Prognostic significance of SOX17 and WNT5a promoter methylation status in circulating cell-free DNA metastatic colorectal cancer patients

Aim

Carcinogenesis of colorectal cancer is a process involving genetic mutations and epigenetic alterations in its multiple phases. The most considerable epigenetic alteration occurring in colorectal cancer (CRC) tumorigenesis is the methylation-mediated silencing of tumor suppressor genes. The present study aimed to detect the methylation status of SOX17 and WNT5a promoters in cell-free DNA circulating in plasma of metastatic CRC patients and to investigate potential prognostic correlation.

Methods

A methylation-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction was utilized to investigate the methylation status of genes (SOX17 and WNT5a) promoter in the blood of 85 metastatic CRC patients.

Results

We found the SOX17 promoter methylated in 54/85 (63.5 %) while WNT5a was methylated in 39/85 (45.8 %) samples of the advanced CRC. All control samples were negative for SOX17 and WNT5a promoter methylation. Patients with metastatic CRC and methylated SOX17 and WNT5a promoter status had a significantly poorer outcome than patients with non-methylated ones.

Conclusions

Plasma SOX17 and WNT5a promoter methylation are frequent epigenetic events in advanced CRC. The reported correlations between the methylation status of genes (SOX17 and Wnt5a) promoter and poorer survival in patients with advanced CRC disease agree with the proposed role of SOX17 as a tumor suppressor gene. A more considerable CRC patient cohort is required to research these findings' potential further and investigate whether SOX17 in plasma could serve as a useful prognostic biomarker in metastatic CRC. HIPPOKRATIA 2023, 27 (1):7-11.

Three- versus six-month adjuvant FOLFOX or CAPOX for high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer patients: the efficacy results of Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG) participation to the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) project

BACKGROUND

The International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) aimed to investigate whether a 3 months (3M) of oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is non-inferior to the 6-month (6M) administration in 3-year disease-free survival (3yDFS) in high-risk (HR) stage II or stage III colon cancer (CC).

METHODS

Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG)-IDEA randomized patients between 3M and 6M of CT with FOLFOX4 or CAPOX.

RESULTS

In total 1115 patients, 413 with HR stage II and 702 with stage III CC, were randomized. The median follow-up was 67.0 (38.3-126.0) months. Overall, 394 DFS events (202 in 3M arm and 192 in 6M arm) where recorded. The 3yDFS rate was 77.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 72.1% to 82.3%] for 3M and 77.9% (72.6% to 82.5%) for 6M of treatment [hazard ratio (HR) 1.05 (95% CI 0.61-1.55); P = 0.647]. Eighty DFS events (3M N = 41; 6M N = 39) were observed in HR stage II patients for a 3yDFS rate of 82.7% and 83.4%, respectively (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.68-1.63, P = 0.829). For stage III patients, 314 DFS events (3M N = 161 and 6M N = 153) were observed, for a 3yDFS rate of 72.9% for 3M versus 74.1% for 6M (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.81-1.42, P = 0.622). For HR stage II patients receiving FOLFOX4, 3yDFS rate was 76.7% for 3M and 79.3% for 6M (HR 1.21; 95% CI 0.54-2.70). For HR stage II patients receiving CAPOX the 3yDFS rate was 85.4% for 3M and 83.8% for 6M (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.59-1.67). For stage III patients receiving FOLFOX4, the 3yDFS rate was 71.5% for 3M and 77.3% for 6M (HR 1.18; 95% CI 0.74-1.86). For stage III patients receiving CAPOX, the 3yDFS rate was 74.5% for 3M and 74.7% for 6M (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.70-1.44).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the HORG-IDEA study are in line with those of the global IDEA project, indicating that the 3yDFS is dependent on the administered adjuvant regimen and the choice and duration of regimen should be personalized.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01308086.

Access to Genetic Testing Impacts Oncologists´ Decisions on Ovarian Cancer Personalized Treatment: Lessons Learned From a National Program in Greece

Background: State health insurance authorities in Greece do not reimburse genetic testing for cancer predisposition. The Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology has launched and carries out a national program covering genetic testing for BRCA1/2 mutations detection, with the financial support of pharmaceutical industry. Aim: This analysis evaluates how, during this program, access to genetic testing transformed the oncologists' therapeutic approach toward their ovarian cancer patients and how the results impacted treatment decisions concerning PARP inhibitors. Adoption of testing by healthy relatives and timing of testing in the disease continuum were also evaluated. Methods: Adult patients with high-grade epithelial ovarian carcinoma, irrespectively of family history or age at diagnosis were eligible for this program. Genetic counseling was recommended before testing, and both were offered at no financial cost. First degree family members of pathogenic mutation carriers were also offered free counseling and testing. Results: From March 2015 through January 2018, 708 patients were enrolled and tested. One hundred and forty seven (20.7%) mutation carriers were identified, 102 (14.4%) in BRCA1 and 45 (6.3%) in BRCA2 gene. Testing was more often pursued at initial diagnosis (61%) than at recurrence (39%), as recorded for 409 patients with available relevant information. During the 1st year of the program, average monthly tests performed were 25.1, while during the 3rd year this number increased to 34.3 tests per month. Among patients who tested positive for deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations, relapse was reported in 58 patients, 94.8% of which (n= 55) received treatment with the PARP inhibitor olaparib as per its indication. Family members of 21 patients (14.3%), out of the 147 who tested positive, received genetic counseling and testing for the mutation identified in the context of the program. Conclusion: Free access to genetic testing for BRCA1/2 for ovarian cancer patients and genetic consultation facilitates testing uptake, affects common clinical practice & has major impact on patients and their families. Still, diffusion of genetic information and broader testing of family members require further efforts by the oncological community.

Abstract P1-12-02: Sequential versus concurrent administration of epirubicin and docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy in women with high-risk axillary lymph node negative early breast cancer. An interim analysis of a multicenter randomized study from the Hellenic oncology research group

Purpose: To compare the sequential versus the concurrent administration of epirubicin and docetaxel as adjuvant therapy in high risk axillary node negative women with early breast cancer.

Patients and treatment: Women 18-75 years old with invasive breast adenocarcinoma surgically resected with no infiltrated axillary lymph nodes and absence of metastatic disease were randomized to receive 4 cycles of epirubicin 90mg/m2 followed by 4 cycles of docetaxel 75mg/m2 (sequential regimen) or 6 cycles of epirubicin 75mg/m2 followed by docetaxel 75mg/m2 (concurrent regimen). All chemotherapy cycles were administered every 21 days with prophylactic G-CSF support for days 3-10 only for the concurrent regimen. Stratification was based on menopausal status, tumor size and hormone receptor expression. By protocol amendment in 2008 women with HER2 positive tumors were excluded. The primary endpoint of the study was to compare the disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years and 329 patients were scheduled to enroll on each arm.

Results: Between 2001-2013, 658 women were randomized and received the sequential (n=329) or the concurrent (n=329) regimen. The median age was 53 and 52 years, premenopausal status 43.8% versus 44.1%, tumor size <2cm in 44.1% versus 44.4%, histological grade 3 tumor in 52% versus 53.5% and hormone receptor negative disease in 33.1% versus 37.4% of patients in the sequential and concurrent regimens, respectively. After a median follow up of 70.5 and 70 months, there were 29 (8.8%) versus 42 (12.8%) disease relapses (p=0.102) and 11 (3.3%) versus 19 (5.8%) deaths (p=0.135), in the sequential and concurrent arms, respectively. The median DFS has not yet been reached in either arm (p=0.053) and the 5-year DFS rates were 92.6% versus 88.2% for sequential and concurrent arms, respectively. Dose reduction was required in 1.2% versus 3% (p=0.001) of the treatment cycles in the sequential and concurrent arms, respectively. Toxicity included grade 2-4 neutropenia in 54% versus 41% (p=0.001), febrile neutropenia 2.7% versus 6.1% (p=0.06), anemia 12% versus 17% (p=0.07), nausea/vomiting 18.5% versus 12.4% (p=0.03) of patients in the sequential and concurrent arms, respectively. There were no toxic deaths.

Conclusion: In this interim analysis both the efficacy and the toxicity profile seem to favor the sequential over the concurrent regimen.

Citation Format: Mavroudis D, Saloustros E, Boukovinas I, Papakotoulas P, Kakolyris S, Ziras N, Christophylakis C, Kentepozidis N, Timotheadou E, Rigas G, Varthalitis I-I, Kalbakis K, Agelaki S, Georgoulias V. Sequential versus concurrent administration of epirubicin and docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy in women with high-risk axillary lymph node negative early breast cancer. An interim analysis of a multicenter randomized study from the Hellenic oncology research group. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-02.

Prognostic role of APC and RASSF1A promoter methylation status in cell free circulating DNA of operable gastric cancer patients

Gastric carcinogenesis is a multistep process including not only genetic mutations but also epigenetic alterations. The best known and more frequent epigenetic alteration is DNA methylation affecting tumor suppressor genes that may be involved in various carcinogenetic pathways. The aim of the present study was to investigate the methylation status of APC promoter 1A and RASSF1A promoter in cell free DNA of operable gastric cancer patients. Using methylation specific PCR, we examined the methylation status of APC promoter 1A and RASSF1A promoter in 73 blood samples obtained from patients with gastric cancer. APC and RASSF1A promoters were found to be methylated in 61 (83.6%) and 50 (68.5%) of the 73 gastric cancer samples examined, but in none of the healthy control samples (p < 0.001). A significant association between methylated RASSF1A promoter status and lymph node positivity was observed (p = 0.005). Additionally, a significant correlation between a methylated APC promoter and elevated CEA (p = 0.033) as well as CA-19.9 (p = 0.032) levels, was noticed. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival, significantly favored patients with a non-methylated APC promoter status (p = 0.008). No other significant correlations between APC and RASSF1A methylation status and different tumor variables examined was observed. Serum RASSF1A and APC promoter hypermethylation is a frequent epigenetic event in patients with early operable gastric cancer. The observed correlations between APC promoter methylation status and survival as well as between a hypermethylated RASSF1A promoter and nodal positivity may be indicative of a prognostic role for those genes in early operable gastric cancer. Additional studies, in a larger cohort of patients are required to further explore whether these findings could serve as potential molecular biomarkers of survival and/or response to specific treatments.

Six versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab in combination with dose-dense chemotherapy for women with HER2-positive breast cancer: a multicenter randomized study by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG)

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy improves survival of women with HER2-positive early breast cancer. In this study, we compared 12 versus 6 months of adjuvant trastuzumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Axillary node-positive or high-risk node-negative women with HER2-positive early breast cancer were randomized to receive 12 or 6 months of adjuvant trastuzumab concurrently with dose-dense, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-supported docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) every 14 days for four cycles). All patients received upfront dose-dense, G-CSF-supported FEC (5-fluorouracil 700 mg/m(2), epirubicin 75 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 700 mg/m(2) every 14 days for four cycles). Randomization was carried out before commence of chemotherapy. The primary end point was the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

A total of 481 patients were randomized to receive 12 months (n = 241) or 6 months (n = 240) of adjuvant trastuzumab. Chemotherapy was completed in 99% and 98% of patients, while trastuzumab therapy in 100% and 96% of patients in the 12- and 6-month groups, respectively. After 47 and 51 months of median follow-up, there were 17 (7.1%) and 28 (11.7%) disease relapses in the 12- and 6-month groups (P = 0.08). The 3-year DFS was 95.7% versus 93.3% in favor of the 12-month treatment group (hazard ratio = 1.57; 95% confidence interval 0.86-2.10; P = 0.137). There was no difference in terms of overall survival and cardiac toxicity between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study failed to show noninferiority for the 6-month arm. The results further support the current standard of care that is administration of adjuvant trastuzumab for 12 months.

γ -H2AX: A Novel Prognostic Marker in a Prognosis Prediction Model of Patients with Early Operable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide and the prognostic evaluation of cancer patients is of great importance in medical care. The use of artificial neural networks in prediction problems is well established in human medical literature. The aim of the current study was to assess the prognostic value of a series of clinical and molecular variables with the addition of γ -H2AX-a new DNA damage response marker-for the prediction of prognosis in patients with early operable non-small cell lung cancer by comparing the γ -H2AX-based artificial network prediction model with the corresponding LR one. Two prognostic models of 96 patients with 27 input variables were constructed by using the parameter-increasing method in order to compare the predictive accuracy of neural network and logistic regression models. The quality of the models was evaluated by an independent validation data set of 11 patients. Neural networks outperformed logistic regression in predicting the patient's outcome according to the experimental results. To assess the importance of the two factors p53 and γ -H2AX, models without these two variables were also constructed. JR and accuracy of these models were lower than those of the models using all input variables, suggesting that these biological markers are very important for optimal performance of the models. This study indicates that neural networks may represent a potentially more useful decision support tool than conventional statistical methods for predicting the outcome of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and that some molecular markers, such as γ -H2AX, enhance their predictive ability.

A multicenter phase I-II study of docetaxel plus epirubicin plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in women with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel (D) plus epirubicin (E) in combination with bevacizumab (B) [DEB regimen] as front-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with previously untreated HER2-negative MBC received B (15 mg/kg), E (75 mg/m2) and D (75 mg/m2) with prophylactic G-CSF support every 3 weeks (q3w) for up to 9 cycles followed by B (15 mg/kg q3w) until disease progression. Primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were evaluated using the CellSearch system at different time points during therapy.

RESULTS

Eighty-three women were enrolled with median age 62 years, performance status 0-1 in 93%, triple negative disease in 12% and liver metastases in 47%. In an intention to treat analysis, complete response was achieved in 13 (15.7%) and partial response in 42 (50.6%) (overall response rate 66.3%; 95% CI 56.09-76.44%). The median time to progression was 20.1 months and the 1-year overall survival rate 82.3%. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 37%, febrile neutropenia in 10%, anemia in 4%, thrombocytopenia in 2% and diarrhea in 2% of patients. There were two deaths possibly related to study treatment (sigmoid perforation n = 1; sudden death n = 1). Moreover, one patient developed pulmonary embolism and another one myocardial infarction while on treatment. Although DEB administration significantly reduced the proportion of patients presenting CTCs, the detection of ≥5 or ≥1 CTCs before treatment initiation was significantly associated with worse progression-free survival (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004) and overall survival (p = 0.001 and p = 0.027), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The DEB regimen is a very active but also potentially toxic combination in MBC. Detection of CTCs before treatment is associated with worse outcome.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV

NCT00705315.

Differential effect of adjuvant taxane-based and taxane-free chemotherapy regimens on the CK-19 mRNA-positive circulating tumour cells in patients with early breast cancer

Background:

To determine the effect of adjuvant taxane-free and taxane-based chemotherapy regimens on the elimination of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in patients with early breast cancer.

Methods:

The presence of CK-19 mRNA-positive CTCs in the peripheral blood was evaluated before and after chemotherapy, using a real-time RT–PCR assay, in a historical comparison of two cohorts of women with stage I–III breast cancer treated with adjuvant taxane-free (N=211; FE₇₅C or E₇₅C) and taxane-based (N=334; T/E₇₅C or T/E₇₅) chemotherapy.

Results:

Taxane-based chemotherapy resulted in a higher incidence of CTCs' elimination than taxane-free regimens since 49.7% (74 of 149) and 33.0% (29 of 88) of patients with detectable CTCs before chemotherapy, respectively, turned negative post-chemotherapy (P=0.015). Patients treated with taxane-free regimens had a significantly lower disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.035) than patients treated with taxane-based regimens; this difference was observed in patients with but not without detectable CTCs before chemotherapy (P=0.018 and P=0.481, respectively). The incidence of deaths was significantly higher in the taxane-free cohort of patients with but not without detectable CTCs before chemotherapy compared with that of the taxane-based cohort (P=0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed that the chemotherapy regimen was significantly associated with prolonged DFS (HR: 2.00; 95% CI=1.20–3.34).

Conclusion:

Elimination of CK-19 mRNA-positive CTCs during adjuvant chemotherapy seems to be an efficacy indicator of treatment and is associated with a favourable clinical outcome of patients with detectable CTCs before chemotherapy.

Outcome of lung cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit with acute respiratory failure

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that the outcome of lung cancer patients who were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), especially those requiring mechanical ventilation, is extremely poor. The present study was conducted in order to assess the outcome of a recent cohort of lung cancer patients admitted to the ICU with acute respiratory failure.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the medical records of 105 lung cancer patients who were admitted to the ICU between January 2008 and January 2011 was performed. Severity of illness on the first day of ICU admission was assessed using the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II and the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scoring systems. Associated organ failure was determined according to the Knaus criteria.

RESULTS

Eighty four (80%) patients were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer, 14 (13.3%) with small cell lung cancer, one patient with mesothelioma, and in the remaining 6 patients, the type of lung cancer could not be determined. Significant factors on admission were APACHE II and SOFA scores, poor performance status and severe comorbidity. During ICU stay, the main risk factors for poor outcome were the long term mechanical ventilation duration, use of vasopressors, more than two organ system failures and septic condition. The overall ICU, hospital and 6-month mortality rates were 44.7% (47/105), 56.1% (59/105) and 77.1% (81/105) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data show that the medical intensive care unit outcome of lung cancer patients is improving. Further studies of patients selected to ICU admission are needed to assess long-term mortality, quality of life, ability to continue chemotherapy and economic cost.

Abstract P1-13-09: A multicenter randomized study comparing the dose dense G-CSF-supported sequential administration of FEC followed by docetaxel versus paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy in women with axillary lymph node positive breast cancer

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of dose dense docetaxel versus paclitaxel following FEC as adjuvant chemotherapy in node positive early breast cancer.

Patients and treatment: Women 18–75 years old with histologically confirmed HER2-negative invasive breast carcinoma surgically resected with at least one infiltrated axillary lymph node and absence of metastatic disease were randomized to receive 4 cycles of fluorouracil (700mg/m2), epirubicin (75mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (700mg/m2) followed by 4 cycles of either docetaxel (75mg/m2) or paclitaxel (175mg/m2). All chemotherapy cycles were administered every 14 days with G-CSF support. Stratification was based on menopausal status, number of involved nodes and hormone receptor expression. The primary endpoint of the study was to compare the disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years and 239 patients were scheduled to enroll on each arm.

Results: Between 2004–2007, 481 women were randomized and received FEC followed by docetaxel (arm A; n=240) or paclitaxel (arm B; n=241). The median age was 55 years in both arms, premenopausal status 31.3% versus 32.8%, more than 10 involved axillary nodes in 12.9% versus 12.4%, histological grade 3 tumor in 36.3% versus 35.3% and hormone receptor negative disease in 14.6% versus 12% of patients in arms A and B, respectively. After a median follow up of 56.3 and 55.6 months (p = 0.3) for arms A and B, respectively, there were 42 (17.5%) versus 47 (19.5%) disease relapses (p = 0.5) and 20 (8.3%) versus 22 (9.1%) disease-related deaths (p = 0.7), respectively. The 3-year DFS rates were 88.1% versus 87.3% for arms A and B, respectively. Toxicity included grade 2–4 neutropenia in 31% versus 21% (p = 0.01), thrombocytopenia 3.5% versus 0.8% (p = 0.06), febrile neutropenia 2.1% versus 1.2% (p = 0.5), diarrhea 3.7% versus 2.5% (p = 0.4), neurotoxicity 2.9% versus 4.6% (p = 0.3) of patients in arms A and B, respectively. There were no toxic deaths.

Conclusion: The dose dense administration with G-CSF support of FEC followed by either docetaxel or paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy in women with node positive early breast cancer is well tolerated and results in a similar 3-year DFS rate.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-09.

Molecular pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer and clinical perspectives

Pancreatic cancer remains stubbornly resistant to many key cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents and novel targeted therapies. The molecular heterogeneity of this cancer may account for therapy failures to date, although our growing arsenal of novel targeted agents could translate into patient survival. The main objectives of this review are to elucidate histological subtypes of pancreatic neoplasms that exhibit the characteristic of a gradual process of differentiation from benign entities to malignant ones. In addition, important genes, molecular abnormalities, and significant pathways of pancreatic cancer are analyzed and a potential clinical interpretation is presented (p16/cdkn2a, k-ras mutations, smad-4/tgf-/stat3, stk-11, braf, brca-2, neurotensin, mucs proteins, palb2, mitochondrial mutations, DNA mismatch repair genes, methylation, microrna expression, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, egfr mutations, the pi3k-akt-mtor pathway, the vegf pathway, heat shock proteins, cxcr4, the cox pathway, the src pathway, the hedgehog pathway, pancreatic stellate cells, a progression model, and molecular events in uncommon pancreatic tumors). Finally, future therapeutic directions are elucidated.

Docetaxel plus gemcitabine in combination with capecitabine as treatment for inoperable pancreatic cancer: a phase II study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the activity and tolerance of gemcitabine in combination with docetaxel and capecitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were treated with gemcitabine (1,500 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15), docetaxel (50 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15) and capecitabine (2,250 mg/m(2), orally in two daily divided doses, on days 1-7 and 15-21). All three drugs were administered in 4-week cycles, in an initial prospective plan of six cycles. The primary end-point was response rate.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled in the study. At the time of enrollment, 40% of patients had locally advanced and 60% metastatic disease. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. On an intent-to-treat analysis, the overall response and disease control rates were 40 and 80%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 6.0 months, and the median overall survival was 9.0 months. Major grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (17.5%), diarrhea (10%) and hand-foot syndrome (7.5%). There was no treatment-related death.

CONCLUSION

The combination of gemcitabine with docetaxel and capecitabine is feasible and exhibits satisfactory degree of activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, deserving further exploration.

Distinct distribution of corticotropin releasing factor receptors in human breast cancer

The hypothalamic neuropeptide corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) has been found in several types of human cancer, where its biological role is not clarified. In experimental models of breast cancer CRF has been shown to exert anti-proliferative and other actions. Aim of the present study was to describe the expression of the two types of CRF receptors CRF(1) and CRF(2) in human breast tumors. Receptor expression was studied in breast biopsies from patients diagnosed for primary breast adenocarcinoma, obtained from the tumor and the adjacent benign tissue. Gene expression levels were evaluated by real-time PCR following reverse transcription of total RNA extracts. CRF(1) transcripts were found in 23.1% of benign and in 23.1% of malignant biopsies. CRF(2(a)) was found in 22.2% of benign and 36.0% of malignant biopsies. Transcript levels of both receptors did not differ significantly between cancer and benign biopsies from the same tumor. No correlation was found between CRF receptor expression and patient histo/clinicopathological characteristics. Histological mapping using immunohistochemistry revealed positive CRF(1) immunostaining in the cancerous implants and breast ducts, whereas CRF(2) immunoreactivity was localized mainly in the perineural invasions. In conclusion, both CRF receptors were found in breast cancer and the respective benign adjacent tissue. The two CRF receptor proteins presented distinct distribution and subcellular localization, pointing into differing biological roles. CRF receptors could serve as targets of endogenous ligands expressed in the tumor microenvironment, regulating cancer growth.

Differences between right- and left-sided colon carcinomas

PURPOSE

Clinical, histopathological, and biological differences between right and left colon carcinomas have been questioned in the literature. The purpose of this retrospective study was to identify possible clinical and histopathological differences between the right and left colon carcinomas.

METHODS

From 1987-2007, 109 patients with right colon carcinomas (RC group), and 186 patients with left colon carcinomas (LC group) were treated at a single institution. Clinical, histopathological, and biological variables were correlated to tumor location. The endpoint of the study was to see for any relationship between overall survival, recurrences, and their pattern in regard to tumor location.

RESULTS

The incidence of distant metastases at initial diagnosis (p=0.049), and poorly differentiated tumors (p=0.001) was higher in right colon carcinomas. The 10-year survival rate in the RC group was 63% and in the LC group 66% (p >0.05). Recurrences, sites of recurrence, the in-hospital mortality and morbidity were similar in both groups (p >0.05).

CONCLUSION

The biological behavior of right and left colon carcinomas is similar despite minor histopathological differences that do not influence survival and development of recurrences.

Randomized phase III trial comparing docetaxel plus epirubicin versus docetaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment in women with advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare docetaxel plus epirubicin versus docetaxel plus capecitabine combinations as front-line treatment in women with advanced breast cancer (ABC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Previously untreated patients with ABC were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) plus epirubicin 75 mg/m(2) (DE) on day 1 or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus capecitabine 950 mg/m(2) orally twice daily on days 1-14 (DC) in 21-day cycles. Previous anthracycline-based (neo)-adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed if completed >1 year before enrollment. The primary objective of the study was to compare time to disease progression (TTP).

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-six women were treated on each arm and median TTP was 10.6 versus 11.0 months (P = 0.7), for DE and DC, respectively. According to RECIST criteria we observed 15 (11%) versus 11 (8%) complete responses and 55 (40%) versus 61 (45%) partial responses (P = 0.8), with DE and DC, respectively. Severe toxicity included grade 3-4 neutropenia (57% versus 46%; P = 0.07), febrile neutropenia (11% versus 8%; P = 0.4), hand-foot syndrome (0% versus 4%; P = 0.02), grade 2-3 anemia (20% versus 7%; P = 0.001) and asthenia (12% versus 6%; P = 0.09) with DE and DC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The DE and DC regimens have similar efficacy but different toxicity. Either regimen can be used as front-line treatment of ABC.

Modified CAPOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) regimen every two weeks as second-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer previously treated with irinotecan-based frontline therapy: a multicenter phase II study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of capecitabine (CAP) given every other week and biweekly oxaliplatin (OX; modified CAPOX regimen) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer previously treated with irinote- can-based frontline chemotherapy.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients were enrolled; the median age was 62 years and 62 (92.5%) had a performance status (ECOG) of 0-1. OX and CAP were administered at the dose of 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 2,000 mg/m(2) on days 1-7, respectively, every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 429 treatment cycles were administered. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 4 (6%) and 2 (3%) patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia complicated 1 treatment cycle. The main nonhematologic toxicities were grade 2/3 peripheral sensory neurotoxicity (10% of patients) and grade 3/4 diarrhea (7%). In an intention-to-treat analysis, 3 (4.5%) complete and 13 (19.4%) partial responses (overall response rate 24%) were observed. Seventeen (24.5%) patients had stable and 27 (40.3%) progressive disease. The median time to tumor progression and overall survival were 5 months and 11.3 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that the modified CAPOX regimen is safe and effective as salvage treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who were previously treated with irinotecan-based frontline therapy.

Docetaxel plus gemcitabine as front-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with lung adenocarcinomas: a multicenter phase II study

BACKGROUND

The docetaxel/gemcitabine (DG) combination is an active and well-tolerated regimen against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A phase II study was conducted in order to evaluate its efficacy in elderly patients with lung adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients, aged > or =70 years, with locally advanced or metastatic lung adenocarcinomas and performance status (PS) < or =2 (ECOG) received gemcitabine 1100 mg/m(2) (days 1+8) and docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) (day 8) with rhG-CSF support.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were enrolled. One (1.3%) complete and 23 (29.9%) partial responses were achieved (intention to treat analysis: ORR 31.2%; 95% CI 20.82-41.51%) whereas tumor growth control was achieved in 53.3% of patients. The median TTP was 4.1 months, the median overall survival 9.4 months and the 1- and 2-year survival rate 37.9% and 10.7%, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 18.2% and febrile neutropenia in 3 (3.9%) patients. Non-haematological toxicity was mild with grade 2-3 asthenia occurring in 22.1% patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The DG regimen is an active and well-tolerated front-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with lung adenocarcinomas and merits further evaluation in prospective randomized trials.

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with front-line docetaxel-gemcitabine chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Front-line docetaxel-gemcitabine (DG) combination represents an alternative to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. One of its more common side effects is neutropenia. The association between the grade of DG-induced neutropenia and the clinical outcome was analyzed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight hundred fifty-eight patients with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC, treated with front-line DG were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into three groups according to the presented worst neutropenia grade: absent (grade 0), mild (grades I/II) and severe (grades III/IV).

RESULTS

Response rate, median time to tumor progression (TTP) and median overall survival (OS) were significantly better in patients developing any grade of neutropenia compared with those without neutropenia. The median TTPs were 3.0, 5.4 and 5.6 months for the groups with absent, mild and severe neutropenia, respectively; the median OSs were 7.9, 12.5 and 11.2 months for the same groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that both mild and severe chemotherapy-induced neutropenia were independent factors associated with a better TTP and OS survival.

CONCLUSION

Although DG-induced neutropenia was emerged as an independent prognostic factor, it remains to be demonstrated in prospective studies that dose escalation of chemotherapy drugs in patients who do not develop neutropenia may improve the clinical efficacy.

The influence of serum HER-2 levels and HER-2 codon 655 polymorphism on breast cancer outcome

HER-2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor-2) proto-oncogene is a member of the EGFR family and plays an important role in the regulation of cell growth, differentiation and survival and is involved in the regulation of normal breast growth and development. Alterations of HER-2 have been associated with carcinogenesis and poor prognosis of breast cancer. The present case-control study was conducted to clarify the predictive and prognostic significance of serum HER-2 protein in breast cancer patients in relation to Ile655Val single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of this gene. Fifty-six consecutive patients with primary breast cancer and 45 healthy women were prospectively included and evaluated. Serum levels of HER-2 were significantly increased in breast cancer patients compared to healthy controls (p=0.035). The optimal cut-off point of 1.98 ng/ml, which was determined to classify breast cancer patients, yielded sensitivity of 54%, specificity of 73% and accuracy of 62%. Significantly elevated serum HER-2 levels were associated with lymphovascular invasion (p=0.022), poor differentiation (p=0.011), advanced clinical stages (p=0.001), lymph node metastasis (p=0.011), higher number of positive lymph nodes (p=0.007) and the immunohistochemical overexpression of HER-2 protein (p=0.016). Regarding to HER-2 Ile655Val SNP, Ile-Val and Val-Val genotypes exhibited highly significant serum HER-2 elevation compared to homozygous Ile-Ile (both p<0.001). In multivariate analysis advanced stages (p=0.003) and Val-containing genotypes (p=0.009) remained the two significant independent determinants of high HER-2 levels. Survival analysis demonstrated an independent prognostic significance of homozygous Val-Val genotype for reduced survival (p=0.045), but not of serum HER-2 (p=0.181). Our findings confirm that serum HER-2 could be used clinically as a useful tumor marker for the diagnosis and the progression of breast cancer. Furthermore, they provide clinical evidence that HER-2 Ile655Val SNP does affect serum HER-2 levels and it can be regarded as a predictive biomarker for breast cancer patients with poor prognosis.

Evaluation of predictive and prognostic significance of serum TGF-beta1 levels in breast cancer according to HER-2 codon 655 polymorphism

The present study was conducted to clarify the predictive and prognostic significance of serum TGF-I(2)1 in breast cancer in relation to Ile655Val single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2). In a case-control study, 56 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer were prospectively included and evaluated. The control group consisted of 45 healthy women. Serum concentrations of TGF-I(2)1 were measured by quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay (ELISA). HER-2 SNP was genotyped using PCR-RFLP method. Serum levels of TGF-I(2)1 were significantly increased in breast cancer patients compared to healthy controls (p<0.001). For the evaluation of the diagnostic significance of serum TGF-I(2)1 the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was 0.804, while the optimal cut-off point of 30.86 ng/ml was determined to classify breast cancer patients, which yielded sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 78% and accuracy of 77%. Significantly elevated serum TGF-I(2)1 levels were associated with advanced stages (p=0.023), positive lymph nodes (p=0.019) and postmenopausal status (p=0.031). A marginal trend towards higher TGF-I(2)1 levels was found among patients with Val-containing genotypes compared to homozygous Ile-Ile (p=0.094). In multivariate analysis lymph node metastases (p=0.009) remained the only significant independent determinant of high TGF-I(2)1 levels. With regard to prognostic significance for advanced stages (AUC, 0.704) and lymph node metastasis (AUC, 0.683), when the optimal cut-off value was set at 65.15 pg/ml, the sensitivity was 86% and 67%, the specificity was 60% and 62% and accuracy was 66% and 64%, respectively. Survival was shorter in patients with increased serum TGF-I(2)1 (36 months vs 46 months, p=0.022). Multivariate analysis demonstrated a marginal prognostic significance of serum TGF-I(2)1 for survival (p=0.072). The combination of high TGF-I(2)1 and Val-Val genotype predicts a worse prognosis than high serum TGF-I(2)1 alone. Our findings suggest that serum TGF-I(2)1 is involved in tumor malignancy and lymph node metastasis and could be used clinically as a useful tumor marker for evaluation, the extension and the outcome of the disease. They also provide clinical evidence for a significant association between HER-2 Ile655Val SNP and serum TGF-I(2)1, resulting to more aggressive phenotype of the tumor and poor prognosis.

Docetaxel compared with vinorelbine in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A randomized phase II Hellenic Oncology Research Group trial

7615

Background: To compare docetaxel versus vinorelbine as front-line treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients >65 years, with stage histologically or cytologically documented IIIB/IV NSCLC and performance status (PS) 0–3 were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 38 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) or vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) every 21 days. Treatment was continued for a maximum of six cycles and was interrupted in case of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: A total of 112 patients with median age of 76 years (range, 66–87) were enrolled onto the study. PS 2–3 had 39 (35%) patients. The two treatment groups were well balanced. There was no statistical difference between the 2 arms in median overall survival (6.27 months vs 3.97 months; p=0.129), in median time to progression (2.2 months vs 2 months; p=0.863.) and in overall response rate (5.3% vs 11.3%; p=0.247). Docetaxel conferred a statistically significant survival benefit compared to vinorelbine only in patients with PS 0–1 (11.4 months vs 4.3 months; p=0.009). Among patients treated with docetaxel there was a significant difference in median overall survival for patients with PS 0–1 compared with patients with PS 2–3 (11.4 months vs 2.5 months; p=0.004) while there was no statistical difference in the vinorelbine arm (4.3 months vs 2.8 months; p=0.970).The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicity was neutropenia (3.4% for docetaxel; 27.8% for vinorelbine; p=0.0001). Other toxicities were mild, well tolerated and similar for both groups with the exception of asthenia grade 2 (8.6% for docetaxel; 24.1% for vinorelbine; p=0.026). Conclusions: Docetaxel improves survival compared with vinorelbine in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and good performance status without increasing toxicity.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Clinical relevance of circulating CK-19 mRNA-positive cells detected during the period of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment in patients with early breast cancer

10534

Background: To evaluate the effect of adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen on the CK-19 mRNA+ circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Methods: CTCs were prospectively and longitudinally detected using a specific real-time PCR for CK-19 mRNA in 119 patients with estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive tumors during the period of tamoxifen administration. Results: Twenty-two (18.5%) patients had detectable CK-19 mRNA+ CTCs after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy and in 15 (68.2%) of them adjuvant tamoxifen could not eliminate these cells (persistently positive). In 68 (57.1%) patients no CK-19 mRNA+ CTCs could be detected throughout the follow up period (persistently negative). Seven (46.7%) of the 15 persistently positive and six (8.8%) of the 68 persistently negative patients developed disease recurrence (p=0.00026). Persistence of CK-19 mRNA+ CTCs was associated with a significantly shorter median disease-free interval (p=0.0001) and overall survival (0.0005). Multivariate analysis revealed that the detection of CK-19 mRNA+ CTCs during the administration of tamoxifen was associated with an increased risk of relapse (HR=22.318, p=0.00006) and death (HR=13.954, p< 0.00001). Conclusions: The detection of CK-19 mRNA+ CTCs throughout the period of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment is an independent poor prognostic factor in patients with early breast cancer.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase III randomized study of oral vinorelbine (oV) and gemcitabine (G) (oVG) versus docetaxel (D) and gemcitabine (DG) as first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A preliminary report

7538

Background: Non-platinum based doublets are effective treatments for advanced NSCLC. We performed a multicenter phase III trial to compare the efficacy and tolerance of oVG and DG in NSCLC patients (pts). Methods: Chemotherapy-naive pts with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and PS (WHO) 0–2 and adequate organ function were eligible. Pts received oV 70 mg/m2 combined with G 900 mg/m2 on days 1, 15 of a 4-week cycle or D 75 mg/m2 on day 1 combined with G 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 of a 3-week cycle. Primary endpoint was OS and secondary endpoints were response rate (RR), time to progression (TTP) and toxicity. Stratification was done for age, stage and PS. Results: 254 pts received oVG (n=121) or DG (n=133). Median age was 64 and 63 years, and PS was 0–1 in 94.2% and 94%, for oVG and DG, respectively. Most patients had disease stage IV and were =70 years (80.9% vs 74.4% and 74% vs 77%, in oVG and DG, respectively). After a median follow-up time of 6.1 months, median OS was 9.0 vs 10.7 months and 1-yr survival was 38% vs 46% for oVG and DG, respectively (p=0.486). Significantly more responders were observed in the DG arm (11% vs 23%, p=0.018). Median TTP was 3.1 vs 3.9 for oVG and DG, respectively (p=0.335). A similar toxicity profile was observed except for a trend for higher neutropenia grade 3–4 in DG compared to oVG (p= 0.066). There was no difference with respect to neutropenic infections (p= 0.124). An analysis of the influence of age (=70 and = 70) on OS and toxicity revealed that OS was similar for both arms in the two age groups but grade 3–4 neutropenia was lower in the oVG arm for pts =70 years. Conclusions: A higher RR that was not translated to a survival benefit was recorded for the DG arm. Both regimens were well tolerated without significant differences in toxicity.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Clinical relevance of circulating CK-19 mRNA-positive cells detected during the adjuvant tamoxifen treatment in patients with early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen on the CK-19 mRNA+ cells in patients with early-stage breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CK-19 mRNA+ cells were prospectively and longitudinally detected using a specific real-time PCR assay for CK-19 mRNA in 119 patients with estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive tumors during the period of tamoxifen administration.

RESULTS

Twenty-two (18.5%) patients had detectable CK-19 mRNA+ cells after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy and in 15 (68.2%) of them adjuvant tamoxifen could not eliminate these cells (persistently positive). In 68 (57.1%) patients, no CK-19 mRNA+ cells could be detected throughout the follow-up period (persistently negative). Seven (46.7%) of the 15 persistently positive and six (8.8%) of the 68 persistently negative patients developed disease recurrence (P = 0.00026). Persistency of CK-19 mRNA+ cells was associated with a significantly lower median disease-free interval (P = 0.0001) and overall survival (P = 0.0005). Multivariate analysis revealed that the detection of CK-19 mRNA+ cells during the administration of tamoxifen was associated with an increased risk of relapse [hazard ratio (HR) = 22.318, P = 0.00006] and death (HR = 13.954, P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of CK-19 mRNA+ cells throughout the period of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment is an independent poor prognostic factor in patients with early breast cancer.

Irinotecan plus weekly 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as salvage treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II trial

BACKGROUND

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (CPT-11/5-FU/LV (AIO schedule)) as salvage treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

33 patients relapsing after oxaliplatin (L-OHP)-based first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. Their median age was 69 years, 20 (61%) patients were male, and performance status (WHO) was 0, 1, and 2 in 15, 16 and 2 patients respectively; prior surgery 20 (61%) patients; adjuvant chemotherapy 11 (33%) patients, and adjuvant radiotherapy 6 (18%) patients. The number of metastatic sites was 1, 2, and > or =3 in 11, 11, and 11 patients, respectively. CPT-11 was administered on day 1 at the dose of 80 mg/m(2) in 30-90 min infusion and LV (500 mg/m(2)) on the same day as a 2-hour infusion followed by 5-FU (2,600 mg/m(2)/day) as a 22-hour infusion on day 1 for 6 subsequent weeks. The regimen was repeated every 7 weeks.

RESULTS

All patients were evaluable for toxicity and for response. Complete response was achieved in 2 patients (6%) and partial response in 4 patients (12%) (RR 18%, CI 5.95-35.43%); 13 patients (40%) had stable disease, and 14 (42%) progressive disease. After a median follow-up period of 9 months, the median duration of response was 5 months, the median time to progression 7.5 months, and OS 14 months. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 13 patients (39%), febrile neutropenia in 3 (9%), grade 2 anemia in 11 (33%), grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 1 (3%). Grade 3-4 diarrhea occurred in 12 patients (36%), grade 3-4 neurotoxicity in 3 (9%), and grade 3 asthenia in 4 (12%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. The median dose intensity was 85% for CPT-11, and 88% for 5-FU and LV.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of weekly CPT-11 and infusional 5-FU/LV is an active and relatively well-tolerated regimen as salvage treatment in MCC.

Salvage chemotherapy with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter phase II study

PURPOSE

It was the aim of this study to evaluate the activity and tolerance of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients who had disease relapse or progression after completion of an anthracycline- and/or taxane-based front-line regimen were treated with gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 as a 30-min intravenous infusion and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 8 as a 4-hour intravenous infusion, in cycles of 21 days.

RESULTS

Complete response occurred in 1 patient (3%) and partial response in 4 patients (13%) (overall response rate 16%; 95% confidence interval 3.2-29.1). Nine patients (29%) had stable disease and 17 (55%) progressive disease. Three partial responses (13%) were achieved among 23 patients receiving the regimen as third-line treatment. The median duration of response was 6 months (range 3-44.8), the median time to tumor progression 4.6 months (range 0.8-43.8), and the median survival 14.4 months (range 2.1-44.8). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 14 patients (45%), grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in 6 patients (20%), and grade 2 and 3 asthenia in 4 patients (13%). There was no episode of febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

The gemcitabine-oxaliplatin combination is a relatively active and well-tolerated salvage regimen in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

A Dose Escalation Study of Docetaxel Plus Capecitabine in Combination With Gemcitabine in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

Capecitabine (CAP), gemcitabine (GEM), and docetaxel (DOC) have shown interesting activity in a wide range of solid tumors. A phase I study was conducted in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of their combination in patients with refractory solid tumors. Eighteen patients were enrolled. The patients' median age was 60 years, 15 were male, and 11 were chemo-naive. DOC was administered on day 1 as an 1-h (IV) infusion at escalating doses ranging from 40 to 50 mg/m2. GEM was administered on day 1 as a 30-min (IV) infusion at a standard dose of 1500 mg/m2. CAP was administered orally on days 1 to 7 at escalating doses ranging from 1750 to 2500 mg/m2 given as two daily divided doses. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks. Five different dose levels were examined. At dose level V two out of three enrolled patients presented DLTs (one patient grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 stomatitis and another grade 3 diarrhea), and thus the recommended MTD for future phase II studies are CAP 2250 mg/m2, DOC 50 mg/m2, and GEM 1500 mg/m2. A total of 124 treatment cycles were administered. Toxicity was generally mild. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in eight (7%) treatment cycles and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in one (1%). There was no febrile episode. Grade 2/3 asthenia was observed in six (33%) patients, grade 2/3 diarrhea in four (22%), and grade 2/3 hand-foot syndrome in three (17%). Other toxicities were uncommon. There was no treatment-related death. One (6%) CR, four (25%) PRs, and six (38%) SD were observed among 16 evaluable patients. Responses were seen in patients with breast (one CR), gastric (three PRs), and pancreatic (one PR) cancer. These results demonstrate that CAP, DOC, and GEM can be safely combined at clinically relevant doses and this regimen merits further evaluation.

Cisplatin plus etoposide chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation and paclitaxel plus cisplatin consolidation therapy for patients with limited stage small cell lung carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of a cisplatin plus etoposide regimen followed by thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and paclitaxel plus cisplatin consolidation chemotherapy in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with limited SCLC were enrolled onto this study. Patients received three courses of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v., day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 i.v., days 1-3 (EP regimen), followed by TRT (45-56 Gy administered in 15 fractions), and three courses of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 i.v., day 1 and cisplatin, as previously, on day 2 (PP regimen); cycles were repeated every 21 days.

RESULTS

All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 34 for response. The overall response rate was 67% (CR: 26%; PR: 41%; intention-to-treat analysis) (95% CI: 53.0-84.2%). After a median follow-up period of 15 months, the median survival time was 15 months, the median time to tumor progression 8.3 months and the 1-year survival rate 53.8%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 39% and 36% of patients receiving EP and PP regimens, respectively. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 5% and 3% for EP and PP regimens, respectively. Other hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were mild, with the exception of esophagitis occurring in 36% of patients during and/or immediately after radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Consolidation therapy with PP after sequential EP and thoracic radiotherapy is feasible and well-tolerated; however, the efficacy results are comparable with those previously obtained in the same patients' population using a combination of EP and TRT.

FOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) vs FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan) as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC): a multicentre randomised phase III trial from the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG)

To compare the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) (FOLFOXIRI) vs irinotecan and 5-FU/LV (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). A total of 283 chemotherapy-naïve patients with MCC were enrolled (FOLFIRI arm: n=146; FOLFOXIRI arm: n=137). In the FOLFOXIRI arm, CPT-11 (150 mg m(-2)) was given on d1, L-OHP (65 mg m(-2)) on d2, LV (200 mg m(-2)) on days 2 and 3 and 5-FU (400 mg m(-2) as i.v. bolus and 600 mg m(-2) as 22 h i.v. continuous infusion) on days 2 and 3. In the FOLFIRI arm, CPT-11 (180 mg m(-2)) was given on d1 whereas LV and 5-FU were administered in the same way as in the FOLFOXIRI regimen. Both regimens were administered every 2 weeks. There was no difference in terms of overall survival (median OS: 19.5 and 21.5 months, for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively; P=0.337), median time to disease progression (FOLFIRI: 6.9 and FOLFOXIRI: 8.4 months; P=0.17), response rates (33.6 and 43% for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively; P=0.168). Patients treated with FOLFOXIRI had a significantly higher incidence of alopecia (P=0.0001), diarrhoea (P=0.0001) and neurosensory toxicity (P=0.001) compared with patients treated with FOLFIRI. The present study failed to demonstrate any superiority of the FOLFOXIRI combination compared with the FOLFIRI regimen, although the observed median OS is one of the best ever reported in the literature.

A Dose Escalation Study of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (Caelyx) in Combination with Capecitabine (Xeloda) in Patients with Refractory Solid Tumors

OBJECTIVE

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and capecitabine (CAP) have separately shown significant antitumor activity in a wide range of solid tumors. A phase I study was conducted in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of their combination in patients with refractory solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients with histologically confirmed inoperable solid neoplasms were enrolled. The patients' median age was 65 years, 10 were male, and 12 had a performance status score (WHO) of 0-1. PLD was administered on day 1 as a 1-hour intravenous infusion at escalated doses ranging from 35 to 40 mg/m(2). CAP was administered on days 1-14 per os, at escalated doses ranging from 1,600 to 1,800 mg/m(2), given as two daily divided doses. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

At the dose of PLD 40 mg/m(2) and CAP 1,800 mg/m(2), all 3 enrolled patients presented DLTs [2 patients grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) and 1 patient grade 3 asthenia] and thus, the recommended MTD for future phase II studies is PLD 40 mg/m(2) and CAP 1,700 mg/m(2). A total of 57 treatment cycles were administered. Grade 2/3 neutropenia complicated 9 (17%) cycles and 1 patient was hospitalized for febrile neutropenia. There was no septic death. The main nonhematologic toxicity was PPE grade 2 in 3 (19%) patients and grade 3 in 4 (27%). PPE was the reason of treatment interruption for 3 patients. Other toxicities were mild and easily manageable. Two patients (16%) with partial response suffering from gastric cancer and 5 patients with (42%) stable disease were observed among 12 evaluable patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this phase I study demonstrate that PLD and CAP can be combined at clinically effective and relevant doses. However, PPE is a common side effect and further investigation is warranted to define its precise role in the treatment of solid malignancies.

Combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI regimen) as first line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with bolus and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) (FOLFIRI regimen) as first-line treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC).

METHODS

Thirty consecutive, previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, aged (median 76 years; range 70-84) were enrolled. The performance status (WHO) was 0 in 8, 1 in 16 and 2 in 6 patients; 19 (63%) patients had prior surgery and 8 (27%) adjuvant chemotherapy. CPT-11 (180 mg/m(2) as a 90 min i.v. infusion) was administered on day 1, LV (200 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour i.v. infusion), 5-FU (400 mg/m(2)/d i.v. bolus followed by 600 mg/m(2)/d as a 22-hour i.v. continuous infusion) were given on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Complete response was achieved in one (3.3%) patient and partial response in 10 (33.3%) (overall response rate: 36.6%; 95% C.I.: 26.6-48.4%); 11 (36.6%) patients had stable disease and, 8 (26.6%) disease progression. The median duration of response was 7.5 months and the median time to disease progression 7.0 months. After a median follow-up period of 17 months, the median overall survival was 14.5 months. Main toxicities were: grade 3-4 neutropenia (n = 6; 20%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 1; 3.3%), grade 2 anemia (n = 9; 30%), grade 3-4 diarrhea (n = 5; 17%) and grade 3 asthenia (n = 3; 10%). There was one treatment-related death due to neutropenic sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

The FOLFIRI combination is an active regimen with manageable toxicity as front-line treatment in patients above 70 years of age.

Irinotecan plus weekly 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as salvage treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A phase II trial

PURPOSE

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11), 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) (AIO regimen) as salvage treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients relapsing after oxaliplatin-based first line chemotherapy were enrolled. There were 20 males and 13 females with median age of 69 years and WHO performance status (PS) of 0, 1, and 2 in 15, 16 and 2 patients, respectively. CPT-11 was administered on day 1 at 80 mg/m(2) in 60 min i.v. infusion, then LV (500 mg/m(2)) on day 1 as a 2h i.v. infusion, followed by 5-FU (2.600 mg/m(2)) as a 22h i.v. infusion. Treatment was repeated weekly for 6 consecutive weeks, in cycles of 7 weeks (one week rest).

RESULTS

All patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 2 (6%) patients and partial response (PR) in 4 (12%) (over-all response rate - ORR: 18%, 95% C.I.: 5.95-35.43); 13 patients (40%) had stable disease (SD) and 14 (42%) progressive disease (PD). After a median follow up period of 9 months the median duration of response was 5 months, the median time to tumor progression (TTP) 7.5 months and the median overall survival (OS) 14 months. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occured in 13 (39%) patients, febrile neutropeina in 3 (9%), and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in one (3%). Grade 3/4 diarrhea occured in 12 (36%) patients, grade 3/4 neurotoxicity in 3 (9%), and grade 3 asthenia in 4 (12%). There was no treatment-related death.

CONCLUSION

The combination of weekly CPT-11 and infusional 5-FU/LV is an active and relatively well-tolerated regimen as salvage treatment in MCC.

Dose escalation study on oxaliplatin and capecitabine (Xeloda) in patients with advanced solid tumors

OBJECTIVES

Capecitabine (CAP) and oxaliplatin (OX) have shown interesting activity in a wide range of solid tumors. A phase I study was conducted in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of their combination in patients with refractory solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three pretreated patients with histologically confirmed inoperable neoplasms were enrolled. The patients' median age was 64 years, 21 were males, and 27 had a WHO performance status of 0-1. OX was administered on days 1 and 8, as a 3-hour intravenous infusion, at escalated doses ranging from 50 to 70 mg/m(2). CAP was administered orally for 14 consecutive days, at escalated doses ranging from 1,200 to 2,100 mg/m(2)/day. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

At the dose of 2,100 mg/m(2) (Xeloda) and 70 mg/m(2) (OX), all 3 enrolled patients presented DLT (grade 3 diarrhea, grade 3 asthenia and grade 3 neurotoxicity, respectively), and, thus, the recommended MTD for future phase II studies are 2,000 mg/m(2) for CAP and 70 mg/m(2 )for OX. A total of 145 treatment cycles were administered. Toxicity was very mild. Grade 2/3 neutropenia was observed in 4 (3%) treatment cycles. The main nonhematologic toxicities were grade 2/3 nausea/vomiting (7 cycles; 5%), grade 2/3 neurotoxicity (10 cycles; 7%), grade 2/3 asthenia (8 cycles; 5.5%) and grade 2/3 diarrhea (6 cycles; 4%). There was no treatment-related death. One (4%) complete remission, 2 (8%) partial remissions, and 9 (36%) cases of stable disease were observed among 25 evaluable patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate that CAP and OX can be safely combined at clinically relevant doses and that this regimen merits further evaluation.