Interpersonal functioning and body image dissatisfaction in patients referred for NHS aesthetic surgery: A mediating role between emotion regulation and perfectionism?

BACKGROUND

Few studies have explored psychological factors associated with body image dissatisfaction in individuals seeking aesthetic surgery on the NHS. In NHS Scotland, The Adult Exceptional Aesthetic Referral Protocol (AEARP) states that individuals are only eligible for consideration for surgery where there is significant psychological distress and physical criteria associated with perceived problem of appearance. The AEARP necessitates that individuals seeking aesthetic surgery on the NHS must have a psychological assessment. It is therefore crucial to identify psychological factors associated with body image dissatisfaction that may highlight contraindications for surgery or are amenable to psychological intervention.

METHOD

A total of 311 consecutive patients seeking aesthetic surgery who were referred for psychological assessment under the AEARP completed a series of psychometric measures as part of routine clinical practice. Multiple mediation analyses using bootstrapped method was used to explore the relationship between interpersonal functioning, emotion regulation, perfectionism, and body image dissatisfaction.

RESULTS

Multiple mediation analysis indicated that emotion regulation partially mediates the relationship between interpersonal functioning and body image dissatisfaction in this clinical population.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that interpersonal functioning and emotion regulation significantly relate to body image dissatisfaction in this patient group. Psychological assessment of patient suitability for aesthetic surgery should include assessment of interpersonal functioning and emotion regulation which may be amenable to psychological intervention and be of significant benefit to patients either pre- or post-operatively or instead of surgery.

The eyes don't have it: lie detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming

Proponents of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) claim that certain eye-movements are reliable indicators of lying. According to this notion, a person looking up to their right suggests a lie whereas looking up to their left is indicative of truth telling. Despite widespread belief in this claim, no previous research has examined its validity. In Study 1 the eye movements of participants who were lying or telling the truth were coded, but did not match the NLP patterning. In Study 2 one group of participants were told about the NLP eye-movement hypothesis whilst a second control group were not. Both groups then undertook a lie detection test. No significant differences emerged between the two groups. Study 3 involved coding the eye movements of both liars and truth tellers taking part in high profile press conferences. Once again, no significant differences were discovered. Taken together the results of the three studies fail to support the claims of NLP. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.