Treatment of elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the nationwide POPular age registry

OBJECTIVE

We describe the current treatment of elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) enrolled in a national registry.

METHODS

The POPular AGE registry is a prospective, multicentre study of patients ≥ 75 years of age presenting with NSTEMI, performed in the Netherlands. Management was at the discretion of the treating physician. Cardiovascular events consisted of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke. Bleeding was classified according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 646 patients were enrolled between August 2016 and May 2018. Median age was 81 (IQR 77-84) years and 58% were male. Overall, 75% underwent coronary angiography, 40% percutaneous coronary intervention, and 11% coronary artery bypass grafting, while 49.8% received pharmacological therapy only. At discharge, dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor) was prescribed to 56.7%, and 27.4% received oral anticoagulation plus at least one antiplatelet agent. At 1‑year follow-up, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke had occurred in 13.6% and major bleeding (BARC 3 and 5) in 3.9% of patients. The risk of both cardiovascular events and major bleeding was highest during the 1st month. However, cardiovascular risk was three times as high as bleeding risk in this elderly population, both after 1 month and after 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national registry of elderly patients with NSTEMI, the majority are treated according to current European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Both the cardiovascular and bleeding risk are highest during the 1st month after NSTEMI. However, the cardiovascular risk was three times as high as the bleeding risk.

Serially Measured hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, hs-CRP and GDF-15 for Risk Assessment After Acute Coronary Syndrome: the BIOMArCS Cohort

AIMS

Evidence regarding the role of serial measurements of biomarkers for risk assessment in post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients is limited. The aim was to explore the prognostic value of four, serially measured biomarkers in a large, real-world cohort of post-ACS patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

BIOMArCS is a prospective, multicentre, observational study in 844 post-ACS patients in whom 12,218 blood samples (median 17/patient) were obtained during one year follow-up. The longitudinal patterns of hs-cTnT, NT-proBNP, hs-CRP and GDF-15 were analysed in relation to the primary endpoint (PE) of CV mortality and recurrent ACS using multivariable joint models. Median age was 63 years, 78% were men and the PE was reached by 45 patients. The average biomarker levels were systematically higher in PE compared to PE-free patients. After adjustment for 6-months post-discharge GRACE score, 1 standard deviation increase in log[hs-cTnT] was associated with a 61% increased risk of the PE (hazard ratio[HR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval[CI] 1.02-2.44, P = 0.045) while for log[GDF-15] this was 81% (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.28-2.70, P = 0.001). These associations remained significant after multivariable adjustment, while NT-proBNP and hs-CRP were not. Furthermore, GDF-15 level showed an increasing trend prior to the PE. (Structured Graphical Abstract).

CONCLUSIONS

Longitudinally measured hs-cTnT and GDF-15 concentrations provide prognostic value in the risk assessment of clinically stabilized patients post-ACS.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Netherlands Trial Register. Currently available at URL https://trialsearch.who.int/; Unique Identifiers: NTR1698 and NTR1106.

Treatment and prognosis of elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Background/Introduction

Elderly constitute a large though specific group of patients presenting with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), as they are at higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events, as well as treatment-related complications. However as they underrepresented in clinical trials, the optimal management strategy for older patients with NSTEMI remains unclear.

Purpose

The aim of this registry was to capture the medical and invasive treatment of elderly NSTEMI patients, find predictors for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and estimate the impact of invasive management and revascularisation.

Methods

The POPular AGE registry is a prospective, observational multicentre study of patients ≥75 years of age presenting with NSTEMI at multiple sites in the Netherlands, United Kingdom and Austria. Management was at the discretion of the treating physician. MACE consisted of cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and stroke. Net adverse clinical events (NACE) was defined as composite of all-cause death, ACS, definite stent thrombosis, stroke, or major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] bleeding 3 or 5). The population was stratified into an invasively treated group defined as patients who underwent coronary angiography (CAG); and a conservatively-treated group with patients who received medical treatment only. The duration of follow-up was one year. Clinical variables were assessed for their predictive value for MACE and bleeding by means of a Cox proportional hazard regression.

Results

The total study population consisted of 1190 elderly patients with NSTEMI (median age 80 years [IQR 77–84], 43% female). Invasive treatment with CAG was performed in 67% of the population, of which 49% underwent PCI and 14% coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). At discharge, the majority of patients (55%) were treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). MACE occurred in 15% and major bleeding occurred in 5% of the total population. Age (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03–1.09), diabetes mellitus (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.16–2.24), reduced LVEF (<50%) (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.03–2.20), Killip class (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.07–2.33) and electrocardiogram (ECG) changes at admission (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.20–2.31) were predictors for MACE. MACE occurred more frequently in conservatively-treated than invasively-treated patients (20% vs. 12%, HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38–0.70, p<0.001). Revascularization with PCI or CABG was associated with lower risk of MACE (PCI; HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30–0.75, p=0.001 and CABG; HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13– 0.73, p=0.008).

Conclusions

In this prospective registry of NSTEMI patients of ≥75 years, MACE and major bleeding were frequent. Age, diabetes mellitus, reduced LVEF, Killip class and ECG changes at admission were independent predictors for MACE. Although subject to selection bias, undergoing CAG and revascularisation, when indicated, were associated with better outcomes.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): AstraZeneca

Colchicine reduces extracellular vesicle NLRP3 inflammasome protein levels in chronic coronary disease: A LoDoCo2 biomarker substudy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Colchicine reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary disease. Colchicine has broad anti-inflammatory effects and part of the atheroprotective effects have been suggested to be the result of NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition. We studied the effect of colchicine on extracellular vesicle (EV) NLRP3 protein levels and inflammatory markers, high sensitivity-CRP (hs-CRP) and interleukin (IL)-6, in patients with chronic coronary disease.

METHODS

In vitro, the NLRP3 inflammasome was stimulated in PMA-differentiated- and undifferentiated THP-1 cells. In vivo, measurements were performed in serum obtained from 278 participants of the LoDoCo2 trial, one year after randomization to colchicine 0.5 mg once daily or placebo. EVs were isolated using precipitation. NLRP3 protein presence in EVs was confirmed using iodixanol density gradient centrifugation. Levels of NLRP3 protein, hs-CRP and IL-6 were measured using ELISA.

RESULTS

In vitro, NLRP3 inflammasome stimulation showed an increase of EV NLRP3 protein levels. EV NLRP3 protein levels were lower in patients treated with colchicine (median 1.38 ng/mL), compared to placebo (median 1.58 ng/mL) (p = 0.025). No difference was observed in serum NLRP3 protein levels. Serum hs-CRP levels were lower in patients treated with colchicine (median 0.80 mg/L) compared to placebo (median 1.34 mg/L) (p < 0.005). IL-6 levels were lower in patients treated with colchicine (median 2.07 ng/L) compared to placebo (median 2.59 ng/L), although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.076).

CONCLUSIONS

Colchicine leads to a reduction of EV NLRP3 protein levels. This indicates that inhibitory effects on the NLRP3 inflammasome might contribute to the atheroprotective effects of colchicine in coronary disease.

Colchicine in Patients with Chronic Coronary Disease

BACKGROUND

Evidence from a recent trial has shown that the antiinflammatory effects of colchicine reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with recent myocardial infarction, but evidence of such a risk reduction in patients with chronic coronary disease is limited.

METHODS

In a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial, we assigned patients with chronic coronary disease to receive 0.5 mg of colchicine once daily or matching placebo. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, spontaneous (nonprocedural) myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or ischemia-driven coronary revascularization. The key secondary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke.

RESULTS

A total of 5522 patients underwent randomization; 2762 were assigned to the colchicine group and 2760 to the placebo group. The median duration of follow-up was 28.6 months. A primary end-point event occurred in 187 patients (6.8%) in the colchicine group and in 264 patients (9.6%) in the placebo group (incidence, 2.5 vs. 3.6 events per 100 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 0.83; P<0.001). A key secondary end-point event occurred in 115 patients (4.2%) in the colchicine group and in 157 patients (5.7%) in the placebo group (incidence, 1.5 vs. 2.1 events per 100 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.92; P = 0.007). The incidence rates of spontaneous myocardial infarction or ischemia-driven coronary revascularization (composite end point), cardiovascular death or spontaneous myocardial infarction (composite end point), ischemia-driven coronary revascularization, and spontaneous myocardial infarction were also significantly lower with colchicine than with placebo. The incidence of death from noncardiovascular causes was higher in the colchicine group than in the placebo group (incidence, 0.7 vs. 0.5 events per 100 person-years; hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.99 to 2.31).

CONCLUSIONS

In a randomized trial involving patients with chronic coronary disease, the risk of cardiovascular events was significantly lower among those who received 0.5 mg of colchicine once daily than among those who received placebo. (Funded by the National Health Medical Research Council of Australia and others; LoDoCo2 Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12614000093684.).

Two-year outcome after early or late Intervention in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To compare long-term outcome of an early to a delayed invasive strategy in high-risk patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).

METHODS

This prospective, multicentre trial included patients with NSTE-ACS and at least two out of three of the following high-risk criteria: (1) evidence of extensive myocardial ischaemia on ECG, (2) elevated biomarkers for myocardial necrosis and (3) age above 65 years. Patients were randomised to either an early (angiography and revascularisation if appropriate <12 hours) or a delayed invasive strategy (>48 hours after randomisation). Endpoint for this prespecified long-term follow-up was the composite incidence of death or reinfarction after 2 years. Data collection was performed by telephone contact with the patients, their relatives or general practitioner and by review of hospital records.

RESULTS

Endpoint status after 2-year follow-up was collected in 521 of 542 initially enrolled patients. Incidence of death or reinfarction was 11.8% in the early and 13.1% in the delayed treatment group (relative risk (RR)=0.90, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.42). No significant differences were found in occurrence of the individual components of the primary endpoint: death 6.1% vs 8.9%, RR 0.69 (95% CI 0.37 to 1.27), reinfarction 6.5% vs 5.4%, RR 1.20 (95% CI 0.60 to 2.38). Post-hoc subgroup analysis showed statistical significant interaction between age and treatment strategy on outcome (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

After 2 years follow-up, no difference in incidence of death or reinfarction was seen between early to late invasive strategy. These findings are in line with results of other studies with longer follow-up. Older patients seem to benefit more from early invasive treatment.

Timing of intervention in high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes in PCI versus non-PCI centres : Sub-group analysis of the ELISA-3 trial

Aims

To compare the effect of timing of intervention in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus non-PCI centres.

Methods and results

A post-hoc sub-analysis was performed of the ELISA III trial, a randomised multicentre trial investigating outcome of early (< 12 h) versus late (> 48 h) angiography and revascularisation in 542 patients with high-risk NSTE-ACS. 90 patients were randomised in non-PCI centres and tended to benefit more from an early invasive strategy than patients included in the PCI centre (relative risk 0.23 vs. 0.85 [p for interaction = 0.089] for incidence of the combined primary endpoint of death, reinfarction and recurrent ischaemia after 30 days of follow-up). This was largely driven by reduction in recurrent ischaemia. In non-PCI centres, patients randomised to the late group had a 4 and 7 day longer period until PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting, respectively. This difference was less pronounced in the PCI centre.

Conclusions

This post-hoc analysis from the ELISA-3 trial suggests that NSTE-ACS patients initially hospitalised in non-PCI centres show the largest benefit from early angiography and revascularisation, associated with a shorter waiting time to revascularisation. Improved patient logistics and transfer between non-PCI and PCI centres might therefore result in better clinical outcome.