A prospective cohort of men with localized prostate cancer on active surveillance protocol in Hong Kong, China: what did we learn?

This study aimed to report the outcomes of active surveillance (AS) in the management of low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). It recruited 87 men who were prospectively followed up according to the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) protocol with local adaptation at SH Ho Urology Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China. We investigated the predictors of disease progression and found that baseline prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and the presence of the highest Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score 5 lesion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are significantly correlated with disease progression. Moreover, men with PSAD >0.2 ng ml-2 or PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions had significantly worse upgrading-free survival compared to those with PSAD ≤0.2 ng ml-2 and PI-RADS 2 or 3 lesions. The study concludes that AS is a safe and effective management strategy for selected patients to defer radical treatment and that most disease progression can be detected after the first repeated biopsy. The combination of PSAD >0.2 ng ml-2 and PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions may serve as a useful predictor of early disease progression and provide a guide to optimize follow-up protocols for men in different risk groups.

Disease-related complications in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Prostate-specific antigen-based screening for prostate cancer reportedly does not improve cancer-specific survival. However, there remain concerns about the increasing incidence of advanced disease at initial presentation. Here, we investigated the incidences and types of complications that occur during the course of disease in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).

METHODS

This study included 100 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with mHSPC at five hospitals from January 2016 to August 2017. Analyses were conducted using patient data extracted from a prospectively collected database, along with information about complications and readmission obtained from electronic medical records.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 74 years and the median serum prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis was 202.5 ng/mL. Ninety-nine patients received androgen deprivation therapy; 17 of these patients also received chemotherapy. During a mean follow-up period of 32.9 months, 41 patients reported bone pain; of these patients, 21 developed pathologic fractures and eight had cord compression. Twenty-eight patients developed retention of urine; of these patients, 10 (36%) required surgery and 11 (39%) required long-term urethral catheter use. Among 15 patients who developed ureteral obstruction, four (27%) required ureteral stenting and four (27%) required long-term nephrostomy drainage. Other complications included anaemia (41%) and deep vein thrombosis (4%). Fifty-nine (59%) patients had ≥1 unplanned hospital admission during the course of disease; 16% of such patients had >5 episodes of readmission.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with mHSPC, 70% experienced disease-related complications and unplanned hospital admissions, which substantially burdened both patients and the healthcare system.

Role of PSA density in diagnosis of prostate cancer in obese men

PURPOSE

To compare the performance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in obese and non-obese Chinese men.

METHODS

The results of transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) prostate biopsies of Chinese men with PSA <20 ng/mL were reviewed. Parameters including age, body mass index (BMI), TRUS prostate volume, and TRUS biopsy results were recorded. The diagnostic yields of PSA density (>0.15 ng/mL as positive) in obese and non-obese men with PSA <20 ng/mL were compared. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 27 kg/m(2) according to WHO recommendation for Hong Kong Chinese.

RESULTS

TRUS biopsy, BMI, and PSA density data were available for 854 men (mean age 65.9 ± 7.3). The mean PSA values for the obese and non-obese patients were 7.9 ± 3.7 and 8.2 ± 4.1 ng/mL, respectively (p = 0.416). TRUS volumes in obese and non-obese men were 63.2 ml and 51.6 ml, respectively (t test, p < 0.001), and PSA density was significantly lower in obese men (0.145 vs. 0.188, p < 0.001). For obese men, positive PSA density was associated with four times (41.1 vs. 9.5 %, p < 0.001) the risk of prostate cancer, compared to only twice the risk (18.8 vs. 9.7 %, p = 0.001) in non-obese men. The specificity and area under the curve of PSA density were 74.2 % and 0.731, respectively, for obese men, and 51.4 % and 0.653, respectively, for non-obese men. Among patients with a diagnosis of prostate cancer, the obese patient group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with Gleason 7-10 prostate cancer than the non-obese patient group (48.9 vs. 32.7 %, Chi-square test, p = 0.035), and a trend toward a higher proportion of bilateral lobe involvement.

CONCLUSION

PSA density had better performance in obese men. Positive PSA density in obese men was associated with four times the risk of prostate cancer.