1
|
Dworkin JP, Adelman LA, Ajluni T, Andronikov AV, Aponte JC, Bartels AE, Beshore E, Bierhaus EB, Brucato JR, Bryan BH, Burton AS, Callahan MP, Castro-Wallace SL, Clark BC, Clemett SJ, Connolly HC, Cutlip WE, Daly SM, Elliott VE, Elsila JE, Enos HL, Everett DF, Franchi IA, Glavin DP, Graham HV, Hendershot JE, Harris JW, Hill SL, Hildebrand AR, Jayne GO, Jenkens RW, Johnson KS, Kirsch JS, Lauretta DS, Lewis AS, Loiacono JJ, Lorentson CC, Marshall JR, Martin MG, Matthias LL, McLain HL, Messenger SR, Mink RG, Moore JL, Nakamura-Messenger K, Nuth JA, Owens CV, Parish CL, Perkins BD, Pryzby MS, Reigle CA, Righter K, Rizk B, Russell JF, Sandford SA, Schepis JP, Songer J, Sovinski MF, Stahl SE, Thomas-Keprta K, Vellinga JM, Walker MS. OSIRIS-REx Contamination Control Strategy and Implementation. Space Sci Rev 2018; 214:19. [PMID: 30713357 PMCID: PMC6350808 DOI: 10.1007/s11214-017-0439-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
OSIRIS-REx will return pristine samples of carbonaceous asteroid Bennu. This article describes how pristine was defined based on expectations of Bennu and on a realistic understanding of what is achievable with a constrained schedule and budget, and how that definition flowed to requirements and implementation. To return a pristine sample, the OSIRIS-REx spacecraft sampling hardware was maintained at level 100 A/2 and <180 ng/cm2 of amino acids and hydrazine on the sampler head through precision cleaning, control of materials, and vigilance. Contamination is further characterized via witness material exposed to the spacecraft assembly and testing environment as well as in space. This characterization provided knowledge of the expected background and will be used in conjunction with archived spacecraft components for comparison with the samples when they are delivered to Earth for analysis. Most of all, the cleanliness of the OSIRIS-REx spacecraft was achieved through communication among scientists, engineers, managers, and technicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Dworkin
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
| | - L A Adelman
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
- Arctic Slope Research Corporation, Beltsville, MD USA
| | - T Ajluni
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
- Arctic Slope Research Corporation, Beltsville, MD USA
| | | | - J C Aponte
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
- Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, USA
| | - A E Bartels
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
| | - E Beshore
- Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - E B Bierhaus
- Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Littleton, CO, USA
| | - J R Brucato
- INAF Astrophysical Observatory of Arcetri, Florence, Italy
| | - B H Bryan
- Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Littleton, CO, USA
| | - A S Burton
- NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - B C Clark
- Space Science Institute, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - S J Clemett
- NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Jacobs Technology, Tullahoma, TN, USA
| | | | - W E Cutlip
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
| | - S M Daly
- NASA Kennedy Space Center, Titusville, FL, USA
| | - V E Elliott
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
| | - J E Elsila
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
| | - H L Enos
- Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - D F Everett
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
| | | | - D P Glavin
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
| | - H V Graham
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
- University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - J E Hendershot
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
- Ball Aerospace, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - J W Harris
- Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Littleton, CO, USA
| | - S L Hill
- Jacobs Technology, Tullahoma, TN, USA
- NASA Kennedy Space Center, Titusville, FL, USA
| | | | - G O Jayne
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
- Arctic Slope Research Corporation, Beltsville, MD USA
| | - R W Jenkens
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
| | - K S Johnson
- Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Littleton, CO, USA
| | - J S Kirsch
- Jacobs Technology, Tullahoma, TN, USA
- NASA Kennedy Space Center, Titusville, FL, USA
| | - D S Lauretta
- Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - A S Lewis
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
| | - J J Loiacono
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
| | - C C Lorentson
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
| | | | - M G Martin
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
- Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, USA
| | - L L Matthias
- NASA Kennedy Space Center, Titusville, FL, USA
- Analex, Titusville, FL, USA
| | - H L McLain
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
- Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - R G Mink
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
| | - J L Moore
- Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Littleton, CO, USA
| | | | - J A Nuth
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
| | - C V Owens
- NASA Kennedy Space Center, Titusville, FL, USA
| | - C L Parish
- Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Littleton, CO, USA
| | - B D Perkins
- NASA Kennedy Space Center, Titusville, FL, USA
| | - M S Pryzby
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
- ATA Aerospace, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - C A Reigle
- Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Littleton, CO, USA
| | - K Righter
- NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - B Rizk
- Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - J F Russell
- Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Littleton, CO, USA
| | - S A Sandford
- NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA
| | - J P Schepis
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
| | - J Songer
- Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Littleton, CO, USA
| | - M F Sovinski
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
| | - S E Stahl
- NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- JES Tech., Houston, TX, USA
| | - K Thomas-Keprta
- NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Jacobs Technology, Tullahoma, TN, USA
| | - J M Vellinga
- Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Littleton, CO, USA
| | - M S Walker
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McIntyre ABR, Rizzardi L, Yu AM, Alexander N, Rosen GL, Botkin DJ, Stahl SE, John KK, Castro-Wallace SL, McGrath K, Burton AS, Feinberg AP, Mason CE. Nanopore sequencing in microgravity. NPJ Microgravity 2016; 2:16035. [PMID: 28725742 PMCID: PMC5515536 DOI: 10.1038/npjmgrav.2016.35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2016] [Revised: 06/24/2016] [Accepted: 08/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Rapid DNA sequencing and analysis has been a long-sought goal in remote research and point-of-care medicine. In microgravity, DNA sequencing can facilitate novel astrobiological research and close monitoring of crew health, but spaceflight places stringent restrictions on the mass and volume of instruments, crew operation time, and instrument functionality. The recent emergence of portable, nanopore-based tools with streamlined sample preparation protocols finally enables DNA sequencing on missions in microgravity. As a first step toward sequencing in space and aboard the International Space Station (ISS), we tested the Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION during a parabolic flight to understand the effects of variable gravity on the instrument and data. In a successful proof-of-principle experiment, we found that the instrument generated DNA reads over the course of the flight, including the first ever sequenced in microgravity, and additional reads measured after the flight concluded its parabolas. Here we detail modifications to the sample-loading procedures to facilitate nanopore sequencing aboard the ISS and in other microgravity environments. We also evaluate existing analysis methods and outline two new approaches, the first based on a wave-fingerprint method and the second on entropy signal mapping. Computationally light analysis methods offer the potential for in situ species identification, but are limited by the error profiles (stays, skips, and mismatches) of older nanopore data. Higher accuracies attainable with modified sample processing methods and the latest version of flow cells will further enable the use of nanopore sequencers for diagnostics and research in space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexa B R McIntyre
- Tri-Institutional Training Program in Computational Biology and Medicine, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lindsay Rizzardi
- Center for Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Angela M Yu
- Tri-Institutional Training Program in Computational Biology and Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Noah Alexander
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gail L Rosen
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Kristen K John
- Exploration Integration and Science Directorate, Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science Division, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.,NASA Postdoctoral Program, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sarah L Castro-Wallace
- Biomedical Research and Environmental Sciences Division, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ken McGrath
- Australian Genome Research Facility, Gehrmann Labs, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Aaron S Burton
- Exploration Integration and Science Directorate, Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science Division, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew P Feinberg
- Center for Epigenetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher E Mason
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,The HRH Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud Institute for Computational Biomedicine, New York, NY, USA.,The Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute (BMRI), New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stahl SE, An HS, Dinkel DM, Noble JM, Lee JM. How accurate are the wrist-based heart rate monitors during walking and running activities? Are they accurate enough? BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2016; 2:e000106. [PMID: 27900173 PMCID: PMC5117066 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heart rate (HR) monitors are valuable devices for fitness-orientated individuals. There has been a vast influx of optical sensing blood flow monitors claiming to provide accurate HR during physical activities. These monitors are worn on the arm and wrist to detect HR with photoplethysmography (PPG) techniques. Little is known about the validity of these wearable activity trackers. AIM Validate the Scosche Rhythm (SR), Mio Alpha (MA), Fitbit Charge HR (FH), Basis Peak (BP), Microsoft Band (MB), and TomTom Runner Cardio (TT) wireless HR monitors. METHODS 50 volunteers (males: n=32, age 19-43 years; females: n=18, age 19-38 years) participated. All monitors were worn simultaneously in a randomised configuration. The Polar RS400 HR chest strap was the criterion measure. A treadmill protocol of one 30 min bout of continuous walking and running at 3.2, 4.8, 6.4, 8.0, and 9.6 km/h (5 min at each protocol speed) with HR manually recorded every minute was completed. RESULTS For group comparisons, the mean absolute percentage error values were: 3.3%, 3.6%, 4.0%, 4.6%, 4.8% and 6.2% for TT, BP, RH, MA, MB and FH, respectively. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (r) was observed: r=0.959 (TT), r=0.956 (MB), r=0.954 (BP), r=0.933 (FH), r=0.930 (RH) and r=0.929 (MA). Results from 95% equivalency testing showed monitors were found to be equivalent to those of the criterion HR (±10% equivalence zone: 98.15-119.96). CONCLUSIONS The results demonstrate that the wearable activity trackers provide an accurate measurement of HR during walking and running activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Stahl
- School of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, University of Nebraska at Omaha , Omaha, Nebraska , USA
| | - Hyun-Sung An
- School of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, University of Nebraska at Omaha , Omaha, Nebraska , USA
| | - Danae M Dinkel
- School of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, University of Nebraska at Omaha , Omaha, Nebraska , USA
| | - John M Noble
- School of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, University of Nebraska at Omaha , Omaha, Nebraska , USA
| | - Jung-Min Lee
- School of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, University of Nebraska at Omaha , Omaha, Nebraska , USA
| |
Collapse
|