2
|
Adams RA, James MD, Smith CG, Wilson RH, Fisher D, Kenny SL, Kaplan RS, Stoerkel S, Maughan TS, Jasani B. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a predictive and prognostic marker in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC): The MRC COIN trial experience. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.4_suppl.359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
359 Background: KRAS mutation has been shown to be a more effective (though negative) biomarker for selection of patients for EGFR targeted therapy in aCRC. However, positive EGFR immunohistochemistry (IHC) remains a license requirement and was an inclusion criterion in most trials to date. The MRC COIN trial recruited 2445 pts into 3 arms of oxaliplatin + fluoropyrimidine +/- cetuximab without prior EGFR assessment. This trial provides a unique opportunity to definitively examine the role of EGFR IHC as prognostic and predictive marker and potentially the evidence required to remove this assessment from the license for this drug. Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue was stained retrospectively for EGFR using Dako kit in a national reference lab. Results were assessed by 3 reviewers (BJ, SS, RA) using digital imaging software in a blinded fashion, then by BJ/SS providing consensus for discrepancies. EGFR scoring was assessed as a prognostic variable in association with selected patient, tumor and biochemical data. Cut off points examined for +ve vs -ve tumours, in terms of total tumour cells demonstrating membrane staining, were: 0% vs >0%; <10% vs ≥10%; <20% vs ≥20%. Results: EGFR IHC was adequately assessed for 1621 pts (66% of randomised), 22% were negative (0%) and 78% positive (>0%), balanced across arms. EGFR was not prognostic for PFS within KRAS wt pts at the standardized cut off point 0% vs >0% HR=1.11 95% CI 0.91-1.36 p=0.31 but was at <10% vs ≥10% (HR=1.27 95% CI 1.07-1.52 p=0.008) this was robust to other prognostic variables. No effect was seen for overall response or survival. There was no prognostic effect for the KRAS mutant group. In the 1065 assessable pts randomised to +/- cetuximab, no evidence of EGFR IHC as a predictive marker for response or survival outcomes was observed for the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy (OS HR=1.11 95% CI 0.70-1.75 p=0.66; PFS HR=0.95 95% CI 0.64-1.43 p=0.82). Conclusions: Extensive assessment of samples from this trial suggest a role for EGFR IHC as a prognostic marker in KRAS wt aCRC but refute the predictive value embedded within the licence for cetuximab used in combination with chemo in first-line therapy. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. A. Adams
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom; Clinical Trials Unit, Medical Research Council, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Pathology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - M. D. James
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom; Clinical Trials Unit, Medical Research Council, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Pathology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - C. G. Smith
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom; Clinical Trials Unit, Medical Research Council, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Pathology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - R. H. Wilson
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom; Clinical Trials Unit, Medical Research Council, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Pathology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - D. Fisher
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom; Clinical Trials Unit, Medical Research Council, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Pathology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - S. L. Kenny
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom; Clinical Trials Unit, Medical Research Council, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Pathology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - R. S. Kaplan
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom; Clinical Trials Unit, Medical Research Council, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Pathology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - S. Stoerkel
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom; Clinical Trials Unit, Medical Research Council, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Pathology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - T. S. Maughan
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom; Clinical Trials Unit, Medical Research Council, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Pathology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - B. Jasani
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom; Clinical Trials Unit, Medical Research Council, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Pathology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Licitra L, Rolland F, Bokemeyer C, Remenar E, Kienzer H, Stoerkel S, Scheid S, Stroh C, Mesia R. Biomarker potential of EGFR gene copy number by FISH in the phase III EXTREME study: Platinum-based CT plus cetuximab in first-line R/M SCCHN. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.6005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
6005 Background: Platinum-based CT + cetuximab is the first systemic therapy in ∼30 years to show a survival benefit vs platinum-based CT in first-line R/M SCCHN (Vermorken JB, et al. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1116–1127). A retrospective analysis has evaluated the influence of EGFR gene copy number, determined by FISH, on clinical outcome in the EXTREME study. Methods: Pts were randomized to 3-weekly cycles of platinum-based CT (cisplatin 100 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5, day 1; 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2/day continuous infusion, days 1–4) with or without cetuximab (initial dose 400 mg/m2, then 250 mg/m2 weekly). The proportion of FISH+ cells per pt (FISH score) was determined using 5 different enrichment models. Tumors were also classified as FISH+ or FISH- using the Colorado scoring system. Results: In the overall population (n=442), addition of cetuximab significantly improved median OS (10.1 vs 7.4 months; p=0.04). No association between FISH score and OS, PFS, or best overall response was determined for any enrichment model. Pts with Colorado FISH+ tumors were evenly distributed between the CT + cetuximab (50/158) and CT-alone (51/154) arms of the FISH- evaluable population (71% of ITT population). Colorado FISH status had no influence on OS in either treatment arm, on PFS in the CT-alone arm, or on RR in the CT + cetuximab arm (see table ). In the CT + cetuximab arm, pts with FISH+ tumors had a lower risk of progression than pts with FISH- tumors. Higher RRs among pts with FISH- tumors in the CT-alone arm may have been due to twice as many nonevaluable response observations in the FISH+ vs the FISH- population (percentage of pts with SD or PD was comparable). Conclusions: EGFR gene copy number, as determined by FISH, is not a predictive biomarker for cetuximab efficacy in R/M SCCHN. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Licitra
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy; Centre René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France; University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; LBI-ACR & ACR-ITR Vienna KFJ Spital, Vienna, Austria; HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, University Witten/Herde, Wuppertal, Germany; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; Institut Catala d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F. Rolland
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy; Centre René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France; University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; LBI-ACR & ACR-ITR Vienna KFJ Spital, Vienna, Austria; HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, University Witten/Herde, Wuppertal, Germany; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; Institut Catala d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C. Bokemeyer
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy; Centre René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France; University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; LBI-ACR & ACR-ITR Vienna KFJ Spital, Vienna, Austria; HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, University Witten/Herde, Wuppertal, Germany; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; Institut Catala d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E. Remenar
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy; Centre René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France; University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; LBI-ACR & ACR-ITR Vienna KFJ Spital, Vienna, Austria; HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, University Witten/Herde, Wuppertal, Germany; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; Institut Catala d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - H. Kienzer
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy; Centre René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France; University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; LBI-ACR & ACR-ITR Vienna KFJ Spital, Vienna, Austria; HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, University Witten/Herde, Wuppertal, Germany; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; Institut Catala d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S. Stoerkel
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy; Centre René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France; University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; LBI-ACR & ACR-ITR Vienna KFJ Spital, Vienna, Austria; HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, University Witten/Herde, Wuppertal, Germany; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; Institut Catala d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S. Scheid
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy; Centre René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France; University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; LBI-ACR & ACR-ITR Vienna KFJ Spital, Vienna, Austria; HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, University Witten/Herde, Wuppertal, Germany; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; Institut Catala d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C. Stroh
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy; Centre René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France; University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; LBI-ACR & ACR-ITR Vienna KFJ Spital, Vienna, Austria; HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, University Witten/Herde, Wuppertal, Germany; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; Institut Catala d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R. Mesia
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy; Centre René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France; University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; LBI-ACR & ACR-ITR Vienna KFJ Spital, Vienna, Austria; HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, University Witten/Herde, Wuppertal, Germany; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; Institut Catala d'Oncologia, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|