plass
- EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - M Remzi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Retz
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Richenberg
- Department of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - M Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - F Roghmann
- Department of Urology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Marien Hospital, Herne, Germany
| | - J E Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - M Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris
| | - O Rouvière
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'Imagerie Urinaire et Vasculaire, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | - C Salembier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Salminen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - P Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - S Sengupta
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Sherif
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - R J Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Smits
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - A Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - G N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Berne, Switzerland
| | - B Tombal
- Division of Urology, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCL, Brussels, Belgium
| | - B Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - S Vahr Lauridsen
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - R Valdagni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - H Van Poppel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M D Vartolomei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - E Veskimäe
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - A Vilaseca
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F A Vives Rivera
- Clinica HematoOncologica Bonadona Prevenir, Universidad Metropolitana, Clinica Club de Leones, Barranquilla, Colombia
| | - T Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - P Wiklund
- Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York City, USA; Department of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Williams
- Department of Urology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - R Zigeuner
- Department of Urology, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - J A Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chau C, Rimmer Y, Law A, Leaning D, Lim J, Young T, Hafeez S, Mitchell D, McGrane J, Beresford M, Vasudev N, Sim VR, Koutalopoulou A, Hilman S, Manetta C, Rajagopalan S, Sharma A, Eswar C, Henderson D, Crabb S. National small cell bladder cancer audit: Results from 26 UK institutions. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz249.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
30
|
Hafeez S. SP-0683 Clinical results of PotD strategies. Radiother Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(19)31103-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
31
|
Webster A, Hafeez S, Hall E, Hansen V, McNair H, Lewis R, Robert H. OC-0634 Implementation of plan of the day adaptive radiotherapy: Compliance to guidelines. Radiother Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(19)31054-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
32
|
Thieme A, Eller Y, del Campo ER, Abrunhosa-Branquinho A, Adebahr S, Desideri I, Fiore M, Hafeez S, Hoeben B, Kaidar-Person O, Kindts I, Meattini I, Mercier C, Mehrhof F, Nevens D, Ollivier L, Suppli M, Visani L, Baumert B, Ostheimer C. PV-0256 European survey on electronic patientreported outcomes by the EORTC young Radiation Oncology Group. Radiother Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(19)30676-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
33
|
Chan K, Warren-Oseni K, Abdel-Aty H, Dunlop A, McQuaid D, Koh M, Sohaib A, Huddart R, Hafeez S. PO-0864 Normal tissue sparing with diffusion weighted MRI informed tumour boost in bladder radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(19)31284-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
34
|
Hunt A, Chan A, Delacroix L, Dysager L, Edwards A, Frew J, Gordon A, Henry A, Huddart R, Koh M, Kong V, Nagar Y, Parikh O, Pearson R, Rimmer Y, Schytte T, Serra M, Sidhom M, Sohaib A, Syndikus I, Tan A, Treece S, Varughese M, Hafeez S. EP-1589 Establishing international variation in target delineation using MRI for bladder radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(19)32009-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
35
|
Hunt A, Hansen VN, Oelfke U, Nill S, Hafeez S. Adaptive Radiotherapy Enabled by MRI Guidance. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:711-719. [PMID: 30201276 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Revised: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) strategies systematically monitor variations in target and neighbouring structures to inform treatment-plan modification during radiotherapy. This is necessary because a single plan designed before treatment is insufficient to capture the actual dose delivered to the target and adjacent critical structures during the course of radiotherapy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides superior soft-tissue image contrast over current standard X-ray-based technologies without additional radiation exposure. With integrated MRI and radiotherapy platforms permitting motion monitoring during treatment delivery, it is possible that adaption can be informed by real-time anatomical imaging. This allows greater treatment accuracy in terms of dose delivered to target with smaller, individualised treatment margins. The use of functional MRI sequences would permit ART to be informed by imaging biomarkers, so allowing both personalised geometric and biological adaption. In this review, we discuss ART solutions enabled by MRI guidance and its potential gains for our patients across tumour types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Hunt
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - V N Hansen
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Joint Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - U Oelfke
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Joint Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Nill
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Joint Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Hafeez
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Huddart R, Henry A, Staffurth J, Syndikus I, Mitra A, Venkitraman R, McNair H, Khoo V, Lewis E, Vassallo-Bonner C, Baker A, Horan G, Parsons E, Moinuddin S, Hansen V, Birtle A, Hafeez S, Goubar A, Hall E. OC-0058: Clinical outcomes of the first rct of adaptive radiotherapy in bladder cancer (HYBRID CRUK/12/055). Radiother Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)30368-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
37
|
Huddart R, Henry A, Khoo V, Staffurth J, Syndikus I, Hansen V, McNair H, Hafeez S, Lewis R, Parsons E, Baker A, Vassallo-Bonner C, Moinuddin S, Illambas J, Birtle A, Horan G, Rimmer Y, Venkitaraman R, Mitra A, Hall E. Toxicity and Survival Outcomes of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Hypofractionated Bladder Radiation Therapy in an Elderly Population With or Without Image Guided Adaptive Plan Selection (HYBRID - CRUK/12/055). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
38
|
Parsons E, Megias D, Baker A, Hafeez S, Hall E, McNair H, Tsang Y, Huddart R. OC-0351: Analysis of concordance in multicentre adaptive bladder trials quality assurance. Radiother Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(17)30793-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
39
|
Eccles C, McNair H, McQuaid D, Warren-Oseni K, Hansen V, Sohaib A, Koh M, Huddart R, Hafeez S. PV-0461: Integrating diagnostic MRI in radical bladder cancer radiotherapy: Challenges in image registration. Radiother Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(17)30902-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
40
|
Hafeez S, Warren-Oseni K, McNair H, Hansen V, Huddart R. EP-1370: Simultaneous integrated tumour boost planning in bladder cancer: a comparison of strategies. Radiother Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(17)31805-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
41
|
Hafeez S, Horwich A, Omar O, Mohammed K, Thompson A, Kumar P, Khoo V, Van As N, Eeles R, Dearnaley D, Huddart R. Selective organ preservation with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Br J Cancer 2016; 114:e24. [PMID: 27228294 PMCID: PMC4984461 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
42
|
Hafeez S. SP-0321: The British Institute of Radiology. Radiother Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(16)31570-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
43
|
Grose NA, Hafeez S, Mutgi SA, Behrouz R. Intracerebral hemorrhage patients presenting with normal blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens 2015. [PMID: 26202689 DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2015.82] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- N A Grose
- Comprehensive Neurovascular Centre, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Centre, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - S Hafeez
- Division of Cerebrovascular Diseases and Neurosciences Critical Care, Department of Neurology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - S A Mutgi
- Division of Cerebrovascular Diseases and Neurosciences Critical Care, Department of Neurology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - R Behrouz
- Department of Neurology, University of Texas School of Medicine at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hafeez S, Horwich A, Omar O, Mohammed K, Thompson A, Kumar P, Khoo V, Van As N, Eeles R, Dearnaley D, Huddart R. Selective organ preservation with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Br J Cancer 2015; 112:1626-35. [PMID: 25897675 PMCID: PMC4430712 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2014] [Revised: 02/12/2015] [Accepted: 02/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) aims to offer organ preservation without oncological compromise. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy provides survival advantage; response may guide patient selection for bladder preservation and identify those most likely to have favourable result with radiotherapy. METHODS Ninety-four successive patients with T2-T4aN0M0 bladder cancer treated between January 2000 and June 2011 were analysed at the Royal Marsden Hospital. Patients received platinum-based chemotherapy following transurethral resection of bladder tumour; repeat cystoscopy (± biopsy) was performed to guide subsequent management. Responders were treated with radiotherapy. Poor responders were recommended radical cystectomy. Progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method; univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS Response assessment was performed in 89 patients. Seventy-eight (88%) demonstrated response; 53 (60%) achieved complete response (CR); 74 responders had radiotherapy; 4 opted for cystectomy. Eleven (12%) demonstrated poor response, 10 received cystectomy. Median survival for CR was 90 months (95% CI 64.7, 115.9) compared with 16 months (95% CI 5.4, 27.4; P < 0.001) poor responders. On multivariate analysis, only response was associated with significantly improved PFS, OS and DSS. After a median follow-up of 39 months (range 4-127 months), 14 patients (16%) required salvage cystectomy (8 for non-muscle invasive disease, 5 for invasive recurrence, 1 for radiotherapy related toxicity). In all, 82% had an intact bladder at last follow-up after radiotherapy; 67% had an intact bladder at last follow-up or death. Our study is limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS Response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is a favourable prognostic indicator and can be used to select patients for radiotherapy allowing bladder preservation in >80% of the selected patients.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/surgery
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
- Cisplatin/administration & dosage
- Cystectomy/methods
- Disease-Free Survival
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Neoadjuvant Therapy
- Neoplasm Invasiveness
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery
- Organ Preservation/methods
- Retrospective Studies
- Salvage Therapy/methods
- Treatment Outcome
- Urinary Bladder/drug effects
- Urinary Bladder/pathology
- Urinary Bladder/radiation effects
- Urinary Bladder/surgery
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Hafeez
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Horwich
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - O Omar
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K Mohammed
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Thompson
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P Kumar
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - V Khoo
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N Van As
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Eeles
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - D Dearnaley
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R Huddart
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hafeez S, McDonald F, Lalondrelle S, McNair H, Warren-Oseni K, Jones K, Harris V, Taylor H, Khoo V, Thomas K, Hansen V, Dearnaley D, Horwich A, Huddart R. EP-1240: Clinical outcomes of image guided adaptive radiotherapy (IGART) for hypofractionated treatment of bladder cancer. Radiother Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(15)41232-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
46
|
McNair HA, Hafeez S, Taylor H, Lalondrelle S, McDonald F, Hansen VN, Huddart R. Radiographer-led plan selection for bladder cancer radiotherapy: initiating a training programme and maintaining competency. Br J Radiol 2015; 88:20140690. [PMID: 25564753 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The implementation of plan of the day selection for patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) for bladder cancer requires efficient and confident decision-making. This article describes the development of a training programme and maintenance of competency. METHODS Cone beam CT (CBCT) images acquired on patients receiving RT for bladder cancer were assessed to establish baseline competency and training needs. A training programme was implemented, and observers were asked to select planning target volumes (PTVs) on two groups of 20 patients' images. After clinical implementation, the PTVs chosen were reviewed offline, and an audit performed after 3 years. RESULTS A mean of 73% (range, 53-93%) concordance rate was achieved prior to training. Subsequent to training, the mean score decreased to 66% (Round 1), then increased to 76% (Round 2). Six radiographers and two clinicians successfully completed the training programme. An independent observer reviewed the images offline after clinical implementation, and a 91% (126/139) concordance rate was achieved. During the audit, 125 CBCT images from 13 patients were reviewed by a single observer and concordance was 92%. CONCLUSION Radiographer-led selection of plan of the day was implemented successfully with the use of a training programme and continual assessment. Quality has been maintained over a period of 3 years. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE The training programme was successful in achieving and maintaining competency for a plan of the day technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H A McNair
- 1 Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Callender J, Parsons E, McNair H, Reilly A, Huddart R, Hafeez S, Hansen V, Tsang Y, Hall E, Baker A. OC-0564: Implementing a remote access database for clinical trials' IGRT quality assurance in the United Kingdom. Radiother Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(15)40559-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
48
|
Vestergaard A, Hafeez S, Muren L, Nill S, Høyer M, Hansen V, Grønborg C, Pedersen E, Petersen J, Huddart R, Olfke U. OC-0403: The potential of MRI-guided online adaptive radiotherapy of urinary bladder cancer. Radiother Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(15)40399-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
49
|
Hafeez S, Huddart R. Audit of Patient Pathway for those Receiving Radical Radiotherapy for Bladder Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
50
|
Hafeez S, Koh M, Sohaib A, Huddart R. PO-0734: Assessing response to radiotherapy with diffusion weighted MRI (DW-MRI) in muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Radiother Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(15)30852-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|