1
|
Gürbüz M, Kiliçkap S, Bilici A, Karadurmuş N, Sezer A, Şendur MAN, Paydaş S, Artaç M, Fulden Yumuk P, Gürsoy P, Uysal M, Şenol Coşkun H, Tatli AM, Selçukbiricik F, Dişel U, Köksoy EB, Güven DC, Uğrakli M, Akkuş E, Yücel Ş, Erol C, Karakaya S, Şakalar T, Khanmammadov N, Paksoy N, Demirkazik A. Crizotinib efficacy and safety in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring MET alterations: A real-life data of Turkish Oncology Group. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e32368. [PMID: 36550824 PMCID: PMC9771320 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000032368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Crizotinib is a multikinase inhibitor, effective in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring mesenchymal-epidermal transition (MET) alterations. Although small prospective studies showed efficacy and safety of crizotinib in NSCLC with MET alterations, there is limited real-life data. Aim of this study is to investigate real-life efficacy and safety of crizotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring MET alterations. This was a retrospective, multicenter (17 centers) study of Turkish Oncology Group. Patients' demographic, histological data, treatment, response rates, survival outcomes, and toxicity data were collected. Outcomes were presented for the study population and compared between MET alteration types. Total of 62 patients were included with a median age of 58.5 (range, 26-78). Major histological type was adenocarcinoma, and 3 patients (4.8%) had sarcomatoid component. The most common MET analyzing method was next generation sequencing (90.3%). MET amplification and mutation frequencies were 53.2% (n = 33) and 46.8% (n = 29), respectively. Overall response rate and disease control rate were 56.5% and 74.2% in whole study population, respectively. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8-10.5), and median overall survival (OS) was 18.7 months (95% CI: 13.7-23.7), regardless of treatment line. Median PFS was 6.1 months (95% CI: 5.6-6.4) for patients with MET amplification, whereas 14.3 months (95% CI: 6.7-21.7) for patients with MET mutation (P = .217). Median PFS was significantly longer in patients who have never smoked (P = .040), have good performance score (P < .001), and responded to the treatment (P < .001). OS was significantly longer in patients with MET mutation (25.6 months, 95% CI: 15.9-35.3) compared to the patients with MET amplification (11.0 months; 95% CI: 5.2-16.8) (P = .049). In never-smokers, median OS was longer than smoker patients (25.6 months [95% CI: 11.8-39.3] vs 16.5 months [95% CI: 9.3-23.6]; P = .049). The most common adverse effects were fatigue (50%), peripheral edema (21%), nausea (29%) and diarrhea (19.4%). Grade 3 or 4 adverse effects were observed in 6.5% of the patients. This real-life data confirms efficacy and safety of crizotinib in the treatment of advanced NSCLC harboring MET alteration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Gürbüz
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
- * Correspondence: Mustafa Gürbüz, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara 06100, Turkey (e-mail: ; )
| | - Saadettin Kiliçkap
- İstinye University Faculty of Medicine, Liv Ankara Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Bilici
- İstanbul Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nuri Karadurmuş
- University of Health Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Sezer
- Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Adana, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Ali Nahit Şendur
- Yildirim Beyazit University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Semra Paydaş
- Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Adana, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Artaç
- Necmettin Erbakan University, Meram Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Konya, Turkey
| | | | - Pinar Gürsoy
- Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Mükremin Uysal
- Medstar Antalya Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Hasan Şenol Coşkun
- Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Ali Murat Tatli
- Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Antalya, Turkey
| | | | - Umut Dişel
- Acibadem Adana Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Adana, Turkey
| | - Elif Berna Köksoy
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Deniz Can Güven
- Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Muzaffer Uğrakli
- Necmettin Erbakan University, Meram Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Konya, Turkey
| | - Erman Akkuş
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Şebnem Yücel
- Yildirim Beyazit University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cihan Erol
- Yildirim Beyazit University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Serdar Karakaya
- Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Teoman Şakalar
- Necip Fazil City Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey
| | - Nijat Khanmammadov
- İstanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nail Paksoy
- Tekirdağ Dr. İsmail Fehmi Cumalioğlu City Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Tekirdağ, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Demirkazik
- Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Akdeniz N, Kaplan MA, İnanç M, Uncu D, Ergün Y, Küçüköner M, Demirci A, Şendur MAN, Beşiroğlu M, Topçu A, Yerlikaya H, Urakçi Z, Kiliçkap S, Işikdoğan A. The Efficacy and Safety of Treatment Regimens Used in the First-Line Setting in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Real-Life Study. Pancreas 2022; 51:1153-1159. [PMID: 37078939 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000002167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of 3 chemotherapy regimens used as first-line treatments in the real-life management of metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS A total of 218 patients were included in this multicenter study. Gemcitabine (Gem, n = 71), gemcitabine-cisplatin (Gem-Cis, n = 91), and FOLFIRINOX (a combination of leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin [FFX], n = 56) treatments were compared. RESULTS Overall response rate was significantly higher in the FFX group (50.0%) than in the Gem (28.2%) and Gem-Cis (27.5%) groups (P = 0.010). Median progression-free survival (8.4 vs 4.6 and 5.5 months, respectively, P < 0.001) and overall survival (16.4 vs 8.1 and 8.7 months, respectively, P = 0.002) were significantly longer in the FFX group than in the Gem and Gem-Cis groups. Toxicity of any grade was noted in 46 (64.8%), 56 (61.5%), and 49 (87.5%) patients in the Gem, Gem-Cis, and FFX groups, respectively (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS In our study, FFX regimen provides a significant advantage over the other treatment regimens in terms of response rates and survival. Treatment toxicity was more frequent but manageable with the FFX regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadiye Akdeniz
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Adiyaman Training and Research Hospital, Adiyaman
| | - Muhammet Ali Kaplan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakir
| | - Mevlüde İnanç
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri
| | - Doğan Uncu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara
| | - Yakup Ergün
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara
| | - Mehmet Küçüköner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakir
| | - Ayşe Demirci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya
| | | | - Mehmet Beşiroğlu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bezmialem Vakif University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul
| | - Atakan Topçu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bezmialem Vakif University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul
| | - Halis Yerlikaya
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir
| | - Zuhat Urakçi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakir
| | - Saadettin Kiliçkap
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istinye University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Esen SA, Ergun Y, Erol C, Arikan R, Er MM, Atci MM, Topçu A, Uçar G, Akagündüz B, Aykan MB, Özen M, Baytemur NK, Özçelik M, Şahin E, Güven D, Menekşe S, Ak N, Teker F, Kut E, Şakalar T, Alan Ö, Kaçan T, Turhal NS, Kiliçkap S, Türker S, Şendur MAN, Köstek O, Karaağaç M, Sakin A, Türk HM, Çağlayan D, Cihan Ş, Açikgöz Y, Uncu D. First-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal carcinoma. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2022; 22:818-825. [PMID: 35460397 PMCID: PMC9519153 DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2021.7069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Fluoropyrimidine+cisplatin/oxaliplatin+trastuzumab therapy is recommended for the first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. However, there is no comprehensive study on which platinum-based treatment should be preferred. This study aimed to compare the treatment response and survival characteristics of patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer who received fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and leucovorin (mFOLFOX)+trastuzumab or cisplatin and fluorouracil (CF)+trastuzumab as first-line therapy. It was a multicenter, retrospective study of the Turkish Oncology Group, which included 243 patients from 21 oncology centers. There were 113 patients in the mFOLFOX+trastuzumab arm and 130 patients in the CF+trastuzumab arm. The median age was 62 years in the mFOLFOX+trastuzumab arm and 61 years in the CF+trastuzumab arm (p = 0.495). About 81.4% of patients in the mFOLFOX+trastuzumab arm and 83.1% in the CF+trastuzumab arm had gastric tumor localization (p = 0.735). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly higher in the mFOLFOX+trastuzumab arm (9.4 months vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.024). The median overall survival (OS) was similar in both groups (18.4 months vs. 15.1 months, p = 0.640). Maintenance trastuzumab was continued after chemotherapy in 101 patients. In this subgroup, the median OS was 23.3 months and the median PFS was 13.3 months. In conclusion, mFOLFOX+trastuzumab is similar to CF+trastuzumab in terms of the median OS, but it is more effective in terms of the median PFS in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic gastric and GEJ cancer. The choice of treatment should be made by considering the prominent toxicity findings of the chemotherapy regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selin Aktürk Esen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
- Corresponding author: Selin Aktürk Esen, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Universities 1604. Street Number: 9, 06800 Çankaya, Ankara, Türkiye. E-mail:
| | - Yakup Ergun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Batman Training and Research Hospital, Batman, Türkiye
| | - Cihan Erol
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Rukiye Arikan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Muhammed Muhiddin Er
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meram Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Türkiye
| | - Muhammed Mustafa Atci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcioğlu City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Atakan Topçu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Gökhan Uçar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Baran Akagündüz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, Türkiye
| | - Musa Bariş Aykan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gulhane Medical Faculty, Health Sciences University, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Miraç Özen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University Sakarya, Türkiye
| | | | - Melike Özçelik
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye
| | - Elif Şahin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Türkiye
| | - Denizcan Güven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Serkan Menekşe
- Department of Medical Oncology, Manisa City Hospital, Manisa, Türkiye
| | - Naziye Ak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yozgat City Hospital, Yozgat, Türkiye
| | - Fatih Teker
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Türkiye
| | - Engin Kut
- Department of Medical Oncology, Manisa City Hospital, Manisa, Türkiye
| | - Teoman Şakalar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kahramanmaraş Necip Fazil City Hospital, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye
| | - Özkan Alan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tekirdağ İsmail Fehmi Cumalioğlu City Hospital, Tekirdağ, Türkiye
| | - Turgut Kaçan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, Health Sciences University Bursa, Bursa, Türkiye
| | | | - Saadettin Kiliçkap
- Department of Medical Oncology, Liv Hospital Ankara, Faculty of Medicine, İstinye University, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Sema Türker
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Bahcesehir University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | | | - Osman Köstek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Mustafa Karaağaç
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meram Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Türkiye
| | - Abdullah Sakin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcioğlu City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Haci Mehmet Türk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Dilek Çağlayan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meram Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Türkiye
| | - Şener Cihan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcioğlu City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Yusuf Açikgöz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Doğan Uncu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bahçeci A, Paydaş S, Ak N, Ferhatoğlu F, Saip PM, Seydaoğlu G, Bilici M, Şimşek M, Tekin SB, Çalikuşu Z, Yavuz S, Şahin AB, Çubukçu E, Evrensel T, Değirmencioğlu S, Demiray AG, Yumuk PF, Alan Ö, Çikman Dİ, Demirelli FH, Köstek O, Gökyer A, Doğan M, Bal Ö, Çakar B, Gökmen E, Yamaç D, Korkmaz T, Aliyev A, Keskin Ö, Urvay S, Büyükşimşek M, Karadeniz C, Yildiz B, Çinkir HY, Demir H, Beypinar İ, Karaçin C, Eser K, Baykara M, Kiliçkap S, Okutur K, Bulut G, Alkan A, Arpaci E, Pilanci KN, Demir A, Işik D, Yildirim N. Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab Emtansine in Her2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Real-World Experience. Cancer Invest 2021; 39:473-481. [PMID: 34014777 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2021.1933011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in cases with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in different lines of treatment. METHOD Retrospective analysis of T-DM1 results of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2) positive 414 cases with mBC from 31 centers in Turkey. FINDINGS Except 2, all of the cases were female with a median age of 47. T-DM1 had been used as second-line therapy in 37.7% of the cases and the median number of T-DM1 cycles was 9. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were different according to the line of treatment. The median OS was found as 43, 41, 46, 23 and 17 months for 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th line, respectively (p = 0.032) while the median PFS was found as 37, 12, 8, 8 and 8 months, respectively (p = 0.0001). Treatment was well tolerated by the patients. The most common grade 3-4 adverse effects were thrombocytopenia (2.7%) and increased serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (2%). DISCUSSION The best of our knowledge this is the largest real-life experience about the safety and efficacy of T-DM1 use in cases with mBC after progression of Her2 targeted treatment. This study suggests and supports that T-DM1 is more effective in earlier lines of treatment and is a reliable option for mBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aykut Bahçeci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Ersin Arslan Education and Research Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Semra Paydaş
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Naziye Ak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Ferhat Ferhatoğlu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Pınar Mualla Saip
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Gülşah Seydaoğlu
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Cukurova, Adana, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Bilici
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Melih Şimşek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Salim Başol Tekin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Züleyha Çalikuşu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem Adana Hospital, Acibadem MAA University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Sinan Yavuz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem Adana Hospital, Acibadem MAA University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Bilgehan Şahin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Erdem Çubukçu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Türkkan Evrensel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Serkan Değirmencioğlu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey
| | - Atike Gökçen Demiray
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey
| | - Perran Fulden Yumuk
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Özkan Alan
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Duygu İlke Çikman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fuat Hulusi Demirelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Osman Köstek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Ali Gökyer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Trakya University, Edirne, Turkey
| | - Mutlu Doğan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Numune Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Öznur Bal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Numune Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Burcu Çakar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Erhan Gökmen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Deniz Yamaç
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Güven Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Taner Korkmaz
- Acıbadem MAA University School of Medicine, Medical Oncology Division, Acibadem Research Institiute of Senology (Maslak Hospital)
| | - Altay Aliyev
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Özge Keskin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Semiha Urvay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Acibadem Kayseri Hospital, Acibadem MAA University, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Mahmut Büyükşimşek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Cemile Karadeniz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hatay Antakya State Hospital, Hatay, Turkey
| | - Birol Yildiz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gulhane Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Hacer Demir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kayseri Education and Research Hospital
| | - İsmail Beypinar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey
| | - Cengiz Karaçin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Diskapi Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Kadir Eser
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey
| | - Meltem Baykara
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - Saadettin Kiliçkap
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Kerem Okutur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Memorial Bahcelievler Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gülcan Bulut
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antakya Defne Hospital, Hatay, Turkey
| | - Ali Alkan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mugla Sıtkı Kocman University, Mugla, Turkey
| | - Erkan Arpaci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kocaeli Gebze Medicalpark Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Kezban Nur Pilanci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul Aydın University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Atakan Demir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Güven Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Deniz Işik
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Ersin Arslan Education and Research Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Nilgün Yildirim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Ersin Arslan Education and Research Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kardaş RC, Bolek EC, Aktaş BY, Kiliçkap S, Karadag O. FRI0207 CANCER INCIDENCE AND FEATURES IN ADULT VASCULITIS PATIENTS. Ann Rheum Dis 2020. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.2575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Background:Vasculitis, like other diseases with chronic inflammation, may be associated with increased cancer risk; possibly due to the inflammation triggering and advancing the neoplastic process. (1-3).Objectives:The primary objective of this study was to determine the incidence of cancer cases among systemic vasculitis cases followed in a university hospital clinic. Secondary objective was to analyze the relationship between the vasculitis and cancer subtypes and their demographical and clinical features.Methods:In this study, adult vasculitis patients followed at Hacettepe University Cancer Research, Diagnosis and Treatment Center (HUVAM) between October 2014 and May 2019 were reviewed for neoplastic development and cancer features. Standardized cancer incidence rate was calculated using the online International Agency for Research on Cancer GLOBOCAN database and the population data for Turkey published by Turkish Statistical Institute.Results:Among 684 patients with a mean age of 46.4±16.9 years and a median follow up duration of 29 months, 38 patients (5.6%) developed cancer. Colon (5 cases, 13%) and lung (4 cases, 11%) were the most commonly seen types of cancer. Among the patients with cancer, giant cell arteritis was the most common type of vasculitis (8 cases, 11%; Table 1). There was no statistically significant association between different cancer and vasculitis subtypes; however, there was increased trend for association between lung cancer and giant cell arteritis (data not shown).Table 1.Distribution of patients and number of cancer in each vasculitis subgroupType of vasculitisTotalWith cancerNN%**Takayasu arteritis12343%Granulomatous polyangiitis10044%Giant cell arteritis71811%Vasculitis limited to skin6246%IgG4-related disease4112%Polyarteritis nodosa3413%Vasculitis secondary to CTD3226%Eosinophilic granulomatous polyangiitis3226%IgA vasculitis3027%Renal limited AAV17424%Buerger disease1716%Isolated aortitis1318%Microscopic polyangiitis10110%Cryoglobulinemic vasculitis8225%Drug-induced Vasculitis11100Compared to the general population in Turkey, cancer incidence was four times higher (SIR: 4.1, 95% CI: 2.9–5.5,P<0.001). Patients whom both the vasculitis and cancer diagnosis was within the same year, had a higher ratio of male patients (87%,P=0.01), had a higher rate of smoking (77%,P<0.001) and had a worse rate of survival (median survival: 54 months, 95% CI: <1 month–125.9 months,P=0.005). There was no association between cyclophosphamide (CYC) use and cancer development, with a low cumulative CYC dose among cancer patients (median: 2 g).Conclusion:The increase in the cancer incidence may indeed be due to chronic inflammation; however, VDI and BVAS scores during the last visit (median: <0.1) indicate that non-inflammatory factor may play a role as the inflammatory damage caused by vasculitis in these patients seem to be low. Similar to other recent cohorts in the literature, there was no association between CYC usage and cancer development.In conclusion, compared to the general population, cancer incidence is significantly higher in patients with vasculitis and the timing of diagnosis between vasculitis and cancer may be associated with different clinical features.References:[1]Trinchieri G. Cancer and Inflammation: An Old Intuition with Rapidly Evolving New Concepts. Annu Rev Immunol. 2012;30(1):677–706.[2]Beyaert R, Beaugerie L, Van Assche G, Brochez L, Renauld J-C, Viguier M, et al. Cancer risk in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID). Mol Cancer. 2013 Aug 29;12(1):98.[3]Turesson C, Matteson EL. Malignancy as a comorbidity in rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology. 2013 Jan 1;52(1):5–14.Disclosure of Interests:None declared
Collapse
|
6
|
Karadag O, Bolek EC, Furuta S, Emmi G, Hocevar A, Hinojosa-Azaola A, Mohammad AJ, Ugurlu S, Alibaz-Oner F, Yazici A, Quartuccio L, Bozzolo E, Dagna L, Ramirez GA, Cantarini L, Gregorini G, Guido J, Monti S, Martin-Nares E, Schiavon F, Padoan R, Kono H, Vaglio A, Kiliçkap S, Ertenli Aİ, Direskeneli H, Özen S, Jayne D. SAT0243 SUBPHENOTYPES IN POLYARTERITIS NODOSA (PAN): TARGET ORGAN ASSOCIATIONS OF A WORLDWIDE COLLABORATION STUDY. Ann Rheum Dis 2020. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.4635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Background:There is a paucity of information on the current phenotypes, ethnic and geographic differences of PAN. A global PAN study group has been working for clinical subphenotype and GWAS studies.Objectives:This study is aimed to look for target organ associations in PAN.Methods:PAN patients fulfilling the EMA vasculitis classification algorithm were recruited. In addition to baseline characteristics, treatment and outcome data, occurrence of any of the clinical manifestations related to PAN during disease course was recorded.Factor analysis was used to analyse target organ associations of 306 patients. Five factors were identified by factor analysis of variables sex, paediatric-onset, HBV, monogenic disease relationship, cutaneous features, musculoskeletal symptoms, constitutional symptoms and involved areas (abdominal, renal, neurologic, ENT, cardiac, pulmonary).Results:PAN cohort from 7 countries were used (Italy: n=59, Japan: n=39, Mexico: n=29, Slovenia: n=14, Sweden:11, TUR: n=106, UK: n=48). 306 (M/F: 171/135 and Caucasian 77.1%, Asian 13.4%, and Hispanic 9.5%) patients were included. 8 were HBV-related, and 22 of TUR patients had a monogenic form of disease (FMF n=15, DADA2 n=7). 21.8% of patients were cutaneous-only PAN patients. 48.4% of patients had radiologic, 64% had biopsy-proven PAN. Median age at disease onset was 40 (IQR 27.0-57.5) years. During a median 57 (16-120) months follow-up, 39 (13%) patients died.Factor analysis revealed 5 factors that explained 54.1% of the original information on the matrix as follows:Factor 1,represented the association between gastrointestinal and renal involvement, male gender and negatively associated with cutaneous features;Factor 2,the association between monogenic relationship with paediatric onset disease;Factor 3,any of musculoskeletal findings with positive constitutional symptoms;Factor 4any neurologic involvement was associated with ENT and pulmonary findings;Factor 5cardiac involvement in non-HBV patients (Table).The eigenvalues of the 5 factors were 2.034, 1.470, 1.427, 1.079 and 1.030, in decreasing order, i.e., the highest contribution to the overall variance in the matrix came from the togetherness of the 4 clinical and demographic characteristics that made up Factor 1.Conclusion:Target organ associations could support distinctive subphenotypes in PAN. Factor 1 seems the most severe form. Patients with FMF or DADA2 have distinct target organ associations. The jury is out to decide whether these patients should be classified as ‘vasculitis associated with probable etiology’ just as HBV-related-PAN. Factor 4 might define a different subphenotype (ANCA- medium vessel vasculitis?).Disclosure of Interests:Omer Karadag: None declared, Ertugrul Cagri Bolek: None declared, Shunsuke Furuta: None declared, Giacomo Emmi: None declared, ALOJZIJA HOCEVAR: None declared, Andrea Hinojosa-Azaola: None declared, Aladdin J Mohammad Speakers bureau: lecture fees from Roche and Elli Lilly Sweden, PI (GiACTA study), Serdal Ugurlu: None declared, Fatma Alibaz-Oner: None declared, Ayten Yazici: None declared, Luca Quartuccio: None declared, Enrica Bozzolo: None declared, Lorenzo Dagna Grant/research support from: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SG, SOBI, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SG, and SOBI, Giuseppe Alvise Ramirez: None declared, Luca Cantarini: None declared, Gina Gregorini: None declared, Jeannin Guido: None declared, Sara Monti: None declared, Eduardo Martin-Nares: None declared, Franco Schiavon: None declared, Roberto Padoan: None declared, Hajime Kono: None declared, Augusto Vaglio: None declared, Saadettin Kiliçkap: None declared, Ali İhsan Ertenli: None declared, Haner Direskeneli: None declared, Seza Özen Consultant of: Novartis, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis, David Jayne Grant/research support from: ChemoCentryx, GSK, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi-Genzyme, Consultant of: Astra-Zeneca, ChemoCentryx, GSK, InflaRx, Takeda, Insmed, Chugai, Boehringer-Ingelheim
Collapse
|
7
|
Eren MF, Ay Eren A, Yücel B, Elagöz S, Özgüven Y, Altun A, Kiliçkap S, Matsuno R, Bese N. Abstract P3-12-20: The impact of everolimus on radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis in wistar albino rats: Results of an experimental study. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p3-12-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives:
This study was performed to evaluate the effects of everolimus on pulmonary fibrosis, given concurrently or sequential with irradiation in rats.
Materials and Methods:
Forty female Wistar albino rats were randomized into five groups. The first group (Group 1: sham) was observed with identical conditions of the animals in other groups. The second group (Group 2) had only everolimus application. The third group (Group 3) had thoracic irradiation first and they had everolimus injection 22 hours after radiotherapy. The fourth group (Group 4) had irradiation to whole thoracic region in 2 hours of following everolimus administration. The last group (Group 5) had irradiation to whole thoracic region. As an end point the percentage of lung with fibrosis for each rat was quantified with image analysis of histological sections of the lung. Groups were compared using the linear regression method, Fisher's exact and chi-square tests were used to assess the association between treatment groups.
Results:
There was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of fibrosis scores among all groups (p=0.0022). Linear regression analyses revealed that all treatment groups showed an increased risk of lung fibrosis compared to control group. Group 2 (p=0.0020), group 3 (p<0.0001), group 4 (p<0.0001), and group 5 (p=0.0002). Chi-square test demonstrated that there was no statistically significant difference between the sequentially and concurrent treatment groups.
Conclusion:
This experimental study showed that of everolimus by itself may lead pulmonary fibrosis and addition to radiotherapy either sequentially or concomitantly increased the severity of the lung damage in rats.
Keywords: Radiotherapy, everolimus, rats, pulmonary fibrosis.
Citation Format: Eren MF, Ay Eren A, Yücel B, Elagöz S, Özgüven Y, Altun A, Kiliçkap S, Matsuno R, Bese N. The impact of everolimus on radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis in wistar albino rats: Results of an experimental study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-20.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MF Eren
- Ministry of Health-Marmara University Pendik Education and Research Hospital Radiation Oncology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey; Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, Sivas, Turkey; Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey; Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; University of California School of Medicine, San Diego, CA; Acibadem Maslak Hospital Breast Health Unit, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - A Ay Eren
- Ministry of Health-Marmara University Pendik Education and Research Hospital Radiation Oncology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey; Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, Sivas, Turkey; Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey; Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; University of California School of Medicine, San Diego, CA; Acibadem Maslak Hospital Breast Health Unit, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - B Yücel
- Ministry of Health-Marmara University Pendik Education and Research Hospital Radiation Oncology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey; Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, Sivas, Turkey; Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey; Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; University of California School of Medicine, San Diego, CA; Acibadem Maslak Hospital Breast Health Unit, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - S Elagöz
- Ministry of Health-Marmara University Pendik Education and Research Hospital Radiation Oncology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey; Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, Sivas, Turkey; Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey; Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; University of California School of Medicine, San Diego, CA; Acibadem Maslak Hospital Breast Health Unit, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Y Özgüven
- Ministry of Health-Marmara University Pendik Education and Research Hospital Radiation Oncology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey; Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, Sivas, Turkey; Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey; Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; University of California School of Medicine, San Diego, CA; Acibadem Maslak Hospital Breast Health Unit, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - A Altun
- Ministry of Health-Marmara University Pendik Education and Research Hospital Radiation Oncology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey; Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, Sivas, Turkey; Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey; Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; University of California School of Medicine, San Diego, CA; Acibadem Maslak Hospital Breast Health Unit, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - S Kiliçkap
- Ministry of Health-Marmara University Pendik Education and Research Hospital Radiation Oncology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey; Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, Sivas, Turkey; Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey; Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; University of California School of Medicine, San Diego, CA; Acibadem Maslak Hospital Breast Health Unit, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - R Matsuno
- Ministry of Health-Marmara University Pendik Education and Research Hospital Radiation Oncology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey; Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, Sivas, Turkey; Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey; Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; University of California School of Medicine, San Diego, CA; Acibadem Maslak Hospital Breast Health Unit, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - N Bese
- Ministry of Health-Marmara University Pendik Education and Research Hospital Radiation Oncology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey; Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, Sivas, Turkey; Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey; Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey; University of California School of Medicine, San Diego, CA; Acibadem Maslak Hospital Breast Health Unit, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Eren M, Eren AA, Yücel B, Ozgüven Y, Matsuno R, Altun A, Kiliçkap S, Elagöz S. 613 The impact of everolimus on pulmonary damage with radiotherapy: Results of an experimental study. Eur J Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)30349-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
9
|
Urun Y, Abal H, Turna H, Esin E, Sedef A, Alkan A, Oksüzoğlu B, Ozdemir N, Sendur M, Sezer A, Kiliçkap S, Akbulut H, Celik I. 3354 Prognostic factors for survival in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ipilimumab: Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) Study. Eur J Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)31872-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
10
|
Babacan NA, Kiliçkap S, Sene S, Kacan T, Yucel B, Eren MF, Cihan S. A Case of Multifocal Skin Metastases from Lung Cancer Presenting with Vasculitic-type Cutaneous Nodule. Indian J Dermatol 2015; 60:213. [PMID: 25814739 PMCID: PMC4372943 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5154.152582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Although cutaneous metastasis occurs usually at the terminal stage of the disease, it may be rarely concurrent with the diagnosis and may also present as the first sign of the illness. A 55-year-old male patient presented with vasculitic-type cutaneous nodular lesions and a necrotic distal phalangeal lesion developed over the last month. He was a tradesman and smoked 40 packets year. On physical examination, he was found to have multiple cutaneous lesions on the skin of the face, limbs, neck, scalp, dorsal side, fingers, subungual side, right leg, and feet. A skin lesion punch biopsy was performed and squamous cell carcinoma metastasis was detected. He was diagnosed as having squamous cell lung cancer with bronchoscopic biopsy. Although it is very rare, cutaneous metastases that is concurrent with the diagnosis of lung cancer may be the first sign of the disease. In patients with suspicious skin lesions, the patient's age, smoking history, and other symptoms should be evaluated and a biopsy should be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Soner Sene
- Department of Rheumatology, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Turgut Kacan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey
| | - Birsen Yucel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Fuat Eren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey
| | - Sener Cihan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Okmeydanı Education and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yüce S, Seker MM, Koç S, Uysal IO, Kaçan T, Doğan M, Doğan M, Babacan NA, Kiliçkap S. Oxaliplatin and ototoxicity: is it really safe for hearing? Turk J Med Sci 2015; 44:586-9. [PMID: 25551926 DOI: 10.3906/sag-1304-76] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Oxaliplatin is an effective and widely used chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of many solid tumors. The most common side effects are peripheral neuropathy, gastrointestinal toxicity, and neutropenia. There have been some case reports about ototoxicity with oxaliplatin, but no clinical trials. In this trial, we explored whether or not oxaliplatin has ototoxic effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 18 patients, 14 with colorectal cancer and 4 with pancreatic cancer, were included in this study. Four patients (22%) were treated with a capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) regimen, and 14 patients (78%) were treated with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-6). Patients' pretreatment and posttreatment hearing levels were assessed with high-frequency audiometry and otoacoustic emission tests. RESULTS The median time between the first and the last oxaliplatin doses was 3.2 months (range: 2-7 months). There was no hearing loss in tests conducted for both ears of patients at frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, 6000, 8000, 12,000, and 16,000 Hz. There was no difference between the pretreatment and posttreatment otoacoustic emission tests. CONCLUSION Oxaliplatin is a reliable agent in terms of ototoxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salim Yüce
- Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kamisli S, Hayran M, Kucukcoban S, Kiliçkap S, Yüce D, Celik I. 160 Study of interaction with a group of cancer patients: guiding cancer patients through psychoeducational interventions. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/s1462-3889(14)70177-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
13
|
Boztosun A, Ozer H, Altun A, Kiliçkap S, Gulturk S, Müderris II, Yanik A. The effect of sorafenib in postoperative adhesion formation in a rat uterine horn model. CLIN EXP OBSTET GYN 2012; 39:351-355. [PMID: 23157042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Postoperative adhesions are a serious problem. In this study, we aimed to observe the effects of sorafenib in postoperative adhesions and, to examine the effects of sorafenib on tissue levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty female Wistar albino rats were randomized into two equal groups; sorafenib group (sorafenib treated) and control group; then all rats underwent laparotomy. Adhesions were developed by scalping on the anti-mesenteric surfaces of the right uterine horns. After 14 days, adhesions were investigated by using macroscopic, histopathological and immunohistochemical (for VEGF and PDGF) methods. RESULTS The sorafenib group had lower scores of total adhesions [1 (0-2.5) vs 1.5 (1-4); p: 0.037], staining of VEGF [1 (0-1) vs 1 (1-3); p: 0.029] and PDGF [1 (0-2) vs 2 (1-3); p: 0.006], and vascular proliferation [1 (0-2) vs 2 (1-3); p: 0.038] than the control group. CONCLUSION The findings of the present study show that sorafenib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, significantly reduced postoperative adhesion formation. This effect may be explained by inhibition of VEGF, PDGF, and thus vascular proliferation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Boztosun
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Büyükdamgaci-Alogan G, Elele T, Hayran M, Erman M, Kiliçkap S. A decision-analytic model for early stage breast cancer: lumpectomy vs mastectomy. Neoplasma 2008; 55:222-228. [PMID: 18348655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
The purpose was to construct a decision model that incorporated patient preferences over differing health state prospects and to analyze the decision context of early stage breast cancer patients in relation to two main surgical treatment options. A Markov chain was constructed to project the clinical history of breast carcinoma following surgery. A Multi Attribute Utility Model was developed for outcome evaluation. Transition probabilities were obtained by using subjective probability assessment. This study was performed on the sample population of female university students and utilities were elicited from these healthy volunteers. The results were validated by using Standard Gamble technique. Finally, Monte Carlo Simulation was utilized in Treeage-Pro 2006-Suit software program in order to calculate expected utility generated by each treatment option. The results showed that, if the subject had mastectomy, mean value for the quality adjusted life years gained was 6.42; on the other hand, if the preference was lumpectomy, it was 7.00 out of a possible 10 years. Sensitivity analysis on transition probabilities to local recurrence and salvaged states was performed and two threshold values were observed. Additionally, sensitivity analysis on utilities showed that the model was more sensitive to no evidence of disease state; however, was not sensitive to utilities of local recurrence and salvaged states. The decision model was developed with reasonable success for early stage breast cancer patients, and tested by using general public data. The results obtained from these data showed that lumpectomy was more favourable for these participants.
Collapse
|
15
|
Aksoy S, Abali H, Kiliçkap S, Güler N. Successful treatment of a chemoresistant tumor with temozolomide in an adult patient: report of a recurrent intracranial mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. J Neurooncol 2005; 71:333-4. [PMID: 15735926 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-004-1725-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
16
|
Aksoy S, Abali H, Kiliçkap S, Yavas Ö, Oyan B, Elkiran ET, Aras T, Ugurlu Ö, Güler N, Tekuzman G. Outcome of well differentiated thyroid cancer: Single institution results. J Clin Oncol 2004. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.5615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S. Aksoy
- Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey; Hacettepe University Nuclear Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - H. Abali
- Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey; Hacettepe University Nuclear Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - S. Kiliçkap
- Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey; Hacettepe University Nuclear Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ö. Yavas
- Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey; Hacettepe University Nuclear Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - B. Oyan
- Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey; Hacettepe University Nuclear Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - E. T. Elkiran
- Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey; Hacettepe University Nuclear Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - T. Aras
- Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey; Hacettepe University Nuclear Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ö. Ugurlu
- Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey; Hacettepe University Nuclear Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - N. Güler
- Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey; Hacettepe University Nuclear Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - G. Tekuzman
- Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey; Hacettepe University Nuclear Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Impairment of liver function can be seen in cancer patients for a variety of reasons including metastasis, biliary obstruction, toxicity of chemotherapy or other concomittant drugs, can be paraneoplastic or can be due to infections, especially with hepatotropic viruses. Mostly reported in hematological malignancies, reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a complication of chronic HBV infection in patients under cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy. Up to now, only a few cases of hepatitis B reactivation have been described in patients with solid tumors. We report an acute reversible deterioration of liver function tests following cytotoxic chemotherapy in an HBsAg-positive patient with metastatic pancreatic cancer due to hepatitis B reactivation. As far as we know, this is the first case of pancreatic carcinoma with reactivation following chemotherapy. As experience with acute flares of HBV carriers in solid tumors increases, the establishment of guidelines for the management of these patients has become more crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berna Oksüzoğlu
- Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|